MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Rover 214 MOT pass rate and common problems

69.1% of Rover 214s passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 615 first tests): 64.9% at the first attempt and 4.2% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 1 in 3 failed the first attempt. For its age, it is statistically indistinguishable from normal: MOT Risk Index 102.6 (95% CI 91.9–113.9; 100 = normal).

Rover 214 at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate69.1%incl. 4.2% fixed at the test centre2024615
Passed at the first attempt64.9%all first tests2024615
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 91.9–113.9)102.6index100 = normal for its age · rank 480 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)2024615
Biggest excess: Noise, emissions and leaks22.5per 1009.3 same-age2019–20246507
Dangerous defects9.7per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20246507
Advisory items167.7per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–20246507
strip · Rover 214 · MOT Risk Index · 102.6 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Rover 214. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 480 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 367 and 598 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Rover 214 index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank480of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age2024615
Best rank within its 95% interval367rankother models held where they are2024615
Worst rank within its 95% interval598rankother models held where they are2024615

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index moved from 92.4 to 102.6 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed, and crossed the normal line.

What actually fails on a Rover 214 MOT, and how often?

Rover 214 MOTs fail most often on ‘body, chassis, structure’: 23.7 per 100 tests, against 16.6 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 6,507).

bar · Rover 214 · Body, chassis, structure · 23.7 vs 16.6 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure23.7per 10016.62019–20241540
Noise, emissions and leaks22.5per 1009.32019–20241467
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment22.1per 10032.62019–20241439
Brakes17.2per 10022.52019–20241116
Suspension17.1per 10025.22019–20241112
Visibility12.3per 10012.12019–2024802

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,507 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Rover 214's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Rover 214 advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: noise, emissions and leaks advisories became a fail at the next MOT 18.1% of the time.

funnel · Rover 214 · Noise, emissions and leaks · 18.1 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on noise, emissions and leaks: 18.1 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Noise, emissions and leaks18.1% next failmedian model2019–2024672
Suspension16.2% next failmedian model2019–2024909
Brakes15.7% next failmedian model2019–2024725
Tyres8.9% next failmedian model2019–2024923

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Rover 214 got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Rover 214 MOTs flag suspension most: 37.9 advisories per 100 tests, against 26.2 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 6,507).

bar · Rover 214 · Suspension · 37.9 vs 26.2 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension37.9per 10026.22019–20242465
Tyres35.1per 10039.72019–20242285
Brakes28.6per 10034.72019–20241858
Noise, emissions and leaks16.6per 1005.22019–20241081
Body, chassis, structure14.3per 1004.62019–2024933
Identification of the vehicle9.1per 1002.52019–2024594

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,507 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Rover 214?

For Rover 214s aged 20 or older whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘body, chassis, structure’: 19.6% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 1,606).

bar · Rover 214 · Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 51 cars) · 17.6 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 51 cars)17.6% next fail2019–202451
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 51 cars)13.7% next fail2019–202451
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 53 cars)17.0% next fail2019–202453
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 53 cars)15.1% next fail2019–202453
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 53 cars)11.3% next fail2019–202453
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)22.2% next fail2019–202472
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)20.8% next fail2019–202472
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)19.4% next fail2019–202472
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)18.1% next fail2019–202472
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)16.7% next fail2019–202472
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)15.3% next fail2019–202472
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)8.3% next fail2019–202472
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)6.9% next fail2019–202472
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 72 cars)6.9% next fail2019–202472
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass9.4% next fail2019–20241431
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass9.4% next fail2019–20241431
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass8.1% next fail2019–20241431
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass6.2% next fail2019–20241431
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass6.2% next fail2019–20241431
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass5.7% next fail2019–20241431
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass3.4% next fail2019–20241431
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass3% next fail2019–20241431
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass2.0% next fail2019–20241431
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a pass0.7% next fail2019–20241431
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory16.6% next fail2019–20241268
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory13.8% next fail2019–20241268
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory12.1% next fail2019–20241268
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory10.9% next fail2019–20241268
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory9.5% next fail2019–20241268
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory8.0% next fail2019–20241268
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory4.8% next fail2019–20241268
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory4.7% next fail2019–20241268
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory2.4% next fail2019–20241268
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after an advisory1.1% next fail2019–20241268
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail19.6% next fail2019–20241606
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail19.4% next fail2019–20241606
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail19.1% next fail2019–20241606
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail13.0% next fail2019–20241606
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail12.6% next fail2019–20241606
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail11.7% next fail2019–20241606
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail7.4% next fail2019–20241606
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail6.3% next fail2019–20241606
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail3.5% next fail2019–20241606
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–20241606

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Rover 214 get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Rover 214 gets a dangerous defect less often than the UK average: 9.7 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 103.3 major and 22.1 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Rover 214 · Dangerous defects · 9.7 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 9.7 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects9.7per 10011.22019–20246507

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 6,507 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Rover 214 compare with cars of its own age and size?

At every age shown, Rover 214s fail first time no more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 20, where they fail less often: 46.8% against 47.4% (2024, n = 370).

line · Rover 214 · Age 20 · 46.8 vs 47.4 · 2024
Age 20: 46.8. Age 20: 46.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 2046.8% fail47.42024370

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Rover 214 MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Rover 214 MOT: about £133 (up to about £252 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 615).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Rover 214 · Expected repair bill · 132.5 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill132.5GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue615
Estimated range lower132.5GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue615
Estimated range upper251.8GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue615
Noise, emissions and leaks: Exhaust rear silencer45GBP expected contribution200price catalogue615
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)30.9GBP expected contribution140price catalogue615
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)30.8GBP expected contribution180price catalogue615
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)25.8GBP expected contribution150price catalogue615

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Rover 214 more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 3 fail less often for their age than the Rover 214 and 5 as often or more. The Rover 214 has an MOT Risk Index of 102.6, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 615).

bar · Rover 214 · Rover 214 (this model) · 102.6 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rover 214 (this model)102.6index100 = normal2024615
Rover 21699.2index102.62024720
Rover 45106.8index102.620242003
SEAT Tarraco102.3index102.620241663
Ford Freedom105.6index102.620241448
Daihatsu Hijet111.5index102.62024909
Skoda Felicia112.6index102.62024947
Mazda 323111.1index102.620241334
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Vauxhall Ampera92.6index102.620241175

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Rover 214 last?

17.9% of Rover 214s tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 3.3% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 1,165).

line · Rover 214 · 100,000 miles · 17.9 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 17.9. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.7. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles17.9% of tested cars20241165
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 212 tests, 95% interval 2.9–3.7%)3.3% of tested cars2024212
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 46 tests, 95% interval 0.5–0.9%)0.7% of tested cars202446

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Rover 214 driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Rover 214 index is 119.8, against 111.1 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 615).

slope · Rover 214 · Age and mileage adjusted index · 119.8 vs 111.1 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 111.1 vs 119.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index119.8index111.12019–2024615

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Rover 214 fail its MOT most?

Rover 214 fails first-time MOTs most in Brighton (BN): 59.6% against 40.5% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 114).

bar · Rover 214 · Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 50.5–68.2%) · 59.6 vs 35.1 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 50.5–68.2%)59.6% fail first time35.12024114
Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 43.1–61.2%)52.2% fail first time35.12024113
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 132 tests, 95% interval 41.6–58.4%)50% fail first time35.12024132
Southampton (SO) (rough estimate: 107 tests, 95% interval 25.4–43.0%)33.6% fail first time35.12024107
Dudley (DY) (rough estimate: 112 tests, 95% interval 26.6–44.0%)34.8% fail first time35.12024112
Oxford (OX) (rough estimate: 177 tests, 95% interval 28.9–42.9%)35.6% fail first time35.12024177
Swindon (SN) (rough estimate: 129 tests, 95% interval 41.1–58.1%)49.6% fail first time35.12024129
Norwich (NR) (rough estimate: 127 tests, 95% interval 39.5–56.6%)48.0% fail first time35.12024127
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Gloucester (GL) (rough estimate: 123 tests, 95% interval 39.3–56.7%)48.0% fail first time35.12024123
Plymouth (PL) (rough estimate: 102 tests, 95% interval 35.8–54.8%)45.1% fail first time35.12024102
Hemel Hempstead (HP) (rough estimate: 102 tests, 95% interval 34.9–53.8%)44.1% fail first time35.12024102
Kingston upon Thames (KT) (rough estimate: 107 tests, 95% interval 34.9–53.4%)43.9% fail first time35.12024107
Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 34.6–52.6%)43.4% fail first time35.12024113
Leicester (LE) (rough estimate: 136 tests, 95% interval 34.7–51.1%)42.6% fail first time35.12024136
Sheffield (S) (rough estimate: 129 tests, 95% interval 33.0–49.7%)41.1% fail first time35.12024129
Ipswich (IP) (rough estimate: 108 tests, 95% interval 31.9–50.2%)40.7% fail first time35.12024108
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 138 tests, 95% interval 32.1–48.2%)39.9% fail first time35.12024138
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 417 tests, 95% interval 35.0–44.3%)39.6% fail first time35.12024417
Coventry (CV) (rough estimate: 191 tests, 95% interval 32.1–45.8%)38.7% fail first time35.12024191
Redhill (RH) (rough estimate: 109 tests, 95% interval 29.1–47.0%)37.6% fail first time35.12024109

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Rover 214?

Of failed Rover 214 MOTs, 26.4% were retested the same day and a further 67.2% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 1,811).

bar · Rover 214 · Same-day retest · 26.4 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest26.4%failed initial tests2019–20241811
Retest within 10 days67.2%failed initial tests2019–20241811
Clean MOT streak27.8%observed chains2019–20241085
Repeat advisory35.8%observed chains2019–20241085
Decreasing odometer1.2% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20241441

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Rover 214 fails, does it fail again?

33.3% of Rover 214s that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 32.2% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 426). The failure most likely to come back is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 37.2% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Rover 214 · Repeat after fail · 33.3 vs 32.2 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 33.3 vs 32.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail33.3%32.22019–2024426

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Rover 214 faults come together?

On Rover 214s, seat belts and supplementary restraint systems and suspension failures turn up together 3.3 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 144).

Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 144 tests, 95% interval 2.8–3.9)3.3liftexpected joint rate2024144
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 26 tests, 95% interval 2.1–4.7)3.2liftexpected joint rate202426
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 29 tests, 95% interval 1.9–4.0)2.8liftexpected joint rate202429
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 107 tests, 95% interval 2.3–3.4)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024107
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 84 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.3)2.7liftexpected joint rate202484
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 135 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.1)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024135
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 101 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.1)2.6liftexpected joint rate2024101
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.3)2.5liftexpected joint rate202454
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility (rough estimate: 230 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024230
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 228 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024228
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 374 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.7)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024374
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 69 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.1)2.5liftexpected joint rate202469
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 66 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.1)2.5liftexpected joint rate202466
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 328 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.7)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024328
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 86 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.0)2.4liftexpected joint rate202486
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 45 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.2)2.4liftexpected joint rate202445
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 135 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024135
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 226 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.7)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024226
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 244 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.7)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024244
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 137 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024137
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension (rough estimate: 251 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.7)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024251
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 81 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.9)2.4liftexpected joint rate202481
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 169 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.7)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024169
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (rough estimate: 26 tests, 95% interval 1.5–3.4)2.3liftexpected joint rate202426
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 85 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.8)2.3liftexpected joint rate202485
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 47 tests, 95% interval 1.6–3.0)2.3liftexpected joint rate202447
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 122 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.7)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024122
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 197 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.5)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024197
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 42 tests, 95% interval 1.6–3.0)2.2liftexpected joint rate202442
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 333 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.4)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024333
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 106 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.6)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024106
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 133 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.5)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024133
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 246 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.3)2.0liftexpected joint rate2024246
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 144 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.4)2.0liftexpected joint rate2024144
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 211 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.3)2.0liftexpected joint rate2024211
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 201 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.2)1.9liftexpected joint rate2024201
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 120 tests, 95% interval 1.6–2.3)1.9liftexpected joint rate2024120
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)15tests with both202415
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of a Rover 214 MOT matter?

Rover 214s fail first time most in January (46.7%, against 31.1% for all cars that month) and least in December (36.3%) (2024, n = 615).

line · Rover 214 · January · 46.7 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 46.7. December: 36.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Rover 214: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January46.7% fail first time31.12024599
February38.7% fail first time30.02024524
March42.7% fail first time28.32024661
April38.4% fail first time29.82024417
May39.1% fail first time28.82024483
June42.9% fail first time28.12024459
July40.5% fail first time29.32024630
August39.2% fail first time29.22024587
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September39.4% fail first time28.22024686
October39.6% fail first time30.32024570
November39.4% fail first time30.62024563
December36.3% fail first time29.32024328

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Does the Rover 214 fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 615 initial Rover 214 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Rover 45, a car of the same inspection class with 3.3× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 615 initial Rover 214 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 615 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Rover 45, a car of the same inspection class with 3.3× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Rover 214 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/rover-214/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Rover 214 MOT: quick answers

What is the Rover 214 first-time MOT pass rate?

64.9% of first attempts passed in 2024 (615 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 615 primary tests: 35.12% failed first time and 69.1% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 102.6 is shown separately.