MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate and common problems

59.1% of Chrysler Voyagers passed the 2024 MOT (a rough estimate from 881 first tests): 50.2% at the first attempt and 9.0% after a fix at the test centre (PRS), each rounded separately. About 1 in 2 failed the first attempt. For its age, it fails 18% more often than normal: MOT Risk Index 118.2 (95% CI 110.4–126.0; 100 = normal).

Chrysler Voyager at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate59.1%incl. 9.0% fixed at the test centre2024881
Passed at the first attempt50.2%all first tests2024881
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 110.4–126.0)118.2index100 = normal for its age · rank 633 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)2024881
Biggest excess: Brakes48.6per 10021.4 same-age2019–202412232
Dangerous defects21.2per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202412232
Advisory items247.3per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202412232
strip · Chrysler Voyager · MOT Risk Index · 118.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Chrysler Voyager. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 633 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 561 and 682 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Chrysler Voyager index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank633of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age2024881
Best rank within its 95% interval561rankother models held where they are2024881
Worst rank within its 95% interval682rankother models held where they are2024881

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 122.6 to 118.2 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on a Chrysler Voyager MOT, and how often?

Chrysler Voyager MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 51.7 per 100 tests, against 35.1 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 12,232).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 51.7 vs 35.1 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment51.7per 10035.12019–20246322
Brakes48.6per 10021.42019–20245947
Suspension29.2per 10029.72019–20243568
Visibility14per 10011.62019–20241717
Body, chassis, structure13.1per 10012.42019–20241604
Tyres9.5per 10010.62019–20241166

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 12,232 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Chrysler Voyager's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Chrysler Voyager advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment advisories became a fail at the next MOT 37.5% of the time.

funnel · Chrysler Voyager · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 37.5 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 37.5 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment37.5% next failmedian model2019–2024643
Brakes27.5% next failmedian model2019–20243153
Suspension22.9% next failmedian model2019–20242172
Body, chassis, structure16.1% next failmedian model2019–2024616
Steering12.0% next failmedian model2019–2024794
Tyres10.0% next failmedian model2019–20242071
Noise, emissions and leaks5.6% next failmedian model2019–20241188
Non-component advisories0% next failmedian model2019–20241671

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Chrysler Voyager got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Chrysler Voyager MOTs flag brakes most: 67.6 advisories per 100 tests, against 34.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 12,232).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Brakes · 67.6 vs 34.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes67.6per 10034.72019–20248266
Suspension57.5per 10026.22019–20247034
Tyres40.2per 10039.72019–20244921
Non-component advisories26.3per 1007.82019–20243216
Noise, emissions and leaks16per 1005.22019–20241963
Steering11.7per 1001.82019–20241427

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 12,232 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Chrysler Voyager?

For Chrysler Voyagers aged 12 to 14 whose last MOT was a fail, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 32.6% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 1,791).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars) · 17.3 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)17.3% next fail2019–2024300
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)15.7% next fail2019–2024300
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)10% next fail2019–2024300
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)8.7% next fail2019–2024300
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)4.3% next fail2019–2024300
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)3.3% next fail2019–2024300
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass (rough estimate: 300 cars)2.7% next fail2019–2024300
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)22.7% next fail2019–2024282
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)18.4% next fail2019–2024282
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)9.9% next fail2019–2024282
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)8.9% next fail2019–2024282
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)8.5% next fail2019–2024282
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)5.7% next fail2019–2024282
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)5.3% next fail2019–2024282
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)2.8% next fail2019–2024282
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory (rough estimate: 282 cars)2.1% next fail2019–2024282
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)24.9% next fail2019–2024426
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)24.6% next fail2019–2024426
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)12.7% next fail2019–2024426
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)9.2% next fail2019–2024426
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)7.8% next fail2019–2024426
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)7.0% next fail2019–2024426
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)6.6% next fail2019–2024426
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)3.8% next fail2019–2024426
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 426 cars)2.6% next fail2019–2024426
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass18.4% next fail2019–2024792
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass18.3% next fail2019–2024792
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass12.6% next fail2019–2024792
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass7.2% next fail2019–2024792
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass4.9% next fail2019–2024792
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass4.4% next fail2019–2024792
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass4.0% next fail2019–2024792
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass2.3% next fail2019–2024792
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass1.5% next fail2019–2024792
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.9% next fail2019–2024792
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory26.9% next fail2019–20241123
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory24.5% next fail2019–20241123
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory14.1% next fail2019–20241123
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory11.7% next fail2019–20241123
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory8.3% next fail2019–20241123
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory6.6% next fail2019–20241123
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory6.0% next fail2019–20241123
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory3.5% next fail2019–20241123
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory2.7% next fail2019–20241123
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–20241123
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.5% next fail2019–20241123
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail32.6% next fail2019–20241791
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail30.6% next fail2019–20241791
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail19.6% next fail2019–20241791
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail12.7% next fail2019–20241791
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail12.3% next fail2019–20241791
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail8.3% next fail2019–20241791
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail8.3% next fail2019–20241791
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail5.0% next fail2019–20241791
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail3.1% next fail2019–20241791
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail1.5% next fail2019–20241791
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.7% next fail2019–20241791
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass20.6% next fail2019–2024596
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass17.6% next fail2019–2024596
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass13.6% next fail2019–2024596
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass8.6% next fail2019–2024596
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass8.2% next fail2019–2024596
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass6.0% next fail2019–2024596
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass5.2% next fail2019–2024596
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass4.0% next fail2019–2024596
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass2.9% next fail2019–2024596
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass0.8% next fail2019–2024596
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory30.4% next fail2019–20241085
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory22.0% next fail2019–20241085
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory20% next fail2019–20241085
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory11.2% next fail2019–20241085
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory11.0% next fail2019–20241085
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory7.6% next fail2019–20241085
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory6.9% next fail2019–20241085
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory4.4% next fail2019–20241085
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory3.6% next fail2019–20241085
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.8% next fail2019–20241085
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.5% next fail2019–20241085
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail33.4% next fail2019–20241661
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail25.8% next fail2019–20241661
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail23.8% next fail2019–20241661
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail13.2% next fail2019–20241661
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail12.6% next fail2019–20241661
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail7.6% next fail2019–20241661
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail6.6% next fail2019–20241661
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail4.7% next fail2019–20241661
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail3.5% next fail2019–20241661
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.9% next fail2019–20241661
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.9% next fail2019–20241661
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 99 cars)19.2% next fail2019–202499
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 99 cars)17.2% next fail2019–202499
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 99 cars)12.1% next fail2019–202499
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass (rough estimate: 99 cars)5.1% next fail2019–202499
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)34.8% next fail2019–2024135
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)23.7% next fail2019–2024135
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)20.7% next fail2019–2024135
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)18.5% next fail2019–2024135
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)14.8% next fail2019–2024135
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)6.7% next fail2019–2024135
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)3.7% next fail2019–2024135
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)3.7% next fail2019–2024135
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory (rough estimate: 135 cars)3.7% next fail2019–2024135
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)39.6% next fail2019–2024222
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)27.0% next fail2019–2024222
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)18.9% next fail2019–2024222
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)16.2% next fail2019–2024222
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)13.1% next fail2019–2024222
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)8.6% next fail2019–2024222
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)7.7% next fail2019–2024222
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)5.4% next fail2019–2024222
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)2.3% next fail2019–2024222
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail (rough estimate: 222 cars)2.3% next fail2019–2024222

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Chrysler Voyager get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Chrysler Voyager gets a dangerous defect more often than the UK average: 21.2 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. A dangerous defect means the vehicle should not be driven away until it is fixed. In the same tests, 132.5 major and 33.0 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Chrysler Voyager · Dangerous defects · 21.2 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 21.2 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects21.2per 10011.22019–202412232

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 12,232 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Chrysler Voyager still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the Chrysler Voyager go from 56.5% at age 15 (rough estimate: 85 tests, 95% interval 45.9–66.5%) to 50% at age 19 (rough estimate: 150 tests, 95% interval 42.1–57.9%), against 43.5% for all cars aged 19 (rough estimate: 150 tests, 95% interval 42.1–57.9%) (2024, n = 881).

line · Chrysler Voyager · Age 15 (rough estimate: 85 tests, 95% interval 45.9–66.5%) · 56.5 vs 41.6 · 2024
Age 15 (rough esti: 56.5. Age 19 (rough esti: 50. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15 (rough estimate: 85 tests, 95% interval 45.9–66.5%)56.5% failed first time41.6202485
Age 16 (rough estimate: 184 tests, 95% interval 41.3–55.5%)48.4% failed first time43.12024184
Age 17 (rough estimate: 87 tests, 95% interval 37.0–57.5%)47.1% failed first time43.1202487
Age 18 (rough estimate: 155 tests, 95% interval 40.6–56.2%)48.4% failed first time43.92024155
Age 19 (rough estimate: 150 tests, 95% interval 42.1–57.9%)50% failed first time43.52024150

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Chrysler Voyager compare with cars of its own age and size?

At every age shown, Chrysler Voyagers fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 11, where they fail more often: 44.8% against 28.2% (2024, n = 592).

line · Chrysler Voyager · Age 10 · 28.9 vs 25.6 · 2024
Age 10: 28.9. Age 20: 48.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1028.9% fail25.62024159
Age 1144.8% fail28.22024592
Age 1246.3% fail30.52024838
Age 1348.9% fail32.620241490
Age 1449.6% fail34.520241814
Age 1551.8% fail3620241890
Age 1651.6% fail37.120241753
Age 1749.8% fail37.520241252
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1849.7% fail37.82024863
Age 1951.0% fail37.42024537
Age 2048.5% fail37.02024301

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Chrysler Voyager years should I avoid?

Chrysler Voyager build years range from index 92.5 to 105.1 against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 881).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Build year 2005 (rough estimate: 1,147 tests, 95% interval 88.9–104.3) · 96.6 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2005 (rough estimate: 1,147 tests, 95% interval 88.9–104.3)96.6index vs own age100 = normal2019–20241147
Build year 2006 (rough estimate: 1,740 tests, 95% interval 87.6–100.2)93.9index vs own age100 = normal2019–20241740
Build year 2007 (rough estimate: 627 tests, 95% interval 90.4–112.7)101.6index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024627
Build year 2008 (better for its age) (rough estimate: 1,351 tests, 95% interval 85.2–99.8)92.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–20241351
Build year 2009 (rough estimate: 404 tests, 95% interval 90.6–119.5)105.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024404

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Chrysler Voyager MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Chrysler Voyager MOT: about £206 (up to about £392 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 881).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Expected repair bill · 206.4 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill206.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue881
Estimated range lower206.4GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue881
Estimated range upper392.1GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue881
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)72.9GBP expected contribution150price catalogue881
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)72.4GBP expected contribution140price catalogue881
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)52.6GBP expected contribution180price catalogue881
Tyres: Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)8.6GBP expected contribution90price catalogue881

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Chrysler Voyager more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 7 fail less often for their age than the Chrysler Voyager and 1 as often or more. The Chrysler Voyager has an MOT Risk Index of 118.2, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 881).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Chrysler Voyager (this model) · 118.2 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Chrysler Voyager (this model)118.2index100 = normal2024881
Isuzu TF117.5index118.220241807
Daihatsu Fourtrak113.7index118.220241291
Peugeot 4007112.6index118.220241367
Ford Freda128index118.22024858
Mitsubishi Delica112.1index118.220241342
Chrysler PT105.4index118.220241916
Nissan Pickup111.2index118.220241297
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Chrysler Jeep Wrangler98.8index118.22024717

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Chrysler Voyager normally do?

Chrysler Voyager: Age 15 median (rough estimate) is 115032 miles (2024).

line · Chrysler Voyager · Age 15 median (rough estimate) · 115032 vs baseline · 2024
Age 15 median (rou: 115032. Age 19 P75 (rough : 146548. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15 median (rough estimate)115032miles202485
Age 15 P25 (rough estimate)85690miles202485
Age 15 P75 (rough estimate)132948miles202485
Age 16 median (rough estimate)105991miles2024184
Age 16 P25 (rough estimate)85357miles2024184
Age 16 P75 (rough estimate)132568miles2024184
Age 17 median (rough estimate)113008miles202487
Age 17 P25 (rough estimate)89319miles202487
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 17 P75 (rough estimate)132258miles202487
Age 18 median (rough estimate)108441miles2024155
Age 18 P25 (rough estimate)88622miles2024155
Age 18 P75 (rough estimate)133459miles2024155
Age 19 median (rough estimate)120970miles2024150
Age 19 P25 (rough estimate)98339miles2024150
Age 19 P75 (rough estimate)146548miles2024150

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Chrysler Voyager MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 15+, 46.3% of Chrysler Voyagers with 40,000 to 70,000 miles failed first time, against 54.1% of those with over 140,000 miles (2024, n = 274). No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Age 15+, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 67 tests, 95% interval 34.9–58.1%) · 46.3 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 15+, 40-70k miles (rough estimate: 67 tests, 95% interval 34.9–58.1%)46.3% failed first time202467
Age 15+, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 35.4–48.3%)41.7% failed first time2024223
Age 15+, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 319 tests, 95% interval 49.4–60.2%)54.9% failed first time2024319
Age 15+, 140k+ miles (rough estimate: 207 tests, 95% interval 47.3–60.8%)54.1% failed first time2024207

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Chrysler Voyager last?

61.4% of Chrysler Voyagers tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 15.6% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 7,499).

line · Chrysler Voyager · 100,000 miles · 61.4 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 61.4. 200,000 miles (rou: 2.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles61.4% of tested cars20247499
150,000 miles15.6% of tested cars20241900
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 263 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.4%)2.1% of tested cars2024263

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Chrysler Voyager driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Chrysler Voyager index is 111.0, against 115.5 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 881).

slope · Chrysler Voyager · Age and mileage adjusted index · 111 vs 115.5 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 115.5 vs 111. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index111index115.52019–2024881

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Chrysler Voyager engine is best?

No Chrysler Voyager engine band clearly fails less or more for its age: the capacity bands are within 5 index points of each other or their 95% intervals overlap (2024, n = 881).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Diesel over 2.0 litre · 99.9 vs 100 = model average · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Diesel over 2.0 litre99.9index vs model norm100 = model average20249258
Petrol over 2.0 litre (rough estimate: 2,770 tests, 95% interval 96.1–103.6)99.9index vs model norm100 = model average20242770
Petrol 1.8–2.0 litre (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 94.2–131.5)113.2index vs model norm100 = model average2024110

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Chrysler Voyager fail its MOT most?

Chrysler Voyager fails first-time MOTs most in Bournemouth (BH): 70.6% against 49.4% across Britain for this model, both 2019–2024 (2024, n = 238).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 238 tests, 95% interval 64.5–76.0%) · 70.6 vs 49.8 · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Bournemouth (BH) (rough estimate: 238 tests, 95% interval 64.5–76.0%)70.6% fail first time49.82024238
Newport (NP) (rough estimate: 117 tests, 95% interval 56.8–73.8%)65.8% fail first time49.82024117
Hull (HU) (rough estimate: 111 tests, 95% interval 53.8–71.5%)63.1% fail first time49.82024111
Twickenham (TW) (rough estimate: 162 tests, 95% interval 23.1–37.1%)29.6% fail first time49.82024162
London E (E) (rough estimate: 154 tests, 95% interval 23.8–38.2%)30.5% fail first time49.82024154
London SE (SE) (rough estimate: 253 tests, 95% interval 26.2–37.6%)31.6% fail first time49.82024253
Bristol (BS) (rough estimate: 180 tests, 95% interval 54.4–68.5%)61.7% fail first time49.82024180
Derby (DE) (rough estimate: 109 tests, 95% interval 51.2–69.2%)60.5% fail first time49.82024109
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Medway (ME) (rough estimate: 140 tests, 95% interval 51.0–67.1%)59.3% fail first time49.82024140
Portsmouth (PO) (rough estimate: 211 tests, 95% interval 52.5–65.6%)59.2% fail first time49.82024211
Blackpool (FY) (rough estimate: 100 tests, 95% interval 49.2–68.1%)59% fail first time49.82024100
Brighton (BN) (rough estimate: 185 tests, 95% interval 51.7–65.8%)58.9% fail first time49.82024185
Southampton (SO) (rough estimate: 184 tests, 95% interval 47.7–61.9%)54.9% fail first time49.82024184
Gloucester (GL) (rough estimate: 123 tests, 95% interval 45.7–63.0%)54.5% fail first time49.82024123
Peterborough (PE) (rough estimate: 270 tests, 95% interval 48.1–59.9%)54.1% fail first time49.82024270
Oxford (OX) (rough estimate: 176 tests, 95% interval 46.6–61.2%)54.0% fail first time49.82024176
Tonbridge (TN) (rough estimate: 145 tests, 95% interval 45.0–61.0%)53.1% fail first time49.82024145
Colchester (CO) (rough estimate: 130 tests, 95% interval 44.5–61.4%)53.1% fail first time49.82024130
Canterbury (CT) (rough estimate: 129 tests, 95% interval 44.1–61.1%)52.7% fail first time49.82024129
Cardiff (CF) (rough estimate: 126 tests, 95% interval 43.7–60.9%)52.4% fail first time49.82024126
Warrington (WA) (rough estimate: 105 tests, 95% interval 42.0–60.8%)51.4% fail first time49.82024105
Preston (PR) (rough estimate: 113 tests, 95% interval 42.2–60.3%)51.3% fail first time49.82024113
Northampton (NN) (rough estimate: 201 tests, 95% interval 44.4–58.1%)51.2% fail first time49.82024201
Norwich (NR) (rough estimate: 221 tests, 95% interval 44.6–57.6%)51.1% fail first time49.82024221
Guildford (GU) (rough estimate: 175 tests, 95% interval 43.5–58.2%)50.9% fail first time49.82024175
Sheffield (S) (rough estimate: 189 tests, 95% interval 43.7–57.8%)50.8% fail first time49.82024189
Milton Keynes (MK) (rough estimate: 121 tests, 95% interval 41.6–59.2%)50.4% fail first time49.82024121
Nottingham (NG) (rough estimate: 228 tests, 95% interval 43.6–56.4%)50% fail first time49.82024228
Swindon (SN) (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 41.0–59.0%)50% fail first time49.82024114
Reading (RG) (rough estimate: 191 tests, 95% interval 41.7–55.7%)48.7% fail first time49.82024191
Ipswich (IP) (rough estimate: 221 tests, 95% interval 41.5–54.5%)48.0% fail first time49.82024221
Llandudno (LL) (rough estimate: 123 tests, 95% interval 38.5–55.9%)47.1% fail first time49.82024123
Manchester (M) (rough estimate: 195 tests, 95% interval 39.3–53.2%)46.1% fail first time49.82024195
London N (N) (rough estimate: 174 tests, 95% interval 38.7–53.4%)46.0% fail first time49.82024174
Dudley (DY) (rough estimate: 107 tests, 95% interval 36.7–55.2%)45.8% fail first time49.82024107
London SW (SW) (rough estimate: 103 tests, 95% interval 36.3–55.2%)45.6% fail first time49.82024103
Chelmsford (CM) (rough estimate: 120 tests, 95% interval 36.4–53.9%)45% fail first time49.82024120
Redhill (RH) (rough estimate: 116 tests, 95% interval 35.3–53.1%)44.0% fail first time49.82024116
Slough (SL) (rough estimate: 137 tests, 95% interval 35.8–52.2%)43.8% fail first time49.82024137
Coventry (CV) (rough estimate: 195 tests, 95% interval 36.8–50.6%)43.6% fail first time49.82024195
Birmingham (B) (rough estimate: 487 tests, 95% interval 38.8–47.6%)43.1% fail first time49.82024487
Liverpool (L) (rough estimate: 174 tests, 95% interval 34.9–49.4%)42.0% fail first time49.82024174
Romford (RM) (rough estimate: 173 tests, 95% interval 34.5–49.1%)41.6% fail first time49.82024173
Leicester (LE) (rough estimate: 209 tests, 95% interval 34.7–47.9%)41.1% fail first time49.82024209
Doncaster (DN) (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 33.6–48.9%)41.0% fail first time49.82024156
Harrow (HA) (rough estimate: 166 tests, 95% interval 33.8–48.6%)41.0% fail first time49.82024166
Hemel Hempstead (HP) (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 32.2–50.3%)40.9% fail first time49.82024110
Southend-on-Sea (SS) (rough estimate: 219 tests, 95% interval 33.5–46.3%)39.7% fail first time49.82024219
Kingston upon Thames (KT) (rough estimate: 161 tests, 95% interval 31.9–46.8%)39.1% fail first time49.82024161
Dartford (DA) (rough estimate: 133 tests, 95% interval 29.8–46.1%)37.6% fail first time49.82024133
Luton (LU) (rough estimate: 110 tests, 95% interval 28.8–46.6%)37.3% fail first time49.82024110
London NW (NW) (rough estimate: 167 tests, 95% interval 30.2–44.7%)37.1% fail first time49.82024167
London W (W) (rough estimate: 103 tests, 95% interval 27.3–45.5%)35.9% fail first time49.82024103
Uxbridge (UB) (rough estimate: 136 tests, 95% interval 27.8–43.6%)35.3% fail first time49.82024136
Croydon (CR) (rough estimate: 144 tests, 95% interval 24.9–39.9%)31.9% fail first time49.82024144

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does a Chrysler Voyager rust more than average?

Allowing for age, Chrysler Voyager MOTs record corrosion failures at 2.8 times the national rate: 2.18% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 849).

Computed, not measured.

slope · Chrysler Voyager · Salt belt susceptibility · 2.8 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 2.8. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility2.8ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers849

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is a Chrysler Voyager ULEZ compliant?

An estimated 8.7% of Chrysler Voyagers tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific car with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · Chrysler Voyager · Likely compliant · 8.7 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant8.7% estimate2024881

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Chrysler Voyager?

Of failed Chrysler Voyager MOTs, 23.2% were retested the same day and a further 69.2% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 3,991).

bar · Chrysler Voyager · Same-day retest · 23.2 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest23.2%failed initial tests2019–20243991
Retest within 10 days69.2%failed initial tests2019–20243991
Clean MOT streak13.4%observed chains2019–20242131
Repeat advisory47.5%observed chains2019–20242131
Decreasing odometer1.0% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–20242809

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is low mileage better for a Chrysler Voyager?

Chrysler Voyagers aged 11 to 14 doing under 5,000 miles a year failed first time in 39.1% of tests, against 52.2% for those doing 8,000 to 12,000 miles (2019–2024, n = 424).

bullet · Chrysler Voyager · Low-use first-time failure · 39.1 vs 52.2 · 2019–2024
Low-use first-time failure: 39.1 vs 52.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Low-use first-time failure39.1%52.22019–2024424
Low-use gap-13.0percentage points8–12k miles2019–2024424

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Chrysler Voyager fails, does it fail again?

40.7% of Chrysler Voyagers that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 42.4% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 1,180). The failure most likely to come back is visibility: 40.6% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Chrysler Voyager · Repeat after fail · 40.7 vs 42.4 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 40.7 vs 42.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail40.7%42.42019–20241180

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Chrysler Voyager faults come together?

On Chrysler Voyagers, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ failures turn up together 3.4 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 196).

Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 196 tests, 95% interval 2.9–3.9)3.4liftexpected joint rate2024196
Road Wheels + Tyres (rough estimate: 23 tests, 95% interval 1.8–4.3)2.8liftexpected joint rate202423
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 53 tests, 95% interval 2.1–3.7)2.8liftexpected joint rate202453
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (rough estimate: 27 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.9)2.7liftexpected joint rate202427
Brakes + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 75 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202475
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 70 tests, 95% interval 1.9–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202470
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension (rough estimate: 39 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.4)2.5liftexpected joint rate202439
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 348 tests, 95% interval 2.2–2.7)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024348
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 137 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.9)2.5liftexpected joint rate2024137
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (rough estimate: 173 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.8)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024173
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 101 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.0)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024101
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 236 tests, 95% interval 2.1–2.7)2.4liftexpected joint rate2024236
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle (rough estimate: 22 tests, 95% interval 1.5–3.6)2.4liftexpected joint rate202422
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (rough estimate: 89 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.9)2.4liftexpected joint rate202489
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 60 tests, 95% interval 1.8–3.0)2.4liftexpected joint rate202460
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 78 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.9)2.4liftexpected joint rate202478
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 237 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.6)2.3liftexpected joint rate2024237
Road Wheels + Suspension (rough estimate: 46 tests, 95% interval 1.6–3.0)2.2liftexpected joint rate202446
Road Wheels + Visibility (rough estimate: 29 tests, 95% interval 1.5–3.2)2.2liftexpected joint rate202429
Steering + Suspension (rough estimate: 312 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.5)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024312
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 137 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.6)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024137
Brakes + Tyres (rough estimate: 458 tests, 95% interval 2.0–2.4)2.2liftexpected joint rate2024458
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 246 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.4)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024246
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 83 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.6)2.1liftexpected joint rate202483
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 432 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.3)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024432
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 337 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.4)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024337
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (rough estimate: 459 tests, 95% interval 1.9–2.3)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024459
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 198 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.4)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024198
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (rough estimate: 175 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.5)2.1liftexpected joint rate2024175
Body, chassis, structure + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 25 tests, 95% interval 1.4–3.1)2.1liftexpected joint rate202425
Brakes + Suspension2.1liftexpected joint rate20241099
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 301 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.3)2.0liftexpected joint rate2024301
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering (rough estimate: 54 tests, 95% interval 1.5–2.6)2liftexpected joint rate202454
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes2.0liftexpected joint rate2024620
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres (rough estimate: 466 tests, 95% interval 1.8–2.2)2.0liftexpected joint rate2024466
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1.9liftexpected joint rate20241656
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension1.9liftexpected joint rate20241151
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility1.9liftexpected joint rate2024735
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1.9liftexpected joint rate2024670
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (rough estimate: 43 tests, 95% interval 1.4–2.6)1.9liftexpected joint rate202443
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 444 tests, 95% interval 1.7–2.0)1.9liftexpected joint rate2024444
Steering + Visibility (rough estimate: 169 tests, 95% interval 1.6–2.2)1.9liftexpected joint rate2024169
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 414 tests, 95% interval 1.6–2.0)1.8liftexpected joint rate2024414
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 152 tests, 95% interval 1.5–2.1)1.8liftexpected joint rate2024152
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 80 tests, 95% interval 1.4–2.2)1.8liftexpected joint rate202480
Brakes + Visibility1.8liftexpected joint rate2024600
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 243 tests, 95% interval 1.5–2.0)1.8liftexpected joint rate2024243
Noise, emissions and leaks + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)18tests with both202418
Road Wheels + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Road Wheels + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Identification of the vehicle + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Has the Chrysler Voyager had safety recalls?

DVSA lists 20 safety recall campaigns matched to the Chrysler Voyager; check whether yours has been fixed, using its registration number.

Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (DVSA register)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
DVSA recall campaigns matched20campaignsDVSA registerDVSA register881

Source: DVSA register; recall effect covers 11 of 761 models · Window: DVSA register · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What does a Chrysler Voyager cost to run in a fleet?

Of every 100 Chrysler Voyagers tested at age 16, about 48 failed the MOT first time (rough estimate); at age 19, about 50 (rough estimate). These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time (2024).

Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 16 (rough estimate: 184 tests, 95% interval 41.3–55.5%)48.4% fail first time2024184
Age 18 (rough estimate: 155 tests, 95% interval 40.6–56.2%)48.4% fail first time2024155
Age 19 (rough estimate: 150 tests, 95% interval 42.1–57.9%)50% fail first time2024150

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the Chrysler Voyager fail inspections in other countries too?

In the Netherlands, 74.2% of Chrysler Voyagers failed their periodic roadworthiness inspection, against 50.8% for all cars there (2024 by country, n = 737 inspections).

Inspections abroad point the same way: in Finland and the Netherlands the Chrysler Voyager also fails more often than the national average.

bullet · Chrysler Voyager · Finland · 53.1 vs 26.3 · 2024 by country
Finland: 53.1 vs 26.3. Netherlands: 74.2 vs 50.8. Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024 by country)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Finland53.1% failed26.32024 by country708
Netherlands74.2% failed50.82024 by country737

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV · licences and full notice

Does the month of a Chrysler Voyager MOT matter?

Chrysler Voyagers fail first time most in January (52.0%, against 31.1% for all cars that month) and least in September (46.2%) (2024, n = 881).

line · Chrysler Voyager · January · 52.0 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 52.0. December: 50.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Chrysler Voyager: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January52.0% fail first time31.120241251
February49.9% fail first time30.020241081
March49.8% fail first time28.320241293
April50.8% fail first time29.82024713
May50.6% fail first time28.82024841
June46.7% fail first time28.12024876
July49.5% fail first time29.320241026
August48.5% fail first time29.22024912
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September46.2% fail first time28.220241095
October47.9% fail first time30.320241233
November50.3% fail first time30.620241137
December50.5% fail first time29.32024774

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Tyres, brakes and suspension: how does the Chrysler Voyager compare with cars of the same age?

not computed for this model: no qualifying records. 881 initial Chrysler Voyager tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Chrysler Grand Cherokee, a car of the same inspection class with 5.2× the tests · Check your car by registration

What have dealers been told about the Chrysler Voyager? (US market)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 211 of 761 models). 881 initial Chrysler Voyager tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: NHTSA, US market; covers 211 of 761 models · Window: NHTSA · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Chrysler Grand Cherokee, a car of the same inspection class with 5.2× the tests · Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 881 initial Chrysler Voyager tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 881 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Chrysler Grand Cherokee, a car of the same inspection class with 5.2× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Chrysler Voyager MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/chrysler-voyager/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Chrysler Voyager MOT: quick answers

What is the Chrysler Voyager first-time MOT pass rate?

50.2% of first attempts passed in 2024 (881 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 881 primary tests: 49.83% failed first time and 59.1% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 118.2 is shown separately.