LDV Convoy — MOT statistics 2024
The LDV Convoy failed 45.11% of 634 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 112.8 (100 = expected for its age profile). This van fails its MOT about 13% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Citroen Relay (index 112.6) — the two published results are 0.2 index points apart.
LDV Convoy common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 76.7 per 100 tests, against 49.6 per 100 tests across UK vans and pickups of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vans and pickups of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 76.7 | 4,426 | 49.6 | 1.55×1.50–1.59 |
| Brakes | 54.2 | 3,125 | 33.7 | 1.61×1.55–1.67 |
| Body & structure | 41.5 | 2,395 | 28.8 | 1.44×1.38–1.50 |
| Suspension | 35.4 | 2,042 | 41.5 | 0.85×0.82–0.89 |
| Visibility | 25.6 | 1,479 | 19.6 | 1.31×1.24–1.38 |
| Tyres | 15.0 | 864 | 8.4 | 1.79×1.67–1.91 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 17.16 | 1.12 | 15.35× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the…Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced | 13.11 | 0.39 | 33.88× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle. | 9.71 | 0.59 | 16.40× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 11.03 | 2.57 | 4.30× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 9.88 | 2.83 | 3.49× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a…Body, cab or chassis excessively corroded at a mounting point | 7.07 | 0.26 | 27.30× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 7.58 | 1.41 | 5.40× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 6.21 | 0.38 | 16.43× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 6.83 | 2.22 | 3.07× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 6.62 | 3.59 | 1.84× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
LDV Convoy MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Brakes are highest at 67.3 per 100 tests; Emissions & leaks are lowest at 16.9 per 100 tests — the gap is 50.4 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Brakes | 67.3 |
| Suspension | 63.6 |
| Body & structure | 35.3 |
| Tyres | 34.6 |
| Steering | 21.1 |
| Emissions & leaks | 16.9 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
If a van like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 36.3% | 742 |
| It passed | 41.4% | 1,656 |
A failed test lowers next year's chance of failing again by 5.1 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is seat belts and supplementary restraint systems — 35.5% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every van with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 5,609 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 118.8 | fails more often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 124.0 | fails more often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 23.1% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.2 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the van sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the LDV Convoy compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against other light commercials tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | LDV Convoy | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 14 years | 49.27% | 46.85% | +2.42 pp | 205 |
| 15 years | 50.94% | 47.39% | +3.56 pp | 318 |
| 16 years | 54.11% | 47.57% | +6.54 pp | 475 |
| 17 years | 53.27% | 47.5% | +5.77 pp | 597 |
| 18 years | 51.56% | 47.44% | +4.12 pp | 737 |
| 19 years | 53.2% | 46.92% | +6.29 pp | 718 |
| 20 years | 50.73% | 46.07% | +4.65 pp | 619 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the LDV Convoy perform as it gets older?
The Convoy at age 20 stands out at 46.3%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: van age, years · failure-rate scale 0–50%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | LDV Convoy | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 46.3% | 41.0% | +5.3 pp |
How dangerous are LDV Convoy MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 217.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 35.33 | 14.22 | 2.48× |
| Major | 217.01 | 52.75 | 4.11× |
| Dangerous | 29.33 | 11.15 | 2.63× |
Chart values: Minor 35.3 · Major 217.0 · Dangerous 29.3.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a LDV Convoy MOT matter?
May is highest at 55.3%; Apr is lowest at 46.4% — the gap is 8.8 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 27%–57%.
bars: LDV Convoy · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | LDV Convoy | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 55.1% | 31.12% | +24.0 pp |
| Feb | 49.21% | 29.99% | +19.2 pp |
| Mar | 54.44% | 28.26% | +26.2 pp |
| Apr | 46.43% | 29.78% | +16.6 pp |
| May | 55.25% | 28.79% | +26.5 pp |
| Jun | 52.17% | 28.15% | +24.0 pp |
| Jul | 50.84% | 29.33% | +21.5 pp |
| Aug | 48.39% | 29.2% | +19.2 pp |
| Sep | 53.73% | 28.19% | +25.5 pp |
| Oct | 49.9% | 30.34% | +19.6 pp |
| Nov | 48.34% | 30.58% | +17.8 pp |
| Dec | 48.47% | 29.33% | +19.1 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 8.8 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
LDV Convoy average mileage by age
At age 20+, the middle half of Convoys runs from 61,985 miles to 112,696 miles, against 83,020 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Does high mileage mean more LDV Convoy MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 40.6% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 53.7% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15+ | 40-70k miles | 40.6% | 33.2–48.5% | 155 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 70-100k miles | 44.3% | 36.6–52.3% | 149 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 100-140k miles | 48.5% | 39–58.1% | 101 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 140k+ miles | 53.7% | 40.6–66.3% | 54 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 | 50,089 | 69,316 | 95,004 | 81 |
| 20+ | 61,985 | 83,020 | 112,696 | 369 |
A typical 20+-year-old Convoy has ~83,020 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the LDV Convoy fails its MOT most
Plymouth area is highest at 67.0%; Birmingham area is lowest at 37.0% — the gap is 30.0 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Plymouth (PL) | 66.96% | +15.9 pp |
| Bristol (BS) | 66.1% | +15.0 pp |
| Bath (BA) | 64.58% | +13.5 pp |
| Brighton (BN) | 62.04% | +11.0 pp |
| Exeter (EX) | 61.03% | +10.0 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Birmingham (B) | 36.97% | -14.1 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.
How many miles does a LDV Convoy last?
100,000+ miles stands out at 33.1%.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 1,902 | 33.11% |
Of 5,745 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 33.1% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
LDV Convoy faults that come together
Seatbelts & SRS + Suspension stand out at 3.16×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 217 | 3.16× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Steering | 132 | 2.88× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 90 | 2.85× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 27 | 2.82× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 313 | 2.8× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 137 | 2.59× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 178 | 2.51× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 46 | 2.47× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 232 | 2.43× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 22 | 2.41× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 415 | 2.4× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 171 | 2.4× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 123 | 2.4× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 29 | 2.36× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 241 | 2.33× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 266 | 2.31× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 98 | 2.31× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 536 | 2.3× |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 48 | 2.28× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 124 | 2.24× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 525 | 2.19× |
| Brakes | Tyres | 305 | 2.13× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 227 | 2.13× (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 236 | 2.12× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 157 | 2.12× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Steering | 326 | 2.1× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 302 | 2.09× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 70 | 2.05× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 139 | 2.02× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 371 | 1.99× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 425 | 1.96× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 212 | 1.96× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 706 | 1.94× |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 685 | 1.94× |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 929 | 1.9× |
| Steering | Visibility | 225 | 1.87× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 434 | 1.85× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 702 | 1.84× |
| Suspension | Visibility | 328 | 1.81× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 442 | 1.76× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 19 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 15 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Tyres | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Steering | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Buses and coaches supplementary tests | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Steering | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Buses and coaches supplementary tests | Suspension | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Speedometer and speed limiter | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Brakes» and «Suspension» appear together 2.30× more often than chance (536 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
LDV Convoy MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £265.90 to £505.21, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 76.7 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £107.38 |
| Brakes | 54.2 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £81.30 |
| Suspension | 35.4 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £63.72 |
| Tyres | 15.0 (nat. 8.7) | Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted) | £90 | £13.50 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £266 to £505, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
LDV Convoy rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 5.68×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This LDV Convoy fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does a LDV Convoy advisory become a failure?
Brakes are highest at 26.9%; Noise, emissions and leaks are lowest at 5.5% — the gap is 21.5 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 26.9% | 12.3 months | 1,672 | 1,479 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 20.4% | 12.2 months | 1,529 | 749 |
| Suspension | 19.5% | 12.2 months | 2,032 | 1,316 |
| Steering | 16.7% | 12.2 months | 2,640 | 690 |
| Tyres | 16.3% | 12.2 months | 2,693 | 877 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 5.5% | 12 months | 3,054 | 587 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 27 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.3 months and roughly 1,672 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on a LDV Convoy?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 41.0%; Visibility after a passed at age 15-19 is lowest at 12.5% — the gap is 28.5 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12-14 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 31.3% · Brakes 18.8% · Tyres 17.5% | 80 (rough estimate) |
| 12-14 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 35.4% · Brakes 26.0% · Steering 17.7% | 96 (rough estimate) |
| 12-14 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 37.8% · Brakes 27.8% · Body, chassis, structure 20.0% | 180 (rough estimate) |
| 15-19 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26.7% · Brakes 15.4% · Visibility 12.5% | 487 (rough estimate) |
| 15-19 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 31.5% · Brakes 20.1% · Visibility 17.8% | 658 |
| 15-19 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 40.6% · Brakes 23.7% · Visibility 20.9% | 1,216 |
| 20+ | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.6% · Brakes 15.7% · Body, chassis, structure 14.0% | 337 (rough estimate) |
| 20+ | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26.6% · Brakes 20.0% · Visibility 16.1% | 440 (rough estimate) |
| 20+ | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 41.0% · Brakes 27.6% · Body, chassis, structure 20.5% | 697 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
LDV Convoy ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 70.8%; The same-day re-test pass rate is lowest at 13.6% — the gap is 57.2 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,773 failures followed through to their re-test, 13.59% were repaired and passed the same day and 70.78% within ten days; the median gap is 4 days. 7,465 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.631 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,444 miles a year across 1,264 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 15.86% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 50.68% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 4.832% of 1,283 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 30,566 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
LDV Convoy safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 1.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2002/119 | 04/09/2002 | 565 | SEAT MOUNTINGS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH HOMOLGATION REQUIREMENTS |
DVSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns for the LDV Convoy, covering roughly 565 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
LDV Convoy MOT: quick answers
LDV Convoy MOT Risk Index stands out at 112.8, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the LDV Convoy first-time MOT pass rate?
- 54.89% of first attempts passed in 2024 (634 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 45.11% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 634 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 112.8 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the LDV Convoy with other cars
Hyundai Matrix is highest at 112.9; Renault Grand Espace is lowest at 112.7 — the gap is 0.2 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Similar risk
Toyota Previa (index 112.8)Renault Grand Espace (index 112.7)Hyundai Matrix (index 112.9)
Same size class
how Audi RS6 compareshow MINI GT compareshow Rover 214 compares
By area
LDV Convoy MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
LDV Convoy body, chassis and structure failuresLDV Convoy brakes failuresLDV Convoy vehicle identification failuresLDV Convoy lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresLDV Convoy noise, emissions and leaks failuresLDV Convoy seat belts and airbags failuresLDV Convoy steering failuresLDV Convoy suspension failuresLDV Convoy tyres failuresLDV Convoy visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:ldv-convoy:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). LDV Convoy MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/ldv-convoy/ · Published 2026-07-30.