MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Land Rover 88 — MOT statistics 2024

The Land Rover 88 failed 29.25% of 1,313 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 75.2 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 25% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 75.2, 95% CI 69.0–81.6 (100 = national average) 100 75.2 0 200
Index
75.2
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
29.25%
n = 1,313
Dangerous /100
14
national ≈11
Rank
216 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Mercedes-Benz SLK (index 75.2) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Land Rover 88 common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 41.3 per 100 tests, against 29.4 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Land Rover 88 common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical41.35,86129.41.41×1.37–1.44
Brakes24.03,40620.31.18×1.15–1.23
Suspension19.12,71119.30.99×0.95–1.03 · not distinguishable
Body & structure13.41,90415.10.89×0.85–0.93
Visibility13.41,90310.61.26×1.21–1.32
Steering8.31,1757.71.08×1.02–1.14
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 14,185 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired7.541.126.74×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen6.861.624.23×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or…A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.320.607.21×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or…A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED4.651.243.74×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the…Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced3.490.399.02×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.3.470.595.86×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Stop lamps all missing or inoperativeStop lamps all missing or inoperative2.720.1026.67×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.702.092.25×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements5.032.571.96×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake3.151.033.06×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Land Rover 88 MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Emissions & leaks are highest at 33.7 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 6.8 per 100 tests — the gap is 26.9 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Land Rover 88 MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Emissions & leaks33.7
Suspension27.9
Body & structure15.9
Tyres15.8
Brakes13.9
Steering6.8

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed29.8%1,117
It passed24.5%4,906

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 5.3 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is noise, emissions and leaks — 32.2% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 13,622 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only106.4fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage124.8fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year97.6%a large low-use population — often second vehicles or cars kept for occasional use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 18.4 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How does the Land Rover 88 perform as it gets older?

The Rover 88 at age 20 is well below the reference at 26.6%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Land Rover 88 perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeLand Rover 88All vehiclesGap
2026.6%41.0%-14.5 pp

Is a Land Rover 88 ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Land Rover 88 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 0.7%.

Based on 922 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 2
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ years0.4%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 918

How dangerous are Land Rover 88 MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 106.3 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Land Rover 88 MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor11.5614.220.81×
Major106.2852.752.01×
Dangerous13.8511.151.24×

Chart values: Minor 11.6 · Major 106.3 · Dangerous 13.8.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Land Rover 88 MOT matter?

Jun is highest at 35.7%; Oct is lowest at 30.7% — the gap is 4.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Land Rover 88 MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–37%.

bars: Land Rover 88 · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthLand Rover 88All vehiclesGap
Jan33.91%31.12%+2.8 pp
Feb34.82%29.99%+4.8 pp
Mar34.56%28.26%+6.3 pp
Apr33.65%29.78%+3.9 pp
May34.75%28.79%+6.0 pp
Jun35.65%28.15%+7.5 pp
Jul33.1%29.33%+3.8 pp
Aug33.01%29.2%+3.8 pp
Sep33.31%28.19%+5.1 pp
Oct30.7%30.34%+0.4 pp
Nov33.75%30.58%+3.2 pp
Dec34.18%29.33%+4.9 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 4.9 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Land Rover 88 average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of Rover 88s runs from 23,035 miles to 78,904 miles, against 49,432 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Land Rover 88 MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 27% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 27.5% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Land Rover 88 MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Land Rover 88: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+<40k miles27%22.8–31.7%381 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles26.2%21–32.1%237 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles27.5%22.3–33.3%251 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
20+23,03549,43278,904922

A typical 20+-year-old Rover 88 has ~49,432 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Land Rover 88 fails its MOT most

Bath area is highest at 50.4%; Leeds area is lowest at 17.8% — the gap is 32.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Land Rover 88 line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Bath (BA)50.42%+16.7 pp
Exeter (EX)50%+16.3 pp
Brighton (BN)47.37%+13.6 pp
Guildford (GU)44.44%+10.7 pp
Taunton (TA)43.78%+10.1 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Leeds (LS)17.78%-15.9 pp
Birmingham (B)19.41%-14.3 pp
Coventry (CV)20.28%-13.4 pp
Leicester (LE)23.53%-10.2 pp
Derby (DE)23.78%-9.9 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 24%–50% failing.

Land Rover 88 faults that come together

Identification + Emissions & leaks stand out at 5.55×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks275.55× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems895.44× (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterVisibility265.17× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems474.88× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering574.69× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension864.35× (rough estimate)
BrakesSpeedometer and speed limiter264.28× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle354.24× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility874.2× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres844.13× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres624.11× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment794.02× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility424.01× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle503.96× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension4393.91× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems953.79× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres933.79× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres453.76× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter353.71× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks3093.69× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension3023.62× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks1963.58× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1383.55× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5013.52×
BrakesSuspension5943.46×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility4083.46× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension2283.45× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility883.42× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension343.41× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility9533.4×
BrakesTyres1053.38× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1623.35× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering2303.33× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks4253.26× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment7023.17×
BrakesVisibility5713.16×
SuspensionVisibility4473.14× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility2173.13× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1263.1× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,0473.09×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension8223.08×
BrakesSteering3042.88× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering4552.77× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility2262.58× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering19too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels17too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres16too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSpeedometer and speed limiter15too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSuspension15too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSteering10too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels10too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres8too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility8too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering6too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSpeedometer and speed limiter6too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres5too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSpeedometer and speed limiter5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Brakes» appear together 3.52× more often than chance (501 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Which Land Rover 88 engine is best?

petrol over 2.0 is highest at 103.0; petrol 1.8–2.0 is lowest at 60.9 — the gap is 42.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrol1.8–2.0 litre60.920.83%120 (rough estimate)
dieselover 2.0 litre96.632.9%4,502 (rough estimate)
petrolover 2.0 litre10335.09%8,063

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the petrol over 2.0 runs at 103 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.8–2.0 runs at 60.9 — a spread of 42.1 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Land Rover 88 MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £128.20 to £243.58, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£128–244
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment41.3 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£57.82
Brakes24.0 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£36.00
Suspension19.1 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£34.38

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £128 to £244, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Land Rover 88 rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at <0.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
<0.1×
0.02% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
54th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Land Rover 88 virtually never fails on corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish. Both point the same way and reinforce each other: it resists corrosion even though its owners live in saltier areas than most.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Land Rover 88 advisory become a failure?

Brakes are highest at 15.1%; Tyres are lowest at 5.4% — the gap is 9.8 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Land Rover 88 chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Land Rover 88, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Brakes 15.1% · Suspension 14.6% · Body & chassis 13.9% · Steering 9.6% · Noise, emissions, leaks 5.7% · Tyres 5.4%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Brakes15.1%12.4 months172887
Suspension14.6%12.2 months4001,559
Body, chassis, structure13.9%12.3 months2711,048
Steering9.6%12.1 months355543
Noise, emissions and leaks5.7%12.2 months2212,104
Tyres5.3%12 months160785

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 15 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.4 months and roughly 172 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Land Rover 88?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 26.0%; Suspension after a passed at age 20+ is lowest at 5.6% — the gap is 20.3 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.4% · Brakes 8.0% · Suspension 5.6%3,684
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.4% · Brakes 11.8% · Visibility 10.3%2,257
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.9% · Brakes 14.9% · Visibility 13.6%3,179

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Land Rover 88 ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 68.9%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 12.9% — the gap is 56.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
18.15%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
3.171
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
37.56%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
2.54%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 3,074 failures followed through to their re-test, 18.15% were repaired and passed the same day and 68.93% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 11,096 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 3.171 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 313 miles a year across 3,117 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 37.56% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 27.36% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 2.54% of 3,307 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 12,523 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Land Rover 88 MOT: quick answers

Land Rover 88 MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 75.2, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Land Rover 88 first-time MOT pass rate?
70.75% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,313 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 29.25% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,313 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 75.2 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Land Rover 88 with other cars

Maserati Ghibli is highest at 75.3; Land Rover 88 is lowest at 75.2 — the gap is 0.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Land Rover MOT statisticsLand Rover Range Rover Evoque MOT statsLand Rover Range Rover Sport MOT stats

Similar risk

Mercedes-Benz SLK (index 75.2)MG TF (index 75.2)Maserati Ghibli (index 75.3)

Same size class

how Volvo 240 compareshow Honda Integra compareshow Mazda 323 compares

By area

Land Rover 88 MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Land Rover 88 body, chassis and structure failuresLand Rover 88 brakes failuresLand Rover 88 vehicle identification failuresLand Rover 88 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresLand Rover 88 noise, emissions and leaks failuresLand Rover 88 road wheels failuresLand Rover 88 seat belts and airbags failuresLand Rover 88 steering failuresLand Rover 88 suspension failuresLand Rover 88 tyres failuresLand Rover 88 visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:land-rover-88:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Land Rover 88 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/land-rover-88/ · Published 2026-07-30.