MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Which Smart models fail their MOT less for their age?

In 2024, 77.7% of MOTs on the 7 Smart models published here passed (71.4% first time, 6.3% after a fix at the test centre), from 86,324 first tests. Allowing for age (not mileage), these Smart models fail 6% less often than normal: brand MOT Risk Index 93.9 (95% CI 92.9–94.9; 100 = normal).

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Among Smart models with at least 10,000 first tests, the Smart Fortwo has the lowest index (87.6) and the Smart Forfour the highest (115.0). On raw pass rates, the Smart Forfour comes first instead, because the models' fleets differ in age.

dot · Smart · MOT Risk Index · 93.9 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index with 95% intervals; 100 = normal; Smart 93.9 for the brand. Smart Fortwo: 87.6 (86.4–88.8). Smart Forfour: 115.0 (112.7–117.4). Axis from 80 to 130. 2 of 7 models shown; all are in the table below. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 25 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

Which Smart models fail least and most for their age?

Of the 7 Smart models, 3 fail less often than normal for their age, 1 more often, and 3 cannot be told apart from normal because their 95% intervals include 100.

Smart models by MOT Risk Index, lowest first (2024)
ModelMOT pass rate, %Passed first time, %MOT Risk Index95% intervalFirst tests
Smart Roadster (798 tests)75.971.068.461.2–76.0798
Smart Roadster (1,584 tests)74.669.672.367.1–77.81,584
Smart Fortwo78.071.587.686.4–88.851,770
Smart EQ Forfour91.788.689.880.6–100.02,569
Smart City68.661.092.384.4–100.4789
Smart City-Coupe67.158.898.695.3–101.94,878
Smart Forfour78.472.5115.0112.7–117.423,936

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 86,324 (initial tests) · Method: MOT Risk Index = observed first-time failures ÷ failures expected for the same age profile × 100; brand index sums both over the 7 models · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where are Smart models worse than other cars of the same age?

Allowing for age, Smart models fail on noise, emissions and leaks more than other cars of the same age: 4.8 failures per 100 tests against 4.0 expected (0.8 more; 95% interval 0.71 to 0.83).

Smart: failures per 100 tests by group against the same-age expectation (2019–2024)
Failure groupSmart, per 100 testsExpected for the same ageDifference95% intervalMost common failure on (models)
Noise, emissions and leaks4.84.0+0.80.71 to 0.830 of 7
Visibility8.78.2+0.50.45 to 0.611 of 7
Identification of the vehicle0.40.4+0.0-0.01 to 0.020 of 7
Road Wheels0.20.4-0.3-0.27 to -0.240 of 7
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems0.51.2-0.7-0.69 to -0.650 of 7
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment17.618.7-1.1-1.23 to -1.006 of 7
Tyres7.89.0-1.3-1.34 to -1.190 of 7
Steering1.63.0-1.3-1.38 to -1.310 of 7
Brakes9.712.3-2.6-2.65 to -2.490 of 7
Body, chassis, structure3.16.0-2.9-2.93 to -2.840 of 7
Suspension10.516.1-5.6-5.71 to -5.530 of 7

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 517,285 (initial tests of the 7 models) · Method: failure items per 100 tests against the rate expected for the same age and kind of vehicle; interval from the count of failures (Poisson); a group is named only when its interval is wholly above zero and it is at least 5% above the expected rate · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Smart MOT statistics by model 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 25 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/brand/smart/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.