Where in Britain does the Lexus UX fail its MOT most?
Across Britain, 5.9% of 24,020 initial MOT tests (first attempts) of the Lexus UX failed in 2019–2024. It fails most in Warrington (WA): 12.7% against 5.8% elsewhere (+6.9 points). It does best in Ipswich (IP), −4.2 points. Area rates are not age-adjusted.
Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · Lexus UX MOT statistics · check a Lexus UX by registration
Lexus UX in every postcode area with 100+ tests
From the largest excess over the rest of Britain to the largest shortfall.
| Area | Failed here, % | Rest of Britain, % | Difference, points | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Warrington (WA) | 12.7 | 5.8 | +6.9 | +0.9 to +12.9 | 118 (rough estimate) |
| Preston (PR) | 12.0 | 5.8 | +6.3 | +3.1 to +9.5 | 399 (rough estimate) |
| Peterborough (PE) | 11.3 | 5.8 | +5.5 | +1.1 to +9.8 | 204 (rough estimate) |
| Plymouth (PL) | 10.4 | 5.9 | +4.5 | −1.3 to +10.3 | 106 (rough estimate) |
| Newcastle (NE) | 10.2 | 5.8 | +4.4 | +1.3 to +7.6 | 362 (rough estimate) |
| Exeter (EX) | 9.9 | 5.8 | +4.1 | +0.7 to +7.5 | 303 (rough estimate) |
| Hemel Hempstead (HP) | 9.1 | 5.9 | +3.2 | −1.7 to +8.2 | 132 (rough estimate) |
| Gloucester (GL) | 9.0 | 5.8 | +3.2 | +0.2 to +6.2 | 356 (rough estimate) |
| Guildford (GU) | 8.9 | 5.8 | +3.1 | +0.9 to +5.4 | 604 |
| Swindon (SN) | 8.9 | 5.8 | +3.1 | −0.3 to +6.4 | 280 (rough estimate) |
| Sheffield (S) | 8.7 | 5.8 | +2.9 | +0.5 to +5.3 | 551 |
| Milton Keynes (MK) | 8.5 | 5.8 | +2.7 | +0.3 to +5.1 | 530 |
| Bournemouth (BH) | 8.3 | 5.8 | +2.5 | −0.9 to +5.8 | 264 (rough estimate) |
| Chester (CH) | 8.2 | 5.8 | +2.3 | −0.2 to +4.9 | 454 (rough estimate) |
| Northampton (NN) | 8.1 | 5.9 | +2.3 | −2.6 to +7.1 | 123 (rough estimate) |
| Lincoln (LN) | 8.1 | 5.8 | +2.2 | −1.0 to +5.5 | 272 (rough estimate) |
| Oxford (OX) | 8.0 | 5.9 | +2.1 | −3.2 to +7.5 | 100 (rough estimate) |
| London E (E) | 8.0 | 5.9 | +2.1 | −2.9 to +7.1 | 113 (rough estimate) |
| Redhill (RH) | 7.5 | 5.8 | +1.7 | −1.1 to +4.4 | 358 (rough estimate) |
| Medway (ME) | 7.3 | 5.9 | +1.4 | −2.9 to +5.8 | 137 (rough estimate) |
| Coventry (CV) | 6.9 | 5.9 | +1.0 | −1.7 to +3.7 | 350 (rough estimate) |
| Norwich (NR) | 6.8 | 5.9 | +1.0 | −3.6 to +5.6 | 117 (rough estimate) |
| Canterbury (CT) | 6.7 | 5.9 | +0.9 | −1.9 to +3.7 | 312 (rough estimate) |
| Stockport (SK) | 6.7 | 5.9 | +0.8 | −1.3 to +3.0 | 524 |
| London NW (NW) | 6.6 | 5.8 | +0.8 | −0.8 to +2.4 | 954 |
| Southampton (SO) | 6.5 | 5.9 | +0.7 | −1.2 to +2.6 | 641 |
| London SE (SE) | 6.3 | 5.9 | +0.5 | −3.3 to +4.3 | 158 (rough estimate) |
| Uxbridge (UB) | 6.2 | 5.9 | +0.3 | −3.4 to +4.0 | 162 (rough estimate) |
| Tonbridge (TN) | 5.9 | 5.9 | +0.1 | −2.0 to +2.1 | 506 |
| Bristol (BS) | 5.9 | 5.9 | +0.0 | −2.0 to +2.0 | 560 |
| Croydon (CR) | 5.6 | 5.9 | −0.3 | −2.3 to +1.8 | 481 (rough estimate) |
| Glasgow (G) | 5.3 | 5.9 | −0.5 | −2.4 to +1.4 | 561 |
| St Albans (AL) | 5.3 | 5.9 | −0.6 | −2.6 to +1.5 | 471 (rough estimate) |
| Bolton (BL) | 5.2 | 5.9 | −0.7 | −2.6 to +1.3 | 499 (rough estimate) |
| Hull (HU) | 5.2 | 5.9 | −0.7 | −2.9 to +1.5 | 404 (rough estimate) |
| Ilford (IG) | 5.1 | 5.9 | −0.8 | −2.6 to +1.0 | 586 |
| Doncaster (DN) | 5.0 | 5.9 | −0.8 | −4.8 to +3.1 | 119 (rough estimate) |
| Carlisle (CA) | 4.9 | 5.9 | −1.0 | −4.8 to +2.8 | 123 (rough estimate) |
| Stoke-on-Trent (ST) | 4.4 | 5.9 | −1.5 | −3.4 to +0.3 | 480 (rough estimate) |
| Twickenham (TW) | 4.3 | 5.9 | −1.6 | −3.2 to −0.0 | 630 |
| Nottingham (NG) | 4.0 | 5.9 | −1.9 | −3.9 to +0.1 | 373 (rough estimate) |
| Leicester (LE) | 3.9 | 5.9 | −2.0 | −3.7 to −0.2 | 483 (rough estimate) |
| Reading (RG) | 3.9 | 5.9 | −2.0 | −3.7 to −0.4 | 541 |
| Cleveland (TS) | 3.8 | 5.9 | −2.1 | −4.2 to −0.1 | 345 (rough estimate) |
| Dartford (DA) | 3.5 | 5.9 | −2.4 | −4.3 to −0.5 | 369 (rough estimate) |
| Harrow (HA) | 3.3 | 5.9 | −2.6 | −5.0 to −0.2 | 213 (rough estimate) |
| Cambridge (CB) | 3.3 | 5.9 | −2.6 | −4.6 to −0.6 | 305 (rough estimate) |
| Derby (DE) | 3.2 | 6.0 | −2.7 | −4.0 to −1.4 | 740 |
| Birmingham (B) | 3.1 | 6.0 | −2.8 | −4.1 to −1.5 | 698 |
| Kingston upon Thames (KT) | 3.0 | 5.9 | −2.9 | −6.2 to +0.5 | 100 (rough estimate) |
| Edinburgh (EH) | 3.0 | 5.9 | −3.0 | −4.5 to −1.5 | 506 |
| London N (N) | 2.9 | 5.9 | −3.0 | −6.2 to +0.3 | 103 (rough estimate) |
| Leeds (LS) | 2.9 | 5.9 | −3.0 | −4.5 to −1.6 | 546 |
| Manchester (M) | 2.8 | 5.9 | −3.1 | −5.8 to −0.4 | 143 (rough estimate) |
| Liverpool (L) | 2.4 | 5.9 | −3.5 | −5.1 to −2.0 | 377 (rough estimate) |
| Wolverhampton (WV) | 2.1 | 5.9 | −3.8 | −5.4 to −2.3 | 336 (rough estimate) |
| Cardiff (CF) | 1.9 | 6.0 | −4.1 | −5.3 to −2.8 | 475 (rough estimate) |
| Ipswich (IP) | 1.7 | 5.9 | −4.2 | −5.7 to −2.7 | 297 (rough estimate) |
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data (OGL v3.0) · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 24,020 (initial tests) · Method: postcode area of the testing station against the same model's tests elsewhere in Britain, difference of two proportions with a 95% interval; named at 3+ points with the interval clear of zero; not age-adjusted · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Other pages for this model
Lexus UX 2019 · Lexus UX 2020 · Lexus UX brakes failures · Lexus UX vehicle identification failures · Lexus UX lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Lexus UX tyres failures · Lexus UX visibility failures