Infiniti Q30 — MOT statistics 2024
The Infiniti Q30 failed 17.51% of 4,866 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 83.5 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 16% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Subaru XV (index 83.5) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.
Infiniti Q30 common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Visibility is well below the reference at 3.0 per 100 tests, against 5.3 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 5.2 | 1,364 | 7.0 | 0.74×0.70–0.77 |
| Lamps & electrical | 3.6 | 943 | 4.4 | 0.81×0.76–0.86 |
| Suspension | 3.1 | 821 | 3.4 | 0.90×0.85–0.97 |
| Brakes | 3.1 | 819 | 4.3 | 0.72×0.67–0.77 |
| Visibility | 3.0 | 799 | 5.3 | 0.56×0.53–0.61 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.7 | 194 | 1.0 | 0.71×0.65–0.87 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or…A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED | 1.12 | 1.24 | 0.90× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen | 0.92 | 1.62 | 0.57× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 1.44 | 2.15 | 0.67× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged | 0.87 | 1.63 | 0.53× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 0.90 | 1.78 | 0.50× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated | 1.01 | 1.90 | 0.53× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged | 1.55 | 2.54 | 0.61× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view | 1.03 | 2.36 | 0.44× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 2.20 | 3.59 | 0.61× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Spring or spring component fractured or seriously…A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | 0.93 | 2.86 | 0.33× | Ask the seller about: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Infiniti Q30 MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Tyres are highest at 45.7 per 100 tests; Emissions & leaks are lowest at 0.2 per 100 tests — the gap is 45.5 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Tyres | 45.7 |
| Brakes | 23 |
| Non-component advisories | 7 |
| Suspension | 1.5 |
| Identification | 0.7 |
| Emissions & leaks | 0.2 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
Tyres, brakes and suspension: Infiniti Q30 against cars of the same age
| Age | Part | Infiniti Q30 | Same age, petrol and diesel | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | Tyres | 1.98 | 4.17 | -2.19 |
| 3 years | Brakes | 1 | 1.77 | -0.77 |
| 3 years | Suspension | 0.12 | 0.63 | -0.51 |
| 4 years | Tyres | 3.15 | 4.54 | -1.39 |
| 4 years | Brakes | 1.76 | 2.43 | -0.67 |
| 4 years | Suspension | 0.58 | 1.21 | -0.63 |
| 5 years | Tyres | 3.85 | 5.06 | -1.21 |
| 5 years | Brakes | 2.64 | 3.09 | -0.45 |
| 5 years | Suspension | 1.04 | 2.19 | -1.15 |
| 6 years | Tyres | 4.46 | 5.54 | -1.08 |
| 6 years | Brakes | 2.58 | 3.81 | -1.23 |
| 6 years | Suspension | 2.99 | 3.72 | -0.73 |
| 7 years | Tyres | 4.63 | 5.95 | -1.32 |
| 7 years | Brakes | 3.3 | 4.55 | -1.25 |
| 7 years | Suspension | 6.03 | 5.68 | 0.35 |
| 8 years | Tyres | 5.15 | 6.31 | -1.16 |
| 8 years | Brakes | 3.13 | 5.38 | -2.25 |
| 8 years | Suspension | 8.06 | 7.78 | 0.28 |
Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 19.1% | 702 |
| It passed | 12.5% | 18,293 |
A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 6.6 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 21.6% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 25,472 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 69.0 | fails less often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 68.6 | fails less often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 2.2% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage changes little here (-0.4 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Infiniti Q30 compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Infiniti Q30 | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | 5.62% | 11.31% | -5.69 pp | 5,698 |
| 4 years | 9.69% | 14.24% | -4.55 pp | 4,818 |
| 5 years | 12.11% | 17.42% | -5.31 pp | 4,882 |
| 6 years | 14.42% | 20.76% | -6.34 pp | 4,682 |
| 7 years | 17.49% | 24.33% | -6.83 pp | 4,362 |
| 8 years | 18.69% | 28.15% | -9.46 pp | 1,787 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Infiniti Q30 perform as it gets older?
The Q30 at age 6 is well below the reference at 11.0%, against 17.5% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–29%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Infiniti Q30 | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 11.7% | 15.1% | -3.4 pp |
| 6 | 11.0% | 17.5% | -6.5 pp |
| 7 | 18.0% | 20.2% | -2.2 pp |
| 8 | 18.7% | 23.3% | -4.6 pp |
Is an Infiniti Q30 ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Infiniti Q30 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.
Based on 4,866 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 205 |
| 6–7 years | 100.0% Check a registration with TfL | n = 2,874 |
| 8 years | 100.0% Check a registration with TfL | n = 1,775 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 12 |
| 10–14 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 15–17 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
How dangerous are Infiniti Q30 MOT failures?
Major defects are well below the reference at 10.9 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 3.69 | 14.22 | 0.26× |
| Major | 10.90 | 52.75 | 0.21× |
| Dangerous | 5.44 | 11.15 | 0.49× |
Chart values: Minor 3.7 · Major 10.9 · Dangerous 5.4.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of an Infiniti Q30 MOT matter?
Dec is highest at 13.7%; Jun is lowest at 9.8% — the gap is 3.9 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 8%–33%.
bars: Infiniti Q30 · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Infiniti Q30 | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 11.6% | 31.12% | -19.5 pp |
| Feb | 11.23% | 29.99% | -18.8 pp |
| Mar | 11.72% | 28.26% | -16.5 pp |
| Apr | 12.57% | 29.78% | -17.2 pp |
| May | 11.73% | 28.79% | -17.1 pp |
| Jun | 9.77% | 28.15% | -18.4 pp |
| Jul | 11.65% | 29.33% | -17.7 pp |
| Aug | 11.94% | 29.2% | -17.3 pp |
| Sep | 13.34% | 28.19% | -14.9 pp |
| Oct | 12.74% | 30.34% | -17.6 pp |
| Nov | 12.6% | 30.58% | -18.0 pp |
| Dec | 13.71% | 29.33% | -15.6 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.9 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Infiniti Q30 average mileage by age
At age 8, the middle half of Q30s runs from 50,338 miles to 79,615 miles, against 63,804 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–84k mi.
Does high mileage mean more Infiniti Q30 MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 6–9, 11.5% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 28.6% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–5 | <40k miles | 9.5% | 5.6–15.6% | 137 (rough estimate) |
| 3–5 | 40-70k miles | 15.9% | 8.9–26.8% | 63 (rough estimate) |
| 6–9 | <40k miles | 11.5% | 9.5–13.8% | 820 |
| 6–9 | 40-70k miles | 17.2% | 15.7–18.7% | 2,477 |
| 6–9 | 70-100k miles | 21.1% | 18.8–23.6% | 1,103 |
| 6–9 | 100-140k miles | 28.6% | 23.1–34.8% | 224 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 25,293 | 33,449 | 42,467 | 205 |
| 6 | 31,853 | 42,929 | 57,076 | 309 |
| 7 | 42,649 | 54,441 | 69,349 | 2,565 |
| 8 | 50,338 | 63,804 | 79,615 | 1,775 |
A typical 8-year-old Q30 has ~63,804 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Infiniti Q30 fails its MOT most
Chelmsford area is highest at 24.1%; Nottingham area is lowest at 3.2% — the gap is 20.9 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Chelmsford (CM) | 24.09% | +12.1 pp |
| Wigan (WN) | 19.66% | +7.7 pp |
| Kirkcaldy (KY) | 18.26% | +6.3 pp |
| Aberdeen (AB) | 17.51% | +5.5 pp |
| Northampton (NN) | 16.38% | +4.4 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Nottingham (NG) | 3.24% | -8.7 pp |
| Coventry (CV) | 5.53% | -6.5 pp |
| Sheffield (S) | 8.1% | -3.9 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 6%–16% failing.
Infiniti Q30 survival: which cars are still on the road
By age 8 is well below the reference at 37.3%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.
Survival vs fail rate by age
| Age | Tests | Survival vs ages 4–6 | Fail % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 5,698 | 100% | 5.62% |
| 4 | 4,818 | 100% | 9.69% |
| 5 | 4,882 | 100% | 12.11% |
| 6 | 4,682 | 97.7% | 14.42% |
| 7 | 4,362 | 91% | 17.49% |
| 8 | 1,787 | 37.3% | 18.69% |
By age 8, only about 37% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈4,794); survivors still fail at 18.7% vs 9.7% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.
How many years is an Infiniti Q30 likely to last?
Bought at age 5 is highest at 2.8 years; Bought at age 8 is lowest at 0.5 years — the gap is 2.3 years.
bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve
| Age now | Typical mileage (p50) | Expected years left |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | — | at least 2.8 |
| 8 | — | at least 0.5 |
estimateObserved only until age 8. The curve does not run five years past the stated age with the share still tested under 50%, so no 'years left' number is given.
Infiniti Q30 faults that come together
Lamps & electrical + Emissions & leaks stand out at 6.20×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 28 | 6.2× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 27 | 6.16× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 25 | 6.1× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 95 | 4.4× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 29 | 4.38× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 71 | 4.03× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 87 | 3.65× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 56 | 3.56× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 52 | 3.53× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 74 | 3.21× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 51 | 3.2× (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 80 | 3.1× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 44 | 3.08× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Visibility | 43 | 2.52× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 15 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 14 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Tyres | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 10 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Tyres | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 6.20× more often than chance (28 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Is low mileage better for an Infiniti Q30?
Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 9.2%, against 16.1% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Band | Fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| <5k miles/year | 9.18% | 1,764 |
| 8–12k miles/year | 16.1% | 4,995 |
| Gap (low − normal) | -6.91 pp | — |
By fuel and age
Diesel
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 6.81 | 426 | 13.9 | 1,432 | -7.09 pp |
| 6 | 9.92 | 393 | 16.61 | 1,511 | -6.69 pp |
| 7 | 12.19 | 361 | 18.92 | 1,480 | -6.73 pp |
| 8 | 12.12 | 132 | 19.97 | 666 | -7.85 pp |
Petrol
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 8.06 | 248 | 11.67 | 240 | -3.6 pp |
| 6 | 10.77 | 195 | 15.85 | 183 | -5.08 pp |
| 7 | 6.38 | 141 | 19.46 | 149 | -13.08 pp |
At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 9.2% vs 16.1% for 8–12k miles/year — 6.9 pp lower (n_low=1,764, n_normal=4,995). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.
Which Infiniti Q30 engine is best?
diesel 1.2–1.5 is highest at 108.9; petrol 1.8–2.0 is lowest at 76.5 — the gap is 32.4 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
| Fuel | Capacity | vs own age norm | Raw fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| petrol | 1.8–2.0 litre | 76.5 | 8.58% | 1,480 (rough estimate) |
| diesel | over 2.0 litre | 90.2 | 11.04% | 7,253 |
| petrol | 1.5–1.8 litre | 93.8 | 10.63% | 3,189 (rough estimate) |
| diesel | 1.5–1.8 litre | 101.5 | 13.08% | 130 (rough estimate) |
| diesel | 1.2–1.5 litre | 108.9 | 13.13% | 14,216 |
Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.2–1.5 runs at 108.9 against this model's own age norm while the diesel over 2.0 runs at 90.2 — a spread of 18.7 points between two cars that share a name.
Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.
Infiniti Q30 MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £21.35 to £40.56, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 3.1 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £5.58 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 3.6 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £5.04 |
| Tyres | 5.2 (nat. 8.7) | Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted) | £90 | £4.68 |
| Brakes | 3.1 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £4.65 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 0.7 (nat. 3.67) | Exhaust rear silencer | £200 | £1.40 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £21 to £41, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Infiniti Q30 running costs for a fleet
Vehicles failing at age 8 stand out at 19.0%, against 12.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
| Age | Fails | Median odometer | Tests | Gap vs age 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 11.71% | 33,449 | 205 | +0.0 pp |
| 6 | 11% | 42,929 | 309 | -0.7 pp |
| 7 | 17.97% | 54,441 | 2,565 | +6.3 pp |
| 8 | 18.7% | 63,804 | 1,775 | +7.0 pp |
No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).
Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.
Infiniti Q30 rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at <0.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Infiniti Q30 virtually never fails on corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish. Both point the same way and reinforce each other: it resists corrosion even though its owners live in saltier areas than most.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does an Infiniti Q30 advisory become a failure?
Tyres are highest at 5.8%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 5.8 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 5.8% | 12 months | 7,900 | 4,971 |
| Brakes | 5.2% | 12 months | 8,245 | 2,905 |
| Non-component advisories | 0.0% | — | — | 1,286 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 6 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 7,900 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on an Infiniti Q30?
Suspension after a advisory at age 6-8 is highest at 8.2%; Brakes after a passed at age <3 are lowest at 1.2% — the gap is 7.0 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| <3 | passed | Tyres 3.0% · Visibility 1.9% · Brakes 1.2% | 3,013 |
| <3 | advisory | Tyres 3.8% · Visibility 2.7% · Brakes 2.0% | 664 |
| <3 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3.9% · Tyres 3.9% | 180 (rough estimate) |
| 3-5 | passed | Tyres 3.2% · Visibility 2.5% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 2.3% | 8,044 |
| 3-5 | advisory | Tyres 4.9% · Visibility 3.3% · Brakes 3.3% | 4,055 |
| 3-5 | failure | Tyres 5.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.9% · Visibility 4.7% | 1,480 |
| 6-8 | passed | Suspension 7.1% · Tyres 4.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3.7% | 2,018 |
| 6-8 | advisory | Suspension 8.2% · Tyres 6.5% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.3% | 1,332 |
| 6-8 | failure | Suspension 7.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 6.1% · Tyres 6.1% | 704 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Infiniti Q30 ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The same-day re-test pass rate is highest at 49.3%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 3.3% — the gap is 46.0 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 2,265 failures followed through to their re-test, 49.27% were repaired and passed the same day and 47.42% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 3,725 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.171 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 6,981 miles a year across 4,874 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 50.18% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 19.08% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 1.662% of 4,875 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 10,980 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Infiniti Q30 safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 6.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
recall campaigns launched per year
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2018/382 | 04/01/2019 | 1,636 | GEAR SHIFT INDICATOR MAY NOT BEHAVE AS INTENDED |
R/2017/293 | 02/01/2018 | 4,970 | DRIVER'S AIRBAG MAY DEPLOY |
R/2017/083 | 30/04/2017 | 8 | SUPPLEMENTARY RESTARINT SYSTEM MAY NOT ACT AS INTENDED. |
R/2016/301 | 01/02/2017 | 3 | AIRBAG MAY NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY |
R/2016/227 | 12/12/2016 | 2,250 | REAR SEAT BELT MAY NOT SECURE THE PASSENGER |
All 6 campaigns
| Reference | Launched | Build dates | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R/2018/382 | 04/01/2019 | 01/03/2015 – 22/08/2018 | 1,636 | GEAR SHIFT INDICATOR MAY NOT BEHAVE AS INTENDED |
R/2017/293 | 02/01/2018 | 01/01/2016 – 19/07/2017 | 4,970 | DRIVER'S AIRBAG MAY DEPLOY |
R/2017/083 | 30/04/2017 | 19/10/2015 – 07/02/2017 | 8 | SUPPLEMENTARY RESTARINT SYSTEM MAY NOT ACT AS INTENDED. |
R/2016/301 | 01/02/2017 | 10/08/2016 – 27/09/2016 | 3 | AIRBAG MAY NOT DEPLOY CORRECTLY |
R/2016/227 | 12/12/2016 | 04/08/2015 – 18/07/2016 | 2,250 | REAR SEAT BELT MAY NOT SECURE THE PASSENGER |
R/2016/228 | 12/12/2016 | 01/03/2015 – 08/03/2016 | 283 | ANCHORAGE POINT MAY BE INCORRECTLY POSITIONED AND MAY NOT RESTRAIN THE PASSENGER |
DVSA lists 6 safety recall campaigns for the Infiniti Q30, covering roughly 9,150 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
Infiniti Q30 MOT: quick answers
Infiniti Q30 MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 83.5, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Infiniti Q30 first-time MOT pass rate?
- 82.49% of first attempts passed in 2024 (4,866 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 17.51% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 4,866 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 83.5 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Infiniti Q30 with other cars
Volkswagen Touareg is highest at 83.5; Infiniti Q30 is lowest at 83.5 — the gap is 0.0 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Similar risk
Subaru XV (index 83.5)Vauxhall Viva (index 83.5)Volkswagen Touareg (index 83.5)
Same size class
how Smart City-Coupe compareshow Aston Martin Vantage compareshow Honda S2000 compares
By build year
Infiniti Q30 2016Infiniti Q30 2017Infiniti Q30 2018Infiniti Q30 2019
By area
Infiniti Q30 MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Infiniti Q30 body, chassis and structure failuresInfiniti Q30 brakes failuresInfiniti Q30 vehicle identification failuresInfiniti Q30 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresInfiniti Q30 noise, emissions and leaks failuresInfiniti Q30 road wheels failuresInfiniti Q30 seat belts and airbags failuresInfiniti Q30 suspension failuresInfiniti Q30 tyres failuresInfiniti Q30 visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:infiniti-q30:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Infiniti Q30 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/infiniti-q30/ · Published 2026-07-30.