MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Honda Fit — MOT statistics 2024

The Honda Fit failed 16.73% of 3,980 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 49.5 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 50% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 49.5, 95% CI 46.1–53.0 (100 = national average) 100 49.5 0 200
Index
49.5
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
16.73%
n = 3,980
Dangerous /100
3
national ≈11
Rank
99 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Porsche Boxster (index 48.5) — the two published results are 1.0 index points apart.

Honda Fit common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension is well below the reference at 8.5 per 100 tests, against 20.3 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Honda Fit common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical18.11,49022.00.82×0.78–0.86
Suspension8.569820.30.42×0.39–0.45
Steering5.24283.41.52×1.38–1.67
Visibility3.62968.50.42×0.38–0.47
Tyres3.02479.90.30×0.27–0.34
Brakes2.117213.70.15×0.13–0.18
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 8,234 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover…Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated3.740.764.93×Ask the seller about: Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or det
Obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or…An obligatory rear fog lamp missing, or a front or rear fog lamp inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning3.320.437.79×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc3.411.781.91×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated3.451.901.81×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Front or rear fog lamp switch inoperative or not…Front or rear fog lamp switch inoperative or not operating in accordance with the requirements1.320.0273.33×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Headlamp reflector or lens slightly defectiveHeadlamp reflector or lens slightly defective2.361.092.16×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover…Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc1.290.602.15×Ask the seller about: Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements1.982.570.77×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning1.432.090.68×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources1.622.830.57×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Honda Fit MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 20.0 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 0.8 per 100 tests — the gap is 19.2 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Honda Fit MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres20
Suspension6.6
Brakes6.5
Lamps & electrical3.9
Non-component advisories2.5
Body & structure0.8

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed32.5%265
It passed21.5%3,252

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 11.0 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 40.0% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 8,090 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only45.3fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage51.7fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year12.3%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 6.4 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Honda Fit compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeHonda FitSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
6 years9.52%20.75%-11.23 pp168
7 years13.95%24.32%-10.37 pp215
8 years10.55%28.15%-17.6 pp275
9 years11.83%32.03%-20.2 pp355
10 years11.34%35.6%-24.26 pp820
11 years10.18%38.66%-28.49 pp1,985
12 years15.97%41.26%-25.28 pp1,922
13 years21.92%43.29%-21.38 pp1,168
14 years26.37%45.04%-18.67 pp383
15 years34.08%46.31%-12.24 pp179

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Honda Fit perform as it gets older?

The Fit at age 11 is well below the reference at 9.6%, against 33.2% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Honda Fit perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–45%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeHonda FitAll vehiclesGap
810.6%23.3%-12.7 pp
914.4%26.5%-12.1 pp
1011.5%30.1%-18.6 pp
119.6%33.2%-23.5 pp
1215.7%35.7%-20.0 pp
1320.5%38.2%-17.7 pp
1426.2%40.4%-14.2 pp

Is a Honda Fit ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Honda Fit MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 99.8%.

Based on 3,946 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 68
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 78
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 95
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 113
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 139
10–14 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 3,295
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 146
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 5
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 4
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 3

How dangerous are Honda Fit MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 25.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Honda Fit MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor14.1014.220.99×
Major25.0352.750.47×
Dangerous2.9511.150.26×

Chart values: Minor 14.1 · Major 25.0 · Dangerous 3.0.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Honda Fit MOT matter?

Oct is highest at 19.9%; Mar is lowest at 13.7% — the gap is 6.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Honda Fit MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 12%–33%.

bars: Honda Fit · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthHonda FitAll vehiclesGap
Jan16.04%31.12%-15.1 pp
Feb14.83%29.99%-15.2 pp
Mar13.68%28.26%-14.6 pp
Apr18.97%29.78%-10.8 pp
May13.87%28.79%-14.9 pp
Jun18.07%28.15%-10.1 pp
Jul13.71%29.33%-15.6 pp
Aug17.41%29.2%-11.8 pp
Sep17.72%28.19%-10.5 pp
Oct19.88%30.34%-10.5 pp
Nov14.88%30.58%-15.7 pp
Dec16.51%29.33%-12.8 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 6.2 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Honda Fit average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of Fits runs from 45,200 miles to 72,424 miles, against 57,177 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Honda Fit · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–80k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Honda Fit MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 10–14, 14.8% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 32.2% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Honda Fit MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Honda Fit: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
6–9<40k miles12%6.8–20.2%92 (rough estimate)
6–940-70k miles10.3%6.7–15.6%184 (rough estimate)
6–970-100k miles19%10.9–30.9%58 (rough estimate)
10–14<40k miles14.8%12.3–17.7%663
10–1440-70k miles15.2%13.6–16.8%1,918
10–1470-100k miles17.3%14.5–20.4%649
10–14100-140k miles32.2%21.7–44.9%59 (rough estimate)
15+<40k miles15.7%8.2–28%51 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles32.8%22.6–45%64 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
845,20057,17772,424113
940,72352,56462,695139
1039,93352,12164,347383
1142,07452,03064,661727
1241,15152,24365,5161,050
1345,10558,54373,317877
1445,72159,19275,737267

A typical 8-year-old Fit has ~57,177 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Honda Fit fails its MOT most

Ipswich area is highest at 47.2%; Bolton area is lowest at 4.7% — the gap is 42.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Honda Fit line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Ipswich (IP)47.22%+30.9 pp
Southampton (SO)28.48%+12.2 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Bolton (BL)4.69%-11.6 pp
Bradford (BD)6.59%-9.7 pp
Romford (RM)7.39%-8.9 pp
Birmingham (B)7.83%-8.5 pp
Slough (SL)8.25%-8.1 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 5%–17% failing.

Honda Fit survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 17 is well below the reference at 60.0%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Honda Fit survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
38381.6%30.12%
46059%20%
57775.7%11.69%
6168100%9.52%
7215100%13.95%
8275100%10.55%
9355100%11.83%
10820100%11.34%
111,985100%10.18%
121,922100%15.97%
131,168100%21.92%
14383100%26.37%
15179100%34.08%
16123100%40.65%
176160%42.62%

By age 17, only about 60% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈102); survivors still fail at 42.6% vs 20.0% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many years is a Honda Fit likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 15.8 years; Bought at age 15 is lowest at 2.1 years — the gap is 13.7 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 15.8
8—at least 9.1
10—at least 7.1
12—at least 5.1
15—at least 2.1

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 7.1 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 17, so the true figure is likely higher.

Honda Fit faults that come together

Body & structure + Lamps & electrical stand out at 6.34×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment236.34× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension335.02× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1294.96× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment544.78× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres804.72× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility244.56× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres424.26× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1923.94× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension673.79× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility343.6× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility533.5× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering963.16× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks17too few (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres17too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension16too few (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres15too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension14too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems14too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering14too few (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility13too few (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks10too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks9too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility8too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility8too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension8too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment7too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering7too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» appear together 6.34× more often than chance (23 co-occurrences in the same test; 55 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Honda Fit?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 11.6%, against 18.3% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year11.55%3,384
8–12k miles/year18.32%404
Gap (low − normal)-6.77 pp—

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 11.6% vs 18.3% for 8–12k miles/year — 6.8 pp lower (n_low=3,384, n_normal=404). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Which Honda Fit engine is best?

petrol 1.5–1.8 is highest at 134.8; petrol 1.2–1.5 is lowest at 96.3 — the gap is 38.5 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrol1.2–1.5 litre96.322.56%2,185 (rough estimate)
petrol1.5–1.8 litre134.829.38%194 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the petrol 1.5–1.8 runs at 134.8 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.2–1.5 runs at 96.3 — a spread of 38.5 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Honda Fit MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £46.49 to £88.33, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£46–88
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment18.1 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£25.34
Suspension8.5 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£15.30
Brakes2.1 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£3.15
Tyres3.0 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£2.70

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £46 to £88, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Honda Fit running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 10 are close to the reference at 11.0%, against 11.0% at age 8, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 8
11
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 113 tests)
At age 10
11
other cars of this model tested at age 10 in 2024 (rough estimate: 383 tests)
Repairs per 100
£4,649
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 41.6% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
810.62%57,177113—
914.39%52,564139—
1011.49%52,121383—
119.63%52,030727—
1215.71%52,2431,050—
1320.52%58,543877—
1426.22%59,192267—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Honda Fit rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at lowest percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
lowest
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 1 postcode areas

This Honda Fit has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

What will fail next on a Honda Fit?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a advisory at age 15-19 are highest at 47.7%; Tyres after a passed at age 6-8 are lowest at 3.7% — the gap is 44.1 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.9% · Visibility 3.7%134 (rough estimate)
<3advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.5% · Suspension 14.6%41 (rough estimate)
<3failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 28.0% · Visibility 16.0% · Suspension 10.0%50 (rough estimate)
3-5passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.2% · Suspension 4.7%127 (rough estimate)
6-8passedSuspension 6.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5.5% · Tyres 3.7%328 (rough estimate)
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.6% · Suspension 11.8%51 (rough estimate)
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.3% · Suspension 8.4% · Steering 6.3%1,779
9-11advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.0% · Steering 7.6% · Suspension 7.0%171 (rough estimate)
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.5% · Suspension 9.2% · Visibility 6.0%251 (rough estimate)
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.1% · Suspension 8.3% · Steering 7.8%503
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 29.9% · Suspension 13.2% · Steering 12.5%144 (rough estimate)
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.6% · Suspension 16.7% · Visibility 10.2%215 (rough estimate)
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.3% · Suspension 13.1%61 (rough estimate)
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 47.7% · Suspension 25.0% · Body, chassis, structure 13.6%44 (rough estimate)
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 32.4% · Suspension 15.5% · Brakes 9.9%71 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Honda Fit ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 54.9%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 3.5% — the gap is 51.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
41.6%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.36
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
46.08%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
22.914%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 827 failures followed through to their re-test, 41.6% were repaired and passed the same day and 54.9% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 1,989 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.36 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 4,231 miles a year across 2,246 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 46.08% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 4.77% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 22.914% of 2,505 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 19,898 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Honda Fit technical service bulletins: what dealers are told

US market, Honda FIT, model years 2015–2020 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.

NHTSA manufacturer communications are 228.

bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults

These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.

United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications

US technical service bulletins by communication year; leading subjects cover the full file
Communication yearBulletinsLeading subjects across all years
201423
  • Electrical system (53)
  • Equipment (47)
  • Engine and cooling (36)
  • Structure (27)
  • Engine (20)
  • Petrol fuel system (17)
  • Back Over Prevention (16)
  • Air Bags (14)
201531
201635
201726
20186
201915
202018
202136
202214
20238
202412
20254

Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.

Honda Fit owner complaints: what goes wrong

US market, Honda FIT, model years 2015–2020 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.

Lamps & electrical are highest at 283; Tyres are lowest at 19 — the gap is 264.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Owner complaints (US) against actual MOT failures (UK) for the same component groups
ComponentComplaintsShareMOT fail items per 100MOT rankAgreement
Lamps & electrical28338.7%18.1#1complained about and fails often
Engine (not MOT-tested)10814.8%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Transmission (not MOT-tested)557.5%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Body & structure517.0%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Restraints446.0%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Tyres192.6%3.0#5complained about, fails occasionally

Two different populations answering two different questions: the MOT records what an inspector can measure once a year, the complaint file records what annoyed or frightened an owner on the road. A component high in one column and absent from the other is the interesting case — driver-assistance and electronics dominate complaints while almost never appearing as an MOT failure item.

What the reports actually say
The paint (white orchid pearl) is peeling down to the metal on three of the doors. I did have a spot on the roof repaired during the extended 7 year warranty. But this current problem happened after the warranty expired.
NHTSA complaint, filed 06/28/2026 · STRUCTURE
Honda confirmed my 2015 Honda fit VIN was part of the paint warranty extension program, yet the paint has continued to fail and spread significantly after the warranty extension expired.
NHTSA complaint, filed 06/04/2026

US owners have filed 732 complaints about the equivalent Honda Fit to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including 31 that mention a crash, 2 a fire and 32 an injury. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.

Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.

Honda Fit MOT: quick answers

Honda Fit MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 49.5, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Honda Fit first-time MOT pass rate?
83.27% of first attempts passed in 2024 (3,980 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 16.73% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 3,980 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 49.5 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Honda Fit with other cars

Porsche Panamera is highest at 50.9; Porsche Boxster is lowest at 48.5 — the gap is 2.4 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Honda MOT statisticsHonda HR-V MOT statsHonda CR-V MOT stats

Similar risk

Porsche Boxster (index 48.5)Porsche Macan (index 48.5)Porsche Panamera (index 50.9)

Same size class

how Audi R8 compareshow BMW M2 compareshow Audi Q8 compares

By build year

Honda Fit 2010Honda Fit 2011Honda Fit 2012

By area

Honda Fit MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Honda Fit body, chassis and structure failuresHonda Fit brakes failuresHonda Fit lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresHonda Fit noise, emissions and leaks failuresHonda Fit seat belts and airbags failuresHonda Fit steering failuresHonda Fit suspension failuresHonda Fit tyres failuresHonda Fit visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:honda-fit:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Honda Fit MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/honda-fit/ · Published 2026-07-30.