Renault Trucks Master — MOT statistics 2024

The Renault Trucks Master failed 23.79% of 887 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 123.9 (100 = expected for its age profile). This van fails its MOT about 24% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

Age-adjusted peer: Fiat Scudo (index 123.7) — the two published results are 0.2 index points apart.

Renault Trucks Master common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension is well below the reference at 12.4 per 100 tests, against 17.7 per 100 tests across UK vans and pickups of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

family vs national — matched to UK vans and pickups of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Renault Trucks Master MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Brakes are highest at 30.1 per 100 tests; Lamps & electrical are lowest at 2.1 per 100 tests — the gap is 28.0 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a van like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 13.3 percentage points. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every van with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 3,495 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 16.9 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the van sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Renault Trucks Master compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against other light commercials tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Renault Trucks Master perform as it gets older?

The Trucks Master at age 3 stands out at 18.4%, against 12.4% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: van age, years · failure-rate scale 0–20%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

How dangerous are Renault Trucks Master MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 56.9 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chart values: Minor 14.5 · Major 56.9 · Dangerous 8.1.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Renault Trucks Master MOT matter?

Jul is highest at 35.7%; Sep is lowest at 22.6% — the gap is 13.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart scale: 21%–37%.

bars: Renault Trucks Master · dashed: all class-4 cars

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 13.1 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Renault Trucks Master average mileage by age

At age 4, the middle half of Trucks Masters runs from 54,614 miles to 84,078 miles, against 67,318 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Renault Trucks Master MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 3–5, 8.6% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 20.6% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

A typical 4-year-old Trucks Master has ~67,318 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Renault Trucks Master fails its MOT most

Chelmsford area is highest at 51.9%; Enfield area is lowest at 0.8% — the gap is 51.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

Renault Trucks Master survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 16 is well below the reference at 72.7%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: van age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Ages 4–6 average 87 tests, too few for an 'only X% as many' claim. The rows are the counts of cars still coming to an MOT.

How many miles does a Renault Trucks Master last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 51.2%; 200,000+ miles is lowest at 15.7% — the gap is 35.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Of 3,551 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 51.2% had reached 100k miles, 34.1% had reached 150k miles, 15.7% had reached 200k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

How many years is a Renault Trucks Master likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 16.4 years; Bought at age 15 is lowest at 1.3 years — the gap is 15.1 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 6.2 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 16, so the true figure is likely higher.

Renault Trucks Master faults that come together

Brakes + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 4.56×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Defects in «Brakes» and «Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems» appear together 4.56× more often than chance (33 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Renault Trucks Master MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £86.61 to £164.56, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £87 to £165, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Renault Trucks Master running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 4 are well below the reference at 11.0%, against 18.0% at age 3, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Renault Trucks Master rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 7.89×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

This Renault Trucks Master fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

What will fail next on a Renault Trucks Master?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 3-5 are highest at 36.4%; Visibility after a passed at age <3 is lowest at 1.4% — the gap is 35.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Renault Trucks Master ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 66.1%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 4.7% — the gap is 61.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 708 failures followed through to their re-test, 29.24% were repaired and passed the same day and 66.1% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 2,104 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.224 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 12,622 miles a year across 817 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 54.49% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 17.23% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 3.178% of 818 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 45,434 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Renault Trucks Master safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 28.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

DVSA lists 28 safety recall campaigns for the Renault Trucks Master, covering roughly 10,696 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Renault Trucks Master MOT: quick answers

Renault Trucks Master MOT Risk Index stands out at 123.9, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Renault Trucks Master first-time MOT pass rate?

76.21% of first attempts passed in 2024 (887 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 23.79% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 887 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 123.9 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Renault Trucks Master with other cars

Jeep Compass is highest at 124.3; Fiat Scudo is lowest at 123.7 — the gap is 0.6 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Renault MOT statisticsRenault Scenic MOT statsRenault Kadjar MOT stats

Similar risk

Peugeot 807 (index 124.1)Fiat Scudo (index 123.7)Jeep Compass (index 124.3)

Same size class

how Chrysler Voyager compareshow Nissan Murano compareshow Vauxhall Nova compares

By area

Renault Trucks Master MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Renault Trucks Master body, chassis and structure failuresRenault Trucks Master brakes failuresRenault Trucks Master lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresRenault Trucks Master noise, emissions and leaks failuresRenault Trucks Master seat belts and airbags failuresRenault Trucks Master steering failuresRenault Trucks Master suspension failuresRenault Trucks Master tyres failuresRenault Trucks Master visibility failures