Rover 25 — MOT statistics 2024

The Rover 25 failed 37.79% of 3,223 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 91.4 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 9% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care. But this fleet is driven far less than average: matched on annual mileage as well as age, using 2019-2024 test chains rather than 2024 alone, the figure is 107.1, on the other side of normal. Both numbers below.

Age-adjusted peer: Mercedes-Benz Viano (index 91.4) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Rover 25 common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension is well below the reference at 10.4 per 100 tests, against 32.4 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Rover 25 MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 38.7 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 9.5 per 100 tests — the gap is 29.2 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 7.4 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is body, chassis, structure — 37.8% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 42,731 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Split by how much each car is driven. This is a split by annual mileage, not by body type — the MOT record does not say whether a car is a conversion. Within each band the index compares with vehicles of the same age driven as much.

This is the rare case where usage changes the answer, not just the number: once you compare these against vehicles driven as little, the car moves from one side of normal to the other. Read the mileage-matched figure, not the headline one. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Rover 25 compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Rover 25 perform as it gets older?

The 25 at age 19 is well below the reference at 36.0%, against 43.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

How dangerous are Rover 25 MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 86.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chart values: Minor 25.9 · Major 86.7 · Dangerous 10.0.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Rover 25 MOT matter?

Apr is highest at 43.3%; Dec is lowest at 39.7% — the gap is 3.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart scale: 27%–45%.

bars: Rover 25 · dashed: all class-4 cars

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.6 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Rover 25 average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of 25s runs from 42,493 miles to 85,486 miles, against 61,574 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Rover 25 MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 28.7% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 40.4% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

A typical 20+-year-old 25 has ~61,574 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Rover 25 fails its MOT most

Salisbury area is highest at 53.2%; Uxbridge area is lowest at 27.5% — the gap is 25.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Salisbury (SP)	53.17%	+11.1 pp
Truro (TR)	52.13%	+10.1 pp
Bath (BA)	51.11%	+9.1 pp
Hull (HU)	50.86%	+8.8 pp
York (YO)	50.82%	+8.8 pp

Easiest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Uxbridge (UB)	27.49%	-14.5 pp
Bromley (BR)	28.76%	-13.3 pp
Romford (RM)	29.76%	-12.3 pp
London N (N)	32.89%	-9.1 pp
Slough (SL)	33.24%	-8.8 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 34%–51% failing.

How many miles does a Rover 25 last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 13.9%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 1.7% — the gap is 12.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Of 42,739 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 13.9% had reached 100k miles, 1.7% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Rover 25 faults that come together

Seatbelts & SRS + Suspension stand out at 4.34×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 2.74× more often than chance (1,531 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Rover 25?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 38.9%, against 55.9% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 38.9% vs 55.9% for 8–12k miles/year — 17.0 pp lower (n_low=1,084, n_normal=93). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Best year for a Rover 25, and the years to avoid

Build year 2001 is highest at 102.7; Build year 2005 is lowest at 91.2 — the gap is 11.5 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

The best build year here is 2005 and the weakest is 2002. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 3 of 7 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Rover 25 MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £91.27 to £173.41, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £91 to £173, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Rover 25 rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 3.04×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

This Rover 25 fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Rover 25 advisory become a failure?

Body, chassis, structure are highest at 30.5%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 30.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 31 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 2,348 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Rover 25?

Body, chassis, structure after a failure at age 12-14 are highest at 27.3%; Visibility after a passed at age 12-14 is lowest at 4.9% — the gap is 22.3 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Rover 25 ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 59.9%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 4.0% — the gap is 55.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 12,521 failures followed through to their re-test, 36.08% were repaired and passed the same day and 59.89% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 34,043 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.33 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,822 miles a year across 9,643 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 28.45% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 31.46% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 0.641% of 9,670 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 2,863 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Rover 25 MOT: quick answers

Rover 25 MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 91.4, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Rover 25 first-time MOT pass rate?

62.21% of first attempts passed in 2024 (3,223 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 37.79% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 3,223 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 91.4 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Rover 25 with other cars

Mercedes-Benz B-Class is highest at 91.8; Rover 25 is lowest at 91.4 — the gap is 0.4 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Rover MOT statisticsRover 75 MOT statsRover Mini MOT stats

Similar risk

Mercedes-Benz Viano (index 91.4)Toyota Avensis (index 91.6)Mercedes-Benz B-Class (index 91.8)

Same size class

how Nissan Primera compareshow Toyota Starlet compareshow Toyota GR Yaris compares

By build year

Rover 25 2000Rover 25 2001Rover 25 2002Rover 25 2003Rover 25 2004Rover 25 2005Rover 25 2006

By area

Rover 25 MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Rover 25 body, chassis and structure failuresRover 25 brakes failuresRover 25 vehicle identification failuresRover 25 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresRover 25 noise, emissions and leaks failuresRover 25 road wheels failuresRover 25 seat belts and airbags failuresRover 25 steering failuresRover 25 suspension failuresRover 25 tyres failuresRover 25 visibility failures

• Rover Mini
• Rover 75
• Rover 45
• Rover 216
• Rover Metro
• Rover 214
• Rover 416