MOT Risk Index.co.uk

BMW I8 — MOT statistics 2024

The BMW I8 failed 11.03% of 2,175 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 49.5 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 50% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 49.5, 95% CI 43.9–55.7 (100 = national average) 100 49.5 0 200
Index
49.5
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
11.03%
n = 2,175
Dangerous /100
7
national ≈11
Rank
98 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Honda Fit (index 49.5) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

BMW I8 common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Brakes are well below the reference at 0.6 per 100 tests, against 5.1 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

BMW I8 common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Tyres7.89267.41.06×0.99–1.13 · not distinguishable
Visibility3.84515.60.68×0.62–0.75
Body & structure2.83351.22.31×2.09–2.59
Identification2.12440.38.08×6.94–8.95
Lamps & electrical1.31545.60.23×0.20–0.27
Brakes0.6735.00.12×0.10–0.15
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 11,882 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements6.153.591.71×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Number plate does not conform to the specified…Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements1.890.209.40×Ask the seller about: Number plate does not conform to the specified requirements
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated1.781.481.20×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d
Direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or…A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning0.500.600.83×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade defectiveWiper blade defective0.911.260.72×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc0.881.560.56×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view1.312.360.56×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen0.842.220.38×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged0.982.540.39×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements0.482.570.19×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

BMW I8 MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 37.8 per 100 tests; Road Wheels are lowest at 0.6 per 100 tests — the gap is 37.2 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

BMW I8 MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres37.8
Brakes6.5
Non-component advisories2.5
Suspension0.8
Road Wheels0.6

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: BMW I8 against cars of the same age

AgePartBMW I8Same age, petrol and dieselDifference
3 yearsTyres4.094.17-0.08
3 yearsBrakes0.181.77-1.59
3 yearsSuspension0.240.63-0.39
4 yearsTyres54.540.46
4 yearsBrakes0.422.43-2.01
4 yearsSuspension0.231.21-0.98
5 yearsTyres5.155.060.09
5 yearsBrakes0.323.09-2.77
5 yearsSuspension0.322.19-1.87
6 yearsTyres5.715.540.17
6 yearsBrakes0.623.81-3.19
6 yearsSuspension0.313.72-3.41
7 yearsTyres4.495.95-1.46
7 yearsBrakes0.644.55-3.91
7 yearsSuspension0.265.68-5.42
8 yearsTyres5.246.31-1.07
8 yearsBrakes0.625.38-4.76
8 yearsSuspension0.237.78-7.55

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed10.0%229
It passed9.6%7,860

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (10.0% against 9.6%): the difference is within the margin of error. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 11,795 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only53.3fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage66.2fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year22.7%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 12.9 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the BMW I8 compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeBMW I8Same class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years9.65%11.3%-1.65 pp1,637
4 years8.71%14.24%-5.53 pp2,158
5 years10.44%17.41%-6.98 pp2,194
6 years11.22%20.76%-9.54 pp1,943
7 years10.9%24.33%-13.42 pp1,559
8 years10.64%28.15%-17.51 pp1,297
9 years11.79%32.03%-20.24 pp831
10 years13.2%35.6%-22.4 pp197

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the BMW I8 perform as it gets older?

The I8 at age 10 is well below the reference at 13.2%, against 30.1% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the BMW I8 perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–36%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeBMW I8All vehiclesGap
57.0%15.1%-8.1 pp
610.0%17.5%-7.5 pp
711.4%20.2%-8.8 pp
811.4%23.3%-11.9 pp
912.2%26.5%-14.3 pp
1013.2%30.1%-16.9 pp

Is a BMW I8 ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 BMW I8 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.

Based on 2,175 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 311
6–7 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 599
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 438
9 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 630
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 197
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are BMW I8 MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 7.9 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are BMW I8 MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor4.4614.220.31×
Major7.8852.750.15×
Dangerous7.2411.150.65×

Chart values: Minor 4.5 · Major 7.9 · Dangerous 7.2.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a BMW I8 MOT matter?

Feb is highest at 11.7%; Sep is lowest at 8.6% — the gap is 3.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a BMW I8 MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 7%–33%.

bars: BMW I8 · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthBMW I8All vehiclesGap
Jan11.22%31.12%-19.9 pp
Feb11.67%29.99%-18.3 pp
Mar11.14%28.26%-17.1 pp
Apr9.66%29.78%-20.1 pp
May9.76%28.79%-19.0 pp
Jun10.62%28.15%-17.5 pp
Jul9.98%29.33%-19.3 pp
Aug10.66%29.2%-18.5 pp
Sep8.55%28.19%-19.6 pp
Oct10.42%30.34%-19.9 pp
Nov10.85%30.58%-19.7 pp
Dec8.71%29.33%-20.6 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.1 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

BMW I8 average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of I8s runs from 30,211 miles to 55,072 miles, against 41,369 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: BMW I8 · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–69k mi.

Does high mileage mean more BMW I8 MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 6–9, 8.2% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 16% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more BMW I8 MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
BMW I8: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
6–9<40k miles8.2%6.5–10.2%882
6–940-70k miles15.1%12.4–18.1%604
6–970-100k miles16%11.1–22.6%156 (rough estimate)
10–14<40k miles12.1%6.3–22.1%66 (rough estimate)
10–1440-70k miles10.2%5.5–18.3%88 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
59,49716,07126,882243
618,07526,84839,548371
726,31637,04951,290228
830,21141,36955,072438
928,20443,49561,120630
1032,35947,99666,087197

A typical 8-year-old I8 has ~41,369 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the BMW I8 fails its MOT most

Portsmouth area is highest at 16.2%; Milton Keynes area is lowest at 5.1% — the gap is 11.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BMW I8 line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Portsmouth (PO)16.19%+5.9 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Milton Keynes (MK)5.14%-5.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 7%–12% failing.

BMW I8 survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 10 is well below the reference at 9.4%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BMW I8 survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
31,63778%9.65%
42,158100%8.71%
52,194100%10.44%
61,94392.6%11.22%
71,55974.3%10.9%
81,29761.8%10.64%
983139.6%11.79%
101979.4%13.2%

By age 9, only about 40% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈2,098); survivors still fail at 11.8% vs 8.7% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many years is a BMW I8 likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 3.2 years; Bought at age 8 is lowest at 1.1 years — the gap is 2.1 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 3.2
8—at least 1.1

estimateObserved only until age 9. The curve does not run five years past the stated age with the share still tested under 50%, so no 'years left' number is given.

BMW I8 faults that come together

Lamps & electrical + Tyres stand out at 4.92×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres284.92× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility583.08× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility282.9× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres292.05× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres15too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility14too few (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres11too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment11too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle11too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility10too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres8too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension5too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment5too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5too few (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Tyres» appear together 4.92× more often than chance (28 co-occurrences in the same test; 55 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a BMW I8?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 8.5%, against 16.2% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year8.48%3,952
8–12k miles/year16.24%1,170
Gap (low − normal)-7.76 pp—

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 8.5% vs 16.2% for 8–12k miles/year — 7.8 pp lower (n_low=3,952, n_normal=1,170). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

BMW I8 MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £9.74 to £18.51, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£10–19
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Tyres7.8 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£7.02
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1.3 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£1.82
Brakes0.6 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£0.90

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £10 to £19, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

BMW I8 running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 10 stand out at 13.0%, against 7.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 5
7
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 243 tests)
At age 10
13
other cars of this model tested at age 10 in 2024 (rough estimate: 197 tests)
Repairs per 100
£974
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 27.36% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
57%16,071243+0.0 pp
69.97%26,848371+3.0 pp
711.4%37,049228+4.4 pp
811.42%41,369438+4.4 pp
912.22%43,495630+5.2 pp
1013.2%47,996197+6.2 pp

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

BMW I8 rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 16th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
16th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This BMW I8 has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a BMW I8 advisory become a failure?

Tyres stand out at 6.3%.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Tyres6.3%12.2 months4,8021,751

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 6 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.2 months and roughly 4,802 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a BMW I8?

Tyres after a advisory at age <3 are highest at 8.6%; Identification of the vehicle after a passed at age <3 is lowest at 0.9% — the gap is 7.7 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedTyres 4.6% · Visibility 3.2% · Identification of the vehicle 0.9%778
<3advisoryTyres 8.6%162 (rough estimate)
<3failureTyres 4.6%109 (rough estimate)
3-5passedTyres 4.5% · Visibility 3.0% · Body, chassis, structure 1.9%3,861
3-5advisoryTyres 6.2% · Visibility 4.0% · Body, chassis, structure 1.9%936
3-5failureTyres 7.7% · Visibility 4.9% · Body, chassis, structure 3.9%508
6-8passedBody, chassis, structure 4.8% · Tyres 3.3% · Visibility 3.2%2,055
6-8advisoryTyres 6.8% · Visibility 6.2% · Body, chassis, structure 4.2%649
6-8failureBody, chassis, structure 5.3% · Visibility 4.7% · Tyres 3.8%343 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

BMW I8 ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 67.3%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 5.4% — the gap is 61.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
27.36%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.206
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
68.39%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.623%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 932 failures followed through to their re-test, 27.36% were repaired and passed the same day and 67.27% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 1,588 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.206 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 3,741 miles a year across 2,342 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 68.39% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 8.91% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.623% of 2,342 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 16,970 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

BMW I8 safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 6.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

BMW I8 recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the BMW I8. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2015: 2 · 2016: 0 · 2017: 1 · 2018: 0 · 2019: 0 · 2020: 3.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the BMW I8
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2020/28314/12/20202,665REMAINING PARTICLES IN THE CELLS OF THE HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY CAN CAUSE A SHORT CIRCUIT
R/2020/28314/12/20202,665REMAINING PARTICLES IN THE CELLS OF THE HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY CAN CAUSE A SHORT CIRCUIT
R/2019/28903/04/2020120THE ELECTRIC MOTOR ELECTRONICS PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD WAS NOT MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO THE
R/2017/01110/01/2017668AIRBAGS MAY NOT DEPLOY
R/2015/24403/12/201541STEERING MAY NOT BEHAVE AS DESIGNED
All 6 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2020/28314/12/202018/05/2020 – 03/06/20202,665REMAINING PARTICLES IN THE CELLS OF THE HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY CAN CAUSE A SHORT CIRCUIT
R/2020/28314/12/202003/06/2020 – 03/06/20202,665REMAINING PARTICLES IN THE CELLS OF THE HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY CAN CAUSE A SHORT CIRCUIT
R/2019/28903/04/202004/02/2019 – 11/03/2019120THE ELECTRIC MOTOR ELECTRONICS PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD WAS NOT MANUFACTURED ACCORDING TO THE
R/2017/01110/01/201721/10/2016 – 03/11/2016668AIRBAGS MAY NOT DEPLOY
R/2015/24403/12/201509/10/2015 – 04/11/201541STEERING MAY NOT BEHAVE AS DESIGNED
R/2014/19014/01/201521/03/2014 – 12/09/2014128FUEL MAY LEAK

DVSA lists 6 safety recall campaigns for the BMW I8, covering roughly 6,287 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

BMW I8 technical service bulletins: what dealers are told

US market, BMW I8 and its variants, model years 2015–2020 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.

NHTSA manufacturer communications are 232.

bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults

These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.

United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications

US technical service bulletins by communication year; leading subjects cover the full file
Communication yearBulletinsLeading subjects across all years
201412
  • Electrical system (86)
  • Equipment (85)
  • Engine and cooling (21)
  • Structure (19)
  • Adaptive and mobility equipment (17)
  • Engine (16)
  • Steering (9)
  • Visibility (9)
201547
201653
201717
201844
201928
202016
20212
20223
20246
20252
20262

Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.

BMW I8 owner complaints: what goes wrong

US market, BMW I8 and its variants, model years 2015–2020 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.

Lamps & electrical are highest at 5; Tyres are lowest at 1 — the gap is 4.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Owner complaints (US) against actual MOT failures (UK) for the same component groups
ComponentComplaintsShareMOT fail items per 100MOT rankAgreement
Lamps & electrical555.6%1.3#5complained about, fails occasionally
Engine (not MOT-tested)333.3%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Restraints222.2%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Tyres111.1%7.8#1complained about and fails often

Two different populations answering two different questions: the MOT records what an inspector can measure once a year, the complaint file records what annoyed or frightened an owner on the road. A component high in one column and absent from the other is the interesting case — driver-assistance and electronics dominate complaints while almost never appearing as an MOT failure item.

What the reports actually say
WHEN I DRING IN TO STREET FROM PARKING LOT, THIS VEHICLE DO NOT SPEED UP, IT IS STOP , NOT MOVING AT ALL FOR ABOUT 3 SECOND THAN KICK UP FAST. IT HAPPEN SOME TIMES NOT EVERY DAY, I WENT TO DEALERSHIP FOR FIX IT LIKE 4 TIME BUT THEY CAN NOT DUPULICATE THE PROBLEM AND CHECK THE SYSTEM BUT IT CAME OUT EVERYTHING NORMAL. BUT I HAVE THOSE PROBLEM LIKE ONE EVERY MONTH SPECIALLY WHEN I'M DRIVING LOW SPEED.
NHTSA complaint, filed 07/11/2017 · ENGINE
2016 BMW I8 EME HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY TEMP SENSORS (NTC SENSORS) WARNING LIGHTS APPEARED WHILE DRIVING LOSS POWER AND MY HIGH VOLTAGE BATTERY SHUT DOWN AT THE RED LIGHT BUT WAS ABLE TO RESTART IT AGAIN AD MAKE IT HOME
NHTSA complaint, filed 08/06/2025 · ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

US owners have filed 9 complaints about the equivalent BMW I8 to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration0. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.

Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.

BMW I8 MOT: quick answers

BMW I8 MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 49.5, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the BMW I8 first-time MOT pass rate?
88.97% of first attempts passed in 2024 (2,175 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 11.03% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 2,175 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 49.5 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the BMW I8 with other cars

Honda Fit is highest at 49.5; Porsche Boxster is lowest at 48.5 — the gap is 1.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All BMW MOT statisticsBMW M3 MOT statsBMW M2 MOT stats

Similar risk

Honda Fit (index 49.5)Porsche Boxster (index 48.5)Porsche Macan (index 48.5)

Same size class

how Porsche 944 compareshow Saab 900 compareshow Toyota Vellfire compares

By build year

BMW I8 2014BMW I8 2015BMW I8 2016BMW I8 2017BMW I8 2018BMW I8 2019

By area

BMW I8 MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

BMW I8 body, chassis and structure failuresBMW I8 brakes failuresBMW I8 vehicle identification failuresBMW I8 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresBMW I8 noise, emissions and leaks failuresBMW I8 road wheels failuresBMW I8 suspension failuresBMW I8 tyres failuresBMW I8 visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:bmw-i8:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). BMW I8 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/bmw-i8/ · Published 2026-07-30.