MOT Risk Index.co.uk

BMW M6 — MOT statistics 2024

The BMW M6 failed 12.88% of 1,281 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 42.2 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 58% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 42.2, 95% CI 36.6–48.6 (100 = national average) 100 42.2 0 200
Index
42.2
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
12.88%
n = 1,281
Dangerous /100
5
national ≈11
Rank
73 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow (index 42.2) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

BMW M6 common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are well below the reference at 2.8 per 100 tests, against 15.3 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

BMW M6 common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Tyres7.15888.70.82×0.75–0.88
Visibility3.42857.50.45×0.41–0.51
Lamps & electrical2.823315.30.18×0.16–0.21
Suspension2.621613.10.20×0.17–0.23
Brakes2.621310.40.25×0.21–0.28
Emissions & leaks2.52093.20.77×0.67–0.89
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 8,323 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Number plate does not conform to the specified…Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements1.290.206.42×Ask the seller about: Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements
Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged2.271.631.39×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or…Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer0.700.531.32×Ask the seller about: Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range s
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged2.682.541.06×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded0.791.410.56×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen0.681.620.42×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view1.202.360.51×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc0.601.780.34×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Spring or spring component fractured or seriously…A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened0.672.860.23×Ask the seller about: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements1.373.590.38×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

BMW M6 MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 30.8 per 100 tests; Emissions & leaks are lowest at 2.1 per 100 tests — the gap is 28.7 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

BMW M6 MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres30.8
Brakes18.8
Suspension4.4
Non-component advisories3.6
Emissions & leaks2.1

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: BMW M6 against cars of the same age

AgePartBMW M6Same age, petrol and dieselDifference
5 yearsTyres5.765.060.70
5 yearsBrakes0.233.09-2.86
5 yearsSuspension0.232.19-1.96
6 yearsTyres4.635.54-0.91
6 yearsBrakes03.81-3.81
6 yearsSuspension0.53.72-3.22
7 yearsTyres5.745.95-0.21
7 yearsBrakes1.234.55-3.32
7 yearsSuspension1.025.68-4.66
8 yearsTyres5.546.31-0.77
8 yearsBrakes1.25.38-4.18
8 yearsSuspension2.297.78-5.49

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed19.3%233
It passed11.1%5,282

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 8.2 percentage points. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 8,266 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only44.3fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage49.3fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year10.7%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.0 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the BMW M6 compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeBMW M6Same class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years8.09%10.78%-2.68 pp482
4 years6.67%12.35%-5.68 pp690
5 years9.37%14.17%-4.8 pp886
6 years9.67%16.09%-6.42 pp993
7 years11.37%18.25%-6.88 pp976
8 years14.1%20.54%-6.45 pp830
9 years11.09%23.1%-12.01 pp604
10 years12.96%25.6%-12.64 pp409
11 years19.66%28.23%-8.57 pp234
12 years15.68%30.56%-14.89 pp185
13 years20.8%32.63%-11.83 pp274
14 years16.87%34.59%-17.72 pp415
15 years17.23%36.04%-18.81 pp354
16 years14.33%37.1%-22.77 pp342
17 years14.84%37.48%-22.63 pp283
18 years16.59%37.85%-21.26 pp217

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the BMW M6 perform as it gets older?

The M6 at age 19 is well below the reference at 17.0%, against 43.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the BMW M6 perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeBMW M6All vehiclesGap
78.5%20.2%-11.7 pp
815.2%23.3%-8.1 pp
910.7%26.5%-15.8 pp
1010.7%30.1%-19.4 pp
1113.9%33.2%-19.3 pp
1917.0%43.5%-26.5 pp

Is a BMW M6 ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 BMW M6 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 91.3%.

Based on 1,264 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 198
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 197
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 206
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 365
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 99
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 93
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 106
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are BMW M6 MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 15.2 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are BMW M6 MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor3.3814.220.24×
Major15.1552.750.29×
Dangerous5.4211.150.49×

Chart values: Minor 3.4 · Major 15.2 · Dangerous 5.4.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a BMW M6 MOT matter?

Feb is highest at 14.2%; Sep is lowest at 9.2% — the gap is 5.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a BMW M6 MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 8%–33%.

bars: BMW M6 · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthBMW M6All vehiclesGap
Jan13.2%31.12%-17.9 pp
Feb14.18%29.99%-15.8 pp
Mar11.04%28.26%-17.2 pp
Apr13.11%29.78%-16.7 pp
May11.41%28.79%-17.4 pp
Jun13.92%28.15%-14.2 pp
Jul12.92%29.33%-16.4 pp
Aug12.44%29.2%-16.8 pp
Sep9.22%28.19%-19.0 pp
Oct13.74%30.34%-16.6 pp
Nov11.96%30.58%-18.6 pp
Dec10.93%29.33%-18.4 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.0 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

BMW M6 average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of M6s runs from 33,994 miles to 59,568 miles, against 46,638 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: BMW M6 · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–106k mi.

Does high mileage mean more BMW M6 MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 6–9, 11.3% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 21% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more BMW M6 MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
BMW M6: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
6–9<40k miles11.3%7.9–15.9%239 (rough estimate)
6–940-70k miles10.4%7.4–14.4%289 (rough estimate)
6–970-100k miles21%12.7–32.6%62 (rough estimate)
10–14<40k miles6.8%2.9–14.9%74 (rough estimate)
10–1440-70k miles13.9%9.8–19.3%202 (rough estimate)
10–1470-100k miles12.5%6.7–22.1%72 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles16.7%10.8–24.8%108 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles17.3%11.2–25.7%104 (rough estimate)
15+100-140k miles19.2%10.8–31.9%52 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
725,43238,84747,802142
833,99446,63859,568197
939,59949,55064,089206
1044,78155,76069,576197
1135,47554,51270,904115
1859,17975,21495,12193
1963,74679,448101,185106

A typical 8-year-old M6 has ~46,638 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the BMW M6 fails its MOT most

Bristol area is highest at 20.0%; London E area is lowest at 3.7% — the gap is 16.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Bristol (BS)20%+7.7 pp
Guildford (GU)18.26%+6.0 pp
Reading (RG)18.13%+5.8 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
London E (E)3.74%-8.6 pp
London SE (SE)3.96%-8.3 pp
London N (N)5.93%-6.4 pp
Hemel Hempstead (HP)7.14%-5.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

BMW M6 survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 19 is well below the reference at 12.4%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BMW M6 survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
348256.3%8.09%
469080.6%6.67%
5886100%9.37%
6993100%9.67%
7976100%11.37%
883096.9%14.1%
960470.5%11.09%
1040947.8%12.96%
1123427.3%19.66%
1218521.6%15.68%
1327432%20.8%
1441548.5%16.87%
1535441.3%17.23%
1634239.9%14.33%
1728333%14.84%
1821725.3%16.59%
1910612.4%16.98%

By age 9, only about 70% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈856); survivors still fail at 11.1% vs 6.7% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many years is a BMW M6 likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 4.2 years; Bought at age 8 is lowest at 1.2 years — the gap is 3.0 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 4.2
8—at least 1.2

estimateObserved only until age 9. The curve does not run five years past the stated age with the share still tested under 50%, so no 'years left' number is given.

BMW M6 faults that come together

Brakes + Lamps & electrical stand out at 11.94×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3411.94× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension217.73× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks217.65× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension247× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility275.53× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility215.43× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility214.51× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres284.46× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres263.99× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres283.4× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility302.68× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres212.67× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility18too few (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks15too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering14too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension12too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres10too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering9too few (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension8too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension7too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment7too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment6too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension5too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks5too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility5too few (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres5too few (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Brakes» and «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» appear together 11.94× more often than chance (34 co-occurrences in the same test; 55 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a BMW M6?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 8.1%, against 14.1% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year8.06%1,773
8–12k miles/year14.14%898
Gap (low − normal)-6.08 pp—
By fuel and age

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
54.9826110.31194-5.33 pp
68.023249.27205-1.24 pp
79.1732712.5184-3.33 pp
810.5328521.23146-10.71 pp
95.5621621.6983-16.13 pp
1010.7816714.8947-4.12 pp
1411.981922532-13.02 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 8.1% vs 14.1% for 8–12k miles/year — 6.1 pp lower (n_low=1,773, n_normal=898). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

BMW M6 MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £23.89 to £45.39, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£24–45
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Tyres7.1 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£6.39
Noise, emissions and leaks2.5 (nat. 3.67)Exhaust rear silencer£200£5.00
Suspension2.6 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£4.68
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.8 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£3.92
Brakes2.6 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£3.90

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £24 to £45, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

BMW M6 running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 10 stand out at 11.0%, against 8.0% at age 7, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 7
8
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 142 tests)
At age 10
11
other cars of this model tested at age 10 in 2024 (rough estimate: 197 tests)
Repairs per 100
£2,389
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
2d
median; 22.78% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
78.45%38,847142—
815.23%46,638197—
910.68%49,550206—
1010.66%55,760197—
1113.91%54,512115—
1916.98%79,448106—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

BMW M6 rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.23×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
0.23×
0.17% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
9th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This BMW M6 fails on corrosion much less often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a BMW M6 advisory become a failure?

Tyres are highest at 8.9%; Brakes are lowest at 5.9% — the gap is 2.9 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Tyres8.9%12.2 months4,0631,060
Brakes5.9%12.3 months1,701655

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 9 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.2 months and roughly 4,063 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a BMW M6?

Suspension after a failure at age 15-19 is highest at 9.8%; Identification of the vehicle after a passed at age 3-5 is lowest at 1.1% — the gap is 8.7 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedTyres 2.7%256 (rough estimate)
3-5passedTyres 3.9% · Visibility 1.8% · Identification of the vehicle 1.1%1,639
3-5advisoryTyres 8.5% · Visibility 2.5% · Brakes 1.4%367 (rough estimate)
3-5failureVisibility 6.5% · Tyres 5.4%184 (rough estimate)
6-8passedTyres 4.0% · Visibility 2.2% · Noise, emissions and leaks 1.8%1,415
6-8advisoryTyres 8.3% · Visibility 3.7% · Noise, emissions and leaks 2.2%410 (rough estimate)
6-8failureTyres 8.0% · Visibility 5.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3.8%264 (rough estimate)
9-11passedTyres 4.6% · Suspension 3.5% · Visibility 2.9%347 (rough estimate)
9-11advisoryTyres 9.4% · Visibility 8.2%85 (rough estimate)
9-11failureVisibility 7.1% · Noise, emissions and leaks 5.9%84 (rough estimate)
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3.3% · Tyres 3.3% · Visibility 3.3%482 (rough estimate)
12-14advisoryBrakes 7.2% · Suspension 7.2% · Tyres 5.9%237 (rough estimate)
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.4% · Suspension 7.2% · Brakes 6.6%166 (rough estimate)
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.1% · Brakes 3.1% · Visibility 2.8%387 (rough estimate)
15-19advisoryVisibility 6.5% · Brakes 5.5% · Suspension 5.5%200 (rough estimate)
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.8% · Suspension 9.8% · Brakes 8.0%112 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

BMW M6 ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 72.0%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 5.2% — the gap is 66.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
22.78%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.297
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
67.24%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.268%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 733 failures followed through to their re-test, 22.78% were repaired and passed the same day and 72.03% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 1,349 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.297 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 3,161 miles a year across 1,576 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 67.24% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 10.94% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.268% of 1,577 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 14,006 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

BMW M6 safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 3.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

BMW M6 recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the BMW M6. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2012: 2 · 2013: 0 · 2014: 0 · 2015: 0 · 2016: 0 · 2017: 0 · 2018: 0 · 2019: 0 · 2020: 1.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the BMW M6
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2020/08130/03/2020615THE FIXINGS OF THE HIGH LEVEL 3RD BRAKE LIGHT COULD COME LOOSE
R/2012/03924/05/2012128,701RISK OF FIRE
R/2012/03924/05/2012128,701RISK OF FIRE

DVSA lists 3 safety recall campaigns for the BMW M6, covering roughly 258,017 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

BMW M6 technical service bulletins: what dealers are told

US market, BMW M6, model years 2016–2018 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.

NHTSA manufacturer communications are 223.

bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults

These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.

United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications

US technical service bulletins by communication year; leading subjects cover the full file
Communication yearBulletinsLeading subjects across all years
201542
  • Equipment (82)
  • Electrical system (70)
  • Engine (20)
  • Adaptive and mobility equipment (16)
  • Powertrain (13)
  • Engine and cooling (11)
  • Petrol fuel system (11)
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic (9)
201660
201731
201838
201924
202012
20216
20225
20234
20241

Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.

BMW M6 owner complaints: what goes wrong

US market, BMW M6, model years 2016–2018 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.

Lamps & electrical are highest at 3; Engine (not MOT-tested) is lowest at 1 — the gap is 2.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Owner complaints (US) against actual MOT failures (UK) for the same component groups
ComponentComplaintsShareMOT fail items per 100MOT rankAgreement
Body & structure350.0%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Restraints350.0%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Lamps & electrical350.0%2.8#3complained about and fails often
Suspension233.3%2.6#4complained about, fails occasionally
Engine (not MOT-tested)116.7%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Steering116.7%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure

Two different populations answering two different questions: the MOT records what an inspector can measure once a year, the complaint file records what annoyed or frightened an owner on the road. A component high in one column and absent from the other is the interesting case — driver-assistance and electronics dominate complaints while almost never appearing as an MOT failure item.

What the reports actually say
My 2016 m6 bmw gran coupe, as if Sep. 27. 2024 I have passengers restrain and airbag malfunction , so many bmw owner's complain about this issue in the pass, it’s dangerous in case of an accident, please help with this issue god bleess
NHTSA complaint, filed 10/07/2024 · AIR BAGS
THE CAR CAUGHT ON FIRE, STARTING IN THE ROOF. I SUSPECT THE CAUSE WAS ELECTRICAL. FROM THE TIME SMOKE STARTED COMING FROM THE HEADLINER/WINDSHIELD UNTIL IT WAS FULLY ENGULFED WAS ONLY ABOUT 5 MINUTES. MY GIRLFRIEND AND I WERE LUCKY TO GET OUT ALIVE. WE WERE AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT, OPERATING THE VEHICLE AT THE TIME ON CITY STREETS.
NHTSA complaint, filed 08/22/2020 · ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

US owners have filed 6 complaints about the equivalent BMW M6 to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including 0 that mention a crash, 1 a fire and 0 an injury. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.

Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.

BMW M6 MOT: quick answers

BMW M6 MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 42.2, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the BMW M6 first-time MOT pass rate?
87.12% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,281 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 12.88% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,281 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 42.2 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the BMW M6 with other cars

Jaguar F-Type is highest at 43.0; TVR Chimaera is lowest at 42.1 — the gap is 0.9 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All BMW MOT statisticsBMW M3 MOT statsBMW M5 MOT stats

Similar risk

Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow (index 42.2)TVR Chimaera (index 42.1)Jaguar F-Type (index 43.0)

Same size class

how Daihatsu Fourtrak compareshow Volvo 240 compareshow Lotus Elan compares

By area

BMW M6 MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

BMW M6 body, chassis and structure failuresBMW M6 brakes failuresBMW M6 vehicle identification failuresBMW M6 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresBMW M6 noise, emissions and leaks failuresBMW M6 steering failuresBMW M6 suspension failuresBMW M6 tyres failuresBMW M6 visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:bmw-m6:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). BMW M6 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/bmw-m6/ · Published 2026-07-30.