MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Which Rover models fail their MOT less for their age?

In 2024, 69.5% of MOTs on the 8 Rover models published here passed (64.6% first time, 4.8% after a fix at the test centre), from 26,116 first tests. Allowing for age (not mileage), these Rover models fail 8% less often than normal: brand MOT Risk Index 92.3 (95% CI 90.8–93.8; 100 = normal).

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

No single Rover model has 10,000 first tests apart from one, so none is named best or worst here; every model's figure is in the chart and the table (the brand index uses all 26,116 tests).

dot · Rover · MOT Risk Index · 92.3 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index with 95% intervals; 100 = normal; Rover 92.3 for the brand. Rover Mini: 80.3 (77.9–82.7). Rover 25: 91.4 (87.3–95.4). Rover Metro: 96.1 (86.0–106.7). Rover 216: 99.2 (89.3–109.5). Rover 75: 101.2 (98.5–103.9). Rover 214: 102.6 (91.9–113.9). Rover 45: 106.8 (101.5–112.0). Rover 416: 121.6 (107.5–136.2). Axis from 70 to 150. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 25 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

Which Rover models fail least and most for their age?

Of the 8 Rover models, 2 fail less often than normal for their age, 2 more often, and 4 cannot be told apart from normal because their 95% intervals include 100.

Rover models by MOT Risk Index, lowest first (2024)
ModelMOT pass rate, %Passed first time, %MOT Risk Index95% intervalFirst tests
Rover Mini74.871.480.377.9–82.710,968
Rover 2569.762.291.487.3–95.43,223
Rover Metro70.967.096.186.0–106.7663
Rover 21671.566.199.289.3–109.5720
Rover 7563.258.2101.298.5–103.97,540
Rover 21469.164.9102.691.9–113.9615
Rover 4562.655.9106.8101.5–112.02,003
Rover 41667.258.3121.6107.5–136.2384

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 26,116 (initial tests) · Method: MOT Risk Index = observed first-time failures ÷ failures expected for the same age profile × 100; brand index sums both over the 8 models · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where are Rover models worse than other cars of the same age?

Allowing for age, Rover models fail on suspension and body, chassis, structure more than other cars of the same age: 31.9 failures per 100 tests against 28.7 expected (3.2 more; 95% interval 3.00 to 3.45) and 18.7 failures per 100 tests against 15.7 expected (3.0 more; 95% interval 2.81 to 3.16); the two intervals overlap, so neither is clearly first.

Rover: failures per 100 tests by group against the same-age expectation (2019–2024)
Failure groupRover, per 100 testsExpected for the same ageDifference95% intervalMost common failure on (models)
Suspension31.928.7+3.23.00 to 3.451 of 8
Body, chassis, structure18.715.7+3.02.81 to 3.164 of 8
Noise, emissions and leaks10.69.1+1.51.40 to 1.660 of 8
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems4.83.6+1.21.13 to 1.310 of 8
Steering7.06.8+0.10.03 to 0.240 of 8
Road Wheels0.50.5-0.0-0.05 to -0.000 of 8
Identification of the vehicle0.70.8-0.1-0.12 to -0.050 of 8
Tyres6.88.2-1.4-1.46 to -1.260 of 8
Visibility11.112.5-1.5-1.58 to -1.320 of 8
Brakes22.123.6-1.5-1.71 to -1.341 of 8
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment33.236.6-3.5-3.69 to -3.242 of 8

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 242,876 (initial tests of the 8 models) · Method: failure items per 100 tests against the rate expected for the same age and kind of vehicle; interval from the count of failures (Poisson); a group is named only when its interval is wholly above zero and it is at least 5% above the expected rate · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Rover MOT statistics by model 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 25 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/brand/rover/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.