MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Where in Britain does the Volvo 240 fail its MOT most?

Across Britain, 38.2% of 9,179 initial MOT tests (first attempts) of the Volvo 240 failed in 2019–2024. It fails most in London N (N): 52.9% against 37.9% elsewhere (+15.0 points). It does best in Leicester (LE), −9.6 points. Area rates are not age-adjusted.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · Volvo 240 MOT statistics · check a Volvo 240 by registration

Volvo 240 in every postcode area with 100+ tests

From the largest excess over the rest of Britain to the largest shortfall.

Volvo 240: first-time MOT failure by postcode area against the rest of Britain (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
AreaFailed here, %Rest of Britain, %Difference, points95% intervalTests
London N (N)52.937.9+15.0+6.6 to +23.3138 (rough estimate)
Guildford (GU)51.038.0+13.1+4.8 to +21.3143 (rough estimate)
Cardiff (CF)50.938.0+12.9+3.4 to +22.4108 (rough estimate)
Truro (TR)49.538.0+11.5+2.2 to +20.9111 (rough estimate)
Oxford (OX)48.838.0+10.9+3.3 to +18.4170 (rough estimate)
Norwich (NR)48.838.0+10.8+2.1 to +19.5129 (rough estimate)
Bath (BA)48.338.0+10.3+1.2 to +19.3118 (rough estimate)
Brighton (BN)47.938.0+9.9+2.4 to +17.5169 (rough estimate)
Ipswich (IP)46.138.0+8.1+0.2 to +16.0156 (rough estimate)
Tonbridge (TN)44.438.0+6.4−0.3 to +13.1216 (rough estimate)
London SE (SE)44.338.1+6.2−2.1 to +14.5140 (rough estimate)
Hemel Hempstead (HP)44.338.1+6.2−2.4 to +14.8131 (rough estimate)
Taunton (TA)43.938.1+5.8−2.8 to +14.4130 (rough estimate)
Swansea (SA)43.338.1+5.2−4.4 to +14.7104 (rough estimate)
Bournemouth (BH)43.038.1+4.9−3.0 to +12.7156 (rough estimate)
Southampton (SO)42.738.1+4.6−4.4 to +13.7117 (rough estimate)
Portsmouth (PO)42.738.1+4.6−3.0 to +12.2164 (rough estimate)
Bristol (BS)42.538.1+4.4−3.7 to +12.5146 (rough estimate)
Gloucester (GL)42.338.1+4.2−3.2 to +11.6175 (rough estimate)
Nottingham (NG)41.338.1+3.2−5.6 to +12.0121 (rough estimate)
Stockport (SK)40.038.1+1.9−6.6 to +10.3130 (rough estimate)
Exeter (EX)38.538.2+0.4−7.5 to +8.3148 (rough estimate)
Llandudno (LL)37.438.2−0.8−9.7 to +8.1115 (rough estimate)
Redhill (RH)35.638.2−2.5−11.9 to +6.8101 (rough estimate)
Peterborough (PE)34.238.2−4.0−10.9 to +2.9184 (rough estimate)
Coventry (CV)34.138.2−4.1−12.3 to +4.0132 (rough estimate)
Birmingham (B)33.538.3−4.8−11.0 to +1.4230 (rough estimate)
Newcastle (NE)32.438.2−5.9−15.0 to +3.3102 (rough estimate)
Shrewsbury (SY)32.238.2−6.1−14.7 to +2.5115 (rough estimate)
Northampton (NN)32.138.2−6.2−15.1 to +2.8106 (rough estimate)
Sheffield (S)31.938.3−6.4−13.0 to +0.3191 (rough estimate)
Chelmsford (CM)31.538.2−6.8−15.6 to +2.1108 (rough estimate)
Kingston upon Thames (KT)29.238.3−9.1−17.3 to −0.9120 (rough estimate)
Leicester (LE)28.738.3−9.6−17.1 to −2.2143 (rough estimate)

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data (OGL v3.0) · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 9,179 (initial tests) · Method: postcode area of the testing station against the same model's tests elsewhere in Britain, difference of two proportions with a 95% interval; named at 3+ points with the interval clear of zero; not age-adjusted · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Other pages for this model

Volvo 240 in Norway · Volvo 240 in the Netherlands · Volvo 240 body, chassis and structure failures · Volvo 240 brakes failures · Volvo 240 vehicle identification failures · Volvo 240 lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Volvo 240 noise, emissions and leaks failures · Volvo 240 seat belts and airbags failures · Volvo 240 steering failures · Volvo 240 suspension failures · Volvo 240 tyres failures · Volvo 240 visibility failures