MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Daihatsu Fourtrak — MOT statistics 2024

The Daihatsu Fourtrak failed 40.2% of 1,291 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 113.7 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 14% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 113.7, 95% CI 106.2–121.3 (100 = national average) 100 113.7 0 200
Index
113.7
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
40.2%
n = 1,291
Dangerous /100
18
national ≈11
Rank
594 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Fiat 500 (index 113.7) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Daihatsu Fourtrak common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Body, chassis, structure stand out at 41.3 per 100 tests, against 16.6 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Daihatsu Fourtrak common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Suspension50.05,47826.01.93×1.87–1.98
Lamps & electrical41.64,56033.21.25×1.22–1.29
Body & structure41.34,52816.62.49×2.41–2.56
Seatbelts & SRS20.82,2794.05.14×4.92–5.35
Brakes18.32,00422.80.80×0.77–0.84
Visibility14.31,57112.21.17×1.11–1.23
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 10,966 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired19.720.3852.17×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired11.931.1210.67×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a…Body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point9.270.2635.79×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn12.704.872.61×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the…Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced6.050.3915.63×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated7.511.903.95×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated5.971.484.04×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc5.901.563.79×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or
Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure4.711.164.06×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view4.962.362.10×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 74.4 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 12.2 per 100 tests — the gap is 62.2 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension74.4
Body & structure38.6
Brakes31.2
Tyres22.5
Emissions & leaks15
Steering12.2

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed33.8%1,160
It passed33.9%4,038

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (33.8% against 33.9%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is tyres — 36.7% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 9,921 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only110.6fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage105.4fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year17.5%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.2 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Daihatsu Fourtrak compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeDaihatsu FourtrakSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
18 years39.07%37.84%+1.23 pp151
19 years43.18%37.44%+5.73 pp359
20 years45.21%36.95%+8.26 pp699

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Daihatsu Fourtrak perform as it gets older?

The Fourtrak at age 20 is well below the reference at 38.0%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Daihatsu Fourtrak perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeDaihatsu FourtrakAll vehiclesGap
2038.0%41.0%-3.1 pp

How dangerous are Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 155.6 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor33.5814.222.36×
Major155.6252.752.95×
Dangerous17.5511.151.57×

Chart values: Minor 33.6 · Major 155.6 · Dangerous 17.6.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT matter?

Apr is highest at 48.1%; Dec is lowest at 38.5% — the gap is 9.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–50%.

bars: Daihatsu Fourtrak · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthDaihatsu FourtrakAll vehiclesGap
Jan40.23%31.12%+9.1 pp
Feb43.04%29.99%+13.1 pp
Mar40.1%28.26%+11.8 pp
Apr48.05%29.78%+18.3 pp
May42.32%28.79%+13.5 pp
Jun44.01%28.15%+15.9 pp
Jul45.93%29.33%+16.6 pp
Aug40.03%29.2%+10.8 pp
Sep41.63%28.19%+13.4 pp
Oct39.83%30.34%+9.5 pp
Nov38.9%30.58%+8.3 pp
Dec38.46%29.33%+9.1 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 9.6 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Daihatsu Fourtrak average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of Fourtraks runs from 91,774 miles to 144,892 miles, against 119,495 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 39.2% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles failed first time versus 41% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Daihatsu Fourtrak: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+100-140k miles39.2%30.3–48.9%102 (rough estimate)
15+140k+ miles41%30.8–52.1%78 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
20+91,774119,495144,892258

A typical 20+-year-old Fourtrak has ~119,495 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Daihatsu Fourtrak fails its MOT most

Bath area is highest at 59.9%; Sheffield area is lowest at 23.7% — the gap is 36.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Daihatsu Fourtrak line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Bath (BA)59.85%+18.3 pp
Llandrindod Wells (LD)58.26%+16.7 pp
Torquay (TQ)56.52%+15.0 pp
Exeter (EX)53.23%+11.7 pp
Stoke-on-Trent (ST)51.45%+9.9 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Sheffield (S)23.74%-17.8 pp
Coventry (CV)27.84%-13.7 pp
Chelmsford (CM)31.37%-10.2 pp
Hereford (HR)36.64%-4.9 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 28%–57% failing.

How many miles does a Daihatsu Fourtrak last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 64.7%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 23.2% — the gap is 41.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles7,08764.73%
150,000+ miles2,54123.21%

Of 10,948 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 64.7% had reached 100k miles, 23.2% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Daihatsu Fourtrak faults that come together

Brakes + Road Wheels stand out at 5.53×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
BrakesRoad Wheels335.53× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks205.38× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems413.99× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering283.73× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks1603.66× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility393.56× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1573.45× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle343.44× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels433.43× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment703.37× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1093.28× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility213.17× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks2813.12× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres1033.08× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres743.03× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres952.95× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle602.95× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension2672.84× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks2602.83× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems3392.81× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres342.8× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres1932.78× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility992.77× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension5212.74×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension7102.73×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1842.72× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension352.72× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering2382.7× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres1762.65× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment6352.6×
Identification of the vehicleSuspension552.59× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension6402.56×
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels312.52× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility1222.51× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering2292.5× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems6072.44×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering4532.44× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems6112.41×
Body, chassis, structureSteering4362.4× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5592.34×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1,1942.32×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1,1792.24×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,0762.14×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility5802.14×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility2822.1× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility2692.09× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility2052.09× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility5271.98×
SuspensionVisibility5161.86×
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems18too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering15too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres13too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres10too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleRoad Wheels5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Steering» and «Suspension» appear together 2.74× more often than chance (521 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £175.69 to £333.81, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£176–334
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension50.0 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£90.00
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment41.6 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£58.24
Brakes18.3 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£27.45

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £176 to £334, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Daihatsu Fourtrak rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 1.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
1.1×
0.84% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
63rd
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Daihatsu Fourtrak fails on corrosion at about the average rate once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Daihatsu Fourtrak advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 29.5%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 29.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Daihatsu Fourtrak chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Daihatsu Fourtrak, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Suspension 29.5% · Body & chassis 27% · Steering 15.6% · Brakes 12.9% · Tyres 5.2% · Noise, emissions, leaks 4.1% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Suspension29.5%12.1 months2,4852,742
Body, chassis, structure27.0%12.2 months2,4661,790
Steering15.6%12.2 months2,556797
Brakes12.9%12.2 months2,1421,602
Tyres5.2%12.1 months1,8561,050
Noise, emissions and leaks4.1%12.2 months2,250991
Non-component advisories0.0%——641

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 30 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 2,485 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Daihatsu Fourtrak?

Suspension after a failure at age 20+ is highest at 28.9%; Body, chassis, structure after a failure at age unknown are lowest at 10.3% — the gap is 18.6 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
15-19passedSuspension 16.5% · Body, chassis, structure 16.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.9%194 (rough estimate)
15-19advisoryBody, chassis, structure 22.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.8% · Suspension 21.4%215 (rough estimate)
15-19failureSuspension 25.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.6% · Body, chassis, structure 23.6%309 (rough estimate)
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.3% · Body, chassis, structure 11.9% · Suspension 11.5%2,043
20+advisoryBody, chassis, structure 21.9% · Suspension 21.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 20.7%2,321
20+failureSuspension 28.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.2% · Body, chassis, structure 25.1%2,957
unknownfailureSuspension 19.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.2% · Body, chassis, structure 10.3%68 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Daihatsu Fourtrak ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 71.8%; The same-day re-test pass rate is lowest at 13.3% — the gap is 58.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
13.27%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.13
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
22.77%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
2.564%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 2,706 failures followed through to their re-test, 13.27% were repaired and passed the same day and 71.77% within ten days; the median gap is 4.5 days. 10,317 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.13 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,894 miles a year across 2,357 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 22.77% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 44.92% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 2.564% of 2,379 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 42,976 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Daihatsu Fourtrak safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 1.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Daihatsu Fourtrak
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2010/00609/06/201012,988POSSIBLE FIRE RISK

DVSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns for the Daihatsu Fourtrak, covering roughly 12,988 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT: quick answers

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT Risk Index stands out at 113.7, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Daihatsu Fourtrak first-time MOT pass rate?
59.8% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,291 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 40.2% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,291 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 113.7 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Daihatsu Fourtrak with other cars

Nissan Pulsar is highest at 113.9; Daihatsu Fourtrak is lowest at 113.7 — the gap is 0.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Daihatsu MOT statisticsDaihatsu Terios MOT statsDaihatsu Sirion MOT stats

Similar risk

Fiat 500 (index 113.7)BMW X7 (index 113.9)Nissan Pulsar (index 113.9)

Same size class

how BMW M6 compareshow Volvo 240 compareshow Lotus Elan compares

By build year

Daihatsu Fourtrak 1998Daihatsu Fourtrak 1999Daihatsu Fourtrak 2000

By area

Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Daihatsu Fourtrak body, chassis and structure failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak brakes failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak vehicle identification failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak noise, emissions and leaks failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak road wheels failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak seat belts and airbags failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak steering failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak suspension failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak tyres failuresDaihatsu Fourtrak visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:daihatsu-fourtrak:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/daihatsu-fourtrak/ · Published 2026-07-30.