MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Toyota Carina — MOT statistics 2024

The Toyota Carina failed 35.08% of 687 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 103.7 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 103.7, 95% CI 93.4–114.5 (100 = national average) 100 103.7 0 200
Index
103.7
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
35.08%
n = 687
Dangerous /100
10
national ≈11
Rank
494 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Alfa Romeo Giulietta (index 104.0) — the two published results are 0.3 index points apart.

Toyota Carina common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are well below the reference at 17.7 per 100 tests, against 30.5 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Toyota Carina common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Brakes20.41,62921.30.96×0.91–1.01 · not distinguishable
Suspension20.11,59922.40.90×0.85–0.94
Emissions & leaks19.21,5338.62.25×2.14–2.36
Body & structure19.21,52816.01.20×1.14–1.26
Lamps & electrical17.71,41230.50.58×0.55–0.61
Visibility13.51,07711.41.19×1.12–1.26
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 7,974 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Emissions levels exceed default limitsEmissions levels exceed default limits7.210.4715.47×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired7.291.126.52×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated6.471.484.38×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or…Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer4.150.537.84×Ask the seller about: Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range s
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded4.671.413.32×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc4.671.563.00×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.3.600.596.08×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure3.911.163.37×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn6.374.871.31×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources3.472.831.23×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Toyota Carina MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 58.1 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 11.1 per 100 tests — the gap is 47.0 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Toyota Carina MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension58.1
Brakes47.5
Tyres35.8
Emissions & leaks15.7
Body & structure14.9
Non-component advisories11.1

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed35.3%618
It passed30.3%3,211

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 5.0 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 28.1% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 7,304 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only111.1fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage105.0fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year22.8%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 6.1 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How does the Toyota Carina perform as it gets older?

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeToyota CarinaAll vehiclesGap

How dangerous are Toyota Carina MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 91.8 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Toyota Carina MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor22.6114.221.59×
Major91.8252.751.74×
Dangerous9.6111.150.86×

Chart values: Minor 22.6 · Major 91.8 · Dangerous 9.6.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Toyota Carina MOT matter?

Nov is highest at 40.3%; Jun is lowest at 33.3% — the gap is 7.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Toyota Carina MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–42%.

bars: Toyota Carina · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthToyota CarinaAll vehiclesGap
Jan37.44%31.12%+6.3 pp
Feb37.75%29.99%+7.8 pp
Mar38.21%28.26%+9.9 pp
Apr39.95%29.78%+10.2 pp
May38.76%28.79%+10.0 pp
Jun33.27%28.15%+5.1 pp
Jul36.57%29.33%+7.2 pp
Aug38.27%29.2%+9.1 pp
Sep36.13%28.19%+7.9 pp
Oct39.91%30.34%+9.6 pp
Nov40.28%30.58%+9.7 pp
Dec38.78%29.33%+9.5 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 7.0 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Toyota Carina average mileage by age

Does high mileage mean more Toyota Carina MOT failures?

All ages together, split by odometer (the bands are not split by age, so higher-mileage cars are also older and this mixes wear with age): 26.4% of the lowest-mileage cars failed versus 47.3% of the highest.

Bars: Toyota Carina · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data
Odometer% failingTestsGap vs lowest-mileage band
40-70k miles26.4%1,015+0.0 pp
70-100k miles35%2,092+8.6 pp
100-140k miles40.5%2,700+14.1 pp
140k+ miles47.3%1,885+20.9 pp

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests

Where in Britain the Toyota Carina fails its MOT most

Bath area is highest at 55.3%; Twickenham area is lowest at 24.3% — the gap is 31.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Bath (BA)55.34%+17.4 pp
Brighton (BN)47.55%+9.6 pp
Portsmouth (PO)46.75%+8.8 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Twickenham (TW)24.27%-13.7 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)26.21%-11.7 pp
Tonbridge (TN)27.34%-10.6 pp
Croydon (CR)29.37%-8.6 pp
Guildford (GU)29.41%-8.5 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

How many miles does a Toyota Carina last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 57.5%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 18.7% — the gap is 38.8 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles4,58557.53%
150,000+ miles1,49218.72%

Of 7,970 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 57.5% had reached 100k miles, 18.7% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Toyota Carina faults that come together

Seatbelts & SRS + Suspension stand out at 4.11×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension564.11× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension263.99× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems503.91× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment273.73× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1723.4× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems483.17× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility203.15× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks202.93× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension2912.87× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension852.85× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres1202.81× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks2912.74× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres1242.73× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering742.65× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility352.64× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2942.61× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks3262.6× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension2922.58× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension3082.57× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility1132.55× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle212.55× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres1212.54× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks3612.53× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility2892.47× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres1422.47× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility2502.37× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering732.34× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering772.33× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems402.33× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3482.3× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems322.25× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering832.21× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension2992.19× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility2162.19× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes2752.15× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility2322.11× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility612.1× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility2662× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres231.83× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle16too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres12too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering10too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres7too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels6too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems» and «Suspension» appear together 4.11× more often than chance (56 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Toyota Carina MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £129.96 to £246.92, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£130–247
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Noise, emissions and leaks19.2 (nat. 3.67)Exhaust rear silencer£200£38.40
Suspension20.1 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£36.18
Brakes20.4 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£30.60
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment17.7 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£24.78

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £130 to £247, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Toyota Carina rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 6th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
6th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Toyota Carina has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Toyota Carina advisory become a failure?

Body, chassis, structure are highest at 25.5%; Tyres are lowest at 9.5% — the gap is 16.1 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Toyota Carina chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Toyota Carina, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Body & chassis 25.5% · Suspension 17.7% · Brakes 16% · Noise, emissions, leaks 14.4% · Tyres 9.5%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Body, chassis, structure25.5%12.1 months2,404658
Suspension17.7%12.1 months2,8121,525
Brakes16.0%12.1 months2,0091,451
Noise, emissions and leaks14.4%12 months2,350794
Tyres9.5%12.1 months2,3721,235

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 26 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 2,404 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Toyota Carina?

Body, chassis, structure after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 18.3%; Noise, emissions and leaks after a passed at age 20+ are lowest at 6.9% — the gap is 11.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
20+passedBody, chassis, structure 9.6% · Visibility 7.1% · Noise, emissions and leaks 6.9%1,678
20+advisoryBody, chassis, structure 17.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.6% · Visibility 12.1%1,888
20+failureBody, chassis, structure 18.3% · Noise, emissions and leaks 17.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.5%1,986

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Toyota Carina ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 67.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 6.6% — the gap is 61.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
25.62%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.333
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
24.85%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
0.892%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,924 failures followed through to their re-test, 25.62% were repaired and passed the same day and 67.83% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 5,654 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.333 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,626 miles a year across 1,777 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 24.85% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 41.64% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 0.892% of 1,793 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 33,356 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Toyota Carina safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 1.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Toyota Carina
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/1997/02723/07/199744,611POSSIBLE NON-OPERATION OF STOP LIGHTS

DVSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns for the Toyota Carina, covering roughly 44,611 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Toyota Carina inspection results in other countries

United Kingdom MOT stands out at 35.1%, against 26.0% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Same model, different national inspection regimes
CountryTestThis model failsNational averagePositionSample
United KingdomMOT (class 4)35.08%26.01%+9.1 pp687
NorwayPKK42.5%33.7%+8.8 pp950

The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Toyota Carina is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: Statens vegvesen — Periodisk kjøretøykontroll (PKK) 2024, CC BY 4.0. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Toyota Carina MOT: quick answers

Toyota Carina MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 103.7, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Toyota Carina first-time MOT pass rate?
64.92% of first attempts passed in 2024 (687 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 35.08% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 687 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 103.7 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Toyota Carina with other cars

Mitsubishi Shogun Sport is highest at 104.0; Nissan Leaf is lowest at 103.4 — the gap is 0.6 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Toyota MOT statisticsToyota Starlet MOT statsToyota Granvia MOT stats

Similar risk

Alfa Romeo Giulietta (index 104.0)Mitsubishi Shogun Sport (index 104.0)Nissan Leaf (index 103.4)

Same size class

how Honda Odyssey compareshow Ferrari Portofino compareshow Ferrari 812 compares

By area

Toyota Carina MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Toyota Carina body, chassis and structure failuresToyota Carina brakes failuresToyota Carina vehicle identification failuresToyota Carina lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresToyota Carina noise, emissions and leaks failuresToyota Carina seat belts and airbags failuresToyota Carina steering failuresToyota Carina suspension failuresToyota Carina tyres failuresToyota Carina visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Toyota Carina in Norway


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:toyota-carina:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Toyota Carina MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/toyota-carina/ · Published 2026-07-30.