MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee — MOT statistics 2024

The Chrysler Jeep Cherokee failed 39.89% of 1,943 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 95.9 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 95.9, 95% CI 90.8–101.2 (100 = national average) 100 95.9 0 200
Index
95.9
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
39.89%
n = 1,943
Dangerous /100
15
national ≈11
Rank
403 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Land Rover Discovery Sport (index 95.9) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Brakes stand out at 33.6 per 100 tests, against 22.7 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 2 of these are already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical36.56,91936.90.99×0.96–1.01 · not distinguishable
Brakes33.66,37422.71.48×1.44–1.51
Suspension28.05,32230.50.92×0.90–0.94
Body & structure14.02,66613.71.02×0.99–1.06 · not distinguishable
Visibility13.52,57212.21.11×1.07–1.15
Steering8.01,5285.91.35×1.29–1.43
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 18,982 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn11.814.872.43×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired6.141.125.49×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement5.341.244.31×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources6.342.832.24×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.232.092.03×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen3.762.221.69×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view3.802.361.61×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm3.302.151.53×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements3.502.571.36×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements3.093.590.86×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 68.4 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 7.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 61.4 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension68.4
Brakes65
Tyres30.5
Emissions & leaks19.2
Body & structure12.7
Steering7

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed33.9%1,878
It passed35.0%7,590

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (33.9% against 35.0%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 32.4% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 18,847 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only94.9fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage91.7fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year2.8%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (-3.2 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeChrysler Jeep CherokeeSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
10 years35.96%25.59%+10.36 pp267
11 years34.36%28.22%+6.14 pp390
12 years36.65%30.55%+6.1 pp783
13 years39.17%32.62%+6.55 pp1,223
14 years40.83%34.57%+6.26 pp1,702
15 years41.95%36.02%+5.93 pp2,298
16 years41.94%37.07%+4.87 pp2,494
17 years42%37.45%+4.55 pp2,550
18 years43.48%37.82%+5.66 pp2,155
19 years42.2%37.43%+4.77 pp1,597
20 years39.89%36.95%+2.94 pp1,123

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee perform as it gets older?

The Jeep Cherokee at age 17 is well below the reference at 37.3%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeChrysler Jeep CherokeeAll vehiclesGap
1737.3%43.1%-5.8 pp
1840.9%43.9%-2.9 pp
1939.8%43.5%-3.7 pp
2040.3%41.0%-0.7 pp

Is a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 2.5%.

Based on 1,810 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 103
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 378
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 276
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 251
20+ years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 802

How dangerous are Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 108.3 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor28.4214.222.00×
Major108.3352.752.05×
Dangerous15.2811.151.37×

Chart values: Minor 28.4 · Major 108.3 · Dangerous 15.3.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT matter?

Apr is highest at 43.7%; Sep is lowest at 38.5% — the gap is 5.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–45%.

bars: Chrysler Jeep Cherokee · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthChrysler Jeep CherokeeAll vehiclesGap
Jan42.38%31.12%+11.3 pp
Feb41.52%29.99%+11.5 pp
Mar39.3%28.26%+11.0 pp
Apr43.74%29.78%+14.0 pp
May40.93%28.79%+12.1 pp
Jun40.47%28.15%+12.3 pp
Jul40.33%29.33%+11.0 pp
Aug42.23%29.2%+13.0 pp
Sep38.48%28.19%+10.3 pp
Oct41.19%30.34%+10.8 pp
Nov39.66%30.58%+9.1 pp
Dec41.09%29.33%+11.8 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee average mileage by age

At age 18, the middle half of Jeep Cherokees runs from 87,651 miles to 135,729 miles, against 109,385 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Chrysler Jeep Cherokee · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–148k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 39% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 42.5% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Chrysler Jeep Cherokee: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+40-70k miles39%31.3–47.2%141 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles41.1%36.5–45.7%436 (rough estimate)
15+100-140k miles39.1%35.6–42.6%758
15+140k+ miles42.5%37.6–47.6%369 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1586,638110,602124,80095
1699,215124,084140,81782
1790,841110,712133,292201
1887,651109,385135,729276
1984,908105,135126,300251
20+92,994115,136139,429823

A typical 18-year-old Jeep Cherokee has ~109,385 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee fails its MOT most

Exeter area is highest at 54.4%; Slough area is lowest at 23.9% — the gap is 30.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Exeter (EX)54.4%+13.5 pp
Truro (TR)52.94%+12.1 pp
Swindon (SN)50.84%+10.0 pp
Plymouth (PL)50.56%+9.7 pp
Bath (BA)50.42%+9.6 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Slough (SL)23.88%-17.0 pp
Dartford (DA)24.14%-16.7 pp
Romford (RM)24.84%-16.0 pp
Enfield (EN)27.21%-13.6 pp
Manchester (M)27.68%-13.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 32%–53% failing.

How many miles does a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 60.4%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 12.5% — the gap is 47.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles11,44760.38%
150,000+ miles2,37112.51%

Of 18,957 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 60.4% had reached 100k miles, 12.5% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee faults that come together

Identification + Tyres stand out at 4.17×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Identification of the vehicleTyres214.17× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks243.99× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels243.44× (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels813.39× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks3143.23× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle663.2× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension2803.11× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems963.11× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres1243.05× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels852.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility352.8× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility402.76× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2902.74× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering1052.74× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks4542.73× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1662.68× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment672.57× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension452.57× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension4482.56× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres3562.56× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension522.56× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1512.51× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels352.5× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering3002.49× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres4302.45× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres1962.41× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension1,1582.39×
TyresVisibility2012.39× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks5012.38×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension6652.35×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems3142.35× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility1512.35× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,6762.33×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres602.32× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle282.32× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes7562.27×
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension3192.26× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility2282.26× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres1122.22× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering4422.14× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility9232.12×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment8932.12×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1,2832.1×
SuspensionTyres2472.09× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering5402.07×
BrakesVisibility6631.92×
SuspensionVisibility5431.85×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility3721.84× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility2261.81× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering16too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres15too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems11too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems10too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleRoad Wheels7too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Brakes» and «Suspension» appear together 2.39× more often than chance (1,158 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 30.5%, against 43.7% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year30.46%463
8–12k miles/year43.67%1,498
Gap (low − normal)-13.22 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1230.886840.45309-9.57 pp
1328.1811042.42429-14.24 pp
1433.1518445.54527-12.39 pp

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1439.134660.6133-21.48 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 30.5% vs 43.7% for 8–12k miles/year — 13.2 pp lower (n_low=463, n_normal=1,498). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 31.2% low-use vs 43.6% normal (-12.4 pp).

Best year for a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee, and the years to avoid

Build year 2009 is highest at 113.7; Build year 2001 is lowest at 85.7 — the gap is 28.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Chrysler Jeep Cherokee by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
201097.476.2–118.636.65%221no different
2009113.797.9–129.643.9%451no different
200898.685–112.338.91%514no different
200795.388.4–102.338.73%1,867no different
200693.487.5–99.238.87%2,498better
200599.293.3–105.242.11%2,527no different
200499.994.5–105.343.31%3,006no different
2003100.794–107.444.36%1,952no different
200296.988.6–105.143.3%1,224no different
200185.772.2–99.239.04%397better

The best build year here is 2001 and the weakest is 2006. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 2 of 10 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £151.90 to £288.61, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£152–289
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment36.5 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£51.10
Brakes33.6 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£50.40
Suspension28.0 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£50.40

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £152 to £289, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 stand out at 40.0%, against 37.0% at age 17, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 17
37
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 201 tests)
At age 19
40
other cars of this model tested at age 19 in 2024 (rough estimate: 251 tests)
Repairs per 100
£15,190
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
3d
median; 20.52% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1737.31%110,712201—
1840.94%109,385276—
1939.84%105,135251—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 4.53×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
4.53×
3.47% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
46th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Chrysler Jeep Cherokee fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee advisory become a failure?

Brakes are highest at 20.9%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 20.9 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Chrysler Jeep Cherokee, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Brakes 20.9% · Body & chassis 20.4% · Suspension 19.4% · Steering 14.8% · Tyres 8.3% · Noise, emissions, leaks 6.9% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Brakes20.9%12.2 months3,2504,547
Body, chassis, structure20.4%12.2 months3,5011,352
Suspension19.4%12.1 months3,6084,292
Steering14.8%12.1 months3,515807
Tyres8.3%12.2 months3,7012,625
Noise, emissions and leaks6.9%12.2 months3,6822,169
Non-component advisories0.0%——824

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 21 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.2 months and roughly 3,250 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Chrysler Jeep Cherokee?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 28.6%; Brakes after a passed at age 6-8 are lowest at 7.5% — the gap is 21.1 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
6-8passedBrakes 7.5% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 7.5%67 (rough estimate)
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.5% · Brakes 14.6% · Suspension 12.2%41 (rough estimate)
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.1% · Brakes 11.3% · Suspension 7.8%370 (rough estimate)
9-11advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.1% · Brakes 14.9% · Suspension 10.4%316 (rough estimate)
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.1% · Brakes 17.0% · Visibility 12.1%371 (rough estimate)
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.7% · Brakes 12.5% · Suspension 10.1%1,140
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 20.2% · Brakes 17.1% · Visibility 12.4%1,219
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.5% · Brakes 20.7% · Suspension 15.1%1,520
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.6% · Suspension 13.0% · Brakes 12.3%1,983
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.9% · Suspension 17.3% · Brakes 16.0%2,550
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 28.6% · Brakes 22.0% · Suspension 20.4%3,282
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.8% · Suspension 13.8% · Brakes 12.5%400 (rough estimate)
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.2% · Suspension 15.6% · Brakes 13.9%532
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.5% · Suspension 17.4% · Brakes 17.1%616

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 69.6%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 9.9% — the gap is 59.8 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
20.52%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.861
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
20.73%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
3.879%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 5,040 failures followed through to their re-test, 20.52% were repaired and passed the same day and 69.62% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 15,916 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.861 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 3,194 miles a year across 3,953 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 20.73% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 47.49% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 3.879% of 3,970 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 58,104 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 85.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2012: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2014: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2016: 12 · 2017: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2019: 0 · 2020: 0 · 2021: 4 · 2022: 0 · 2023: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2026: 1.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2026/02916/02/20262592020-2025 Jeep Wrangler and 2022-2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee PHEV vehicles. High voltage bat
R/2025/49221/11/2025258JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE PHEV 2022-2026 HYBRID CONTROL PROCESSOR SOFTWARE UPDATE
R/2025/48519/11/20254,0312014-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee 3.0L diesel. Loss of crankshaft reference position. Software
R/2025/38425/09/202567Jeep Grand Cherokee 2023-2024. 2nd row head restraints.
R/2025/28615/07/202543Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) blower motor inoperable
All 85 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2026/02916/02/202614/04/2021 – 15/10/20252592020-2025 Jeep Wrangler and 2022-2026 Jeep Grand Cherokee PHEV vehicles. High voltage bat
R/2025/49221/11/202517/05/2021 – 29/08/2025258JEEP GRAND CHEROKEE PHEV 2022-2026 HYBRID CONTROL PROCESSOR SOFTWARE UPDATE
R/2025/48519/11/202530/10/2012 – 14/09/20204,0312014-2020 Jeep Grand Cherokee 3.0L diesel. Loss of crankshaft reference position. Software
R/2025/38425/09/202516/05/2023 – 02/05/202467Jeep Grand Cherokee 2023-2024. 2nd row head restraints.
R/2025/28615/07/202502/11/2022 – 21/09/202343Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC) blower motor inoperable
R/2024/33013/09/202427/03/2023 – 07/08/2023112023 Jeep Grand Cherokee steering column control module (SCCM) internal failure
R/2024/19628/06/202403/12/2020 – 30/05/202366Front upper control arm to steering knuckle pinch bolts
R/2024/18728/06/202412/06/2013 – 14/09/20208,074High pressure fuel pump
R/2024/23014/06/202427/02/2013 – 09/09/20153,316Jeep Cherokee 2014-2014 Power liftgate module
R/2024/14904/06/202425/07/2013 – 26/12/2017452Reverse lamp height
R/2024/15930/05/202431/08/2020 – 05/12/2023142Windscreen defrost
R/2023/27817/11/202305/12/2020 – 31/05/20232On affected vehicles the rear coil springs may not have been installed correctly which may
R/2023/27817/11/202305/12/2020 – 31/05/20232On affected vehicles the rear coil springs may not have been installed correctly which may
R/2023/19604/08/202303/09/2015 – 10/10/2016149The Power Transfer Unit (PTU) may allow relative movement between the input splines and th
R/2022/34213/01/202311/12/2017 – 26/09/20191The Hydraulic Control Unit (HCU/ABS) Anti-lock Brake System module may have been built wit
R/2021/18413/08/202114/05/2014 – 26/04/20182,316THE ENGINE MAY LOSE ITS ABILITY TO SYNCHRONIZE INJECTOR PULSES AND CAMSHAFT TIMING
R/2021/09523/04/202130/05/2014 – 09/02/20209THE ENGINE TONE WHEEL WHICH PROVIDES A SIGNAL TO THE CRANKSHAFT POSITION SENSOR MAY FAIL
R/2021/07026/03/202104/02/2010 – 19/08/20131,773A FUEL PUMP RELAY WHICH COULD OPERATE INTERMITTENTLY OR FAIL WITHOUT WARNING
R/2021/02919/02/202114/04/2014 – 10/10/2020261A POSSIBLE LOSS OF MOTIVE POWER OR PARK FUNCTION DUE TO WEAR IN THE POWER TRANSFER UNIT
R/2018/18824/08/201827/10/2012 – 24/05/2018341VEHICLE SHORT CAUSING CAN-C BUS TO STOP COMMUNICATING
R/2018/20224/08/201829/04/2003 – 29/06/200756REAR LOWER CONTROL ARM MAY EXPERIENCE EXCESSIVE CORROSION
R/2018/18924/08/201827/02/2013 – 05/01/201880VEHICLE SHORT CAUSING CAN-C BUS TO STOP COMMUNICATING
R/2017/32015/12/201701/08/2010 – 08/09/20142,421BRAKE BOOSTER WATER SHIELD MAY BE INCORRECTLY INSTALLED
R/2017/05631/03/201714/12/2012 – 31/10/20141,418TRANSAXLE WIRING HAS BEEN INCORRECTLY FITTED
R/2016/28827/01/201726/07/2013 – 05/02/201630SEAT MAY NOT PERFORM CORRECTLY IN A COLLISION
R/2016/21421/10/201620/01/2010 – 01/09/20121,401FIRE MAY OCCUR
R/2016/21507/10/201613/01/2013 – 21/12/20154,621VEHICLE MAY ROLL AWAY
R/2015/19329/09/201611/02/2004 – 18/10/200710,511POSSIBLE LOSS OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES
R/2016/16326/08/201610/09/2013 – 06/08/201517HEADLIGHT DIRECTIONAL CONTROL MAY FAIL
R/2016/12112/08/201614/09/2015 – 27/02/201615CENTRE REAR SEAT BELT RETRACTOR MAY NOT COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS
R/2016/11008/07/201629/03/2003 – 09/12/20046,443FRONT AIRBAG AND/OR SEATBELT PRE-TENSIONER MAY DEPLOY UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2016/11008/07/201629/03/2003 – 09/12/20046,443FRONT AIRBAG AND/OR SEATBELT PRE-TENSIONER MAY DEPLOY UNEXPECTEDLY
R/2016/11609/06/201609/12/2015 – 13/01/20163BRAKING PERFORMANCE MAY BE REDUCED
R/2016/02118/03/201601/02/2002 – 31/12/200314,551INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OF A FRONT AIRBAG
R/2016/02118/03/201601/01/2002 – 31/12/200414,551INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OF A FRONT AIRBAG
R/2016/02618/03/201618/02/2015 – 09/09/20151,115FIRE MAY OCCUR
R/2015/21806/02/201604/01/2014 – 18/02/20152,201RISK OF FIRE
R/2015/20004/12/201510/01/2007 – 12/05/20082,481POSSIBLE LOSS OF VEHICLE SAFETY FEATURES
R/2015/19206/11/201515/02/2005 – 14/09/2006988UNINTENDED VEHICLE MOVEMENT
R/2015/19130/10/201520/06/2012 – 23/07/201548VEHICLE ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS MAY MALFUNCTION
R/2015/18423/10/201504/02/2010 – 19/08/20131,770ENGINE MAY STALL
R/2015/09819/06/201525/07/2012 – 28/06/20141,069SHORT CIRCUIT MAY OCCUR
R/2015/06413/03/201504/02/2010 – 19/08/20132ENGINE MAY STALL
R/2014/16809/01/201503/10/2013 – 11/04/2014903VEHICLE MAY BECOME UNSTABLE
R/2014/16612/12/201421/05/2014 – 06/06/2014206REAR SUSPENSION MAY DETACH
R/2014/13907/11/201405/01/2010 – 11/12/20133,250RISK OF FIRE
R/2014/13305/11/201411/10/2011 – 01/10/201220BRAKE PEDAL MAY NOT PERFORM CORRECTLY
R/2014/13205/11/201402/02/2013 – 30/04/20141,570INDICATORS MAY NOT FUNCTION CORRECTLY
R/2013/09330/09/201401/01/1992 – 27/10/199833,053RISK OF FIRE
R/2013/09330/09/201401/09/2001 – 09/08/200733,053RISK OF FIRE
R/2014/07902/09/201401/08/2010 – 08/08/20142,420INCREASED BRAKE PEDAL APPLICATION MAY BE REQUIRED
R/2014/08002/09/201416/01/2014 – 17/04/201420POSSIBILITY OF UNINTENDED ACCELERATION
R/2013/15107/03/201408/01/2013 – 20/08/2013349INSTRUMENT CLUSTER MAY FAIL
R/2013/12031/10/201301/09/2001 – 28/03/200414,558INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OF AIRBAGS
R/2013/12031/10/201301/09/2001 – 28/03/200314,558INADVERTENT DEPLOYMENT OF AIRBAGS
R/2013/08716/08/201301/02/2004 – 31/03/201012,014VEHICLE MAY ROLL AWAY
R/2012/04627/04/201201/01/2004 – 31/12/200710,247POSSIBILITY OF LOSS OF CONTROL
R/2011/08106/08/201115/04/2011 – 14/05/201125STEERING COLUMN PERFORMANCE DURING AN IMPACT MAY BE COMPROMISED
R/2010/21918/02/201119/05/2008 – 28/06/200823WINDSCREEN WIPERS MAY FAIL
R/2010/10504/10/201001/05/2002 – 30/09/20021,707FRONT SUSPENSION ARM MAY SEPERATE
R/2009/13410/03/20105,266FIRE MAY OCCUR
R/2008/16809/01/2009834PARK BRAKE MAY NOT BE EFFECTIVE
R/2007/15815/02/200801/01/2006 – 26/10/20079,427ELECTRONIC BRAKE CONTROL MODULE MAY ALLOW A MOMENTARY DELAY IN BRAKE APPLICATION.
R/2007/15915/02/200801/01/2007 – 26/10/2007257FRONT BRAKE CALIPERS COULD BREAK UNDER CERTAIN OPERATING CONDITIONS.
R/2007/04206/06/20071,207REAR BRAKES MAY LOCK
R/2006/21101/03/200701/01/2002 – 31/12/20056,148FRONT SEAT HEATING ELEMENTS MAY OVERHEAT
R/2006/18515/12/200601/01/1999 – 31/12/20031,499ENGINE MAY OVERHEAT
R/2006/15015/12/20063,300ENGINE MAY CUT OUT AND OR FAIL TO RESTART
R/2004/01601/06/20047,129POSSIBLE SEPARATION OF FRONT SUSPENSION BALL JOINT
R/2003/01904/08/20032,552POSSIBLE LOSS OF BRAKE SERVO ASSISTANCE
R/2003/02004/08/20031,848POSSIBLE LOSS OF BRAKE SERVO ASSISTANCE
R/2002/10406/01/200301/01/2002 – 23/07/20021,207SIDE AIRBAG MAY NOT DEPLOY
R/2002/06129/11/200201/01/2001 – 31/12/20021,651UNDERBONNET FIRE CONCERN
R/2002/11629/11/20027,143POSSIBLE LOSS OF SERVO ASSISTANCE
R/2001/16619/08/200201/01/1990 – 31/12/199944,314FRONT BRAKE ROTORS (DISCS) MAY FAIL.
R/2001/16619/08/200201/01/1990 – 31/12/199944,314FRONT BRAKE ROTORS (DISCS) MAY FAIL.
R/2001/15612/04/200201/01/2001 – 31/12/2001404INSTRUMENT PANEL COVER CONCERN
R/2000/06902/08/200011,209AIR BAG WARNING LIGHT AND / OR AIRBAGS MAY OPERATE/ DEPLOY WITHOUT WARNING.
R/1998/07001/02/19999,206INACCURATE INDICATION OF FUEL TANK CONTENTS
R/1998/07001/02/19999,206INACCURATE INDICATION OF FUEL TANK CONTENTS
R/1998/03622/06/199829/10/1997 – 07/11/1997157BRAKE BOOSTER DIAPHRAGM MAY SPLIT
R/1998/04315/06/199812/01/1998 – 16/01/199820FRONT SEAT SHOULDER BELTS ADJUSTABLE ANCHORS MAY HAVE INADEQUATE STRENGTH
R/1997/05921/11/1997 – 03/09/1996567INADVERTANT OPERATION OF AIR BAG
R/1996/06016/05/199625/08/1995 – 26/08/1995349POWER DISTRIBUTION FUSE LINK
R/1996/06016/05/199625/08/1995 – 26/08/1995349POWER DISTRIBUTION FUSE LINK

DVSA lists 85 safety recall campaigns for the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee, covering roughly 391,347 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT: quick answers

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 95.9, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee first-time MOT pass rate?
60.11% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,943 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 39.89% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,943 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 95.9 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Chrysler Jeep Cherokee with other cars

Polestar 2 is highest at 96.2; Volkswagen Scirocco is lowest at 95.6 — the gap is 0.6 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Chrysler MOT statisticsChrysler Jeep Grand MOT statsChrysler Grand Cherokee MOT stats

Similar risk

Land Rover Discovery Sport (index 95.9)Polestar 2 (index 96.2)Volkswagen Scirocco (index 95.6)

Same size class

how Audi S5 compareshow Chrysler Crossfire compareshow Chrysler PT compares

By build year

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2001Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2002Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2003Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2004Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2005Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2006Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2007Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2008Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2009Chrysler Jeep Cherokee 2010

By area

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Chrysler Jeep Cherokee body, chassis and structure failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee brakes failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee vehicle identification failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee noise, emissions and leaks failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee road wheels failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee seat belts and airbags failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee steering failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee suspension failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee tyres failuresChrysler Jeep Cherokee visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:chrysler-jeep-cherokee:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Chrysler Jeep Cherokee MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/chrysler-jeep-cherokee/ · Published 2026-07-30.