MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Mitsubishi L200 MOT pass rate and common problems

75.0% of Mitsubishi L200s passed the 2024 MOT (87,555 first tests): 68.7% at the first attempt and 6.3% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 3 in 10 failed the first attempt. For its age, it fails 9% more often than normal: MOT Risk Index 109.3 (95% CI 108.2–110.3; 100 = normal).

Mitsubishi L200 at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate75.0%incl. 6.3% fixed at the test centre202487555
Passed at the first attempt68.7%all first tests202487555
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 108.2–110.3)109.3index100 = normal for its age · rank 551 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)202487555
Biggest excess: Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment34.6per 10031.5 same-age2019–2024539553
Dangerous defects10.3per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–2024539553
Advisory items154.0per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–2024539553
strip · Mitsubishi L200 · MOT Risk Index · 109.3 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · Mitsubishi L200. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 551 (tied) of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 543 and 560 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
Mitsubishi L200 index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank551of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age202487555
Best rank within its 95% interval543rankother models held where they are202487555
Worst rank within its 95% interval560rankother models held where they are202487555

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index is unchanged in the 24 September 2026 release.

What actually fails on a Mitsubishi L200 MOT, and how often?

Mitsubishi L200 MOTs fail most often on ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 34.6 per 100 tests, against 31.5 for UK vehicles of the same age (2019–2024, n = 539,553).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 34.6 vs 31.5 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment34.6per 10031.52019–2024186727
Suspension22.7per 10024.32019–2024122515
Brakes20.5per 10019.92019–2024110836
Body, chassis, structure14.2per 10013.22019–202476478
Visibility10.8per 10015.62019–202458107
Steering5.2per 1005.02019–202427806

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 539,553 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Tyres, brakes and suspension: how does the Mitsubishi L200 compare with vehicles of the same age?

The biggest excess for the Mitsubishi L200 is brakes at age 8: 8.8 failures per 100 tests, against 5.4 for same-age vehicles of comparable models (2019–2024, n = 31,846).

bullet · Mitsubishi L200 · Tyres, age 3 · 2.1 vs 4.2 · 2019–2024
Tyres, age 3: 2.1 vs 4.2. Brakes, age 3: 3.6 vs 1.8. Suspension, age 3: 0.7 vs 0.6. Tyres, age 4: 2.3 vs 4.5. Brakes, age 4: 4.3 vs 2.4. Suspension, age 4: 1.2 vs 1.2. Tyres, age 5: 2.5 vs 5.1. Brakes, age 5: 4.9 vs 3.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres, age 32.1per 1004.22019–202444024
Brakes, age 33.6per 1001.82019–202444024
Suspension, age 30.7per 1000.62019–202444024
Tyres, age 42.3per 1004.52019–202445752
Brakes, age 44.3per 1002.42019–202445752
Suspension, age 41.2per 1001.22019–202445752
Tyres, age 52.5per 1005.12019–202445308
Brakes, age 54.9per 1003.12019–202445308
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension, age 51.8per 1002.22019–202445308
Tyres, age 62.6per 1005.52019–202440226
Brakes, age 66.0per 1003.82019–202440226
Suspension, age 62.8per 1003.72019–202440226
Tyres, age 72.7per 1006.02019–202435230
Brakes, age 77.4per 1004.52019–202435230
Suspension, age 74.1per 1005.72019–202435230
Tyres, age 82.9per 1006.32019–202431846
Brakes, age 88.8per 1005.42019–202431846
Suspension, age 86.3per 1007.82019–202431846

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Mitsubishi L200's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

Mitsubishi L200 advisories turn into fails more often than on the median model: lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment advisories became a fail at the next MOT 39.3% of the time.

funnel · Mitsubishi L200 · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment · 39.3 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 39.3 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment39.3% next failmedian model2019–20247765
Suspension25.2% next failmedian model2019–202471396
Body, chassis, structure23.1% next failmedian model2019–202433112
Brakes16.6% next failmedian model2019–2024116642
Steering14.9% next failmedian model2019–202413808
Noise, emissions and leaks7.5% next failmedian model2019–202433311
Tyres6.7% next failmedian model2019–202468740
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems6.0% next failmedian model2019–20242664
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Identification of the vehicle4.6% next failmedian model2019–20248669
Non-component advisories0% next failmedian model2019–202421212

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My Mitsubishi L200 got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

Mitsubishi L200 MOTs flag brakes most: 53.8 advisories per 100 tests, against 34.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 539,553).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Brakes · 53.8 vs 34.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes53.8per 10034.72019–2024290104
Suspension34per 10026.22019–2024183628
Tyres28per 10039.72019–2024151206
Body, chassis, structure12.6per 1004.62019–202468052
Noise, emissions and leaks9.3per 1005.22019–202450419
Non-component advisories5.8per 1007.82019–202431031

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 539,553 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on a Mitsubishi L200?

For Mitsubishi L200s aged 3 to 5 whose last MOT was a pass, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 5.5% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 61,762).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Visibility, under 3 years old, after a pass · 5.1 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Visibility, under 3 years old, after a pass5.1% next fail2019–202418430
Brakes, under 3 years old, after a pass3.6% next fail2019–202418430
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, under 3 years old, after a pass3.5% next fail2019–202418430
Tyres, under 3 years old, after a pass1.8% next fail2019–202418430
Suspension, under 3 years old, after a pass0.8% next fail2019–202418430
Noise, emissions and leaks, under 3 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–202418430
Body, chassis, structure, under 3 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–202418430
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, under 3 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202418430
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Identification of the vehicle, under 3 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202418430
Steering, under 3 years old, after a pass0.1% next fail2019–202418430
Road wheels, under 3 years old, after a pass0.1% next fail2019–202418430
Visibility, under 3 years old, after an advisory8.0% next fail2019–20246104
Brakes, under 3 years old, after an advisory5.5% next fail2019–20246104
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, under 3 years old, after an advisory5.0% next fail2019–20246104
Tyres, under 3 years old, after an advisory2.9% next fail2019–20246104
Suspension, under 3 years old, after an advisory1.8% next fail2019–20246104
Noise, emissions and leaks, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.6% next fail2019–20246104
Body, chassis, structure, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.5% next fail2019–20246104
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–20246104
Identification of the vehicle, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.2% next fail2019–20246104
Road wheels, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.1% next fail2019–20246104
Steering, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.1% next fail2019–20246104
Visibility, under 3 years old, after a fail8.4% next fail2019–20243807
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, under 3 years old, after a fail6.6% next fail2019–20243807
Brakes, under 3 years old, after a fail5.2% next fail2019–20243807
Tyres, under 3 years old, after a fail3.2% next fail2019–20243807
Suspension, under 3 years old, after a fail1.9% next fail2019–20243807
Body, chassis, structure, under 3 years old, after a fail0.9% next fail2019–20243807
Noise, emissions and leaks, under 3 years old, after a fail0.9% next fail2019–20243807
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, under 3 years old, after a fail0.7% next fail2019–20243807
Steering, under 3 years old, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20243807
Road wheels, under 3 years old, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20243807
Identification of the vehicle, under 3 years old, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–20243807
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass5.5% next fail2019–202461762
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass4.7% next fail2019–202461762
Brakes, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass4.1% next fail2019–202461762
Tyres, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass1.8% next fail2019–202461762
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass1.5% next fail2019–202461762
Noise, emissions and leaks, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.7% next fail2019–202461762
Body, chassis, structure, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.6% next fail2019–202461762
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.5% next fail2019–202461762
Steering, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202461762
Identification of the vehicle, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202461762
Road wheels, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.1% next fail2019–202461762
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory7.9% next fail2019–202425016
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory7.1% next fail2019–202425016
Brakes, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory6.9% next fail2019–202425016
Tyres, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory2.9% next fail2019–202425016
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory2.8% next fail2019–202425016
Noise, emissions and leaks, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory1.0% next fail2019–202425016
Body, chassis, structure, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–202425016
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.7% next fail2019–202425016
Identification of the vehicle, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–202425016
Steering, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–202425016
Road wheels, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.2% next fail2019–202425016
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail12.6% next fail2019–202419210
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail8.5% next fail2019–202419210
Brakes, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail8.2% next fail2019–202419210
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail4.0% next fail2019–202419210
Tyres, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail4.0% next fail2019–202419210
Noise, emissions and leaks, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail2.2% next fail2019–202419210
Body, chassis, structure, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail1.8% next fail2019–202419210
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail1.2% next fail2019–202419210
Steering, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–202419210
Identification of the vehicle, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.5% next fail2019–202419210
Road wheels, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–202419210
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass11.6% next fail2019–202433963
Brakes, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass5.9% next fail2019–202433963
Visibility, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass5.4% next fail2019–202433963
Suspension, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass4.8% next fail2019–202433963
Body, chassis, structure, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass2.3% next fail2019–202433963
Tyres, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass1.9% next fail2019–202433963
Noise, emissions and leaks, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass1.8% next fail2019–202433963
Steering, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.9% next fail2019–202433963
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.7% next fail2019–202433963
Identification of the vehicle, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202433963
Road wheels, 6 to 8 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202433963
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory16.6% next fail2019–202420256
Brakes, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory11.1% next fail2019–202420256
Visibility, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory8.0% next fail2019–202420256
Suspension, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory8.0% next fail2019–202420256
Body, chassis, structure, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory3.6% next fail2019–202420256
Tyres, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory3.3% next fail2019–202420256
Noise, emissions and leaks, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory2.4% next fail2019–202420256
Steering, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory1.5% next fail2019–202420256
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory1.1% next fail2019–202420256
Identification of the vehicle, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory0.5% next fail2019–202420256
Road wheels, 6 to 8 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–202420256
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail24.9% next fail2019–202421724
Brakes, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail13.7% next fail2019–202421724
Suspension, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail11.1% next fail2019–202421724
Visibility, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail10.4% next fail2019–202421724
Body, chassis, structure, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail6.1% next fail2019–202421724
Noise, emissions and leaks, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail4.6% next fail2019–202421724
Tyres, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail4.5% next fail2019–202421724
Steering, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail2.0% next fail2019–202421724
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail1.9% next fail2019–202421724
Identification of the vehicle, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail0.8% next fail2019–202421724
Road wheels, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail0.4% next fail2019–202421724
Speedometer and speed limiter, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail0.0% next fail2019–202421724
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass17.7% next fail2019–202418022
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass12.9% next fail2019–202418022
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass9.2% next fail2019–202418022
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass7.6% next fail2019–202418022
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass6.9% next fail2019–202418022
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass2.4% next fail2019–202418022
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass2.4% next fail2019–202418022
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass2.1% next fail2019–202418022
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass1.5% next fail2019–202418022
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass0.5% next fail2019–202418022
Road wheels, 9 to 11 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202418022
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory24.5% next fail2019–202417309
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory18.8% next fail2019–202417309
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory14.2% next fail2019–202417309
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory10.6% next fail2019–202417309
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory9.4% next fail2019–202417309
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory3.8% next fail2019–202417309
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory3.5% next fail2019–202417309
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory3.1% next fail2019–202417309
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory1.6% next fail2019–202417309
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.7% next fail2019–202417309
Road wheels, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.5% next fail2019–202417309
Buses and coaches supplementary tests, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.0% next fail2019–202417309
Speedometer and speed limiter, 9 to 11 years old, after an advisory0.0% next fail2019–202417309
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail32.4% next fail2019–202424380
Suspension, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail23.4% next fail2019–202424380
Brakes, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail17.6% next fail2019–202424380
Body, chassis, structure, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail15.1% next fail2019–202424380
Visibility, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail12.2% next fail2019–202424380
Noise, emissions and leaks, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail5.2% next fail2019–202424380
Tyres, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail4.9% next fail2019–202424380
Steering, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail4.8% next fail2019–202424380
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail3.1% next fail2019–202424380
Identification of the vehicle, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.9% next fail2019–202424380
Road wheels, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–202424380
Speedometer and speed limiter, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.0% next fail2019–202424380
Seat belt installation check, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.0% next fail2019–202424380
Buses and coaches supplementary tests, 9 to 11 years old, after a fail0.0% next fail2019–202424380
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass18.4% next fail2019–202416737
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass16.8% next fail2019–202416737
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass11.9% next fail2019–202416737
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass9.9% next fail2019–202416737
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass7.1% next fail2019–202416737
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass3.9% next fail2019–202416737
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass2.6% next fail2019–202416737
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass2.4% next fail2019–202416737
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass2% next fail2019–202416737
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.5% next fail2019–202416737
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–202416737
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory27.1% next fail2019–202421173
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory23.3% next fail2019–202421173
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory16.9% next fail2019–202421173
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory14.8% next fail2019–202421173
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory10.6% next fail2019–202421173
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory6.2% next fail2019–202421173
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory3.9% next fail2019–202421173
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory3.8% next fail2019–202421173
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory2.5% next fail2019–202421173
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.8% next fail2019–202421173
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after an advisory0.6% next fail2019–202421173
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail35.2% next fail2019–202432519
Suspension, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail29.4% next fail2019–202432519
Body, chassis, structure, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail21.3% next fail2019–202432519
Brakes, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail19.5% next fail2019–202432519
Visibility, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail13.9% next fail2019–202432519
Steering, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail8.3% next fail2019–202432519
Noise, emissions and leaks, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail6.1% next fail2019–202432519
Tyres, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail5.4% next fail2019–202432519
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail4.1% next fail2019–202432519
Identification of the vehicle, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail1.1% next fail2019–202432519
Road wheels, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.6% next fail2019–202432519
Speedometer and speed limiter, 12 to 14 years old, after a fail0.1% next fail2019–202432519
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass18.4% next fail2019–202414724
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass14.5% next fail2019–202414724
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass13.7% next fail2019–202414724
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass9.2% next fail2019–202414724
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass7.3% next fail2019–202414724
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass5.9% next fail2019–202414724
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass3.4% next fail2019–202414724
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass2.0% next fail2019–202414724
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass1.4% next fail2019–202414724
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass0.5% next fail2019–202414724
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202414724
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory28.1% next fail2019–202424004
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory20.8% next fail2019–202424004
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory19.7% next fail2019–202424004
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory13.6% next fail2019–202424004
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory11.2% next fail2019–202424004
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory9.2% next fail2019–202424004
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory5.1% next fail2019–202424004
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory3.5% next fail2019–202424004
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory1.7% next fail2019–202424004
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.9% next fail2019–202424004
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.4% next fail2019–202424004
Speedometer and speed limiter, 15 to 19 years old, after an advisory0.0% next fail2019–202424004
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail36.5% next fail2019–202433437
Suspension, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail26.2% next fail2019–202433437
Body, chassis, structure, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail24.7% next fail2019–202433437
Brakes, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail17.8% next fail2019–202433437
Visibility, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail14.4% next fail2019–202433437
Steering, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail11.6% next fail2019–202433437
Noise, emissions and leaks, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail7.6% next fail2019–202433437
Tyres, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail5.1% next fail2019–202433437
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail2.7% next fail2019–202433437
Identification of the vehicle, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail1.1% next fail2019–202433437
Road wheels, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.4% next fail2019–202433437
Speedometer and speed limiter, 15 to 19 years old, after a fail0.1% next fail2019–202433437
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a pass16.2% next fail2019–20241567
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a pass14.2% next fail2019–20241567
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a pass11.3% next fail2019–20241567
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a pass9.8% next fail2019–20241567
Steering, 20 years or older, after a pass6.8% next fail2019–20241567
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a pass6.8% next fail2019–20241567
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a pass2.9% next fail2019–20241567
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a pass1.8% next fail2019–20241567
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a pass1.5% next fail2019–20241567
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a pass0.4% next fail2019–20241567
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after an advisory24.9% next fail2019–20242538
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after an advisory22.3% next fail2019–20242538
Suspension, 20 years or older, after an advisory17.3% next fail2019–20242538
Brakes, 20 years or older, after an advisory13.0% next fail2019–20242538
Visibility, 20 years or older, after an advisory12.8% next fail2019–20242538
Steering, 20 years or older, after an advisory9.9% next fail2019–20242538
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after an advisory4.3% next fail2019–20242538
Tyres, 20 years or older, after an advisory2.9% next fail2019–20242538
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after an advisory1.6% next fail2019–20242538
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after an advisory0.6% next fail2019–20242538
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 20 years or older, after a fail35.2% next fail2019–20243428
Body, chassis, structure, 20 years or older, after a fail25.1% next fail2019–20243428
Suspension, 20 years or older, after a fail23.4% next fail2019–20243428
Brakes, 20 years or older, after a fail17.0% next fail2019–20243428
Visibility, 20 years or older, after a fail16.4% next fail2019–20243428
Steering, 20 years or older, after a fail12.1% next fail2019–20243428
Noise, emissions and leaks, 20 years or older, after a fail5.9% next fail2019–20243428
Tyres, 20 years or older, after a fail4.0% next fail2019–20243428
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 20 years or older, after a fail2.0% next fail2019–20243428
Identification of the vehicle, 20 years or older, after a fail1.2% next fail2019–20243428
Road wheels, 20 years or older, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20243428
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 44 cars)45.5% next fail2019–202444
Brakes, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 44 cars)20.4% next fail2019–202444
Suspension, an unknown age, after a fail (rough estimate: 44 cars)15.9% next fail2019–202444

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does a Mitsubishi L200 get a dangerous MOT defect?

The Mitsubishi L200 gets a dangerous defect about as often as the UK average: 10.3 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 86.1 major and 22.8 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · Mitsubishi L200 · Dangerous defects · 10.3 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 10.3 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects10.3per 10011.22019–2024539553

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 539,553 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my Mitsubishi L200 still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the Mitsubishi L200 go from 13.1% at age 3 to 45.4% at age 19, against 43.5% for all vehicles aged 19 (2024, n = 87,555).

line · Mitsubishi L200 · Age 3 · 13.1 vs 12.4 · 2024
Age 3: 13.1. Age 19: 45.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 313.1% failed first time12.420242614
Age 415.6% failed first time13.120244702
Age 516.8% failed first time15.120248858
Age 618.0% failed first time17.520247890
Age 720.5% failed first time20.220248151
Age 821.7% failed first time23.320246686
Age 930.6% failed first time26.520246617
Age 1036.7% failed first time30.120244722
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1137.7% failed first time33.220243791
Age 1240.2% failed first time35.720242960
Age 1345.1% failed first time38.220244154
Age 1445.0% failed first time40.420243700
Age 1548.2% failed first time41.620242446
Age 1647.4% failed first time43.120242639
Age 1745.8% failed first time43.120243977
Age 1845.6% failed first time43.920244882
Age 1945.4% failed first time43.520242887

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the Mitsubishi L200 compare with vehicles of its own age and size?

At 1 of 18 ages shown, Mitsubishi L200s fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 6, where they fail less often: 21.4% against 29.2% (2024, n = 40,226).

line · Mitsubishi L200 · Age 3 · 14.3 vs 20.1 · 2024
Age 3: 14.3. Age 20: 45.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 314.3% fail20.1202444024
Age 416.9% fail23.2202445752
Age 518.8% fail25.7202445308
Age 621.4% fail29.2202440226
Age 724.9% fail32.6202435230
Age 829.5% fail35.8202431846
Age 934.5% fail38.6202429318
Age 1038.9% fail41.0202425295
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1142.5% fail43.1202423855
Age 1244.2% fail44.9202425541
Age 1346.4% fail46.1202430227
Age 1446.3% fail46.9202430213
Age 1546.9% fail47.4202429631
Age 1646.7% fail47.6202428622
Age 1746.6% fail47.5202424780
Age 1846.1% fail47.5202418564
Age 1946.0% fail47.0202411890
Age 2045.2% fail46.120247550

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Mitsubishi L200 years should I avoid?

The Mitsubishi L200 build year that fails most for its age is 2014: index 111.0 (95% CI 108.7–113.2) against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 30,852).

Build year matters for the Mitsubishi L200: 2014 Mitsubishi L200s fail more than their age would predict, 2016 ones less. Years whose confidence interval includes normal are shown without a label.

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Build year 1998 (rough estimate: 509 tests, 95% interval 98.5–125.5) · 112 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 1998 (rough estimate: 509 tests, 95% interval 98.5–125.5)112index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024509
Build year 1999 (rough estimate: 936 tests, 95% interval 88.3–106.9)97.6index vs own age100 = normal2019–2024936
Build year 2000 (rough estimate: 2,089 tests, 95% interval 93.4–105.9)99.7index vs own age100 = normal2019–20242089
Build year 200198.8index vs own age100 = normal2019–20244595
Build year 2002102.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–20249423
Build year 200399.8index vs own age100 = normal2019–202417811
Build year 2004 (better for its age)97.9index vs own age100 = normal2019–202422575
Build year 2005 (better for its age)97index vs own age100 = normal2019–202428163
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2006100.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–202442640
Build year 200799.8index vs own age100 = normal2019–202432922
Build year 2008 (worse for its age)103.7index vs own age100 = normal2019–202420700
Build year 2009 (worse for its age)105index vs own age100 = normal2019–202418304
Build year 2010101.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–202426509
Build year 2011 (worse for its age)104.4index vs own age100 = normal2019–202429062
Build year 201299.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–202420161
Build year 2013 (worse for its age)103.2index vs own age100 = normal2019–202425247
Build year 2014 (worse for its age)111index vs own age100 = normal2019–202430852
Build year 2015 (worse for its age)105.8index vs own age100 = normal2019–202442198
Build year 2016 (better for its age)86.7index vs own age100 = normal2019–202442199
Build year 2017 (better for its age)87.9index vs own age100 = normal2019–202444694
Build year 201898.5index vs own age100 = normal2019–202433094
Build year 201998index vs own age100 = normal2019–202427709
Build year 202098.6index vs own age100 = normal2019–20249436

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix a Mitsubishi L200 MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per Mitsubishi L200 MOT: about £120 (up to about £228 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 87,555).

Computed, not measured.

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Expected repair bill · 120.0 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill120.0GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue87555
Estimated range lower120.0GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue87555
Estimated range upper228.1GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue87555
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)48.4GBP expected contribution140price catalogue87555
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)40.9GBP expected contribution180price catalogue87555
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)30.8GBP expected contribution150price catalogue87555

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Mitsubishi L200 more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 3 fail less often for their age than the Mitsubishi L200 and 5 as often or more. The Mitsubishi L200 has an MOT Risk Index of 109.3, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 87,555).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Mitsubishi L200 (this model) · 109.3 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Mitsubishi L200 (this model)109.3index100 = normal202487555
Ford Ranger121.4index109.32024108814
Toyota Hilux114.3index109.3202471998
Nissan Navara126.6index109.3202472755
Volkswagen Amarok103.1index109.3202420324
Isuzu D-Max132index109.3202433786
Mercedes-Benz X-Class130.3index109.320243594
Ford F15059.3index109.32024725
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dodge Ram50.3index109.320241084

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Mitsubishi L200 normally do?

At age 8, the median Mitsubishi L200 had covered 77,429 miles by its MOT; the middle half ranged from 57,768 to 100,106 miles (2024, n = 6,686).

line · Mitsubishi L200 · Age 3 median · 35451 vs baseline · 2024
Age 3 median: 35451. Age 19 P75: 146453. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3 median35451miles20242614
Age 3 P2524512miles20242614
Age 3 P7551560miles20242614
Age 4 median44346miles20244702
Age 4 P2530288miles20244702
Age 4 P7560150miles20244702
Age 5 median51165miles20248858
Age 5 P2536805miles20248858
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 5 P7570618miles20248858
Age 6 median60784miles20247890
Age 6 P2544657miles20247890
Age 6 P7581373miles20247890
Age 7 median69786miles20248151
Age 7 P2551922miles20248151
Age 7 P7590552miles20248151
Age 8 median77429miles20246686
Age 8 P2557768miles20246686
Age 8 P75100106miles20246686
Age 9 median83670miles20246617
Age 9 P2563884miles20246617
Age 9 P75104966miles20246617
Age 10 median89541miles20244722
Age 10 P2569440miles20244722
Age 10 P75111619miles20244722
Age 11 median99246miles20243791
Age 11 P2576821miles20243791
Age 11 P75121419miles20243791
Age 12 median106986miles20242960
Age 12 P2584326miles20242960
Age 12 P75131764miles20242960
Age 13 median117066miles20244154
Age 13 P2592846miles20244154
Age 13 P75145319miles20244154
Age 14 median124328miles20243700
Age 14 P2598663miles20243700
Age 14 P75151046miles20243700
Age 15 median126120miles20242446
Age 15 P2599787miles20242446
Age 15 P75154805miles20242446
Age 16 median130682miles20242639
Age 16 P25107083miles20242639
Age 16 P75159527miles20242639
Age 17 median129536miles20243977
Age 17 P25103549miles20243977
Age 17 P75156770miles20243977
Age 18 median135409miles20244882
Age 18 P25107225miles20244882
Age 18 P75161786miles20244882
Age 19 median122227miles20242887
Age 19 P2597786miles20242887
Age 19 P75146453miles20242887

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more Mitsubishi L200 MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 6–9, 12.7% of Mitsubishi L200s with under 40,000 miles failed first time, against 34.2% of those with over 140,000 miles (2024, n = 4,515). Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Age 3–5, <40k miles · 11.8 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3–5, <40k miles11.8% failed first time20246204
Age 3–5, 40-70k miles17.3% failed first time20246685
Age 3–5, 70-100k miles19.4% failed first time20242476
Age 3–5, 100-140k miles24.4% failed first time2024713
Age 3–5, 140k+ miles (rough estimate: 92 tests, 95% interval 15.4–32.4%)22.8% failed first time202492
Age 6–9, <40k miles12.7% failed first time20243363
Age 6–9, 40-70k miles18.1% failed first time202410511
Age 6–9, 70-100k miles25.3% failed first time20249423
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 6–9, 100-140k miles29.9% failed first time20244885
Age 6–9, 140k+ miles34.2% failed first time20241152
Age 10–14, <40k miles20.7% failed first time2024518
Age 10–14, 40-70k miles29.2% failed first time20242502
Age 10–14, 70-100k miles39.2% failed first time20245336
Age 10–14, 100-140k miles44.4% failed first time20247109
Age 10–14, 140k+ miles46.8% failed first time20243850
Age 15+, <40k miles (rough estimate: 209 tests, 95% interval 19.5–31.2%)24.9% failed first time2024209
Age 15+, 40-70k miles35.6% failed first time20241295
Age 15+, 70-100k miles43.4% failed first time20243681
Age 15+, 100-140k miles46.6% failed first time20248427
Age 15+, 140k+ miles47.9% failed first time20248552

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does a Mitsubishi L200 last?

40.2% of Mitsubishi L200s tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 11.3% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 215,806).

line · Mitsubishi L200 · 100,000 miles · 40.2 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles: 40.2. 200,000 miles: 1.7. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles40.2% of tested cars2024215806
150,000 miles11.3% of tested cars202460395
200,000 miles1.7% of tested cars20249259

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the Mitsubishi L200 driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the Mitsubishi L200 index is 101.5, against 109.5 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 87,555).

slope · Mitsubishi L200 · Age and mileage adjusted index · 101.5 vs 109.5 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 109.5 vs 101.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index101.5index109.52019–202487555

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Mitsubishi L200 fuel fails its MOT less?

All Mitsubishi L200s tested were diesel: 31.3% failed first time (2024, n = 87,463).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Diesel · 31.3 vs other fuels · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Diesel31.3% fail first timeother fuels202487463

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Mitsubishi L200 engine is best?

No Mitsubishi L200 engine band clearly fails less or more for its age: the capacity bands are within 5 index points of each other or their 95% intervals overlap (2024, n = 87,555).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Petrol over 2.0 litre (rough estimate: 659 tests, 95% interval 86.5–103.3) · 94.8 vs 100 = model average · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol over 2.0 litre (rough estimate: 659 tests, 95% interval 86.5–103.3)94.8index vs model norm100 = model average2024659
Diesel over 2.0 litre100index vs model norm100 = model average2024538050

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the Mitsubishi L200 fail its MOT most?

First-time failure rates for the Mitsubishi L200 range from 19.4% in the London NW (NW) postcode area to 46.4% in the Torquay (TQ) postcode area, before allowing for age: a wider spread by area than for the typical model.

map · Mitsubishi L200 · Torquay (TQ) · 46.4 vs 31.3 · 2024
Scotland. N. England. Wales. London. S. West. % failing. 22%. 43%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Torquay (TQ)46.4% fail first time31.320244301
Bath (BA)45.4% fail first time31.320244910
Plymouth (PL)44.0% fail first time31.320247496
London NW (NW)19.4% fail first time31.32024754
Enfield (EN)19.8% fail first time31.320241489
Ilford (IG)20.4% fail first time31.32024560
Truro (TR)43.5% fail first time31.320244076
Exeter (EX)42.9% fail first time31.3202416040
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salisbury (SP)42.6% fail first time31.320243433
Taunton (TA)42.4% fail first time31.320246549
Dorchester (DT)41.8% fail first time31.320244359
Brighton (BN)40.5% fail first time31.320244927
Portsmouth (PO)39.3% fail first time31.320247237
Lancaster (LA)39.1% fail first time31.320244943
York (YO)39% fail first time31.320248519
Dundee (DD)38.9% fail first time31.320243226
Carlisle (CA)38.3% fail first time31.320245733
Bournemouth (BH)38.2% fail first time31.320245550
Worcester (WR)38.2% fail first time31.320244844
Bristol (BS)37.1% fail first time31.320247327
Ipswich (IP)36.7% fail first time31.320246981
Gloucester (GL)36.6% fail first time31.3202411622
Canterbury (CT)36.4% fail first time31.320243371
Aberdeen (AB)36.4% fail first time31.3202410121
Southampton (SO)36.2% fail first time31.320245394
Guildford (GU)36.1% fail first time31.320245348
St Albans (AL)36.0% fail first time31.320241035
Perth (PH)36.0% fail first time31.320243665
Lerwick (ZE)35.7% fail first time31.320241348
Lincoln (LN)35.5% fail first time31.320243642
Newport (NP)35.5% fail first time31.320246034
Shrewsbury (SY)35.1% fail first time31.3202410785
Hereford (HR)35.0% fail first time31.320247245
Kirkcaldy (KY)34.9% fail first time31.320244740
Dudley (DY)34.8% fail first time31.320245357
Swansea (SA)34.8% fail first time31.3202412916
Norwich (NR)34.7% fail first time31.320248806
Huddersfield (HD)34.6% fail first time31.320241931
Stockport (SK)34.3% fail first time31.320243882
Llandrindod Wells (LD)34.3% fail first time31.320243061
Inverness (IV)34.2% fail first time31.320246547
Peterborough (PE)34.2% fail first time31.3202410233
Oxford (OX)33.9% fail first time31.320248729
Watford (WD)33.7% fail first time31.32024872
Northampton (NN)33.5% fail first time31.320246492
Sunderland (SR)33.5% fail first time31.320241024
Cardiff (CF)33.4% fail first time31.320248196
Swindon (SN)33.4% fail first time31.320245431
Tonbridge (TN)33.3% fail first time31.320249112
Llandudno (LL)33.3% fail first time31.3202411881
Stevenage (SG)33.0% fail first time31.320243324
Leicester (LE)32.9% fail first time31.320247124
Halifax (HX)32.8% fail first time31.320241919
Wigan (WN)32.5% fail first time31.320241622
Crewe (CW)32.5% fail first time31.320243815
Chester (CH)32.5% fail first time31.320244760
Reading (RG)32.5% fail first time31.320245393
Oldham (OL)32.4% fail first time31.320242345
Bradford (BD)32.2% fail first time31.320244180
Milton Keynes (MK)32.2% fail first time31.320244060
Wolverhampton (WV)32.2% fail first time31.320242816
Kirkwall (KW)32.2% fail first time31.320241671
Hull (HU)32.2% fail first time31.320243824
Blackpool (FY)32% fail first time31.320241475
Falkirk (FK)31.9% fail first time31.320242664
Cambridge (CB)31.8% fail first time31.320243205
Darlington (DL)31.8% fail first time31.320246302
Redhill (RH)31.7% fail first time31.320244678
Harrogate (HG)31.3% fail first time31.320241841
Colchester (CO)31.2% fail first time31.320245161
Stoke-on-Trent (ST)30.9% fail first time31.320246484
Dumfries (DG)30.6% fail first time31.320245327
Hemel Hempstead (HP)30.6% fail first time31.320244001
Kingston upon Thames (KT)30.6% fail first time31.320241819
Leeds (LS)30.4% fail first time31.320243660
Outer Hebrides (HS)30.1% fail first time31.320241225
Bolton (BL)30.1% fail first time31.320242097
Preston (PR)30.1% fail first time31.320245109
Cleveland (TS)29.9% fail first time31.320243686
Walsall (WS)29.8% fail first time31.320243282
Kilmarnock (KA)29.8% fail first time31.320244154
Derby (DE)29.5% fail first time31.320246266
Medway (ME)29.2% fail first time31.320246646
Paisley (PA)29.1% fail first time31.320243525
Galashiels (TD)28.9% fail first time31.320245284
Edinburgh (EH)28.9% fail first time31.320244785
Newcastle (NE)28.8% fail first time31.320247846
Birmingham (B)28.8% fail first time31.320248945
Telford (TF)28.7% fail first time31.320242704
Coventry (CV)28.5% fail first time31.320246591
Liverpool (L)28.4% fail first time31.320242432
Manchester (M)28.3% fail first time31.320242900
Warrington (WA)27.8% fail first time31.320243477
Doncaster (DN)27.7% fail first time31.320247415
Chelmsford (CM)27.5% fail first time31.320245765
London N (N)26.9% fail first time31.32024687
Sheffield (S)26.9% fail first time31.320249641
Harrow (HA)26.8% fail first time31.32024732
Durham (DH)26.8% fail first time31.320242647
London SW (SW)26.4% fail first time31.32024606
London W (W) (rough estimate: 194 tests, 95% interval 20.6–32.9%)26.3% fail first time31.32024194
Nottingham (NG)25.8% fail first time31.3202410215
Wakefield (WF)25.8% fail first time31.320243924
Southend-on-Sea (SS)25.6% fail first time31.320243446
Glasgow (G)25.6% fail first time31.320245551
Blackburn (BB)25.5% fail first time31.320243866
Dartford (DA)25.5% fail first time31.320242110
Bromley (BR)25.5% fail first time31.32024836
Slough (SL)25.4% fail first time31.320242432
Luton (LU)24.7% fail first time31.320241826
Croydon (CR)24.4% fail first time31.320241403
Motherwell (ML)24.4% fail first time31.320242936
London SE (SE)24.0% fail first time31.320241035
Uxbridge (UB)22.5% fail first time31.32024853
Twickenham (TW)22.4% fail first time31.320241345
Romford (RM)21.5% fail first time31.320242028
Sutton (SM)21.4% fail first time31.32024524
London E (E)21.2% fail first time31.320241038

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does a Mitsubishi L200 rust more than average?

Allowing for age, Mitsubishi L200 MOTs record corrosion failures at 7.3 times the national rate: 5.59% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 87,042).

Computed, not measured.

slope · Mitsubishi L200 · Salt belt susceptibility · 7.3 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 7.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility7.3ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers87042

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is a Mitsubishi L200 ULEZ compliant?

An estimated 48.3% of Mitsubishi L200s tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific pickup with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · Mitsubishi L200 · Likely compliant · 48.3 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant48.3% estimate202487555

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning a Mitsubishi L200?

Of failed Mitsubishi L200 MOTs, 28.1% were retested the same day and a further 65.5% within 10 days; the median failed pickup passed its retest after 2 days (2019–2024, n = 123,764).

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Same-day retest · 28.1 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest28.1%failed initial tests2019–2024123764
Retest within 10 days65.5%failed initial tests2019–2024123764
Clean MOT streak33.5%observed chains2019–202499910
Repeat advisory34.3%observed chains2019–202499910
Decreasing odometer1.0% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–2024111083

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is low mileage better for a Mitsubishi L200?

Mitsubishi L200s aged 5 to 14 doing under 5,000 miles a year failed first time in 21.2% of tests, against 33.5% for those doing 8,000 to 12,000 miles (2019–2024, n = 23,322).

bullet · Mitsubishi L200 · Low-use first-time failure · 21.2 vs 33.5 · 2019–2024
Low-use first-time failure: 21.2 vs 33.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Low-use first-time failure21.2%33.52019–202423322
Low-use gap-12.3percentage points8–12k miles2019–202423322

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many years is a Mitsubishi L200 likely to last?

Mitsubishi L200s tend to last: at ten years old the typical one has about 9.3 more years of MOTs ahead, more than the median model. This is a forecast from the survival curve and may not come true.

Computed, not measured.

Forecast, not a prediction for a particular car.

bar · Mitsubishi L200 · Age 5 · 9.3 vs baseline · survival forecast
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (survival forecast)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 59.3years forecastsurvival forecast0
Age 89.2years forecastsurvival forecast0
Age 109.3years forecastsurvival forecast0
Age 127.3years forecastsurvival forecast0
Age 15 (at least; observed only until age 19)3.3years forecastsurvival forecast0

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: survival forecast · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Mitsubishi L200s are still on the road?

In 2024, for every 100 Mitsubishi L200s tested at ages 4 to 6, about 27 were tested at age 19 (2024, n = 11,890).

line · Mitsubishi L200 · Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) · 100 vs baseline · 2024
Age 3 (at least as: 100. Age 19: 27.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6)100% of age 4–6 baseline202444024
Age 4 (at least as many as at ages 4–6)100% of age 4–6 baseline202445752
Age 5 (at least as many as at ages 4–6)100% of age 4–6 baseline202445308
Age 691.9% of age 4–6 baseline202440226
Age 780.5% of age 4–6 baseline202435230
Age 872.8% of age 4–6 baseline202431846
Age 967% of age 4–6 baseline202429318
Age 1057.8% of age 4–6 baseline202425295
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1154.5% of age 4–6 baseline202423855
Age 1258.4% of age 4–6 baseline202425541
Age 1369.1% of age 4–6 baseline202430227
Age 1469% of age 4–6 baseline202430213
Age 1567.7% of age 4–6 baseline202429631
Age 1665.4% of age 4–6 baseline202428622
Age 1756.6% of age 4–6 baseline202424780
Age 1842.4% of age 4–6 baseline202418564
Age 1927.2% of age 4–6 baseline202411890

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a Mitsubishi L200 fails, does it fail again?

35.8% of Mitsubishi L200s that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 26.6% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 41,330). The failure most likely to come back is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 32.2% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · Mitsubishi L200 · Repeat after fail · 35.8 vs 26.6 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 35.8 vs 26.6. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail35.8%26.62019–202441330

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which Mitsubishi L200 faults come together?

On Mitsubishi L200s, ‘noise, emissions and leaks’ and speedometer and speed limiter failures turn up together 7.7 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 26).

Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Noise, emissions and leaks + Speedometer and speed limiter (rough estimate: 26 tests, 95% interval 5.0–11.3)7.7liftexpected joint rate202426
Identification of the vehicle + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 64 tests, 95% interval 4.7–7.8)6.1liftexpected joint rate202464
Road Wheels + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 151 tests, 95% interval 4.5–6.3)5.4liftexpected joint rate2024151
Identification of the vehicle + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 286 tests, 95% interval 4.8–6.0)5.4liftexpected joint rate2024286
Body, chassis, structure + Speedometer and speed limiter (rough estimate: 50 tests, 95% interval 3.8–6.8)5.1liftexpected joint rate202450
Speedometer and speed limiter + Steering (rough estimate: 20 tests, 95% interval 3.1–7.9)5.1liftexpected joint rate202420
Noise, emissions and leaks + Road Wheels (rough estimate: 257 tests, 95% interval 4.1–5.3)4.7liftexpected joint rate2024257
Brakes + Seat belt installation check (rough estimate: 21 tests, 95% interval 2.8–7.0)4.6liftexpected joint rate202421
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems4.6liftexpected joint rate20241276
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 475 tests, 95% interval 4.2–5.0)4.5liftexpected joint rate2024475
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Speedometer and speed limiter (rough estimate: 86 tests, 95% interval 3.5–5.4)4.4liftexpected joint rate202486
Body, chassis, structure + Steering4.3liftexpected joint rate20247879
Brakes + Speedometer and speed limiter (rough estimate: 48 tests, 95% interval 3.1–5.7)4.3liftexpected joint rate202448
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks4.2liftexpected joint rate20246650
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering4.2liftexpected joint rate20242662
Steering + Suspension4.2liftexpected joint rate202410279
Seat belt installation check + Suspension (rough estimate: 22 tests, 95% interval 2.6–6.3)4.2liftexpected joint rate202422
Identification of the vehicle + Steering4.1liftexpected joint rate2024500
Speedometer and speed limiter + Suspension (rough estimate: 52 tests, 95% interval 3.0–5.2)4.0liftexpected joint rate202452
Speedometer and speed limiter + Visibility (rough estimate: 36 tests, 95% interval 2.8–5.4)3.9liftexpected joint rate202436
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (rough estimate: 423 tests, 95% interval 3.5–4.3)3.9liftexpected joint rate2024423
Body, chassis, structure + Identification of the vehicle3.8liftexpected joint rate20241159
Brakes + Road Wheels3.7liftexpected joint rate2024686
Body, chassis, structure + Road Wheels3.7liftexpected joint rate2024586
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3.7liftexpected joint rate20242241
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension3.7liftexpected joint rate202422428
Road Wheels + Tyres (rough estimate: 210 tests, 95% interval 3.2–4.2)3.6liftexpected joint rate2024210
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks3.6liftexpected joint rate20246629
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems3.6liftexpected joint rate20243360
Road Wheels + Suspension3.6liftexpected joint rate2024770
Identification of the vehicle + Suspension3.6liftexpected joint rate20241454
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension3.6liftexpected joint rate20243874
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems3.6liftexpected joint rate20242879
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension3.5liftexpected joint rate20247424
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility3.5liftexpected joint rate2024992
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belt installation check (rough estimate: 28 tests, 95% interval 2.3–5.1)3.5liftexpected joint rate202428
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle3.5liftexpected joint rate20241216
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels3.5liftexpected joint rate20241112
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems3.4liftexpected joint rate20245611
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres3.4liftexpected joint rate20241946
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Steering3.4liftexpected joint rate20241102
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks3.4liftexpected joint rate202410784
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres3.4liftexpected joint rate2024984
Brakes + Suspension3.3liftexpected joint rate202423244
Brakes + Steering3.2liftexpected joint rate20246768
Road Wheels + Steering (rough estimate: 203 tests, 95% interval 2.8–3.6)3.2liftexpected joint rate2024203
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering3.1liftexpected joint rate202411588
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes3.1liftexpected joint rate202416398
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility3.0liftexpected joint rate20242302
Brakes + Tyres3.0liftexpected joint rate20245772
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment3.0liftexpected joint rate202427473
Road Wheels + Visibility (rough estimate: 444 tests, 95% interval 2.7–3.3)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024444
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension3.0liftexpected joint rate202436614
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility2.9liftexpected joint rate20244257
Steering + Tyres2.9liftexpected joint rate20241903
Tyres + Visibility2.9liftexpected joint rate20244439
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2.9liftexpected joint rate202430440
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres2.8liftexpected joint rate20249389
Suspension + Tyres2.8liftexpected joint rate20246112
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres2.7liftexpected joint rate20244435
Steering + Visibility2.6liftexpected joint rate20244500
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility2.6liftexpected joint rate202422212
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility2.5liftexpected joint rate202410709
Brakes + Visibility2.5liftexpected joint rate202412150
Suspension + Visibility2.4liftexpected joint rate202413577
Buses and coaches supplementary tests + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (seen together; too few for a multiplier)19tests with both202419
Speedometer and speed limiter + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belt installation check (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Seat belt installation check + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)15tests with both202415
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Speedometer and speed limiter (seen together; too few for a multiplier)14tests with both202414
Body, chassis, structure + Buses and coaches supplementary tests (seen together; too few for a multiplier)12tests with both202412
Buses and coaches supplementary tests + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Buses and coaches supplementary tests + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)9tests with both20249
Seat belt installation check + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Seat belt installation check + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belt installation check (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Brakes + Buses and coaches supplementary tests (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Has the Mitsubishi L200 had safety recalls?

DVSA lists 18 safety recall campaigns matched to the Mitsubishi L200; check whether yours has been fixed, using its registration number.

Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (DVSA register)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
DVSA recall campaigns matched18campaignsDVSA registerDVSA register87555

Source: DVSA register; recall effect covers 11 of 761 models · Window: DVSA register · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What does a Mitsubishi L200 cost to run in a fleet?

Of every 100 Mitsubishi L200s tested at age 5, about 17 failed the MOT first time; at age 10, about 37. These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time; the steepest one-year step in this cross-section is between cars aged 8 and 9, 8.93 percentage points (2024).

Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 313.1% fail first time20242614
Age 415.6% fail first time20244702
Age 516.8% fail first time20248858
Age 618.0% fail first time20247890
Age 720.5% fail first time20248151
Age 821.7% fail first time20246686
Age 930.6% fail first time20246617
Age 1036.7% fail first time20244722
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 1137.7% fail first time20243791
Age 1240.2% fail first time20242960
Age 1345.1% fail first time20244154
Age 1445.0% fail first time20243700
Age 1548.2% fail first time20242446
Age 1647.4% fail first time20242639
Age 1745.8% fail first time20243977
Age 1845.6% fail first time20244882
Age 1945.4% fail first time20242887

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the month of a Mitsubishi L200 MOT matter?

Mitsubishi L200s fail first time most in November (34.9%, against 30.6% for all vehicles that month) and least in September (31.3%) (2024, n = 87,555).

line · Mitsubishi L200 · January · 34.6 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 34.6. December: 32.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
Mitsubishi L200: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January34.6% fail first time31.1202449838
February34.1% fail first time30.0202444073
March31.9% fail first time28.3202455100
April33.5% fail first time29.8202432494
May33.7% fail first time28.8202434220
June32.9% fail first time28.1202437689
July34.2% fail first time29.3202438689
August33.4% fail first time29.2202441482
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September31.3% fail first time28.2202456656
October33.9% fail first time30.3202456249
November34.9% fail first time30.6202453229
December32.2% fail first time29.3202439834

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

What have dealers been told about the Mitsubishi L200? (US market)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 211 of 761 models). 87,555 initial Mitsubishi L200 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: NHTSA, US market; covers 211 of 761 models · Window: NHTSA · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Check your car by registration

What do owners complain about? (US market)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 211 of 761 models). 87,555 initial Mitsubishi L200 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: NHTSA, US market; covers 211 of 761 models · Window: NHTSA + 2024 · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Check your car by registration

Does the Mitsubishi L200 fail inspections in other countries too?

no match in the other-country inspection register. 87,555 initial Mitsubishi L200 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Check your car by registration

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 87,555 initial Mitsubishi L200 tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 87,555 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Mitsubishi L200 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mitsubishi-l200/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Mitsubishi L200 MOT: quick answers

What is the Mitsubishi L200 first-time MOT pass rate?

68.7% of first attempts passed in 2024 (87,555 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 87,555 primary tests: 31.3% failed first time and 75.0% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 109.3 is shown separately.