MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Volvo 240 MOT pass rate and common problems

68.3% of Volvo 240s passed the 2024 MOT (based on 1,311 first tests): 64.0% at the first attempt and 4.3% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 1 in 3 failed the first attempt. For its age, it is statistically indistinguishable from normal: MOT Risk Index 103.2 (95% CI 95.9–110.8; 100 = normal).

Volvo 240 at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate68.3%incl. 4.3% fixed at the test centre20241311
Passed at the first attempt64.0%all first tests20241311
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 95.9–110.8)103.2index100 = normal for its age · rank 489 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)20241311
Biggest excess: Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment48.3per 10029.5 same-age2019–20249179
Dangerous defects10.5per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20249179
Advisory items185.4per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20249179
strip · Volvo 240 · MOT Risk Index · 103.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Volvo 240. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 489 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 403 and 565 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Volvo 240 index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank489of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age20241311
Best rank within its 95% interval403rankother models held where they are20241311
Worst rank within its 95% interval565rankother models held where they are20241311

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index moved from 96.3 to 103.2 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed, and crossed the normal line.

What actually fails on a Volvo 240 MOT, and how often?

Volvo 240 MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 48.3 per 100 tests, against 29.5 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 9,179).

bar · Volvo 240 · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 48.3 vs 29.5 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment48.3per 10029.52019–20244434
Suspension25.5per 10019.42019–20242340
Brakes19.9per 10020.32019–20241823
Visibility16.2per 10010.62019–20241488
Body, chassis, structure14.8per 10015.02019–20241357
Steering8.7per 1007.72019–2024794

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 9,179 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Volvo 240's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Volvo 240 advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: suspension advisories became a fail at the next MOT 20.4% of the time.

funnel · Volvo 240 · Suspension · 20.4 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on suspension: 20.4 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension20.4% next failmedian model2019–20241928
Brakes16.3% next failmedian model2019–20241426
Body, chassis, structure15.7% next failmedian model2019–2024933
Tyres7.9% next failmedian model2019–20241013
Noise, emissions and leaks7.6% next failmedian model2019–2024941
Non-component advisories0% next failmedian model2019–2024710

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Volvo 240 got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Volvo 240 MOTs flag suspension most: 62 advisories per 100 tests, against 26.2 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 9,179).

bar · Volvo 240 · Suspension · 62 vs 26.2 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension62per 10026.22019–20245694
Brakes36.1per 10034.72019–20243317
Tyres23.6per 10039.72019–20242169
Body, chassis, structure18.5per 1004.62019–20241697
Noise, emissions and leaks15.7per 1005.22019–20241437
Non-component advisories11.6per 1007.82019–20241069

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 9,179 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Volvo 240?

For Volvo 240s aged 20 or older whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 31.7% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 2,612).

bar · Volvo 240 · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass · 14.3 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass14.3% next fail2019–20242271
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass7.6% next fail2019–20242271
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass7.4% next fail2019–20242271
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass6.4% next fail2019–20242271
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass4.9% next fail2019–20242271
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass4.3% next fail2019–20242271
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass4.2% next fail2019–20242271
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass1.7% next fail2019–20242271
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass1.5% next fail2019–20242271
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–20242271
Speedometer and speed limiter, 20 years or older, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–20242271
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory27.3% next fail2019–20241975
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory15.5% next fail2019–20241975
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory13.0% next fail2019–20241975
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory11.3% next fail2019–20241975
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory9.9% next fail2019–20241975
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory7.4% next fail2019–20241975
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory5.7% next fail2019–20241975
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory5.0% next fail2019–20241975
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory2.9% next fail2019–20241975
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after an advisory0.8% next fail2019–20241975
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail31.7% next fail2019–20242612
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail18.0% next fail2019–20242612
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail15.6% next fail2019–20242612
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail14.8% next fail2019–20242612
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail12.6% next fail2019–20242612
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail9.1% next fail2019–20242612
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail8.4% next fail2019–20242612
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail4.6% next fail2019–20242612
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail4.3% next fail2019–20242612
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a fail0.7% next fail2019–20242612
Speedometer and speed limiter, 20 years or older, after a fail0.4% next fail2019–20242612
Road wheels, 20 years or older, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–20242612
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 78 cars)20.5% next fail2019–202478
Brakes, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 78 cars)12.8% next fail2019–202478
Suspension, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 78 cars)10.3% next fail2019–202478
Body, chassis, structure, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 78 cars)9.0% next fail2019–202478
Visibility, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 78 cars)7.7% next fail2019–202478
Noise, emissions and leaks, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 78 cars)6.4% next fail2019–202478

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Volvo 240 get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Volvo 240 gets a dangerous defect about as often as the UK average: 10.5 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 114.0 major and 29.4 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Volvo 240 · Dangerous defects · 10.5 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 10.5 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects10.5per 10011.22019–20249179

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 9,179 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Volvo 240 MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Volvo 240 MOT: about £143 (up to about £272 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 1,311).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Volvo 240 · Expected repair bill · 143.4 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill143.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue1311
Estimated range lower143.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue1311
Estimated range upper272.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue1311
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)67.6GBP expected contribution140price catalogue1311
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)45.9GBP expected contribution180price catalogue1311
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)29.9GBP expected contribution150price catalogue1311

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Volvo 240 more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 5 fail less often for their age than the Volvo 240 and 3 as often or more. The Volvo 240 has an MOT Risk Index of 103.2, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 1,311).

bar · Volvo 240 · Volvo 240 (this model) · 103.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Volvo 240 (this model)103.2index100 = normal20241311
Volvo 800 Series109.8index103.220241788
Volvo 900108.8index103.220243112
SEAT Arosa103index103.220242025
Renault Wind102.4index103.220242065
Chrysler PT105.4index103.220241916
Isuzu Trooper102.9index103.220242503
Saab 900101.6index103.220242305
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Fiat Fullback101.4index103.220242825

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Volvo 240 MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 26.0% of Volvo 240s with 100,000 to 140,000 miles failed first time, against 35.0% of those with over 140,000 miles (2024, n = 110). No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

bar · Volvo 240 · Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 50 tests, 95% interval 15.9–39.6%) · 26 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 50 tests, 95% interval 15.9–39.6%)26% failed first time202450
Age 15+, 140k+ miles (rough estimate: 60 tests, 95% interval 24.2–47.6%)35% failed first time202460

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Volvo 240 last?

76.6% of Volvo 240s tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 42.3% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 7,004).

line · Volvo 240 · 100,000 miles · 76.6 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 76.6. 200,000 miles: 14.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles76.6% of tested cars20247004
150,000 miles42.3% of tested cars20243869
200,000 miles14.8% of tested cars20241350

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Volvo 240 driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Volvo 240 index is 108.4, against 120.6 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 1,311).

slope · Volvo 240 · Age and mileage adjusted index · 108.4 vs 120.6 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 120.6 vs 108.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index108.4index120.62019–20241311

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Volvo 240 fuel fails its MOT less?

All Volvo 240s tested were petrol: 36.0% failed first time (2024, n = 1,294).

bar · Volvo 240 · Petrol · 36.0 vs other fuels · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol36.0% fail first timeother fuels20241294

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Volvo 240 engine is best?

No Volvo 240 engine band clearly fails less or more for its age: the capacity bands are within 5 index points of each other or their 95% intervals overlap (2024, n = 1,311).

bar · Volvo 240 · Petrol over 2.0 litre (rough estimate: 3,680 tests, 95% interval 92.8–101.0) · 96.8 vs 100 = model average · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol over 2.0 litre (rough estimate: 3,680 tests, 95% interval 92.8–101.0)96.8index vs model norm100 = model average20243680
Petrol 1.8–2.0 litre (rough estimate: 4,234 tests, 95% interval 98.8–106.5)102.6index vs model norm100 = model average20244234

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Volvo 240 fail its MOT most?

Volvo 240 fails first-time MOTs most in London N (N): 52.9% against 38.2% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 138).

bar · Volvo 240 · London N (N) (rough estimate: 138 tests, 95% interval 44.6–61.0%) · 52.9 vs 36 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
London N (N) (rough estimate: 138 tests, 95% interval 44.6–61.0%)52.9% fail first time362024138
Guildford (GU) (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 42.9–59.1%)51.0% fail first time362024143
Cardiff (CF) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 41.6–60.2%)50.9% fail first time362024108
Leicester (LE) (rough estimate: 143 tests, 95% interval 21.9–36.6%)28.7% fail first time362024143
Kingston upon Thames (KT) (rough estimate: 120 tests, 95% interval 21.8–37.8%)29.2% fail first time362024120
Chelmsford (CM) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 23.5–40.7%)31.5% fail first time362024108
Truro (TR) (rough estimate: 111 tests, 95% interval 40.4–58.7%)49.5% fail first time362024111
Norwich (NR) (rough estimate: 129 tests, 95% interval 40.4–57.4%)48.8% fail first time362024129
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Oxford (OX) (rough estimate: 170 tests, 95% interval 41.4–56.3%)48.8% fail first time362024170
Bath (BA) (rough estimate: 118 tests, 95% interval 39.5–57.2%)48.3% fail first time362024118
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 169 tests, 95% interval 40.5–55.4%)47.9% fail first time362024169
Ipswich (IP) (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 38.5–54.0%)46.1% fail first time362024156
Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 216 tests, 95% interval 38.0–51.1%)44.4% fail first time362024216
London SE (SE) (rough estimate: 140 tests, 95% interval 36.3–52.6%)44.3% fail first time362024140
Hemel Hempstead (HP) (rough estimate: 131 tests, 95% interval 36.0–52.8%)44.3% fail first time362024131
Taunton (TA) (rough estimate: 130 tests, 95% interval 35.6–52.4%)43.9% fail first time362024130
Swansea (SA) (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 34.2–52.9%)43.3% fail first time362024104
Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 35.4–50.8%)43.0% fail first time362024156
Southampton (SO) (rough estimate: 117 tests, 95% interval 34.1–51.8%)42.7% fail first time362024117
Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 164 tests, 95% interval 35.4–50.3%)42.7% fail first time362024164
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 34.7–50.6%)42.5% fail first time362024146
Gloucester (GL) (rough estimate: 175 tests, 95% interval 35.2–49.7%)42.3% fail first time362024175
Nottingham (NG) (rough estimate: 121 tests, 95% interval 32.9–50.2%)41.3% fail first time362024121
Stockport (SK) (rough estimate: 130 tests, 95% interval 32.0–48.6%)40% fail first time362024130
Exeter (EX) (rough estimate: 148 tests, 95% interval 31.1–46.5%)38.5% fail first time362024148
Llandudno (LL) (rough estimate: 115 tests, 95% interval 29.1–46.5%)37.4% fail first time362024115
Redhill (RH) (rough estimate: 101 tests, 95% interval 27.0–45.3%)35.6% fail first time362024101
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 184 tests, 95% interval 27.8–41.4%)34.2% fail first time362024184
Coventry (CV) (rough estimate: 132 tests, 95% interval 26.6–42.5%)34.1% fail first time362024132
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 230 tests, 95% interval 27.7–39.8%)33.5% fail first time362024230
Newcastle (NE) (rough estimate: 102 tests, 95% interval 24.1–41.9%)32.4% fail first time362024102
Shrewsbury (SY) (rough estimate: 115 tests, 95% interval 24.3–41.2%)32.2% fail first time362024115
Northampton (NN) (rough estimate: 106 tests, 95% interval 24.0–41.5%)32.1% fail first time362024106
Sheffield (S) (rough estimate: 191 tests, 95% interval 25.7–38.9%)31.9% fail first time362024191

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Volvo 240?

Of failed Volvo 240 MOTs, 18.7% were retested the same day and a further 68.8% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 3 days (2019–2024, n = 2,197).

bar · Volvo 240 · Same-day retest · 18.7 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest18.7%failed initial tests2019–20242197
Retest within 10 days68.8%failed initial tests2019–20242197
Clean MOT streak31.0%observed chains2019–20241636
Repeat advisory40.5%observed chains2019–20241636
Decreasing odometer2.7% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20241876

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Volvo 240 fails, does it fail again?

31.9% of Volvo 240s that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 30.5% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 923). The failure most likely to come back is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 31.3% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Volvo 240 · Repeat after fail · 31.9 vs 30.5 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 31.9 vs 30.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail31.9%30.52019–2024923

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Volvo 240 faults come together?

On Volvo 240s, seat belts and supplementary restraint systems and tyres failures turn up together 3.8 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 46).

Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 46 tests, 95% interval 2.8–5.1)3.8liftexpected joint rate202446
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 207 tests, 95% interval 3.3–4.3)3.8liftexpected joint rate2024207
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 190 tests, 95% interval 3.2–4.2)3.7liftexpected joint rate2024190
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 121 tests, 95% interval 2.8–4.0)3.4liftexpected joint rate2024121
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (rough estimate: 26 tests, 95% interval 2.2–5.0)3.4liftexpected joint rate202426
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (rough estimate: 22 tests, 95% interval 2.0–4.8)3.2liftexpected joint rate202422
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 131 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.7)3.1liftexpected joint rate2024131
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 84 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.7)3.0liftexpected joint rate202484
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 257 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.3)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024257
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 98 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.6)2.9liftexpected joint rate202498
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 288 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.3)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024288
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 39 tests, 95% interval 2.1–4.0)2.9liftexpected joint rate202439
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 432 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.1)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024432
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 58 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.6)2.8liftexpected joint rate202458
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 333 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.1)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024333
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 189 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.1)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024189
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 64 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.5)2.7liftexpected joint rate202464
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.5)2.7liftexpected joint rate202454
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 116 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.2)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024116
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 279 tests, 95% interval 2.3–2.9)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024279
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 101 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.1)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024101
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 230 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024230
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (rough estimate: 62 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.3)2.5liftexpected joint rate202462
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 192 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024192
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 189 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024189
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 206 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024206
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.9)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024112
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.4liftexpected joint rate2024507
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 352 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.6)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024352
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 172 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024172
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.3liftexpected joint rate2024616
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 312 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.6)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024312
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility2.2liftexpected joint rate2024650
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension2.2liftexpected joint rate2024714
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 124 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.6)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024124
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 346 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.3)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024346
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 317 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.3)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024317
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 78 tests, 95% interval 1.6–2.5)2.0liftexpected joint rate202478
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 150 tests, 95% interval 1.6–2.2)1.9liftexpected joint rate2024150
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)16tests with both202416
Identification of the vehicle + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Speedometer and speed limiter (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Road Wheels + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Brakes + Speedometer and speed limiter (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Brakes + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Road Wheels + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Speedometer and speed limiter + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Speedometer and speed limiter + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the Volvo 240 fail inspections in other countries too?

In Norway, 40.6% of Volvo 240s failed their periodic roadworthiness inspection, against 33.7% for all cars there (2024 by country, n = 1,704 inspections).

Inspections abroad point the same way: in Norway and the Netherlands the Volvo 240 also fails more often than the national average.

bullet · Volvo 240 · Norway · 40.6 vs 33.7 · 2024 by country
Norway: 40.6 vs 33.7. Netherlands: 64.8 vs 50.8. Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024 by country)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Norway40.6% failed33.72024 by country1704
Netherlands64.8% failed50.82024 by country1250

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV · licences and full notice

Does the month of a Volvo 240 MOT matter?

Volvo 240s fail first time most in February (43.0%, against 30.0% for all cars that month) and least in July (36.0%) (2024, n = 1,311).

line · Volvo 240 · January · 40.8 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 40.8. December: 37.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Volvo 240: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January40.8% fail first time31.12024764
February43.0% fail first time30.02024637
March37.4% fail first time28.32024755
April38.5% fail first time29.82024611
May37.4% fail first time28.82024645
June39.4% fail first time28.12024634
July36.0% fail first time29.32024881
August36.0% fail first time29.22024856
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September36.5% fail first time28.22024856
October37.1% fail first time30.32024997
November40.2% fail first time30.62024918
December37.3% fail first time29.32024625

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 1,311 initial Volvo 240 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 1,311 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Volvo C70, a car of the same inspection class with 5.9× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Volvo 240 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/volvo-240/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Volvo 240 MOT: quick answers

What is the Volvo 240 first-time MOT pass rate?

64.0% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,311 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 1,311 primary tests: 36% failed first time and 68.3% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 103.2 is shown separately.