Jaguar E-Type — MOT statistics 2024
The Jaguar E-Type failed 10.71% of 1,317 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 27.2 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 73% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Bentley Continental (index 27.0) — the two published results are 0.2 index points apart.
Jaguar E-Type common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are well below the reference at 11.3 per 100 tests, against 28.0 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 11.3 | 882 | 28.0 | 0.40×0.38–0.43 |
| Suspension | 8.4 | 657 | 18.7 | 0.45×0.42–0.49 |
| Brakes | 7.3 | 567 | 19.2 | 0.38×0.35–0.41 |
| Visibility | 5.0 | 387 | 10.3 | 0.49×0.44–0.53 |
| Steering | 3.4 | 263 | 7.1 | 0.48×0.42–0.54 |
| Body & structure | 1.3 | 102 | 14.0 | 0.09×0.08–0.11 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen | 3.22 | 1.62 | 1.99× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Audible warning inoperativeAudible warning inoperative | 1.12 | 0.29 | 3.89× | Ask the seller about: Audible warning inoperative |
| Headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or…A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED | 1.89 | 1.24 | 1.52× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated | 2.54 | 1.90 | 1.33× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 1.59 | 1.24 | 1.28× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover…Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated | 1.09 | 0.76 | 1.44× | Ask the seller about: Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or det |
| Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 1.89 | 1.78 | 1.06× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 2.38 | 2.57 | 0.93× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 1.30 | 2.09 | 0.62× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 1.71 | 4.87 | 0.35× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Jaguar E-Type MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Suspension is highest at 15.6 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 2.6 per 100 tests — the gap is 13.0 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Suspension | 15.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 6.4 |
| Brakes | 3.7 |
| Tyres | 3.3 |
| Steering | 3 |
| Body & structure | 2.6 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 15.8% | 253 |
| It passed | 8.0% | 2,997 |
A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 7.8 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 19.1% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 7,621 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 39.7 | fails less often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 46.8 | fails less often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 92.3% | a large low-use population — often second vehicles or cars kept for occasional use |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 7.1 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How does the Jaguar E-Type perform as it gets older?
The E-Type at age 20 is well below the reference at 10.8%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Jaguar E-Type | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 10.8% | 41.0% | -30.2 pp |
Is a Jaguar E-Type ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Jaguar E-Type MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 10.8%.
Based on 1,292 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 25 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 34 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 15 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 14 |
| 10–14 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 34 |
| 15–17 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 11 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 6 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 5 |
| 20+ years | 0.0% Check a registration with TfL | n = 1,148 |
How dangerous are Jaguar E-Type MOT failures?
Major defects are well below the reference at 29.4 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 6.64 | 14.22 | 0.47× |
| Major | 29.41 | 52.75 | 0.56× |
| Dangerous | 3.21 | 11.15 | 0.29× |
Chart values: Minor 6.6 · Major 29.4 · Dangerous 3.2.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Jaguar E-Type MOT matter?
Nov is highest at 15.5%; Jan is lowest at 10.7% — the gap is 4.8 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 9%–33%.
bars: Jaguar E-Type · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Jaguar E-Type | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 10.69% | 31.12% | -20.4 pp |
| Feb | 15.38% | 29.99% | -14.6 pp |
| Mar | 12.15% | 28.26% | -16.1 pp |
| Apr | 13.7% | 29.78% | -16.1 pp |
| May | 11.21% | 28.79% | -17.6 pp |
| Jun | 12.22% | 28.15% | -15.9 pp |
| Jul | 12.75% | 29.33% | -16.6 pp |
| Aug | 12.47% | 29.2% | -16.7 pp |
| Sep | 10.88% | 28.19% | -17.3 pp |
| Oct | 12.44% | 30.34% | -17.9 pp |
| Nov | 15.52% | 30.58% | -15.1 pp |
| Dec | 12.44% | 29.33% | -16.9 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 4.8 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Jaguar E-Type average mileage by age
At age 20+, the middle half of E-Types runs from 18,853 miles to 71,962 miles, against 47,006 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Does high mileage mean more Jaguar E-Type MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 10.3% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 13.8% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15+ | <40k miles | 10.3% | 7.9–13.2% | 517 |
| 15+ | 40-70k miles | 8.6% | 6.1–12.1% | 336 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 70-100k miles | 13.8% | 10.4–18.1% | 305 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20+ | 18,853 | 47,006 | 71,962 | 1,148 |
A typical 20+-year-old E-Type has ~47,006 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Jaguar E-Type fails its MOT most
Exeter area is highest at 21.6%; Derby area is lowest at 2.3% — the gap is 19.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Exeter (EX) | 21.57% | +9.1 pp |
| Bristol (BS) | 21.21% | +8.7 pp |
| York (YO) | 20.55% | +8.1 pp |
| Wolverhampton (WV) | 20% | +7.5 pp |
| Southampton (SO) | 19.46% | +7.0 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Derby (DE) | 2.29% | -10.2 pp |
| Leicester (LE) | 3.81% | -8.7 pp |
| Tonbridge (TN) | 8.84% | -3.7 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 2%–20% failing.
Jaguar E-Type survival: which cars are still on the road
By age 9 is well below the reference at 68.2%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.
Survival vs fail rate by age
| Age | Tests | Survival vs ages 4–6 | Fail % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 52 | 70.9% | 9.62% |
| 4 | 66 | 90% | 12.12% |
| 5 | 72 | 98.2% | 9.72% |
| 6 | 82 | 100% | 12.2% |
| 7 | 98 | 100% | 13.27% |
| 8 | 73 | 99.5% | 10.96% |
| 9 | 50 | 68.2% | 4% |
Ages 4–6 average 73 tests, too few for an 'only X% as many' claim. The rows are the counts of cars still coming to an MOT.
How many years is a Jaguar E-Type likely to last?
Bought at age 5 is highest at 4.2 years; Bought at age 8 is lowest at 1.2 years — the gap is 3.0 years.
bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve
| Age now | Typical mileage (p50) | Expected years left |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | — | at least 4.2 |
| 8 | — | at least 1.2 |
estimateObserved only until age 9. The curve does not run five years past the stated age with the share still tested under 50%, so no 'years left' number is given.
Jaguar E-Type faults that come together
Body & structure + Steering stand out at 9.75×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 24 | 9.75× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 186 | 9.41× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 39 | 9.28× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 32 | 8.22× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 32 | 8.19× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 46 | 8.16× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 72 | 7.73× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 101 | 7.38× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Visibility | 61 | 7.07× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 139 | 7.01× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 103 | 6.97× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Visibility | 101 | 6.85× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 76 | 6.09× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Steering | 52 | 6.01× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 122 | 5.72× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 17 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 15 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 14 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 14 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Steering» appear together 9.75× more often than chance (24 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Jaguar E-Type MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £41.89 to £79.59, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 11.3 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £15.82 |
| Suspension | 8.4 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £15.12 |
| Brakes | 7.3 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £10.95 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £42 to £80, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Jaguar E-Type rust problems: where they corrode
Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 12th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
This Jaguar E-Type has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
What will fail next on a Jaguar E-Type?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 9.6%; Visibility after a passed at age 20+ is lowest at 2.0% — the gap is 7.6 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20+ | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3.0% · Suspension 2.6% · Visibility 2.0% | 2,979 |
| 20+ | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 7.1% · Suspension 6.7% · Visibility 6.3% | 479 (rough estimate) |
| 20+ | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.6% · Brakes 7.7% · Visibility 7.1% | 533 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Jaguar E-Type ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 70.9%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 6.6% — the gap is 64.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 561 failures followed through to their re-test, 22.46% were repaired and passed the same day and 70.94% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 1,566 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.958 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 301 miles a year across 1,860 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 71.86% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 5.84% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 1.693% of 1,890 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 6,905 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Jaguar E-Type MOT: quick answers
Jaguar E-Type MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 27.2, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Jaguar E-Type first-time MOT pass rate?
- 89.29% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,317 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 10.71% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,317 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 27.2 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Jaguar E-Type with other cars
Aston Martin DB11 is highest at 28.3; McLaren 720S is lowest at 25.9 — the gap is 2.4 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Jaguar MOT statisticsJaguar F-Type MOT statsJaguar I-Pace MOT stats
Similar risk
Bentley Continental (index 27.0)Aston Martin DB11 (index 28.3)McLaren 720S (index 25.9)
Same size class
how Land Rover 88 compareshow Fiat Seicento compareshow Volvo 240 compares
By area
Jaguar E-Type MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Jaguar E-Type body, chassis and structure failuresJaguar E-Type brakes failuresJaguar E-Type vehicle identification failuresJaguar E-Type lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresJaguar E-Type noise, emissions and leaks failuresJaguar E-Type seat belts and airbags failuresJaguar E-Type steering failuresJaguar E-Type suspension failuresJaguar E-Type tyres failuresJaguar E-Type visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:jaguar-e-type:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Jaguar E-Type MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/jaguar-e-type/ · Published 2026-07-30.