MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Smart Fortwo 2002: MOT failure rate for its age

44.4% of 558 MOT tests of the Smart Fortwo first registered in 2002 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 106.2 (95% CI 93.0–119.4; 100 = normal for this model at that age): the 2002 build year is no different from other years of the same model at the same age. This is a rough estimate from a smaller sample.

Smart Fortwo built in 2002 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time44.4%all ages tested2019–2024558
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 93.0–119.4)106.2index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–2024558
Rank among this model's 18 build years16of 181 = fails least for its age2019–2024558
Tested in 202481testsmedian 66,657 miles202481
line · Smart Fortwo built 2002 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2002 48.4% vs model normal 43.5% at age 17 · 2019–2024
Built 2002 against Smart Fortwo normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 17: 48.4% vs 43.5%; age 18: 45.5% vs 41.2%; age 19: 33.6% vs 42.2%; age 20: 47.3% vs 39.5%; age 21: 44.1% vs n/a%; age 22: 39.5% vs n/a%. Axis from 0% to 50%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2002 Smart Fortwo fail at each age?

Cars built in 2002 were tested at ages 17 to 22 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Smart Fortwo built 2002: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
17188 (rough estimate)48.441.4–55.543.5111.2
18145 (rough estimate)45.537.6–53.641.2110.4
19113 (rough estimate)33.625.6–42.742.279.6
20112 (rough estimate)47.338.3–56.539.5120
2193 (rough estimate)44.134.4–54.2not availablenot available
2281 (rough estimate)39.529.6–50.4not availablenot available

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 732 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2002 Smart Fortwo?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2002 is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: 63.9 items per 100 first tests, against 14.2 across all build years of the Smart Fortwo. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2002 were tested at ages 17 to 22.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Smart Fortwo built 2002 against the Smart Fortwo in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2002, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment63.914.2468
Suspension21.310156
Brakes17.39.5127
Visibility16.57.8121
Noise, emissions and leaks13.54.299

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 732 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2002 compare with the years around it?

Among the 18 published build years of the Smart Fortwo, 2002 ranks 16 (1 = fails least for its age). 2003: index 101.5.

Smart Fortwo build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
2002106.293.0–119.4no different (rough estimate)558
2003101.593.1–109.9no different (rough estimate)1,343
200499.795.5–103.9no different5,368
2005109.7105.5–113.9worse6,098
2006104.7100.9–108.5worse7,185
2007103.3100.6–106.1worse14,353
2008103.3101.4–105.2worse29,795
2009103.2101.4–105.0worse36,100
2010106.4104.5–108.4worse34,072
201195.292.9–97.4better23,700
201291.889.1–94.6better16,141
201396.193.5–98.8better20,631
201493.991.3–96.6better22,779
201590.686.8–94.3better13,197
201698.996.2–101.5no different34,193
201796.593.3–99.7better25,276
2018102.397.6–107.0no different13,525
201994.186.8–101.4no different5,751

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 310,065 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Smart Fortwo 2002 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/smart-fortwo/2002/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Smart Fortwo 2003 · Smart Fortwo 2004 · Smart Fortwo 2005 · Smart Fortwo 2006 · Smart Fortwo 2007 · Smart Fortwo 2008 · Smart Fortwo 2009 · Smart Fortwo 2010 · Smart Fortwo 2011 · Smart Fortwo 2012 · Smart Fortwo 2013 · Smart Fortwo 2014 · Smart Fortwo 2015 · Smart Fortwo 2016 · Smart Fortwo 2017 · Smart Fortwo 2018 · Smart Fortwo 2019 · Smart Fortwo in Norway · Smart Fortwo in Finland · Smart Fortwo in the Netherlands · Smart Fortwo by postcode area · Smart Fortwo body, chassis and structure failures · Smart Fortwo brakes failures · Smart Fortwo vehicle identification failures · Smart Fortwo lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Smart Fortwo noise, emissions and leaks failures · Smart Fortwo road wheels failures · Smart Fortwo seat belts and airbags failures · Smart Fortwo steering failures · Smart Fortwo suspension failures · Smart Fortwo tyres failures · Smart Fortwo visibility failures