MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Smart City MOT pass rate and common problems

68.6% of Smart Citys passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 789 first tests): 61.0% at the first attempt and 7.6% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 2 in 5 failed the first attempt. For its age, it is statistically indistinguishable from normal: MOT Risk Index 92.3 (95% CI 84.4–100.4; 100 = normal).

Smart City at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate68.6%incl. 7.6% fixed at the test centre2024789
Passed at the first attempt61.0%all first tests2024789
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 84.4–100.4)92.3index100 = normal for its age · rank 369 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)2024789
Biggest excess: Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment46.4per 10039.0 same-age2019–20246619
Dangerous defects10.3per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20246619
Advisory items159.5per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20246619
strip · Smart City · MOT Risk Index · 92.3 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Smart City. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 369 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 304 and 463 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Smart City index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank369of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age2024789
Best rank within its 95% interval304rankother models held where they are2024789
Worst rank within its 95% interval463rankother models held where they are2024789

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index moved from 103.7 to 92.3 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed, and crossed the normal line.

What actually fails on a Smart City MOT, and how often?

Smart City MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 46.4 per 100 tests, against 39.0 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 6,619).

bar · Smart City · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 46.4 vs 39.0 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment46.4per 10039.02019–20243068
Suspension21.3per 10031.92019–20241410
Brakes15.6per 10023.72019–20241031
Visibility14.4per 10012.52019–2024952
Noise, emissions and leaks10.4per 1008.82019–2024688
Tyres8.6per 10010.62019–2024570

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,619 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Smart City's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Smart City advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: suspension advisories became a fail at the next MOT 19.1% of the time.

funnel · Smart City · Suspension · 19.1 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on suspension: 19.1 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension19.1% next failmedian model2019–20241020
Brakes14.1% next failmedian model2019–20241366
Tyres10.9% next failmedian model2019–20241080

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Smart City got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Smart City MOTs flag brakes most: 48.5 advisories per 100 tests, against 34.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 6,619).

bar · Smart City · Brakes · 48.5 vs 34.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes48.5per 10034.72019–20243211
Tyres35per 10039.72019–20242319
Suspension34.6per 10026.22019–20242292
Noise, emissions and leaks10.9per 1005.22019–2024723
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment8.5per 1002.82019–2024563
Steering5.4per 1001.82019–2024360

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,619 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Smart City?

For Smart Citys aged 15 to 19 whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 28.4% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 1,471).

bar · Smart City · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars) · 18.1 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)18.1% next fail2019–2024453
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)12.4% next fail2019–2024453
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)6.8% next fail2019–2024453
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)5.7% next fail2019–2024453
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)4.2% next fail2019–2024453
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)3.8% next fail2019–2024453
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)3.8% next fail2019–2024453
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)2.9% next fail2019–2024453
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)24.8% next fail2019–2024347
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)18.7% next fail2019–2024347
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)12.7% next fail2019–2024347
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)10.4% next fail2019–2024347
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)7.8% next fail2019–2024347
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)6.9% next fail2019–2024347
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)6.0% next fail2019–2024347
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)5.2% next fail2019–2024347
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail28.0% next fail2019–2024596
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail16.8% next fail2019–2024596
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail14.6% next fail2019–2024596
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail9.4% next fail2019–2024596
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail7.5% next fail2019–2024596
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail7.0% next fail2019–2024596
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail6.5% next fail2019–2024596
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail4.5% next fail2019–2024596
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail1.5% next fail2019–2024596
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass17.6% next fail2019–20241131
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass11.0% next fail2019–20241131
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass9.2% next fail2019–20241131
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass5.4% next fail2019–20241131
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass5.0% next fail2019–20241131
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass4.2% next fail2019–20241131
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass4.0% next fail2019–20241131
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass3.0% next fail2019–20241131
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.2% next fail2019–20241131
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory24.3% next fail2019–2024997
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory15.4% next fail2019–2024997
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory10.7% next fail2019–2024997
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory9.9% next fail2019–2024997
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory7.2% next fail2019–2024997
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory6.1% next fail2019–2024997
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory5.7% next fail2019–2024997
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory5.2% next fail2019–2024997
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–2024997
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.5% next fail2019–2024997
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail28.4% next fail2019–20241471
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail14.3% next fail2019–20241471
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail13.9% next fail2019–20241471
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail11.4% next fail2019–20241471
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail9.8% next fail2019–20241471
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail8.3% next fail2019–20241471
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail6.8% next fail2019–20241471
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail5.0% next fail2019–20241471
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail2.5% next fail2019–20241471
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.8% next fail2019–20241471

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Smart City get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Smart City gets a dangerous defect about as often as the UK average: 10.3 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 103.3 major and 18.2 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Smart City · Dangerous defects · 10.3 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 10.3 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects10.3per 10011.22019–20246619

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,619 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Smart City still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the Smart City go from 40.4% at age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%) to 34.6% at age 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%), against 43.5% for all cars aged 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%) (2024, n = 789).

line · Smart City · Age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%) · 40.4 vs 43.1 · 2024
Age 17 (rough esti: 40.4. Age 19 (rough esti: 34.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%)40.4% failed first time43.12024104
Age 18 (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 34.7–50.6%)42.5% failed first time43.92024146
Age 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%)34.6% failed first time43.52024156

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Smart City compare with cars of its own age and size?

At 1 of 9 ages shown, Smart Citys fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 19, where they fail less often: 36.3% against 50.4% (2024, n = 678).

line · Smart City · Age 12 · 38.6 vs 40.5 · 2024
Age 12: 38.6. Age 20: 38.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1238.6% fail40.52024153
Age 1345.7% fail43.32024337
Age 1444.4% fail45.92024595
Age 1542.3% fail48.020241023
Age 1642.9% fail50.020241274
Age 1743.5% fail50.520241110
Age 1841.4% fail50.92024879
Age 1936.3% fail50.42024678
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 2038.1% fail49.62024412

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Smart City years should I avoid?

Smart City build years range from index 95.2 to 107.1 against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 789).

No Smart City build year stands out once age is allowed for; every year's interval includes normal.

bar · Smart City · Build year 2004 (rough estimate: 905 tests, 95% interval 85.5–104.8) · 95.2 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2004 (rough estimate: 905 tests, 95% interval 85.5–104.8)95.2index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024905
Build year 2005 (rough estimate: 424 tests, 95% interval 89.2–119.4)104.3index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024424
Build year 2006 (rough estimate: 369 tests, 95% interval 90.6–123.7)107.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024369
Build year 2007 (rough estimate: 251 tests, 95% interval 82.4–121.9)102.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024251

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Smart City MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Smart City MOT: about £155 (up to about £295 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 789).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Smart City · Expected repair bill · 155.2 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill155.2GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue789
Estimated range lower155.2GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue789
Estimated range upper295.0GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue789
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)65.0GBP expected contribution140price catalogue789
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)38.3GBP expected contribution180price catalogue789
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)23.4GBP expected contribution150price catalogue789
Noise, emissions and leaks: Exhaust rear silencer20.8GBP expected contribution200price catalogue789
Tyres: Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)7.7GBP expected contribution90price catalogue789

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Smart City more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 3 fail less often for their age than the Smart City and 5 as often or more. The Smart City has an MOT Risk Index of 92.3, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 789).

bar · Smart City · Smart City (this model) · 92.3 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Smart City (this model)92.3index100 = normal2024789
MCC Smart91.4index92.32024855
Subaru Justy93.3index92.32024659
Daihatsu Charade98.1index92.320241241
Nissan Figaro92.7index92.320242413
Smart Roadster (798 tests)68.4index92.32024798
Smart City-Coupe98.6index92.320244878
Smart Roadster (1,584 tests)72.3index92.320241584
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Renault Wind102.4index92.320242065

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Smart City normally do?

Smart City: Age 17 median (rough estimate) is 65747 miles (2024).

line · Smart City · Age 17 median (rough estimate) · 65747 vs baseline · 2024
Age 17 median (rou: 65747. Age 19 P75 (rough : 87859. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 17 median (rough estimate)65747miles2024104
Age 17 P25 (rough estimate)48330miles2024104
Age 17 P75 (rough estimate)85901miles2024104
Age 18 median (rough estimate)63664miles2024146
Age 18 P25 (rough estimate)49411miles2024146
Age 18 P75 (rough estimate)78702miles2024146
Age 19 median (rough estimate)72987miles2024156
Age 19 P25 (rough estimate)57817miles2024156
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 19 P75 (rough estimate)87859miles2024156

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Smart City MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 31.3% of Smart Citys with under 40,000 miles failed first time, against 41.0% of those with 100,000 to 140,000 miles (2024, n = 161). No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

bar · Smart City · Age 15+, <40k miles (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 22.4–41.9%) · 31.3 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15+, <40k miles (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 22.4–41.9%)31.3% failed first time202483
Age 15+, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 313 tests, 95% interval 32.2–42.9%)37.4% failed first time2024313
Age 15+, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 292 tests, 95% interval 36.3–47.5%)41.8% failed first time2024292
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 78 tests, 95% interval 30.8–52.1%)41% failed first time202478

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Smart City last?

10.9% of Smart Citys tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 1.1% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 717).

line · Smart City · 100,000 miles · 10.9 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 10.9. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles10.9% of tested cars2024717
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 70 tests, 95% interval 0.8–1.4%)1.1% of tested cars202470
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 13 tests, 95% interval 0.1–0.3%)0.2% of tested cars202413

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Smart City driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

This fleet is driven less than average. Matched on annual mileage as well as age (test chains 2019–2024), the index is 104.2, on the other side of normal, so both readings are shown.

Both readings are shown: this comparison changes when usage or inspection rules differ.

slope · Smart City · Age and mileage adjusted index · 104.2 vs 94.1 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 94.1 vs 104.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index104.2index94.12019–2024789

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Smart City fail its MOT most?

Smart City fails first-time MOTs most in Bournemouth (BH): 57.5% against 41.8% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 160).

bar · Smart City · Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 160 tests, 95% interval 49.8–64.9%) · 57.5 vs 39.0 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 160 tests, 95% interval 49.8–64.9%)57.5% fail first time39.02024160
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 47.9–65.9%)57.1% fail first time39.02024112
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 189 tests, 95% interval 43.7–57.8%)50.8% fail first time39.02024189
London SE (SE) (rough estimate: 140 tests, 95% interval 27.6–43.2%)35% fail first time39.02024140
Plymouth (PL) (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 28.9–44.4%)36.3% fail first time39.02024146
London N (N) (rough estimate: 101 tests, 95% interval 27.9–46.4%)36.6% fail first time39.02024101
Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 219 tests, 95% interval 42.3–55.4%)48.9% fail first time39.02024219
Southampton (SO) (rough estimate: 105 tests, 95% interval 38.3–57.1%)47.6% fail first time39.02024105
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Reading (RG) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 37.2–55.7%)46.3% fail first time39.02024108
Guildford (GU) (rough estimate: 115 tests, 95% interval 34.8–52.6%)43.5% fail first time39.02024115
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 133 tests, 95% interval 34.8–51.4%)42.9% fail first time39.02024133
Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 138 tests, 95% interval 34.8–51.1%)42.8% fail first time39.02024138
Chelmsford (CM) (rough estimate: 131 tests, 95% interval 33.2–49.8%)41.2% fail first time39.02024131
Sheffield (S) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 28.5–46.4%)37.0% fail first time39.02024108
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 181 tests, 95% interval 30.3–44.3%)37.0% fail first time39.02024181
London E (E) (rough estimate: 103 tests, 95% interval 28.2–46.5%)36.9% fail first time39.02024103

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does a Smart City rust more than average?

Allowing for age, Smart City MOTs record corrosion failures at 3.0 times the national rate: 2.33% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 787).

Computed, not measured.

slope · Smart City · Salt belt susceptibility · 3.0 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility3.0ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers787

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is a Smart City ULEZ compliant?

An estimated 31.9% of Smart Citys tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific car with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · Smart City · Likely compliant · 31.9 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant31.9% estimate2024789

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Smart City?

Of failed Smart City MOTs, 25.1% were retested the same day and a further 70.2% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 1,844).

bar · Smart City · Same-day retest · 25.1 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest25.1%failed initial tests2019–20241844
Retest within 10 days70.2%failed initial tests2019–20241844
Clean MOT streak26.4%observed chains2019–20241208
Repeat advisory37.6%observed chains2019–20241208
Decreasing odometer3.7% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20241360

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Smart City fails, does it fail again?

39.4% of Smart Citys that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 36.6% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 647). The failure most likely to come back is tyres: 41.7% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Smart City · Repeat after fail · 39.4 vs 36.6 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 39.4 vs 36.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail39.4%36.62019–2024647

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Smart City faults come together?

On Smart Citys, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ failures turn up together 4.3 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 117).

Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 117 tests, 95% interval 3.5–5.1)4.3liftexpected joint rate2024117
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 28 tests, 95% interval 2.7–5.8)4.0liftexpected joint rate202428
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 22 tests, 95% interval 2.4–5.7)3.8liftexpected joint rate202422
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 61 tests, 95% interval 2.6–4.4)3.4liftexpected joint rate202461
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 82 tests, 95% interval 2.7–4.2)3.4liftexpected joint rate202482
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 148 tests, 95% interval 2.9–4.0)3.4liftexpected joint rate2024148
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 140 tests, 95% interval 2.7–3.8)3.2liftexpected joint rate2024140
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.8)3.2liftexpected joint rate2024113
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 72 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.9)3.1liftexpected joint rate202472
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.5)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024108
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 26 tests, 95% interval 1.9–4.2)2.9liftexpected joint rate202426
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 261 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.2)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024261
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 120 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.4)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024120
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 30 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.8)2.7liftexpected joint rate202430
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility (rough estimate: 450 tests, 95% interval 2.3–2.8)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024450
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.3)2.6liftexpected joint rate202454
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 278 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024278
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 359 tests, 95% interval 2.3–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024359
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 69 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202469
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 237 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024237
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 140 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024140
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.9)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024112
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 165 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024165
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 44 tests, 95% interval 1.7–3.2)2.4liftexpected joint rate202444
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 206 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.7)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024206
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 137 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.7)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024137
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 78 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.9)2.3liftexpected joint rate202478
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 247 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.6)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024247
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 161 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.6)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024161
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 63 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.8)2.2liftexpected joint rate202463
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension (rough estimate: 497 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.4)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024497
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 115 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.6)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024115
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 31 tests, 95% interval 1.5–3.0)2.1liftexpected joint rate202431
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 144 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.5)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024144
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (seen together; too few for a multiplier)15tests with both202415
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)12tests with both202412
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What does a Smart City cost to run in a fleet?

Of every 100 Smart Citys tested at age 17, about 40 failed the MOT first time (rough estimate); at age 19, about 35 (rough estimate). These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time (2024).

Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%)40.4% fail first time2024104
Age 18 (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 34.7–50.6%)42.5% fail first time2024146
Age 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%)34.6% fail first time2024156

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of a Smart City MOT matter?

Smart Citys fail first time most in April (45.3%, against 29.8% for all cars that month) and least in July (39.0%) (2024, n = 789).

line · Smart City · January · 41.8 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 41.8. December: 42.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January41.8% fail first time31.12024639
February45.2% fail first time30.02024564
March39.4% fail first time28.32024546
April45.3% fail first time29.82024481
May42.6% fail first time28.82024465
June41.2% fail first time28.12024437
July39.0% fail first time29.32024557
August41.2% fail first time29.22024536
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September40.8% fail first time28.22024649
October41.6% fail first time30.32024675
November41.4% fail first time30.62024671
December42.6% fail first time29.32024399

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Does the Smart City fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 789 initial Smart City tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Nissan Figaro, a car of the same inspection class with 3.1× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 789 initial Smart City tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Nissan Figaro, a car of the same inspection class with 3.1× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Smart City MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/smart-city-review-f7c5aa62/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Smart City MOT: quick answers

What is the Smart City first-time MOT pass rate?

61.0% of first attempts passed in 2024 (789 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 789 primary tests: 39.04% failed first time and 68.6% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 92.3 is shown separately.