MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Ford Capri — MOT statistics 2024

The Ford Capri failed 18.18% of 2,156 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 51.5 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 48% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 51.5, 95% CI 47.1–56.3 (100 = national average) 100 51.5 0 200
Index
51.5
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
18.18%
n = 2,156
Dangerous /100
5
national ≈11
Rank
106 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Porsche Panamera (index 50.9) — the two published results are 0.6 index points apart.

Ford Capri common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension is well below the reference at 10.2 per 100 tests, against 19.3 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Ford Capri common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical21.93,46629.50.74×0.72–0.77
Brakes14.22,24120.30.70×0.67–0.73
Suspension10.21,61819.30.53×0.51–0.56
Visibility6.91,08310.60.65×0.61–0.68
Body & structure6.71,06415.10.44×0.42–0.47
Steering4.87537.70.62×0.58–0.67
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 15,793 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired4.631.124.14×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Emissions levels exceed default limitsEmissions levels exceed default limits3.600.477.73×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake3.371.033.27×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or…A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED3.361.242.70×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.2.370.594.00×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen3.121.621.92×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or…A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning1.770.602.95×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements3.292.571.28×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources2.102.830.74×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn1.684.870.35×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Ford Capri MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 22.9 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 4.3 per 100 tests — the gap is 18.6 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Ford Capri MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension22.9
Brakes14.8
Emissions & leaks10.6
Body & structure10
Tyres8.6
Non-component advisories4.3

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed26.2%799
It passed13.8%6,738

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 12.4 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is body, chassis, structure — 28.0% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 13,959 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only65.1fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage76.4fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year99.0%a large low-use population — often second vehicles or cars kept for occasional use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 11.3 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How does the Ford Capri perform as it gets older?

The Capri at age 20 is well below the reference at 13.7%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Ford Capri perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeFord CapriAll vehiclesGap
2013.7%41.0%-27.4 pp

How dangerous are Ford Capri MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 59.2 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Ford Capri MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor9.6114.220.68×
Major59.1852.751.12×
Dangerous5.0011.150.45×

Chart values: Minor 9.6 · Major 59.2 · Dangerous 5.0.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Ford Capri MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 26.4%; May is lowest at 17.8% — the gap is 8.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Ford Capri MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 16%–33%.

bars: Ford Capri · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthFord CapriAll vehiclesGap
Jan26.4%31.12%-4.7 pp
Feb25.48%29.99%-4.5 pp
Mar20.22%28.26%-8.0 pp
Apr21.1%29.78%-8.7 pp
May17.78%28.79%-11.0 pp
Jun20.23%28.15%-7.9 pp
Jul19.2%29.33%-10.1 pp
Aug19.1%29.2%-10.1 pp
Sep18.74%28.19%-9.5 pp
Oct24.07%30.34%-6.3 pp
Nov22.92%30.58%-7.7 pp
Dec21.48%29.33%-7.8 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 8.6 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Ford Capri average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of Capris runs from 23,614 miles to 76,620 miles, against 49,438 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Ford Capri MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 14.1% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 15% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Ford Capri MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Ford Capri: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+<40k miles14.1%9.6–20.3%163 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles11.2%6.5–18.6%107 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles15%9.8–22.2%127 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
20+23,61449,43876,620403

A typical 20+-year-old Capri has ~49,438 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Ford Capri fails its MOT most

Bournemouth area is highest at 32.6%; Uxbridge area is lowest at 7.9% — the gap is 24.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Ford Capri line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Bournemouth (BH)32.61%+12.1 pp
Plymouth (PL)31.85%+11.3 pp
Hemel Hempstead (HP)31.54%+11.0 pp
Portsmouth (PO)31.29%+10.8 pp
Exeter (EX)30.09%+9.6 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Uxbridge (UB)7.87%-12.6 pp
Blackburn (BB)10.49%-10.0 pp
Enfield (EN)11.61%-8.9 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)12.13%-8.4 pp
Cardiff (CF)12.5%-8.0 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 14%–30% failing.

Ford Capri faults that come together

Body & structure + Identification stand out at 10.56×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle2310.56× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension11510.13× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems718.76× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres427.04× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension2446.78× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment406.7× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems536.6× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility746.47× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks1586.21× (rough estimate)
BrakesSpeedometer and speed limiter226.2× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems896.11× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres505.98× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1315.9× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes2715.87× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres345.75× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle225.62× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3955.61× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres595.5× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension3545.48× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension1765.41× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter295.36× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres875.32× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility1915.27× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering1225.25× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks2395.23× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering385.18× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension1815.08× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility424.99× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility4884.92× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks3434.92× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility1744.85× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment6124.84×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension4564.63× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility3014.63× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering1874.48× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility2184.3× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering944.08× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering2503.93× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres213.89× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility1243.79× (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterVisibility19too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension19too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks16too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering15too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility15too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSpeedometer and speed limiter14too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSuspension14too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSpeedometer and speed limiter13too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSteering10too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels10too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels7too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres7too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering6too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterTyres5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Brakes» and «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» appear together 4.84× more often than chance (612 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Which Ford Capri engine is best?

petrol 1.5–1.8 is highest at 129.3; petrol over 2.0 is lowest at 82.1 — the gap is 47.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrolover 2.0 litre82.116.97%7,442
petrol1.2–1.5 litre8717.88%151 (rough estimate)
petrol1.8–2.0 litre113.923.52%3,406 (rough estimate)
petrol1.5–1.8 litre129.326.79%2,986 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the petrol 1.5–1.8 runs at 129.3 against this model's own age norm while the petrol over 2.0 runs at 82.1 — a spread of 47.2 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Ford Capri MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £70.32 to £133.61, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£70–134
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment21.9 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£30.66
Brakes14.2 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£21.30
Suspension10.2 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£18.36

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £70 to £134, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Ford Capri rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure stands out at 64th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
64th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Ford Capri has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Ford Capri advisory become a failure?

Brakes are highest at 14.2%; Tyres are lowest at 3.7% — the gap is 10.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Ford Capri chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Ford Capri, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Brakes 14.2% · Suspension 12.1% · Body & chassis 8.8% · Noise, emissions, leaks 5.4% · Tyres 3.7%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Brakes14.2%12.1 months361991
Suspension12.1%12.2 months6881,409
Body, chassis, structure8.8%12.4 months500795
Noise, emissions and leaks5.4%12.2 months544949
Tyres3.7%12.3 months138566

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 14 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 361 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Ford Capri?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 19.6%; Visibility after a passed at age 20+ is lowest at 3.0% — the gap is 16.6 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.9% · Brakes 3.6% · Visibility 3.0%6,720
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.7% · Visibility 8.3% · Suspension 7.4%1,916
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.6% · Brakes 11.9% · Suspension 10.7%2,241
unknownfailureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.6%47 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Ford Capri ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 65.7%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 11.9% — the gap is 53.8 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
22.36%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.466
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
58.54%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
2.01%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,977 failures followed through to their re-test, 22.36% were repaired and passed the same day and 65.71% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 6,662 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.466 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 288 miles a year across 3,613 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 58.54% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 14.77% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 2.01% of 3,682 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 9,921 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Ford Capri safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 4.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Ford Capri
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2026/08224/02/2026126S06 Capri Explorer - Torque Inspection On Various Joints
R/2026/08224/02/2026226S06 Capri Explorer - Torque Inspection On Various Joints
R/2026/08224/02/2026226S06 Capri Explorer - Torque Inspection On Various Joints
R/2025/31707/08/2025125S79 Explorer Capri - Ground Connection Inspection

DVSA lists 4 safety recall campaigns for the Ford Capri, covering roughly 6 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Ford Capri MOT: quick answers

Ford Capri MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 51.5, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Ford Capri first-time MOT pass rate?
81.82% of first attempts passed in 2024 (2,156 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 18.18% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 2,156 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 51.5 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Ford Capri with other cars

Toyota Vitz is highest at 53.2; BMW I8 is lowest at 49.5 — the gap is 3.7 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Ford MOT statisticsFord Escort MOT statsFord Sierra MOT stats

Similar risk

Porsche Panamera (index 50.9)Toyota Vitz (index 53.2)BMW I8 (index 49.5)

Same size class

how BMW I8 compareshow Porsche 944 compareshow Saab 900 compares

By area

Ford Capri MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Ford Capri body, chassis and structure failuresFord Capri brakes failuresFord Capri vehicle identification failuresFord Capri lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresFord Capri noise, emissions and leaks failuresFord Capri seat belts and airbags failuresFord Capri steering failuresFord Capri suspension failuresFord Capri tyres failuresFord Capri visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:ford-capri:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Ford Capri MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/ford-capri/ · Published 2026-07-30.