MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Smart Fortwo 2009: MOT failure rate for its age

35.9% of 36,100 MOT tests of the Smart Fortwo first registered in 2009 failed at the first attempt (2019–2024; retests excluded). Against this model's own normal rate at the same ages the index is 103.2 (95% CI 101.4–105.0; 100 = normal for this model at that age): close to other build years of the same model at the same age (within 5 points of normal).

Smart Fortwo built in 2009 at a glance
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Failed first time35.9%all ages tested2019–202436100
Index against this model at the same age (95% CI 101.4–105.0)103.2index100 = normal for this model at that age2019–202436100
Rank among this model's 18 build years12of 181 = fails least for its age2019–202436100
Tested in 20245579testsmedian 64,874 miles20245579
line · Smart Fortwo built 2009 · first-time MOT failure share by age · built 2009 36.4% vs model normal 33% at age 10 · 2019–2024
Built 2009 against Smart Fortwo normal for the age: first-time MOT failure share at each age, age 10: 36.4% vs 33%; age 11: 35.3% vs 33.9%; age 12: 35.9% vs 34.7%; age 13: 34.9% vs 34.6%; age 14: 35.7% vs 35.9%; age 15: 37% vs 36.8%. Axis from 0% to 40%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · full dataset (v5).

How does the 2009 Smart Fortwo fail at each age?

Cars built in 2009 were tested at ages 10 to 15 between 2019 and 2024. Each row compares their first-time failure share with what this model normally shows at that age, after allowing for the overall failure level of each test year.

Smart Fortwo built 2009: first-time MOT failure by age, against the model's normal rate at that age (2019–2024)
AgeTestsFailed, %95% intervalNormal for this model at that age, %Index (100 = normal)
106,55536.435.3–37.633110.5
116,03135.334.1–36.533.9104.3
126,11035.934.7–37.234.7103.5
135,98334.933.7–36.134.6100.8
145,84235.734.5–3735.999.6
155,5793735.7–38.236.8100.4

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 36,100 (initial tests) · Method: normal rate = this model's first-time failure share at that age across its build years (cells of 400+ tests), adjusted for each test year's overall level; cells of 30+ tests, under 500 marked rough · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What fails most on the 2009 Smart Fortwo?

The most common failure group on cars built in 2009 is suspension: 18.5 items per 100 first tests, against 10 across all build years of the Smart Fortwo. These counts are not age-adjusted: cars built in 2009 were tested at ages 10 to 15.

Failure items per 100 first tests, Smart Fortwo built 2009 against the Smart Fortwo in all build years (2019–2024, not age-adjusted)
Failure groupBuilt 2009, per 100All build years, per 100Items
Suspension18.5106,694
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment18.314.26,602
Brakes149.55,060
Visibility8.17.82,928
Tyres8.17.22,914

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 36,100 (initial tests of this build year) · Method: failure items grouped by DVSA's top-level defect groups, per 100 initial tests; groups with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does 2009 compare with the years around it?

Among the 18 published build years of the Smart Fortwo, 2009 ranks 12 (1 = fails least for its age). 2008: index 103.3. 2010: index 106.4.

Smart Fortwo build years: index against the model at the same age (2019–2024)
Build yearIndex (100 = normal)95% intervalVerdictTests
2002106.293.0–119.4no different (rough estimate)558
2003101.593.1–109.9no different (rough estimate)1,343
200499.795.5–103.9no different5,368
2005109.7105.5–113.9worse6,098
2006104.7100.9–108.5worse7,185
2007103.3100.6–106.1worse14,353
2008103.3101.4–105.2worse29,795
2009103.2101.4–105.0worse36,100
2010106.4104.5–108.4worse34,072
201195.292.9–97.4better23,700
201291.889.1–94.6better16,141
201396.193.5–98.8better20,631
201493.991.3–96.6better22,779
201590.686.8–94.3better13,197
201698.996.2–101.5no different34,193
201796.593.3–99.7better25,276
2018102.397.6–107.0no different13,525
201994.186.8–101.4no different5,751

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 310,065 (initial tests) · Method: observed failures against those expected for the same model at the same ages, test-year level adjusted; verdict follows the printed one-decimal bound · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). Smart Fortwo 2009 MOT statistics (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 30 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/smart-fortwo/2009/

How every figure is calculated: methodology. Age, test year and build year are tied together (age = test year − build year), so the test-year level is taken as observed, not estimated.

Other pages for this model

Smart Fortwo 2002 · Smart Fortwo 2003 · Smart Fortwo 2004 · Smart Fortwo 2005 · Smart Fortwo 2006 · Smart Fortwo 2007 · Smart Fortwo 2008 · Smart Fortwo 2010 · Smart Fortwo 2011 · Smart Fortwo 2012 · Smart Fortwo 2013 · Smart Fortwo 2014 · Smart Fortwo 2015 · Smart Fortwo 2016 · Smart Fortwo 2017 · Smart Fortwo 2018 · Smart Fortwo 2019 · Smart Fortwo in Norway · Smart Fortwo in Finland · Smart Fortwo in the Netherlands · Smart Fortwo by postcode area · Smart Fortwo body, chassis and structure failures · Smart Fortwo brakes failures · Smart Fortwo vehicle identification failures · Smart Fortwo lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · Smart Fortwo noise, emissions and leaks failures · Smart Fortwo road wheels failures · Smart Fortwo seat belts and airbags failures · Smart Fortwo steering failures · Smart Fortwo suspension failures · Smart Fortwo tyres failures · Smart Fortwo visibility failures