MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Kia Stinger — MOT statistics 2024

The Kia Stinger failed 13.17% of 2,119 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 83.5 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 16% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 83.5, 95% CI 74.8–93.1 (100 = national average) 100 83.5 0 200
Index
83.5
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
13.17%
n = 2,119
Dangerous /100
8
national ≈11
Rank
292 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Infiniti Q30 (index 83.5) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Kia Stinger common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are well below the reference at 1.1 per 100 tests, against 3.0 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Kia Stinger common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 5 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 2 of these are already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Tyres7.85376.41.21×1.12–1.32
Visibility5.23605.01.03×0.94–1.15 · not distinguishable
Brakes3.52373.31.05×0.91–1.17 · not distinguishable
Lamps & electrical1.1743.00.37×0.28–0.45
Identification0.7510.32.80×2.21–3.91
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 6,867 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm2.322.151.08×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Wiper blade defectiveWiper blade defective1.411.261.12×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged2.622.541.03×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged1.461.630.90×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements3.233.590.90×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen1.702.220.76×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view1.502.360.64×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Kia Stinger MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 40.4 per 100 tests; Identification is lowest at 0.8 per 100 tests — the gap is 39.6 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Kia Stinger MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres40.4
Brakes23.2
Non-component advisories3.6
Identification0.8

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Kia Stinger against cars of the same age

AgePartKia StingerSame age, petrol and dieselDifference
3 yearsTyres4.64.170.43
3 yearsBrakes1.461.77-0.31
3 yearsSuspension0.090.63-0.54
4 yearsTyres5.714.541.17
4 yearsBrakes1.822.43-0.61
4 yearsSuspension0.051.21-1.16
5 yearsTyres6.045.060.98
5 yearsBrakes3.083.09-0.01
5 yearsSuspension02.19-2.19

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed16.7%144
It passed11.5%4,148

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (16.7% against 11.5%): the difference is within the margin of error. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 6,866 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only75.3fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage80.4fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year7.3%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.1 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Kia Stinger compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeKia StingerSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years9.25%10.78%-1.53 pp2,130
4 years11.73%12.34%-0.61 pp1,978
5 years13.04%14.17%-1.13 pp1,756
6 years12.67%16.08%-3.41 pp789

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Kia Stinger perform as it gets older?

The Stinger at age 6 is well below the reference at 13.7%, against 17.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Kia Stinger perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–25%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeKia StingerAll vehiclesGap
39.3%12.4%-3.1 pp
412.4%13.1%-0.7 pp
513.1%15.1%-2.0 pp
613.7%17.5%-3.8 pp
716.9%20.2%-3.3 pp

Is a Kia Stinger ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Kia Stinger MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.

Based on 2,119 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 3
3–5 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,325
6–7 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 791
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are Kia Stinger MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 7.8 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Kia Stinger MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor3.2614.220.23×
Major7.7952.750.15×
Dangerous8.2111.150.74×

Chart values: Minor 3.3 · Major 7.8 · Dangerous 8.2.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Kia Stinger MOT matter?

Apr is highest at 15.4%; Oct is lowest at 8.4% — the gap is 7.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Kia Stinger MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 7%–33%.

bars: Kia Stinger · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthKia StingerAll vehiclesGap
Jan9.17%31.12%-22.0 pp
Feb10.96%29.99%-19.0 pp
Mar12.12%28.26%-16.1 pp
Apr15.38%29.78%-14.4 pp
May11.88%28.79%-16.9 pp
Jun13.64%28.15%-14.5 pp
Jul13.27%29.33%-16.1 pp
Aug9.48%29.2%-19.7 pp
Sep10.27%28.19%-17.9 pp
Oct8.38%30.34%-22.0 pp
Nov12.26%30.58%-18.3 pp
Dec10.36%29.33%-19.0 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 7.0 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Kia Stinger average mileage by age

At age 5, the middle half of Stingers runs from 27,461 miles to 48,171 miles, against 36,751 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Kia Stinger · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–59k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Kia Stinger MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 3–5, 10% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 17.1% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Kia Stinger MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Kia Stinger: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
3–5<40k miles10%8.2–12.1%872
3–540-70k miles17.1%13.7–21.1%398 (rough estimate)
6–9<40k miles12.4%9.3–16.2%356 (rough estimate)
6–940-70k miles14.2%11–18.3%351 (rough estimate)
6–970-100k miles20.3%12.7–30.8%74 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
315,24920,01226,731161
419,03527,21536,568217
527,46136,75148,171947
631,37141,67454,923655
731,07742,59856,391136

A typical 5-year-old Stinger has ~36,751 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Kia Stinger fails its MOT most

Nottingham area is highest at 21.2%; Birmingham area is lowest at 6.3% — the gap is 14.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Nottingham (NG)21.24%+9.8 pp
Glasgow (G)20.3%+8.8 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Birmingham (B)6.33%-5.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

Kia Stinger survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 7 is well below the reference at 9.0%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Kia Stinger survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
32,130100%9.25%
41,978100%11.73%
51,756100%13.04%
678952.3%12.67%
71369%16.91%

By age 7, only about 9% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈1,508); survivors still fail at 16.9% vs 11.7% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many years is a Kia Stinger likely to last?

Bought at age 5 stands out at 1.1 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 1.1

estimateObserved only until age 7. The curve does not run five years past the stated age with the share still tested under 50%, so no 'years left' number is given.

Kia Stinger faults that come together

Brakes + Tyres stand out at 6.30×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
BrakesTyres536.3× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility442.63× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility16too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres10too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility10too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility8too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres6too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Brakes» and «Tyres» appear together 6.30× more often than chance (53 co-occurrences in the same test; 55 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Kia Stinger?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 7.4%, against 16.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year7.43%636
8–12k miles/year16.5%728
Gap (low − normal)-9.07 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
56.984316.09174-9.12 pp

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
56.6935917.42310-10.73 pp
68.6717312.34154-3.67 pp
74.884125.8131-20.93 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 7.4% vs 16.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 9.1 pp lower (n_low=636, n_normal=728). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 7.0% low-use vs 16.1% normal (-9.1 pp).

Which Kia Stinger engine is best?

diesel over 2.0 is highest at 129.7; petrol over 2.0 is lowest at 85.2 — the gap is 44.5 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrolover 2.0 litre85.29.83%3,215 (rough estimate)
petrol1.8–2.0 litre100.411.47%2,067 (rough estimate)
dieselover 2.0 litre129.714.83%1,585 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel over 2.0 runs at 129.7 against this model's own age norm while the petrol over 2.0 runs at 85.2 — a spread of 44.5 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Best year for a Kia Stinger, and the years to avoid

Build year 2019 is highest at 104.6; Build year 2017 is lowest at 73.4 — the gap is 31.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Kia Stinger build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Kia Stinger by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
202097.168.1–126.110.09%426no different
2019104.693.5–115.811.69%2,875no different
2018101.290.1–112.311.92%2,667no different
201773.452.2–94.68.78%524better

The best build year here is 2017 and the weakest is 2017. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 4 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Kia Stinger MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £13.81 to £26.24, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£14–26
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Tyres7.8 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£7.02
Brakes3.5 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£5.25
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1.1 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£1.54

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £14 to £26, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Kia Stinger running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 7 stand out at 17.0%, against 13.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 5
13
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 947 tests)
At age 7
17
other cars of this model tested at age 7 in 2024 (rough estimate: 136 tests)
Repairs per 100
£1,381
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 41.04% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
39.32%20,012161-3.8 pp
412.44%27,215217-0.7 pp
513.09%36,751947+0.0 pp
613.74%41,674655+0.7 pp
716.91%42,598136+3.8 pp

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Kia Stinger rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure stands out at 82nd percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
82nd
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Kia Stinger has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Kia Stinger advisory become a failure?

Tyres are highest at 7.3%; Brakes are lowest at 5.4% — the gap is 1.9 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Tyres7.3%11.9 months6,9281,052
Brakes5.4%12.1 months8,279588

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 7 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 11.9 months and roughly 6,928 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Kia Stinger?

Tyres after a failure at age <3 are highest at 9.8%; Brakes after a passed at age <3 are lowest at 1.2% — the gap is 8.6 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedTyres 4.8% · Visibility 3.7% · Brakes 1.2%988
<3advisoryTyres 6.0% · Visibility 4.9% · Brakes 2.9%347 (rough estimate)
<3failureTyres 9.8% · Visibility 5.3%133 (rough estimate)
3-5passedTyres 4.7% · Visibility 4.4% · Brakes 2.3%2,043
3-5advisoryTyres 7.5% · Visibility 6.9% · Brakes 3.9%845
3-5failureTyres 9.7% · Visibility 5.7% · Brakes 4.5%402 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Kia Stinger ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 56.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 2.2% — the gap is 54.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
41.04%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.167
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
39.51%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
0.207%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 597 failures followed through to their re-test, 41.04% were repaired and passed the same day and 56.78% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 1,005 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.167 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 6,848 miles a year across 1,933 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 39.51% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 5.51% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 0.207% of 1,934 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 13,842 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Kia Stinger safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 13.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Kia Stinger recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Kia Stinger. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2020: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2022: 0 · 2023: 0 · 2024: 10.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Kia Stinger
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2024/30408/08/2024362Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/202450Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/2024283Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/2024217Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/2024144Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
All 13 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2024/30408/08/202424/11/2016 – 07/03/2023362Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/202424/11/2016 – 07/03/202350Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/202424/11/2016 – 07/03/2023283Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/202424/11/2016 – 07/03/2023217Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/202424/11/2016 – 07/03/2023144Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/30408/08/202424/11/2016 – 07/03/20231Kia Stinger Oil Feed Pipe Leak
R/2024/25317/06/202405/12/2016 – 04/04/2023163Kia Stinger High Pressure Fuel Pump Recall
R/2024/25317/06/202405/12/2016 – 04/04/2023107Kia Stinger High Pressure Fuel Pump Recall
R/2024/25317/06/202405/12/2016 – 04/04/2023261Kia Stinger High Pressure Fuel Pump Recall
R/2024/25317/06/202405/12/2016 – 04/04/2023103Kia Stinger High Pressure Fuel Pump Recall
R/2021/15517/05/202108/08/2018 – 05/03/2019283THE ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT WITHIN THE HECU MAY EXPERIENCE A SHORT CIRCUIT CONDITION
R/2021/15517/05/202129/12/2016 – 31/12/2016283THE ELECTRICAL CIRCUIT WITHIN THE HECU MAY EXPERIENCE A SHORT CIRCUIT CONDITION
R/2020/36316/11/202013/05/2020 – 17/07/20201THE VEHICLE MAY EXPERIENCE A LOSS OF POWER DUE TO INSUFFICIENT FUEL SUPPLY TO THE ENGINE

DVSA lists 13 safety recall campaigns for the Kia Stinger, covering roughly 2,258 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Kia Stinger technical service bulletins: what dealers are told

US market, Kia STINGER, model years 2018–2022 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.

NHTSA manufacturer communications are 141.

bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults

These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.

United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications

US technical service bulletins by communication year; leading subjects cover the full file
Communication yearBulletinsLeading subjects across all years
20173
  • Electrical system (54)
  • Engine and cooling (43)
  • Equipment (29)
  • Structure (14)
  • Powertrain (13)
  • Engine (12)
  • Service Brakes, Hydraulic (6)
  • Visibility (5)
201841
201919
202011
202122
202211
202316
20243
20256
20269

Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.

Kia Stinger owner complaints: what goes wrong

US market, Kia STINGER, model years 2018–2022 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.

Engine (not MOT-tested) is highest at 51; Body & structure are lowest at 6 — the gap is 45.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Owner complaints (US) against actual MOT failures (UK) for the same component groups
ComponentComplaintsShareMOT fail items per 100MOT rankAgreement
Engine (not MOT-tested)5131.5%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Lamps & electrical4427.2%1.1#4complained about, fails occasionally
Brakes3018.5%3.5#3complained about and fails often
Transmission (not MOT-tested)138.0%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Visibility116.8%5.2#2complained about and fails often
Body & structure63.7%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure

Two different populations answering two different questions: the MOT records what an inspector can measure once a year, the complaint file records what annoyed or frightened an owner on the road. A component high in one column and absent from the other is the interesting case — driver-assistance and electronics dominate complaints while almost never appearing as an MOT failure item.

What the reports actually say
While driving the steering wheel jerks back and forth as if it's trying to help assist in keeping in lanes even with the lane assistant off and it doesn't matter what speed it jerks the whole time. The steering wheel will also move on its own back and forth while in a parked position too. It's very dangerous because it's trying to jerk you all around the road at no matter what speed you're doing.
NHTSA complaint, filed 08/01/2026 · STEERING
The oil pressure light is coming on . Even after doing oil change at dealership it’s not going away. Confirmed that the issue was with the oil pressure switch at dealership, which is a common problem for 3.3L V6 engines . Similar issue was observed in other older models with similar engine and the warranty was extended to cover this issue (WTY026).
NHTSA complaint, filed 03/12/2026 · FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM

US owners have filed 162 complaints about the equivalent Kia Stinger to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including 5 that mention a crash, 8 a fire and 2 an injury. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.

Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.

Kia Stinger MOT: quick answers

Kia Stinger MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 83.5, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Kia Stinger first-time MOT pass rate?
86.83% of first attempts passed in 2024 (2,119 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 13.17% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 2,119 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 83.5 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Kia Stinger with other cars

Vauxhall Viva is highest at 83.5; Kia Stinger is lowest at 83.5 — the gap is 0.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Kia MOT statisticsKia Stonic MOT statsKia Niro MOT stats

Similar risk

Infiniti Q30 (index 83.5)Subaru XV (index 83.5)Vauxhall Viva (index 83.5)

Same size class

how Toyota Supra compareshow Ford Capri compareshow Nissan Skyline compares

By build year

Kia Stinger 2017Kia Stinger 2018Kia Stinger 2019Kia Stinger 2020

By area

Kia Stinger MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Kia Stinger brakes failuresKia Stinger vehicle identification failuresKia Stinger lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresKia Stinger noise, emissions and leaks failuresKia Stinger tyres failuresKia Stinger visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:kia-stinger:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Kia Stinger MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/kia-stinger/ · Published 2026-07-30.