Chevrolet Cruze — MOT statistics 2024
The Chevrolet Cruze failed 39.53% of 5,067 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 110.4 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 10% more often than expected for its age.
Age-adjusted peer: Alfa Romeo MiTo (index 110.4) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.
Chevrolet Cruze common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 20.3 per 100 tests, against 16.3 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 20.3 | 7,567 | 16.3 | 1.24×1.22–1.27 |
| Suspension | 16.4 | 6,094 | 15.4 | 1.07×1.04–1.09 |
| Brakes | 13.6 | 5,067 | 10.9 | 1.25×1.22–1.29 |
| Visibility | 9.8 | 3,648 | 7.5 | 1.31×1.27–1.35 |
| Tyres | 9.4 | 3,509 | 9.5 | 0.99×0.96–1.02 · not distinguishable |
| Emissions & leaks | 6.5 | 2,421 | 3.2 | 2.02×1.95–2.11 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring or spring component fractured or seriously…A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened | 9.85 | 2.86 | 3.45× | Ask the seller about: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened |
| Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm | 4.59 | 2.15 | 2.13× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 4.91 | 2.83 | 1.74× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 4.06 | 2.09 | 1.94× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunctionEngine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction | 2.88 | 1.19 | 2.43× | Ask the seller about: Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction |
| Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 3.46 | 2.22 | 1.56× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or…A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED | 2.07 | 1.24 | 1.66× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged | 2.86 | 2.54 | 1.13× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 3.91 | 3.59 | 1.09× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 3.01 | 4.87 | 0.62× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Chevrolet Cruze MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Tyres are highest at 44.0 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 6.5 per 100 tests — the gap is 37.5 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Tyres | 44 |
| Brakes | 33.2 |
| Suspension | 14.1 |
| Emissions & leaks | 13.7 |
| Non-component advisories | 10.5 |
| Body & structure | 6.5 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
Tyres, brakes and suspension: Chevrolet Cruze against cars of the same age
| Age | Part | Chevrolet Cruze | Same age, petrol and diesel | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 years | Tyres | 5.59 | 5.54 | 0.05 |
| 6 years | Brakes | 6.2 | 3.81 | 2.39 |
| 6 years | Suspension | 6.06 | 3.72 | 2.34 |
| 7 years | Tyres | 6.85 | 5.95 | 0.90 |
| 7 years | Brakes | 6.87 | 4.55 | 2.32 |
| 7 years | Suspension | 10.36 | 5.68 | 4.68 |
| 8 years | Tyres | 6.37 | 6.31 | 0.06 |
| 8 years | Brakes | 7.14 | 5.38 | 1.76 |
| 8 years | Suspension | 12.01 | 7.78 | 4.23 |
Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 40.7% | 3,226 |
| It passed | 34.6% | 17,610 |
A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 6.1 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is body, chassis, structure — 40.0% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 37,149 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 120.6 | fails more often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 122.0 | fails more often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 4.0% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage changes little here (+1.4 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Chevrolet Cruze compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Chevrolet Cruze | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 years | 25.78% | 17.41% | +8.37 pp | 578 |
| 6 years | 30.38% | 20.75% | +9.63 pp | 2,130 |
| 7 years | 35.81% | 24.32% | +11.49 pp | 4,044 |
| 8 years | 36.4% | 28.14% | +8.25 pp | 5,322 |
| 9 years | 39.09% | 32.02% | +7.07 pp | 6,224 |
| 10 years | 38.44% | 35.59% | +2.85 pp | 6,365 |
| 11 years | 40.02% | 38.65% | +1.37 pp | 5,492 |
| 12 years | 40.62% | 41.25% | -0.63 pp | 3,828 |
| 13 years | 41.65% | 43.29% | -1.64 pp | 2,036 |
| 14 years | 41.84% | 45.04% | -3.2 pp | 882 |
| 15 years | 41.7% | 46.31% | -4.61 pp | 235 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Chevrolet Cruze perform as it gets older?
The Cruze at age 11 stands out at 39.0%, against 33.2% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars; from about age 11 it stays above the national age curve.
Data table
| Age | Chevrolet Cruze | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 35.9% | 30.1% | +5.7 pp |
| 11 | 39.0% | 33.2% | +5.8 pp |
| 12 | 40.5% | 35.7% | +4.8 pp |
| 13 | 38.5% | 38.2% | +0.3 pp |
| 14 | 42.1% | 40.4% | +1.7 pp |
| 15 | 41.9% | 41.6% | +0.3 pp |
Is a Chevrolet Cruze ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Chevrolet Cruze MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 73.6%.
Based on 5,050 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 9 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 4 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 7 |
| 10–14 years | 73.5% Check a registration with TfL | n = 4,796 |
| 15–17 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 234 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
How dangerous are Chevrolet Cruze MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 55.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 14.22 | 14.22 | 1.00× |
| Major | 55.71 | 52.75 | 1.06× |
| Dangerous | 13.46 | 11.15 | 1.21× |
Chart values: Minor 14.2 · Major 55.7 · Dangerous 13.5.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Chevrolet Cruze MOT matter?
Apr is highest at 39.7%; Jan is lowest at 36.4% — the gap is 3.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 27%–41%.
bars: Chevrolet Cruze · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Chevrolet Cruze | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 36.35% | 31.12% | +5.2 pp |
| Feb | 36.45% | 29.99% | +6.5 pp |
| Mar | 37.32% | 28.26% | +9.1 pp |
| Apr | 39.65% | 29.78% | +9.9 pp |
| May | 39.39% | 28.79% | +10.6 pp |
| Jun | 39.59% | 28.15% | +11.4 pp |
| Jul | 38.31% | 29.33% | +9.0 pp |
| Aug | 37.26% | 29.2% | +8.1 pp |
| Sep | 38.84% | 28.19% | +10.7 pp |
| Oct | 38.95% | 30.34% | +8.6 pp |
| Nov | 38.04% | 30.58% | +7.5 pp |
| Dec | 38% | 29.33% | +8.7 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Chevrolet Cruze average mileage by age
At age 13, the middle half of Cruzes runs from 60,883 miles to 100,011 miles, against 79,837 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–117k mi.
Does high mileage mean more Chevrolet Cruze MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 10–14, 23.9% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 50.6% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10–14 | <40k miles | 23.9% | 19.5–29% | 305 (rough estimate) |
| 10–14 | 40-70k miles | 33.8% | 31.4–36.3% | 1,384 |
| 10–14 | 70-100k miles | 42.2% | 39.9–44.4% | 1,822 |
| 10–14 | 100-140k miles | 43.9% | 40.9–46.9% | 1,034 |
| 10–14 | 140k+ miles | 50.6% | 44.5–56.7% | 253 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 70-100k miles | 44.4% | 34.6–54.7% | 90 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 100-140k miles | 47.5% | 35.5–59.8% | 61 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 58,669 | 80,039 | 101,741 | 477 |
| 11 | 62,606 | 79,132 | 99,072 | 1,247 |
| 12 | 60,258 | 79,870 | 103,030 | 1,494 |
| 13 | 60,883 | 79,837 | 100,011 | 982 |
| 14 | 68,469 | 86,953 | 108,819 | 603 |
| 15 | 70,178 | 88,296 | 111,513 | 234 |
A typical 13-year-old Cruze has ~79,837 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Chevrolet Cruze fails its MOT most
Aberdeen area is highest at 53.1%; Southend-on-Sea area is lowest at 24.8% — the gap is 28.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Aberdeen (AB) | 53.09% | +15.1 pp |
| Huddersfield (HD) | 51.85% | +13.8 pp |
| Paisley (PA) | 51.43% | +13.4 pp |
| Inverness (IV) | 49.62% | +11.6 pp |
| Dundee (DD) | 49.54% | +11.5 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Southend-on-Sea (SS) | 24.76% | -13.3 pp |
| Sutton (SM) | 26.28% | -11.7 pp |
| Wolverhampton (WV) | 26.89% | -11.1 pp |
| Enfield (EN) | 27.4% | -10.6 pp |
| Bradford (BD) | 29.56% | -8.5 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 31%–48% failing.
Chevrolet Cruze survival: which cars are still on the road
By age 15 is well below the reference at 17.4%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.
Survival vs fail rate by age
| Age | Tests | Survival vs ages 4–6 | Fail % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 578 | 42.7% | 25.78% |
| 6 | 2,130 | 100% | 30.38% |
| 7 | 4,044 | 100% | 35.81% |
| 8 | 5,322 | 100% | 36.4% |
| 9 | 6,224 | 100% | 39.09% |
| 10 | 6,365 | 100% | 38.44% |
| 11 | 5,492 | 100% | 40.02% |
| 12 | 3,828 | 100% | 40.62% |
| 13 | 2,036 | 100% | 41.65% |
| 14 | 882 | 65.1% | 41.84% |
| 15 | 235 | 17.4% | 41.7% |
By age 14, only about 65% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈1,354); survivors still fail at 41.8% vs 25.8% at age 5. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.
How many miles does a Chevrolet Cruze last?
100,000+ miles is highest at 16.9%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 2.1% — the gap is 14.7 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 6,269 | 16.87% |
| 150,000+ miles | 796 | 2.14% |
Of 37,166 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 16.9% had reached 100k miles, 2.1% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
How many years is a Chevrolet Cruze likely to last?
Bought at age 5 is highest at 20.8 years; Bought at age 12 is lowest at 2.2 years — the gap is 18.6 years.
bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve
| Age now | Typical mileage (p50) | Expected years left |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | — | at least 20.8 |
| 8 | — | at least 6.2 |
| 10 | — | at least 4.2 |
| 12 | — | at least 2.2 |
estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 4.2 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 14, so the true figure is likely higher.
Chevrolet Cruze faults that come together
Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 4.35×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 376 | 4.35× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 32 | 3.79× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 39 | 3.72× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 39 | 3.59× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Road Wheels | 24 | 3.59× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 92 | 3.49× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 34 | 3.38× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 59 | 3.36× (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Tyres | 28 | 3.26× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 534 | 3.19× |
| Identification of the vehicle | Tyres | 41 | 3.17× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 848 | 3.14× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 33 | 3.1× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 85 | 3.09× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 27 | 3.07× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 38 | 3× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 51 | 2.99× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 45 | 2.8× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 37 | 2.75× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Steering | 56 | 2.72× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 42 | 2.72× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 353 | 2.66× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 567 | 2.63× |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 910 | 2.62× |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 413 | 2.61× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 1,144 | 2.6× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 361 | 2.57× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 1,065 | 2.56× |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 41 | 2.51× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 80 | 2.4× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 74 | 2.4× (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 39 | 2.4× (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 478 | 2.35× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 531 | 2.34× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 476 | 2.26× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 578 | 2.25× |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 23 | 2.24× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 556 | 2.22× |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 54 | 2.21× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Visibility | 43 | 2.21× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 898 | 2.2× |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 1,437 | 2.18× |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 55 | 2.16× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 239 | 2.15× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 277 | 2.08× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 658 | 2.04× |
| Suspension | Visibility | 703 | 1.82× |
| Steering | Tyres | 27 | 1.65× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Road Wheels | 19 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Steering | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Brakes» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 3.19× more often than chance (534 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Is low mileage better for a Chevrolet Cruze?
Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 28.7%, against 43.1% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Band | Fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| <5k miles/year | 28.7% | 5,983 |
| 8–12k miles/year | 43.12% | 9,569 |
| Gap (low − normal) | -14.42 pp | — |
By fuel and age
Diesel
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6 | 15.69 | 51 | 33.45 | 281 | -17.77 pp |
| 7 | 21.43 | 84 | 38.04 | 531 | -16.61 pp |
| 8 | 23.33 | 90 | 40 | 555 | -16.67 pp |
| 9 | 27.82 | 133 | 41.88 | 702 | -14.06 pp |
| 10 | 23.19 | 138 | 40.37 | 748 | -17.19 pp |
| 11 | 29.17 | 96 | 44.63 | 587 | -15.47 pp |
| 12 | 27.27 | 88 | 45.18 | 363 | -17.91 pp |
| 13 | 33.33 | 45 | 48.72 | 156 | -15.38 pp |
| 14 | 30.3 | 33 | 40.22 | 92 | -9.91 pp |
Petrol
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 6.52 | 46 | 29.79 | 94 | -23.27 pp |
| 6 | 18.88 | 249 | 35.41 | 466 | -16.53 pp |
| 7 | 19.82 | 545 | 40.72 | 830 | -20.91 pp |
| 8 | 26.84 | 801 | 41.57 | 1,174 | -14.73 pp |
| 9 | 31.79 | 1,013 | 44.13 | 1,269 | -12.34 pp |
| 10 | 30.05 | 1,105 | 42.44 | 1,204 | -12.4 pp |
| 11 | 30.84 | 1,044 | 44.69 | 969 | -13.84 pp |
| 12 | 30.5 | 846 | 48.08 | 624 | -17.58 pp |
| 13 | 35.15 | 515 | 42.7 | 281 | -7.56 pp |
| 14 | 34.58 | 214 | 48.24 | 85 | -13.66 pp |
At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 28.7% vs 43.1% for 8–12k miles/year — 14.4 pp lower (n_low=5,983, n_normal=9,569). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.
Which Chevrolet Cruze engine is best?
diesel 1.8–2.0 is highest at 107.5; petrol 1.2–1.5 is lowest at 95.7 — the gap is 11.8 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
| Fuel | Capacity | vs own age norm | Raw fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| petrol | 1.2–1.5 litre | 95.7 | 31.63% | 215 (rough estimate) |
| petrol | 1.5–1.8 litre | 98.5 | 37.66% | 26,875 |
| diesel | 1.5–1.8 litre | 99.9 | 35.91% | 4,617 (rough estimate) |
| diesel | 1.8–2.0 litre | 107.5 | 41.87% | 5,364 |
Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.8–2.0 runs at 107.5 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.5–1.8 runs at 98.5 — a spread of 9 points between two cars that share a name.
Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.
Best year for a Chevrolet Cruze, and the years to avoid
Build year 2010 is highest at 105.5; Build year 2014 is lowest at 93.9 — the gap is 11.6 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected
Every build year with its confidence interval
| Build year | vs own age norm | 95% CI | Raw fail % | Tests | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 93.9 | 88.1–99.7 | 31.93% | 3,160 | better |
| 2013 | 98.9 | 95.3–102.4 | 36.03% | 8,452 | no different |
| 2012 | 99.9 | 96.9–103 | 38.25% | 10,617 | no different |
| 2011 | 99 | 95.4–102.6 | 38.78% | 7,418 | no different |
| 2010 | 105.5 | 101.1–109.9 | 42.48% | 5,238 | worse |
| 2009 | 99.8 | 92.9–106.7 | 40.66% | 1,953 | no different |
The best build year here is 2010 and the weakest is 2010. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 6 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.
Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.
Chevrolet Cruze MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £99.80 to £189.62, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 16.4 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £29.52 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 20.3 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £28.42 |
| Brakes | 13.6 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £20.40 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 6.5 (nat. 3.67) | Exhaust rear silencer | £200 | £13.00 |
| Tyres | 9.4 (nat. 8.7) | Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted) | £90 | £8.46 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £100 to £190, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Chevrolet Cruze running costs for a fleet
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
| Age | Fails | Median odometer | Tests | Gap vs age 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 35.85% | 80,039 | 477 | — |
| 11 | 38.97% | 79,132 | 1,247 | — |
| 12 | 40.5% | 79,870 | 1,494 | — |
| 13 | 38.49% | 79,837 | 982 | — |
| 14 | 42.12% | 86,953 | 603 | — |
| 15 | 41.88% | 88,296 | 234 | — |
No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).
Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.
Chevrolet Cruze rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.14×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Chevrolet Cruze virtually never fails on corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish. Both point the same way and reinforce each other: it resists corrosion even though its owners live in saltier areas than most.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does a Chevrolet Cruze advisory become a failure?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 20.6%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 20.6 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 20.6% | 12 months | 6,638 | 839 |
| Suspension | 19.2% | 12 months | 6,402 | 2,462 |
| Brakes | 13.3% | 12.1 months | 6,108 | 6,136 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 10.5% | 12 months | 5,688 | 1,677 |
| Tyres | 9.5% | 12.1 months | 6,256 | 7,778 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 7.7% | 12.1 months | 6,266 | 3,443 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 4.2% | 12 months | 4,550 | 958 |
| Steering | 2.4% | 12 months | 3,202 | 586 |
| Non-component advisories | 0.0% | — | — | 2,616 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 21 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 6,638 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on a Chevrolet Cruze?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 12-14 are highest at 22.0%; Suspension after a passed at age 3-5 is lowest at 5.6% — the gap is 16.5 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-5 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.0% · Visibility 5.7% · Suspension 5.6% | 864 |
| 3-5 | advisory | Suspension 8.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 7.7% · Visibility 7.3% | 466 (rough estimate) |
| 3-5 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.0% · Visibility 10.0% · Suspension 8.3% | 482 (rough estimate) |
| 6-8 | passed | Suspension 10.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.5% · Visibility 6.6% | 4,753 |
| 6-8 | advisory | Suspension 13.2% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.4% · Visibility 8.5% | 3,510 |
| 6-8 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.9% · Suspension 12.8% · Visibility 9.4% | 4,669 |
| 9-11 | passed | Suspension 12.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.6% · Visibility 6.5% | 4,004 |
| 9-11 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.3% · Suspension 14.0% · Brakes 10.4% | 4,154 |
| 9-11 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.0% · Suspension 15.9% · Brakes 12.1% | 5,198 |
| 12-14 | passed | Suspension 16.1% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.3% · Body, chassis, structure 8.5% | 504 |
| 12-14 | advisory | Suspension 18.5% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.8% · Brakes 12.5% | 617 |
| 12-14 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.0% · Suspension 21.1% · Brakes 14.3% | 840 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Chevrolet Cruze ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The same-day re-test pass rate is highest at 50.0%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 2.2% — the gap is 47.8 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 9,819 failures followed through to their re-test, 49.95% were repaired and passed the same day and 47.9% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 23,443 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.585 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 5,273 miles a year across 6,900 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 29.31% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 37.13% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 2.476% of 6,905 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 29,154 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Chevrolet Cruze safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 9.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
recall campaigns launched per year
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2025/036 | 04/02/2025 | 29 | Chevrolet Takata Driver’s Airbag |
R/2016/175 | 26/07/2016 | 781 | ENGINE MAY STALL |
R/2015/034 | 03/03/2015 | 5,630 | BRAKE FLUID MAY LEAK |
R/2014/180 | 15/12/2014 | 925 | VEHICLE MAY LOSE DRIVE WHEN PARKED IN 'P' ROLL AWAY |
R/2014/095 | 12/09/2014 | 276 | DRIVE SHAFT MAY FAIL |
All 9 campaigns
| Reference | Launched | Build dates | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R/2025/036 | 04/02/2025 | 01/01/2009 – 31/12/2017 | 29 | Chevrolet Takata Driver’s Airbag |
R/2016/175 | 26/07/2016 | 11/11/2008 – 06/09/2010 | 781 | ENGINE MAY STALL |
R/2015/034 | 03/03/2015 | 13/10/2008 – 24/05/2011 | 5,630 | BRAKE FLUID MAY LEAK |
R/2014/180 | 15/12/2014 | 28/11/2008 – 27/02/2011 | 925 | VEHICLE MAY LOSE DRIVE WHEN PARKED IN 'P' ROLL AWAY |
R/2014/095 | 12/09/2014 | 30/01/2013 – 04/11/2013 | 276 | DRIVE SHAFT MAY FAIL |
R/2014/007 | 08/01/2014 | 04/12/2012 – 01/03/2013 | 50 | DRIVE SHAFT MAY FRACTURE |
R/2011/160 | 28/11/2011 | 810 | ENGINE MAY STALL | |
R/2011/058 | 12/05/2011 | 62 | SEAT BELT MOUNT MAY NOT BE SECURE | |
R/2010/022 | 23/04/2010 | 25/09/2009 – 03/12/2009 | 810 | FUEL MAY LEAK |
DVSA lists 9 safety recall campaigns for the Chevrolet Cruze, covering roughly 9,373 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
Chevrolet Cruze technical service bulletins: what dealers are told
US market, Chevrolet CRUZE, model year 2015 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.
NHTSA manufacturer communications are 1,556.
bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults
These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.
United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications
| Communication year | Bulletins | Leading subjects across all years |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1 |
|
| 2014 | 218 | |
| 2015 | 242 | |
| 2016 | 215 | |
| 2017 | 166 | |
| 2018 | 87 | |
| 2019 | 106 | |
| 2020 | 101 | |
| 2021 | 62 | |
| 2022 | 112 | |
| 2023 | 97 | |
| 2024 | 106 | |
| 2025 | 37 | |
| 2026 | 6 |
Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.
Chevrolet Cruze owner complaints: what goes wrong
US market, Chevrolet CRUZE, model year 2015 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.
Engine (not MOT-tested) is highest at 104; Brakes are lowest at 19 — the gap is 85.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
| Component | Complaints | Share | MOT fail items per 100 | MOT rank | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engine (not MOT-tested) | 104 | 41.3% | not in top 6 | — | complained about, rarely an MOT failure |
| Lamps & electrical | 51 | 20.2% | 20.3 | #1 | complained about and fails often |
| Transmission (not MOT-tested) | 37 | 14.7% | not in top 6 | — | complained about, rarely an MOT failure |
| Steering | 24 | 9.5% | not in top 6 | — | complained about, rarely an MOT failure |
| Restraints | 24 | 9.5% | not in top 6 | — | complained about, rarely an MOT failure |
| Brakes | 19 | 7.5% | 13.6 | #3 | complained about and fails often |
Two different populations answering two different questions: the MOT records what an inspector can measure once a year, the complaint file records what annoyed or frightened an owner on the road. A component high in one column and absent from the other is the interesting case — driver-assistance and electronics dominate complaints while almost never appearing as an MOT failure item.
What the reports actually say
I have replaced my whole engine and the cars fuel system.. my gas was backing into my oil along with the engine failing .. has happened again. This car has been a nightmare and just keeps failing. Strong gas and oil burning smell then car starts smoking. Had to shut it off in the middle of the road.
Radiator leaks, car overheated. Looking online it is obvious that a lot of people have had this same issue, so why no recall. It's a peice of crap car, that is dangerous to drive.
US owners have filed 252 complaints about the equivalent Chevrolet Cruze to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including 20 that mention a crash, 4 a fire and 13 an injury. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.
Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.
Chevrolet Cruze inspection results in other countries
United Kingdom MOT stands out at 39.5%, against 26.0% nationally.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Country | Test | This model fails | National average | Position | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | MOT (class 4) | 39.53% | 26.01% | +13.5 pp | 5,067 |
| Finland | Katsastus | 29% | 26.3% | +2.7 pp | 2,421 |
| Netherlands | APK | 59.6% | 50.8% | +8.8 pp | 1,259 |
The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.
| Fault area | Share |
|---|---|
| Axles, wheels and suspension | 39.7% |
| Brake systems | 39.3% |
| Environmental hazards | 12.7% |
| Vehicle identification | 2% |
| Chassis and body | 1.8% |
Useful as a cross-check on the UK defect table above: the categories are named differently, but a component that dominates in both regimes is a genuine weak point of the model rather than an artefact of one country's testing style.
| Code | Fault | Recorded | Type |
|---|---|---|---|
210 | Tyre pressure not at the correct value | 219 | failure |
RA2 | Excessive leak of other fluids | 185 | advisory |
497 | Number-plate light not working or missing | 140 | failure |
205 | Tyre with insufficient tread | 135 | failure |
516 | Dipped headlight incorrectly aimed | 106 | failure |
576 | Indicator colour wrong or not permitted | 96 | failure |
584 | Sidelight not working properly | 94 | failure |
AC1 | Tyre down to 1.6–2.5 mm of tread | 87 | advisory |
Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 1.491 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.
Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Chevrolet Cruze is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.
Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: Traficom — Periodic inspections of cars by model / by model and fault object 2024, CC BY 4.0; RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.. Adapted; licences and full notice.
Chevrolet Cruze MOT: quick answers
Chevrolet Cruze MOT Risk Index stands out at 110.4, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Chevrolet Cruze first-time MOT pass rate?
- 60.47% of first attempts passed in 2024 (5,067 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 39.53% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 5,067 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 110.4 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Chevrolet Cruze with other cars
Mitsubishi Colt is highest at 110.7; Chevrolet Cruze is lowest at 110.4 — the gap is 0.3 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Chevrolet MOT statisticsChevrolet Matiz MOT statsChevrolet Spark MOT stats
Similar risk
Alfa Romeo MiTo (index 110.4)Volvo V50 (index 110.4)Mitsubishi Colt (index 110.7)
Same size class
how Lotus Elise compareshow Fiat Bravo compareshow Kia Sedona compares
By build year
Chevrolet Cruze 2009Chevrolet Cruze 2010Chevrolet Cruze 2011Chevrolet Cruze 2012Chevrolet Cruze 2013Chevrolet Cruze 2014
By area
Chevrolet Cruze MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Chevrolet Cruze body, chassis and structure failuresChevrolet Cruze brakes failuresChevrolet Cruze vehicle identification failuresChevrolet Cruze lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresChevrolet Cruze noise, emissions and leaks failuresChevrolet Cruze road wheels failuresChevrolet Cruze seat belts and airbags failuresChevrolet Cruze steering failuresChevrolet Cruze suspension failuresChevrolet Cruze tyres failuresChevrolet Cruze visibility failures
Inspections abroad
Chevrolet Cruze in FinlandChevrolet Cruze in the Netherlands
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:chevrolet-cruze:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Chevrolet Cruze MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/chevrolet-cruze/ · Published 2026-07-30.