MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Rover Metro MOT pass rate and common problems

70.9% of Rover Metros passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 663 first tests): 67.0% at the first attempt and 3.9% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 1 in 3 failed the first attempt. For its age, it is statistically indistinguishable from normal: MOT Risk Index 96.1 (95% CI 86.0–106.7; 100 = normal).

Rover Metro at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate70.9%incl. 3.9% fixed at the test centre2024663
Passed at the first attempt67.0%all first tests2024663
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 86.0–106.7)96.1index100 = normal for its age · rank 405 of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)2024663
Biggest excess: Noise, emissions and leaks19.4per 1007.4 same-age2019–20245116
Dangerous defects11.6per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20245116
Advisory items105.6per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20245116
strip · Rover Metro · MOT Risk Index · 96.1 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Rover Metro. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 405 of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 312 and 530 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Rover Metro index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank405of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age2024663
Best rank within its 95% interval312rankother models held where they are2024663
Worst rank within its 95% interval530rankother models held where they are2024663

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 89.9 to 96.1 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on a Rover Metro MOT, and how often?

Rover Metro MOTs fail most often on brakes: 25.1 per 100 tests, against 20.3 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 5,116).

bar · Rover Metro · Brakes · 25.1 vs 20.3 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes25.1per 10020.32019–20241284
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment22.1per 10029.52019–20241130
Suspension21.1per 10019.42019–20241081
Body, chassis, structure21per 10015.12019–20241076
Noise, emissions and leaks19.4per 1007.42019–2024991
Visibility9.1per 10010.72019–2024468

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,116 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Rover Metro's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Rover Metro advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: suspension advisories became a fail at the next MOT 18.4% of the time.

funnel · Rover Metro · Suspension · 18.4 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on suspension: 18.4 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension18.4% next failmedian model2019–2024543

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Rover Metro got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Rover Metro MOTs flag suspension most: 24.8 advisories per 100 tests, against 26.2 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 5,116).

bar · Rover Metro · Suspension · 24.8 vs 26.2 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension24.8per 10026.22019–20241268
Tyres23.8per 10039.72019–20241219
Brakes19.5per 10034.72019–20241000
Body, chassis, structure16.4per 1004.62019–2024840
Noise, emissions and leaks9.7per 1005.22019–2024498
Non-component advisories3.9per 1007.82019–2024199

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,116 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Rover Metro?

For Rover Metros aged 20 or older whose last MOT was a pass, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘noise, emissions and leaks’: 8.4% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 1,603).

bar · Rover Metro · Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass · 8.4 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass8.4% next fail2019–20241603
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass7.8% next fail2019–20241603
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass7.0% next fail2019–20241603
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass6.9% next fail2019–20241603
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass6.4% next fail2019–20241603
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass4.2% next fail2019–20241603
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass1.9% next fail2019–20241603
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass1.4% next fail2019–20241603
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–20241603
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory14.5% next fail2019–2024765
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory14.4% next fail2019–2024765
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory12.9% next fail2019–2024765
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory12.7% next fail2019–2024765
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory12.4% next fail2019–2024765
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory8.0% next fail2019–2024765
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory4.2% next fail2019–2024765
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory2.8% next fail2019–2024765
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory1.1% next fail2019–2024765
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail18.6% next fail2019–20241202
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail18.1% next fail2019–20241202
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail17.6% next fail2019–20241202
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail15.0% next fail2019–20241202
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail15.0% next fail2019–20241202
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail8.3% next fail2019–20241202
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail4.7% next fail2019–20241202
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail3.9% next fail2019–20241202
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail1.7% next fail2019–20241202
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–20241202

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Rover Metro get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Rover Metro gets a dangerous defect about as often as the UK average: 11.6 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 102.6 major and 15.6 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Rover Metro · Dangerous defects · 11.6 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 11.6 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects11.6per 10011.22019–20245116

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,116 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Rover Metro MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Rover Metro MOT: about £145 (up to about £276 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 663).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Rover Metro · Expected repair bill · 145.4 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill145.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue663
Estimated range lower145.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue663
Estimated range upper276.2GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue663
Noise, emissions and leaks: Exhaust rear silencer38.8GBP expected contribution200price catalogue663
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)38.0GBP expected contribution180price catalogue663
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)37.6GBP expected contribution150price catalogue663
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)30.9GBP expected contribution140price catalogue663

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Rover Metro more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 1 fail less often for their age than the Rover Metro and 7 as often or more. The Rover Metro has an MOT Risk Index of 96.1, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 663).

bar · Rover Metro · Rover Metro (this model) · 96.1 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rover Metro (this model)96.1index100 = normal2024663
Rover 21699.2index96.12024720
Chrysler Jeep Wrangler98.8index96.12024717
Audi 8094.3index96.12024814
Fiat Coupe99.8index96.12024802
Toyota Granvia96.7index96.120241185
Volvo 700 Series100.4index96.12024867
Hyundai Terracan97index96.120241242
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Alfa Romeo 15698index96.120241206

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Rover Metro last?

4.6% of Rover Metros tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 0.2% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 234).

line · Rover Metro · 100,000 miles (rough estimate: 234 tests, 95% interval 4.0–5.2%) · 4.6 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles (rou: 4.6. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.0. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles (rough estimate: 234 tests, 95% interval 4.0–5.2%)4.6% of tested cars2024234
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 10 tests, 95% interval 0.1–0.4%)0.2% of tested cars202410
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 2 tests, 95% interval 0.0–0.1%)0.0% of tested cars20242

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Rover Metro driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Rover Metro index is 125.3, against 109.3 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 663).

slope · Rover Metro · Age and mileage adjusted index · 125.3 vs 109.3 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 109.3 vs 125.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index125.3index109.32019–2024663

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Rover Metro engine is best?

For its age, the best Rover Metro engine is the petrol 1.2–1.5 litre at index 84.4, and the worst the petrol 1.0–1.2 litre at 110.7, where 100 = the model's own average (2024, n = 663).

bar · Rover Metro · Petrol 1.2–1.5 litre (rough estimate: 1,613 tests, 95% interval 78.2–91.0) · 84.4 vs 100 = model average · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol 1.2–1.5 litre (rough estimate: 1,613 tests, 95% interval 78.2–91.0)84.4index vs model norm100 = model average20241613
Petrol under 1.0 litre (rough estimate: 304 tests, 95% interval 87.3–118.1)102.2index vs model norm100 = model average2024304
Petrol 1.0–1.2 litre (rough estimate: 2,425 tests, 95% interval 105.2–116.4)110.7index vs model norm100 = model average20242425

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Rover Metro fail its MOT most?

Rover Metro fails first-time MOTs most in Portsmouth (PO): 46.4% against 34.5% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 138).

bar · Rover Metro · Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 138 tests, 95% interval 38.3–54.7%) · 46.4 vs 33.0 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 138 tests, 95% interval 38.3–54.7%)46.4% fail first time33.02024138
Coventry (CV) (rough estimate: 104 tests, 95% interval 33.3–51.9%)42.3% fail first time33.02024104
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 103 tests, 95% interval 32.7–51.4%)41.8% fail first time33.02024103
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 105 tests, 95% interval 30.3–48.6%)39.0% fail first time33.02024105
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 136 tests, 95% interval 23.1–38.3%)30.1% fail first time33.02024136
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 313 tests, 95% interval 24.6–34.7%)29.4% fail first time33.02024313

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Rover Metro?

Of failed Rover Metro MOTs, 19.0% were retested the same day and a further 68.8% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 3 days (2019–2024, n = 1,076).

bar · Rover Metro · Same-day retest · 19.0 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest19.0%failed initial tests2019–20241076
Retest within 10 days68.8%failed initial tests2019–20241076
Clean MOT streak42.6%observed chains2019–2024932
Repeat advisory21.0%observed chains2019–2024932
Decreasing odometer1.4% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20241169

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Rover Metro fails, does it fail again?

34.5% of Rover Metros that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 26.9% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 426). The failure most likely to come back is ‘body, chassis, structure’: 37.8% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Rover Metro · Repeat after fail · 34.5 vs 26.9 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 34.5 vs 26.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail34.5%26.92019–2024426

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Rover Metro faults come together?

On Rover Metros, seat belts and supplementary restraint systems and suspension failures turn up together 5.2 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 108).

Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 4.3–6.3)5.2liftexpected joint rate2024108
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 23 tests, 95% interval 2.5–5.8)3.9liftexpected joint rate202423
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 22 tests, 95% interval 2.3–5.5)3.6liftexpected joint rate202422
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 77 tests, 95% interval 2.8–4.4)3.5liftexpected joint rate202477
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 22 tests, 95% interval 2.2–5.3)3.5liftexpected joint rate202422
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 42 tests, 95% interval 2.5–4.6)3.4liftexpected joint rate202442
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 71 tests, 95% interval 2.6–4.3)3.4liftexpected joint rate202471
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 255 tests, 95% interval 2.9–3.7)3.3liftexpected joint rate2024255
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 71 tests, 95% interval 2.5–4.1)3.2liftexpected joint rate202471
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 69 tests, 95% interval 2.5–4.1)3.2liftexpected joint rate202469
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 251 tests, 95% interval 2.8–3.5)3.1liftexpected joint rate2024251
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 20 tests, 95% interval 1.9–4.8)3.1liftexpected joint rate202420
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 67 tests, 95% interval 2.4–3.9)3.1liftexpected joint rate202467
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 255 tests, 95% interval 2.7–3.4)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024255
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility (rough estimate: 137 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.6)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024137
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 66 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.8)3.0liftexpected joint rate202466
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 136 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.5)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024136
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 37 tests, 95% interval 2.1–4.1)3.0liftexpected joint rate202437
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 2.6–3.4)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024223
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 226 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.3)2.9liftexpected joint rate2024226
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 63 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.6)2.8liftexpected joint rate202463
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 121 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.3)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024121
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 220 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.1)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024220
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 123 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.2)2.7liftexpected joint rate2024123
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 217 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024217
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 220 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024220
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 209 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024209
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 202 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.0)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024202
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 56 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202456
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 51 tests, 95% interval 1.7–3.0)2.3liftexpected joint rate202451
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 107 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.7)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024107
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Brakes + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)16tests with both202416
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Steering + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245
Steering + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of a Rover Metro MOT matter?

Rover Metros fail first time most in January (41.3%, against 31.1% for all cars that month) and least in June (32.1%) (2024, n = 663).

line · Rover Metro · January · 41.3 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 41.3. December: 36.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover Metro: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January41.3% fail first time31.12024300
February35.4% fail first time30.02024353
March34.8% fail first time28.32024489
April34.8% fail first time29.82024423
May32.8% fail first time28.82024445
June32.1% fail first time28.12024486
July33.5% fail first time29.32024523
August32.5% fail first time29.22024523
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September36.0% fail first time28.22024464
October32.2% fail first time30.32024478
November36.2% fail first time30.62024412
December36.8% fail first time29.32024220

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Does the Rover Metro fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 663 initial Rover Metro tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Rover 25, a car of the same inspection class with 4.9× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 663 initial Rover Metro tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 663 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Rover 25, a car of the same inspection class with 4.9× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Rover Metro MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/rover-metro/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Rover Metro MOT: quick answers

What is the Rover Metro first-time MOT pass rate?

67.0% of first attempts passed in 2024 (663 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 663 primary tests: 33.03% failed first time and 70.9% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 96.1 is shown separately.