MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Smart Fortwo 2016: MOT failure rate for its age

15.9% of 34,193 MOT tests of the Smart Fortwo first registered in 2016 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 98.9 (95% CI 96.2–101.5; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2016 build year is no different from other years of the same model at the same age.

Smart Fortwo built in 2016 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time15.9%all ages tested2019–202434193
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 96.2–101.5)98.9index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202434193
Rank among this model's 18 build years8of 181 = fails least for its age2019–202434193
Tested in 20245734testsmedian 35,504 miles20245734
line · Smart Fortwo built 2016 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2016 11.1% vs model normal 10.4% at age 3 · 2019–2024
Built 2016 against Smart Fortwo normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 3: 11.1% vs 10.4%; age 4: 11.6% vs 12.2%; age 5: 14.8% vs 14.9%; age 6: 16.8% vs 17.1%; age 7: 19.1% vs 19.4%; age 8: 21.9% vs 22.4%. Axis from 0% to 30%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2016 Smart Fortwo fail at each age?

Cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Smart Fortwo built 2016: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
35,75611.110.3–11.910.4106.4
45,48511.610.8–12.512.295
55,72814.813.9–15.714.999.1
65,75916.815.9–17.817.198.4
75,73119.118.1–20.219.498.7
85,73421.920.8–2322.497.8

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 34,193 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2016 Smart Fortwo?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2016 is visibility: 6.1 items per 100 first tests, against 7.8 across all build years of the Smart Fortwo. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2016 were tested at ages 3 to 8.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Smart Fortwo built 2016 against the Smart Fortwo in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2016, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Visibility6.17.82,091
Tyres67.22,039
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment4.614.21,570
Brakes4.59.51,541
Noise, emissions and leaks2.74.2912

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 34,193 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2016 compare with the years around it?

Among the 18 published build years of the Smart Fortwo, 2016 ranks 8 (1 = fails least for its age). 2015: index 90.6. 2017: index 96.5.

Smart Fortwo build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
2002106.293.0–119.4no different (rough estimate)558
2003101.593.1–109.9no different (rough estimate)1,343
200499.795.5–103.9no different5,368
2005109.7105.5–113.9worse6,098
2006104.7100.9–108.5worse7,185
2007103.3100.6–106.1worse14,353
2008103.3101.4–105.2worse29,795
2009103.2101.4–105.0worse36,100
2010106.4104.5–108.4worse34,072
201195.292.9–97.4better23,700
201291.889.1–94.6better16,141
201396.193.5–98.8better20,631
201493.991.3–96.6better22,779
201590.686.8–94.3better13,197
201698.996.2–101.5no different34,193
201796.593.3–99.7better25,276
2018102.397.6–107.0no different13,525
201994.186.8–101.4no different5,751

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 310,065 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Smart Fortwo 2016 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/smart-fortwo/2016/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Smart Fortwo 2002 · Smart Fortwo 2003 · Smart Fortwo 2004 · Smart Fortwo 2005 · Smart Fortwo 2006 · Smart Fortwo 2007 · Smart Fortwo 2008 · Smart Fortwo 2009 · Smart Fortwo 2010 · Smart Fortwo 2011 · Smart Fortwo 2012 · Smart Fortwo 2013 · Smart Fortwo 2014 · Smart Fortwo 2015 · Smart Fortwo 2017 · Smart Fortwo 2018 · Smart Fortwo 2019 · Smart Fortwo in Norway · Smart Fortwo in Finland · Smart Fortwo in the Netherlands · Smart Fortwo by postcode area · Smart Fortwo body, chassis and structure failures · Smart Fortwo brakes failures · Smart Fortwo vehicle identification failures · Smart Fortwo lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Smart Fortwo noise, emissions and leaks failures · Smart Fortwo road wheels failures · Smart Fortwo seat belts and airbags failures · Smart Fortwo steering failures · Smart Fortwo suspension failures · Smart Fortwo tyres failures · Smart Fortwo visibility failures