68.6% of Smart Citys passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 789 first tests): 61.0% at the first attempt and 7.6% after a fix at the test centre (PRS).About 2 in 5 failed the first attempt.For its age, it is statistically indistinguishable from normal: MOT Risk Index 92.3 (95% CI 84.4–100.4; 100 = normal).
Smart City at a glance, 2024 MOT
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
MOT pass rate
68.6
%
incl. 7.6% fixed at the test centre
2024
789
Passed at the first attempt
61.0
%
all first tests
2024
789
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 84.4–100.4)
92.3
index
100 = normal for its age · rank 369 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)
2024
789
Biggest excess: Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
46.4
per 100
39.0 same-age
2019–2024
6619
Dangerous defects
10.3
per 100
11.2 UK, not age-adjusted
2019–2024
6619
Advisory items
159.5
per 100
127.1 UK, not age-adjusted
2019–2024
6619
MOT Risk Index · Smart City. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 369 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 304 and 463 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index moved from 103.7 to 92.3 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed, and crossed the normal line.
What actually fails on a Smart City MOT, and how often?
Smart City MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 46.4 per 100 tests, against 39.0 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 6,619).
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
46.4
per 100
39.0
2019–2024
3068
Suspension
21.3
per 100
31.9
2019–2024
1410
Brakes
15.6
per 100
23.7
2019–2024
1031
Visibility
14.4
per 100
12.5
2019–2024
952
Noise, emissions and leaks
10.4
per 100
8.8
2019–2024
688
Tyres
8.6
per 100
10.6
2019–2024
570
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,619 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Will my Smart City's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?
Smart City advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: suspension advisories became a fail at the next MOT 19.1% of the time.
Advisories on suspension: 19.1 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Suspension
19.1
% next fail
median model
2019–2024
1020
Brakes
14.1
% next fail
median model
2019–2024
1366
Tyres
10.9
% next fail
median model
2019–2024
1080
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
My Smart City got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?
Smart City MOTs flag brakes most: 48.5 advisories per 100 tests, against 34.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 6,619).
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Brakes
48.5
per 100
34.7
2019–2024
3211
Tyres
35
per 100
39.7
2019–2024
2319
Suspension
34.6
per 100
26.2
2019–2024
2292
Noise, emissions and leaks
10.9
per 100
5.2
2019–2024
723
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
8.5
per 100
2.8
2019–2024
563
Steering
5.4
per 100
1.8
2019–2024
360
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,619 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
What is likely to fail next on a Smart City?
For Smart Citys aged 15 to 19 whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 28.4% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 1,471).
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
18.1
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
12.4
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
6.8
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
5.7
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
4.2
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
3.8
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
3.8
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 453 cars)
2.9
% next fail
2019–2024
453
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
24.8
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
18.7
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
12.7
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
10.4
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
7.8
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
6.9
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
6.0
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 347 cars)
5.2
% next fail
2019–2024
347
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
28.0
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
16.8
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
14.6
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
9.4
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
7.5
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
7.0
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
6.5
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
4.5
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail
1.5
% next fail
2019–2024
596
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
17.6
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
11.0
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
9.2
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
5.4
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
5.0
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
4.2
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
4.0
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
3.0
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass
1.2
% next fail
2019–2024
1131
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
24.3
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
15.4
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
10.7
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
9.9
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
7.2
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
6.1
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
5.7
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
5.2
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
0.9
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory
0.5
% next fail
2019–2024
997
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
28.4
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
14.3
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
13.9
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
11.4
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
9.8
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
8.3
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
6.8
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
5.0
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
2.5
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail
0.8
% next fail
2019–2024
1471
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
How often does a Smart City get a dangerous MOT defect?
The Smart City gets a dangerous defect about as often as the UK average: 10.3 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 103.3 major and 18.2 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).
Dangerous defects: 10.3 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Dangerous defects
10.3
per 100
11.2
2019–2024
6619
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,619 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Will my Smart City still pass its MOT in a few years?
First-time MOT failures for the Smart City go from 40.4% at age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%) to 34.6% at age 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%), against 43.5% for all cars aged 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%) (2024, n = 789).
Age 17 (rough esti: 40.4. Age 19 (rough esti: 34.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%)
40.4
% failed first time
43.1
2024
104
Age 18 (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 34.7–50.6%)
42.5
% failed first time
43.9
2024
146
Age 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%)
34.6
% failed first time
43.5
2024
156
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
How does the Smart City compare with cars of its own age and size?
At 1 of 9 ages shown, Smart Citys fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 19, where they fail less often: 36.3% against 50.4% (2024, n = 678).
Age 12: 38.6. Age 20: 38.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 12
38.6
% fail
40.5
2024
153
Age 13
45.7
% fail
43.3
2024
337
Age 14
44.4
% fail
45.9
2024
595
Age 15
42.3
% fail
48.0
2024
1023
Age 16
42.9
% fail
50.0
2024
1274
Age 17
43.5
% fail
50.5
2024
1110
Age 18
41.4
% fail
50.9
2024
879
Age 19
36.3
% fail
50.4
2024
678
Full table
Further values · 2024
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 20
38.1
% fail
49.6
2024
412
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Which Smart City years should I avoid?
Smart City build years range from index 95.2 to 107.1 against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 789).
No Smart City build year stands out once age is allowed for; every year's interval includes normal.
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Build year 2004 (rough estimate: 905 tests, 95% interval 85.5–104.8)
95.2
index vs own age
100 = normal
2019–2024
905
Build year 2005 (rough estimate: 424 tests, 95% interval 89.2–119.4)
104.3
index vs own age
100 = normal
2019–2024
424
Build year 2006 (rough estimate: 369 tests, 95% interval 90.6–123.7)
107.1
index vs own age
100 = normal
2019–2024
369
Build year 2007 (rough estimate: 251 tests, 95% interval 82.4–121.9)
102.1
index vs own age
100 = normal
2019–2024
251
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
How much does it cost to fix a Smart City MOT fail?
Expected repair cost per Smart City MOT: about £155 (up to about £295 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 789).
Computed, not measured.
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Expected repair bill
155.2
GBP estimate
modal price catalogue
price catalogue
789
Estimated range lower
155.2
GBP estimate
modal price catalogue
price catalogue
789
Estimated range upper
295.0
GBP estimate
modal price catalogue
price catalogue
789
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)
65.0
GBP expected contribution
140
price catalogue
789
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)
38.3
GBP expected contribution
180
price catalogue
789
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)
23.4
GBP expected contribution
150
price catalogue
789
Noise, emissions and leaks: Exhaust rear silencer
20.8
GBP expected contribution
200
price catalogue
789
Tyres: Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)
7.7
GBP expected contribution
90
price catalogue
789
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Is the Smart City more reliable than similar cars?
Of 8 similar models, 3 fail less often for their age than the Smart City and 5 as often or more. The Smart City has an MOT Risk Index of 92.3, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 789).
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Smart City (this model)
92.3
index
100 = normal
2024
789
MCC Smart
91.4
index
92.3
2024
855
Subaru Justy
93.3
index
92.3
2024
659
Daihatsu Charade
98.1
index
92.3
2024
1241
Nissan Figaro
92.7
index
92.3
2024
2413
Smart Roadster (798 tests)
68.4
index
92.3
2024
798
Smart City-Coupe
98.6
index
92.3
2024
4878
Smart Roadster (1,584 tests)
72.3
index
92.3
2024
1584
Full table
Further values · 2024
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Renault Wind
102.4
index
92.3
2024
2065
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
How many miles does a Smart City normally do?
Smart City: Age 17 median (rough estimate) is 65747 miles (2024).
Age 17 median (rou: 65747. Age 19 P75 (rough : 87859. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 17 median (rough estimate)
65747
miles
2024
104
Age 17 P25 (rough estimate)
48330
miles
2024
104
Age 17 P75 (rough estimate)
85901
miles
2024
104
Age 18 median (rough estimate)
63664
miles
2024
146
Age 18 P25 (rough estimate)
49411
miles
2024
146
Age 18 P75 (rough estimate)
78702
miles
2024
146
Age 19 median (rough estimate)
72987
miles
2024
156
Age 19 P25 (rough estimate)
57817
miles
2024
156
Full table
Further values · 2024
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 19 P75 (rough estimate)
87859
miles
2024
156
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Does high mileage mean more Smart City MOT failures at the same age?
At ages 15+, 31.3% of Smart Citys with under 40,000 miles failed first time, against 41.0% of those with 100,000 to 140,000 miles (2024, n = 161). No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 15+, <40k miles (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 22.4–41.9%)
31.3
% failed first time
2024
83
Age 15+, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 313 tests, 95% interval 32.2–42.9%)
37.4
% failed first time
2024
313
Age 15+, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 292 tests, 95% interval 36.3–47.5%)
41.8
% failed first time
2024
292
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 78 tests, 95% interval 30.8–52.1%)
41
% failed first time
2024
78
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
How many miles does a Smart City last?
10.9% of Smart Citys tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 1.1% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 717).
100,000 miles: 10.9. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
100,000 miles
10.9
% of tested cars
2024
717
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 70 tests, 95% interval 0.8–1.4%)
1.1
% of tested cars
2024
70
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 13 tests, 95% interval 0.1–0.3%)
0.2
% of tested cars
2024
13
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Is the Smart City driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?
This fleet is driven less than average.Matched on annual mileage as well as age (test chains 2019–2024), the index is 104.2, on the other side of normal, so both readings are shown.
Both readings are shown: this comparison changes when usage or inspection rules differ.
Age and mileage adjusted index: 94.1 vs 104.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age and mileage adjusted index
104.2
index
94.1
2019–2024
789
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Where in Britain does the Smart City fail its MOT most?
Smart City fails first-time MOTs most in Bournemouth (BH): 57.5% against 41.8% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 160).
London E (E) (rough estimate: 103 tests, 95% interval 28.2–46.5%)
36.9
% fail first time
39.0
2024
103
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Does a Smart City rust more than average?
Allowing for age, Smart City MOTs record corrosion failures at 3.0 times the national rate: 2.33% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 787).
Computed, not measured.
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Salt belt susceptibility
3.0
ratio estimate
1
2024 + geographic layers
787
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Is a Smart City ULEZ compliant?
An estimated 31.9% of Smart Citys tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific car with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).
Computed, not measured.
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Likely compliant
31.9
% estimate
2024
789
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Smart City?
Of failed Smart City MOTs, 25.1% were retested the same day and a further 70.2% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 1,844).
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Same-day retest
25.1
%
failed initial tests
2019–2024
1844
Retest within 10 days
70.2
%
failed initial tests
2019–2024
1844
Clean MOT streak
26.4
%
observed chains
2019–2024
1208
Repeat advisory
37.6
%
observed chains
2019–2024
1208
Decreasing odometer
3.7
% mileage anomaly
observed chains
2019–2024
1360
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
If a Smart City fails, does it fail again?
39.4% of Smart Citys that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 36.6% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 647). The failure most likely to come back is tyres: 41.7% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.
Repeat after fail: 39.4 vs 36.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Repeat after fail
39.4
%
36.6
2019–2024
647
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Which Smart City faults come together?
On Smart Citys, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ failures turn up together 4.3 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 117).
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
15
tests with both
2024
15
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
14
tests with both
2024
14
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
12
tests with both
2024
12
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
10
tests with both
2024
10
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
10
tests with both
2024
10
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
10
tests with both
2024
10
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
9
tests with both
2024
9
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
8
tests with both
2024
8
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
7
tests with both
2024
7
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)
7
tests with both
2024
7
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
What does a Smart City cost to run in a fleet?
Of every 100 Smart Citys tested at age 17, about 40 failed the MOT first time (rough estimate); at age 19, about 35 (rough estimate). These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time (2024).
Smart City: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
Measure
Value
Unit
Compared with
Years
Tests
Age 17 (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 31.5–50.0%)
40.4
% fail first time
2024
104
Age 18 (rough estimate: 146 tests, 95% interval 34.7–50.6%)
42.5
% fail first time
2024
146
Age 19 (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 27.6–42.4%)
34.6
% fail first time
2024
156
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 789 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Does the month of a Smart City MOT matter?
Smart Citys fail first time most in April (45.3%, against 29.8% for all cars that month) and least in July (39.0%) (2024, n = 789).
How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.
Report an error
What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.
Smart City MOT: quick answers
What is the Smart City first-time MOT pass rate?
61.0% of first attempts passed in 2024 (789 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 789 primary tests: 39.04% failed first time and 68.6% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 92.3 is shown separately.