MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Fiat Stilo — MOT statistics 2024

The Fiat Stilo failed 46.61% of 753 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 110.4 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 10% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 110.4, 95% CI 102.0–118.8 (100 = national average) 100 110.4 0 200
Index
110.4
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
46.61%
n = 753
Dangerous /100
23
national ≈11
Rank
563 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Alfa Romeo MiTo (index 110.4) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Fiat Stilo common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Suspension stands out at 49.4 per 100 tests, against 31.6 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Fiat Stilo common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical51.96,90338.31.35×1.32–1.39
Suspension49.46,56631.61.56×1.53–1.60
Brakes27.83,69923.21.20×1.16–1.24
Body & structure20.12,67113.71.47×1.41–1.53
Visibility15.32,04012.31.24×1.19–1.30
Tyres14.11,87310.71.32×1.26–1.38
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 13,292 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn20.154.874.14×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements14.652.575.71×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure7.211.166.22×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Spring or spring component fractured or seriously…A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened7.872.862.75×Ask the seller about: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in…Lamp emitted colour, position or intensity not in accordance with the requirements5.820.856.87×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement6.021.244.86×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements6.553.591.82×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc4.691.782.63×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen5.002.222.25×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated4.581.902.41×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Fiat Stilo MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 66.3 per 100 tests; Lamps & electrical are lowest at 11.9 per 100 tests — the gap is 54.4 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Fiat Stilo MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension66.3
Brakes46.5
Tyres45.7
Body & structure20.9
Emissions & leaks14.3
Lamps & electrical11.9

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed44.0%1,052
It passed43.5%3,764

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (44.0% against 43.5%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is tyres — 45.0% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 13,078 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only120.5fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage122.8fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year9.3%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (+2.3 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Fiat Stilo compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeFiat StiloSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
12 years50.42%41.25%+9.18 pp236
13 years55.68%43.29%+12.39 pp1,022
14 years52.65%45.03%+7.62 pp1,489
15 years54.12%46.31%+7.82 pp2,594
16 years54.91%47.34%+7.58 pp2,666
17 years53.88%47.78%+6.1 pp2,227
18 years51.64%47.99%+3.65 pp1,400
19 years50.57%47.73%+2.83 pp880
20 years48.15%47.36%+0.78 pp513

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Fiat Stilo perform as it gets older?

The Stilo at age 20 stands out at 47.5%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Fiat Stilo perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–51%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeFiat StiloAll vehiclesGap
1845.5%43.9%+1.6 pp
1947.3%43.5%+3.8 pp
2047.5%41.0%+6.5 pp

Is a Fiat Stilo ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Fiat Stilo MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 22.1%.

Based on 747 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 70
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 165
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 131
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 381

How dangerous are Fiat Stilo MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 159.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Fiat Stilo MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor24.9514.221.75×
Major159.0452.753.01×
Dangerous22.5811.152.03×

Chart values: Minor 24.9 · Major 159.0 · Dangerous 22.6.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Fiat Stilo MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 55.8%; Aug is lowest at 49.9% — the gap is 5.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Fiat Stilo MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–57%.

bars: Fiat Stilo · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthFiat StiloAll vehiclesGap
Jan55.75%31.12%+24.6 pp
Feb54.73%29.99%+24.7 pp
Mar53.76%28.26%+25.5 pp
Apr53.97%29.78%+24.2 pp
May52.67%28.79%+23.9 pp
Jun54.07%28.15%+25.9 pp
Jul54.23%29.33%+24.9 pp
Aug49.9%29.2%+20.7 pp
Sep51.74%28.19%+23.6 pp
Oct51.18%30.34%+20.8 pp
Nov53.51%30.58%+22.9 pp
Dec53.65%29.33%+24.3 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.9 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Fiat Stilo average mileage by age

At age 19, the middle half of Stilos runs from 67,357 miles to 123,086 miles, against 89,239 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Fiat Stilo MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 36.1% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 62.2% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Fiat Stilo MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Fiat Stilo: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+40-70k miles36.1%29.5–43.4%180 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles48.3%42.1–54.6%242 (rough estimate)
15+100-140k miles50.5%43.7–57.2%206 (rough estimate)
15+140k+ miles62.2%50.8–72.4%74 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1870,19394,285118,569165
1967,35789,239123,086131
20+65,73784,778112,458381

A typical 19-year-old Stilo has ~89,239 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Fiat Stilo fails its MOT most

Cleveland area is highest at 67.1%; Enfield area is lowest at 33.9% — the gap is 33.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fiat Stilo line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Cleveland (TS)67.12%+13.8 pp
Plymouth (PL)64%+10.7 pp
Bournemouth (BH)63.92%+10.6 pp
Portsmouth (PO)63.46%+10.1 pp
Blackpool (FY)63.37%+10.0 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Enfield (EN)33.93%-19.4 pp
Leicester (LE)36.81%-16.5 pp
London N (N)38.58%-14.7 pp
Slough (SL)39.86%-13.5 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)41.84%-11.5 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 37%–63% failing.

How many miles does a Fiat Stilo last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 37.9%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 6.3% — the gap is 31.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles4,95837.89%
150,000+ miles8306.34%

Of 13,084 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 37.9% had reached 100k miles, 6.3% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Fiat Stilo faults that come together

Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 2.90×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks6052.9×
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle412.78× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres252.77× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2042.62× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment612.5× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems3092.46× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle342.39× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems4792.3× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2802.3× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks212.3× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility2082.21× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres4652.18× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks7722.16×
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks4622.14× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres1642.13× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering962.11× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension552.1× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres2772.09× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility3352.07× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering2602.07× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,1882.06×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres7272.06×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres1582.05× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility221.99× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension4431.98× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering4131.98× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension4411.97× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility8491.96×
Body, chassis, structureTyres4051.96× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility3101.94× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility5011.92×
BrakesSuspension1,1771.9×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,0471.88×
Body, chassis, structureBrakes6321.88×
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension7131.86×
SuspensionTyres7041.86×
Body, chassis, structureSteering2211.82× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility4541.8× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1,8281.78×
SteeringVisibility1671.77× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1381.77× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility7831.69×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1,0001.67×
Identification of the vehicleSteering15too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems14too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension13too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter12too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels12too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSpeedometer and speed limiter10too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSuspension10too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility7too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSteering6too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSpeedometer and speed limiter6too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels6too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterVisibility5too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 2.90× more often than chance (605 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Fiat Stilo?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 41.9%, against 56.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year41.85%611
8–12k miles/year56.46%699
Gap (low − normal)-14.61 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1344.443664.19148-19.74 pp
1446.435657.47174-11.04 pp

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1229.274158.8251-29.56 pp
1344.3816056.08148-11.71 pp
1441.8531349.67153-7.82 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 41.9% vs 56.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 14.6 pp lower (n_low=611, n_normal=699). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 45.6% low-use vs 60.1% normal (-14.4 pp).

Which Fiat Stilo engine is best?

petrol 1.0–1.2 is highest at 105.9; petrol over 2.0 is lowest at 73.6 — the gap is 32.3 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrolover 2.0 litre73.638.88%859 (rough estimate)
petrol1.2–1.5 litre98.652.88%4,822 (rough estimate)
petrol1.5–1.8 litre99.252.64%2,025 (rough estimate)
diesel1.8–2.0 litre105.456.33%3,907 (rough estimate)
petrol1.0–1.2 litre105.955.75%1,618 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the petrol 1.0–1.2 runs at 105.9 against this model's own age norm while the petrol over 2.0 runs at 73.6 — a spread of 32.3 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Fiat Stilo MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £215.97 to £410.34, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£216–410
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension49.4 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£88.92
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment51.9 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£72.66
Brakes27.8 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£41.70
Tyres14.1 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£12.69

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £216 to £410, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Fiat Stilo running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 are close to the reference at 47.0%, against 45.0% at age 18, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 18
45
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 165 tests)
At age 19
47
other cars of this model tested at age 19 in 2024 (rough estimate: 131 tests)
Repairs per 100
£21,597
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
2d
median; 26.44% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1845.45%94,285165—
1947.33%89,239131—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Fiat Stilo rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 4.72×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
4.72×
3.61% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
40th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Fiat Stilo fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Fiat Stilo advisory become a failure?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 33.8%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 33.8 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Fiat Stilo chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Fiat Stilo, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Lamps & electrical 33.8% · Suspension 32.1% · Body & chassis 22.9% · Brakes 20.5% · Tyres 13.1% · Noise, emissions, leaks 12.5% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment33.8%12 months3,634613
Suspension32.1%12.1 months3,3022,753
Body, chassis, structure22.9%12.1 months3,4561,303
Brakes20.5%12.1 months3,5132,130
Tyres13.1%12.1 months3,9892,331
Noise, emissions and leaks12.4%12 months3,6391,052
Non-component advisories0.0%——626

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 34 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 3,634 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Fiat Stilo?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 12-14 are highest at 33.7%; Brakes after a passed at age 15-19 are lowest at 9.9% — the gap is 23.7 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
12-14passedSuspension 20.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.6% · Brakes 10.2%635
12-14advisorySuspension 26.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.4% · Body, chassis, structure 13.6%759
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.7% · Suspension 31.0% · Brakes 18.6%1,495
15-19passedSuspension 18.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.7% · Brakes 9.9%1,077
15-19advisorySuspension 26.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.9% · Body, chassis, structure 15.3%1,647
15-19failureSuspension 31.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 30.9% · Brakes 19.1%2,743
20+advisoryBrakes 23.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.8% · Suspension 21.4%42 (rough estimate)
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 32.4% · Body, chassis, structure 28.4% · Suspension 24.3%74 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Fiat Stilo ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 67.5%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 6.1% — the gap is 61.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
26.44%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.196
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
13.71%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
2.222%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 4,925 failures followed through to their re-test, 26.44% were repaired and passed the same day and 67.51% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 17,215 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.196 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 2,971 miles a year across 3,039 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 13.71% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 43.31% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 2.222% of 3,060 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 52,878 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Fiat Stilo safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 5.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Fiat Stilo recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Fiat Stilo. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2003: 2 · 2004: 0 · 2005: 1 · 2006: 1 · 2007: 1.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Fiat Stilo
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2007/01220/04/20071,474ENGINE POWER MAY BE LOST
R/2006/18428/11/200644,221SUSPENSION COIL SPRINGS MAY BREAK
R/2005/04311/07/20053,030POSSIBLE LOSS OF STEERING
R/2003/06901/05/2003566UNINTENDED ACTIVATION OF SIDE WINDOW AIRBAGS
R/2003/02831/03/2003230POSSIBLE SHORT CIRCUIT IN ENGINE COOLING FAN CONTROL UNIT

DVSA lists 5 safety recall campaigns for the Fiat Stilo, covering roughly 49,521 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Fiat Stilo inspection results in other countries

Finland Katsastus stands out at 50.6%, against 26.3% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Same model, different national inspection regimes
CountryTestThis model failsNational averagePositionSample
United KingdomMOT (class 4)46.61%26.01%+20.6 pp753
FinlandKatsastus50.6%26.3%+24.3 pp1,542
NetherlandsAPK67.4%50.8%+16.6 pp680

The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.

What Finland fails it for — share of recorded faults
Fault areaShare
Axles, wheels and suspension26.3%
Brake systems26.1%
Chassis and body19.6%
Environmental hazards14.6%
Steering equipment5.6%

Useful as a cross-check on the UK defect table above: the categories are named differently, but a component that dominates in both regimes is a genuine weak point of the model rather than an artefact of one country's testing style.

The exact faults Netherlands records — APK defect codes, 2024
CodeFaultRecordedType
210Tyre pressure not at the correct value113failure
RA2Excessive leak of other fluids92advisory
205Tyre with insufficient tread92failure
516Dipped headlight incorrectly aimed87failure
115Exhaust not gas-tight or venting unsafely64failure
RA1Airbag or seat-belt warning light showing a fault63advisory
AC1Tyre down to 1.6–2.5 mm of tread54advisory
AC4Steering or suspension ball joint worn up to 1.0 mm53advisory

Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 2.097 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Fiat Stilo is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: Traficom — Periodic inspections of cars by model / by model and fault object 2024, CC BY 4.0; RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Fiat Stilo MOT: quick answers

Fiat Stilo MOT Risk Index stands out at 110.4, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Fiat Stilo first-time MOT pass rate?
53.39% of first attempts passed in 2024 (753 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 46.61% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 753 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 110.4 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Fiat Stilo with other cars

Volvo V50 is highest at 110.4; Fiat Stilo is lowest at 110.4 — the gap is 0.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Fiat MOT statisticsFiat Grande Punto MOT statsFiat Seicento MOT stats

Similar risk

Alfa Romeo MiTo (index 110.4)Chevrolet Cruze (index 110.4)Volvo V50 (index 110.4)

Same size class

how Mitsubishi Carisma compareshow Lotus Esprit compareshow Toyota Highlander compares

By build year

Fiat Stilo 2002Fiat Stilo 2003Fiat Stilo 2004Fiat Stilo 2005Fiat Stilo 2006Fiat Stilo 2007

By area

Fiat Stilo MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Fiat Stilo body, chassis and structure failuresFiat Stilo brakes failuresFiat Stilo vehicle identification failuresFiat Stilo lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresFiat Stilo noise, emissions and leaks failuresFiat Stilo road wheels failuresFiat Stilo seat belts and airbags failuresFiat Stilo steering failuresFiat Stilo suspension failuresFiat Stilo tyres failuresFiat Stilo visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Fiat Stilo in FinlandFiat Stilo in the Netherlands


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:fiat-stilo:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Fiat Stilo MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/fiat-stilo/ · Published 2026-07-30.