Renault Wind — MOT statistics 2024

The Renault Wind failed 39.81% of 2,065 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 102.4 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

Age-adjusted peer: Nissan Note (index 102.6) — the two published results are 0.2 index points apart.

Renault Wind common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension stands out at 29.6 per 100 tests, against 19.4 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Renault Wind MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Brakes are highest at 56.5 per 100 tests; Lamps & electrical are lowest at 3.4 per 100 tests — the gap is 53.1 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Renault Wind against cars of the same age

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

A failed test lowers next year's chance of failing again by 4.0 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 29.1% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 13,027 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 18.7 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Renault Wind compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Renault Wind perform as it gets older?

The Wind at age 13 is close to the reference at 39.8%, against 38.2% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–45%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

How dangerous are Renault Wind MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 76.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chart values: Minor 12.4 · Major 76.7 · Dangerous 13.4.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Renault Wind MOT matter?

Apr is highest at 44.2%; Aug is lowest at 36.8% — the gap is 7.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart scale: 27%–46%.

bars: Renault Wind · dashed: all class-4 cars

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 7.4 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Renault Wind average mileage by age

At age 14, the middle half of Winds runs from 49,865 miles to 82,681 miles, against 65,819 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Renault Wind MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 10–14, 28.3% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 51.9% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

A typical 14-year-old Wind has ~65,819 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Renault Wind fails its MOT most

Kilmarnock area is highest at 59.7%; Exeter area is lowest at 26.7% — the gap is 32.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Kilmarnock (KA)	59.66%	+18.6 pp
Hull (HU)	56.64%	+15.6 pp
Glasgow (G)	51.64%	+10.6 pp
Edinburgh (EH)	50.54%	+9.5 pp
Walsall (WS)	48.35%	+7.3 pp

Easiest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Exeter (EX)	26.72%	-14.3 pp
Llandudno (LL)	31.94%	-9.1 pp
Tonbridge (TN)	33.33%	-7.7 pp
Birmingham (B)	33.5%	-7.5 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 34%–52% failing.

How many miles does a Renault Wind last?

100,000+ miles stands out at 5.0%.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Of 13,034 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 5.0% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Renault Wind faults that come together

Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 8.41×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Defects in «Brakes» and «Suspension» appear together 2.18× more often than chance (702 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Renault Wind?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 35.7%, against 51.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 35.7% vs 51.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 15.8 pp lower (n_low=6,451, n_normal=1,222). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Best year for a Renault Wind, and the years to avoid

Build year 2011 is highest at 100.6; Build year 2012 is lowest at 78.4 — the gap is 22.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

The best build year here is 2012 and the weakest is 2012. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 3 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Renault Wind MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £118.68 to £225.49, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £119 to £225, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Renault Wind running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 14 are close to the reference at 40.0%, against 40.0% at age 13, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Renault Wind rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 1.39×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

This Renault Wind fails on corrosion more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Renault Wind advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 27.0%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 27.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 27 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 3,804 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Renault Wind?

Suspension after a failure at age 9-11 is highest at 24.8%; Brakes after a passed at age 6-8 are lowest at 7.9% — the gap is 16.9 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Renault Wind ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 66.6%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 5.1% — the gap is 61.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 4,305 failures followed through to their re-test, 28.29% were repaired and passed the same day and 66.57% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 10,182 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.049 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 2,788 miles a year across 2,239 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 33.3% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 43.3% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.251% of 2,239 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 5,295 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Renault Wind inspection results in other countries

United Kingdom MOT stands out at 39.8%, against 26.0% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.

Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 1.188 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Renault Wind is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Renault Wind MOT: quick answers

Renault Wind MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 102.4, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Renault Wind first-time MOT pass rate?

60.19% of first attempts passed in 2024 (2,065 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 39.81% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 2,065 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 102.4 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Renault Wind with other cars

Ford Focus is highest at 102.7; Seat Arona is lowest at 102.2 — the gap is 0.5 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Renault MOT statisticsRenault Master MOT statsRenault Captur MOT stats

Similar risk

Nissan Note (index 102.6)Seat Arona (index 102.2)Ford Focus (index 102.7)

Same size class

how Mercedes-Benz R-Class compareshow Chevrolet Lacetti compareshow Nissan Skyline compares

By build year

Renault Wind 2010Renault Wind 2011Renault Wind 2012

By area

Renault Wind MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Renault Wind body, chassis and structure failuresRenault Wind brakes failuresRenault Wind vehicle identification failuresRenault Wind lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresRenault Wind noise, emissions and leaks failuresRenault Wind road wheels failuresRenault Wind steering failuresRenault Wind suspension failuresRenault Wind tyres failuresRenault Wind visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Renault Wind in the Netherlands