MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Hyundai Terracan — MOT statistics 2024

The Hyundai Terracan failed 41.47% of 1,242 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 97.0 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 97.0, 95% CI 90.7–103.5 (100 = national average) 100 97.0 0 200
Index
97.0
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
41.47%
n = 1,242
Dangerous /100
17
national ≈11
Rank
415 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Mitsubishi Outlander (index 97.0) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Hyundai Terracan common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Brakes stand out at 39.3 per 100 tests, against 22.9 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Hyundai Terracan common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 2 of these are already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Brakes39.34,98322.91.71×1.67–1.76
Lamps & electrical39.24,96838.01.03×1.00–1.06
Suspension35.44,48131.41.13×1.09–1.16
Body & structure13.71,73413.41.02×0.97–1.07 · not distinguishable
Steering13.21,6665.82.27×2.15–2.37
Visibility12.71,60212.21.04×0.99–1.09 · not distinguishable
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 12,664 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn13.194.872.71×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Steering ball joint with excessive wear or free playA steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play8.961.227.33×Ask the seller about: A steering ball joint with excessive wear or free play
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded8.691.416.19×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement6.001.244.84×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources7.582.832.68×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements6.732.572.62×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated5.381.902.83×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Headlamp reflector or lens slightly defectiveHeadlamp reflector or lens slightly defective3.911.093.57×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.142.091.98×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view4.242.361.80×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Hyundai Terracan MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Brakes are highest at 71.4 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 9.6 per 100 tests — the gap is 61.8 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Hyundai Terracan MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Brakes71.4
Suspension54.5
Tyres28.9
Body & structure16.9
Emissions & leaks15.3
Steering9.6

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed35.5%1,216
It passed38.1%4,894

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (35.5% against 38.1%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 35.9% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 12,647 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only99.4fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage96.4fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year2.6%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (-3.0 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Hyundai Terracan compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeHyundai TerracanSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
12 years42.4%30.55%+11.84 pp434
13 years44.75%32.61%+12.14 pp934
14 years42.45%34.57%+7.89 pp1,762
15 years43.93%36.01%+7.92 pp2,381
16 years44.83%37.07%+7.77 pp2,391
17 years43.68%37.45%+6.23 pp2,001
18 years43.77%37.83%+5.94 pp1,396
19 years42.28%37.44%+4.84 pp868
20 years45.29%36.95%+8.34 pp382

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Hyundai Terracan perform as it gets older?

The Terracan at age 19 is well below the reference at 37.4%, against 43.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Hyundai Terracan perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–50%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeHyundai TerracanAll vehiclesGap
1746.6%43.1%+3.5 pp
1838.5%43.9%-5.3 pp
1937.4%43.5%-6.1 pp
2044.6%41.0%+3.6 pp

Is a Hyundai Terracan ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Hyundai Terracan MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 0.1%.

Based on 1,235 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 234
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 288
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 350
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 363

How dangerous are Hyundai Terracan MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 121.2 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Hyundai Terracan MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor29.7614.222.09×
Major121.1852.752.30×
Dangerous17.4711.151.57×

Chart values: Minor 29.8 · Major 121.2 · Dangerous 17.5.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Hyundai Terracan MOT matter?

Apr is highest at 46.0%; Oct is lowest at 40.6% — the gap is 5.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Hyundai Terracan MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–48%.

bars: Hyundai Terracan · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthHyundai TerracanAll vehiclesGap
Jan45.04%31.12%+13.9 pp
Feb44.61%29.99%+14.6 pp
Mar42.31%28.26%+14.1 pp
Apr46.04%29.78%+16.3 pp
May44.79%28.79%+16.0 pp
Jun42.95%28.15%+14.8 pp
Jul44.39%29.33%+15.1 pp
Aug45.08%29.2%+15.9 pp
Sep44.52%28.19%+16.3 pp
Oct40.57%30.34%+10.2 pp
Nov44.25%30.58%+13.7 pp
Dec40.9%29.33%+11.6 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.5 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Hyundai Terracan average mileage by age

At age 19, the middle half of Terracans runs from 92,644 miles to 135,689 miles, against 114,892 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Hyundai Terracan · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–144k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Hyundai Terracan MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 32.3% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 47.2% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Hyundai Terracan MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Hyundai Terracan: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+40-70k miles32.3%23.9–42%99 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles39.4%34–45.2%289 (rough estimate)
15+100-140k miles42.5%38.5–46.6%572
15+140k+ miles47.2%41.2–53.4%254 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1791,057115,027134,974234
1891,353110,984136,796288
1992,644114,892135,689350
20+94,561115,194136,087363

A typical 19-year-old Terracan has ~114,892 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Hyundai Terracan fails its MOT most

Exeter area is highest at 61.5%; Southend-on-Sea area is lowest at 26.0% — the gap is 35.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Hyundai Terracan line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Exeter (EX)61.54%+17.8 pp
Taunton (TA)60.98%+17.2 pp
Plymouth (PL)58.4%+14.7 pp
Bath (BA)57.55%+13.8 pp
York (YO)52.76%+9.0 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Southend-on-Sea (SS)25.95%-17.8 pp
Wolverhampton (WV)29.85%-13.9 pp
Chelmsford (CM)30.72%-13.0 pp
Medway (ME)31.3%-12.4 pp
Colchester (CO)32.24%-11.5 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 33%–51% failing.

How many miles does a Hyundai Terracan last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 61.2%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 11.4% — the gap is 49.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles7,73861.15%
150,000+ miles1,44511.42%

Of 12,654 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 61.1% had reached 100k miles, 11.4% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Hyundai Terracan faults that come together

Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 3.73×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks1723.73× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres493.48× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems503.44× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels323.22× (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels283.1× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres483.03× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering262.97× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility262.92× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle522.91× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1182.88× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks2812.74× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2332.56× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres2322.56× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment502.55× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2082.5× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1142.49× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility1122.49× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle222.49× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension212.49× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres1112.48× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks2292.45× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility1002.42× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension1852.39× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering972.39× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres2012.38× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension5782.37×
SteeringTyres1052.37× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres2332.34× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension392.34× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension2022.32× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension5672.31×
BrakesSteering5972.28×
Body, chassis, structureSteering2952.28× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5932.25×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility6542.24×
BrakesSuspension1,1032.21×
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,2852.19×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment6162.13×
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility982.11× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1,0932×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering5762×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility2521.92× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility5061.9×
SuspensionVisibility4521.83× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility2241.72× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres14too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels12too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility12too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks10too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres7too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems7too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering7too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Steering» and «Suspension» appear together 2.37× more often than chance (578 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Hyundai Terracan?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 31.4%, against 49.0% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year31.38%376
8–12k miles/year48.95%1,103
Gap (low − normal)-17.57 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1234.044749.69159-15.64 pp
1332.3510250.45337-18.09 pp
1430.422748.18604-17.78 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 31.4% vs 49.0% for 8–12k miles/year — 17.6 pp lower (n_low=376, n_normal=1,103). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 31.4% low-use vs 49.0% normal (-17.6 pp).

Best year for a Hyundai Terracan, and the years to avoid

Build year 2006 is highest at 101.3; Build year 2005 is lowest at 94.6 — the gap is 6.7 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Hyundai Terracan build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Hyundai Terracan by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
200795.489.1–101.842.26%2,054no different
2006101.395.4–107.145.37%2,517no different
200594.689.7–99.542.22%3,411better
200499.693.8–105.445.24%2,531no different
200399.589.1–109.845.73%772no different

The best build year here is 2005 and the weakest is 2005. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 5 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Hyundai Terracan MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £177.55 to £337.34, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£178–337
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension35.4 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£63.72
Brakes39.3 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£58.95
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment39.2 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£54.88

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £178 to £337, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Hyundai Terracan running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 are well below the reference at 37.0%, against 47.0% at age 17, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 17
47
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 234 tests)
At age 19
37
other cars of this model tested at age 19 in 2024 (rough estimate: 350 tests)
Repairs per 100
£17,755
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
3d
median; 16.03% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1746.58%115,027234—
1838.54%110,984288—
1937.43%114,892350—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Hyundai Terracan rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 10.83×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
10.83×
8.29% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
74th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Hyundai Terracan fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Hyundai Terracan advisory become a failure?

Brakes are highest at 25.4%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 25.4 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Hyundai Terracan chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Hyundai Terracan, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Brakes 25.4% · Suspension 25.1% · Steering 18.7% · Body & chassis 16% · Tyres 7% · Noise, emissions, leaks 6.1% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Brakes25.4%12.1 months4,2853,571
Suspension25.1%12.1 months4,4702,670
Steering18.7%12 months5,599729
Body, chassis, structure16.0%12.1 months4,7331,094
Tyres7.0%12.1 months4,4601,662
Noise, emissions and leaks6.1%12.1 months4,2201,183
Non-component advisories0.0%——570

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 25 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 4,285 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Hyundai Terracan?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 28.4%; Suspension after a passed at age 12-14 is lowest at 11.5% — the gap is 16.9 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
9-11passedBrakes 14.9% · Steering 13.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.8%94 (rough estimate)
9-11advisorySuspension 21.1% · Brakes 19.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.5%57 (rough estimate)
9-11failureBrakes 26.3% · Suspension 20.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.9%95 (rough estimate)
12-14passedBrakes 13.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.8% · Suspension 11.5%1,015
12-14advisoryBrakes 22.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.6% · Suspension 18.6%1,158
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26.5% · Brakes 25.5% · Suspension 22.2%1,576
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.6% · Brakes 12.9% · Suspension 12.6%1,378
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.5% · Suspension 21.3% · Brakes 18.5%1,809
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 28.4% · Brakes 23.3% · Suspension 23.3%2,521

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Hyundai Terracan ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 75.3%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 8.6% — the gap is 66.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
16.03%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.916
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
20.28%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.205%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 3,755 failures followed through to their re-test, 16.03% were repaired and passed the same day and 75.34% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 12,569 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.916 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 3,668 miles a year across 2,649 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 20.28% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 48.09% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.205% of 2,656 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 16,577 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Hyundai Terracan safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 1.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Hyundai Terracan
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2006/08701/08/20061,676POSSIBILTY OF POOR BRAKING PERFORMANCE

DVSA lists 1 safety recall campaigns for the Hyundai Terracan, covering roughly 1,676 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Hyundai Terracan MOT: quick answers

Hyundai Terracan MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 97.0, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Hyundai Terracan first-time MOT pass rate?
58.53% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,242 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 41.47% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,242 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 97.0 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Hyundai Terracan with other cars

Hyundai i10 is highest at 97.1; Hyundai Terracan is lowest at 97.0 — the gap is 0.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Hyundai MOT statisticsHyundai i10 MOT statsHyundai Tucson MOT stats

Similar risk

Mitsubishi Outlander (index 97.0)Volkswagen Touran (index 97.0)Hyundai i10 (index 97.1)

Same size class

how Land Rover Discovery Sport compareshow Alfa Romeo 156 compareshow DS DS compares

By build year

Hyundai Terracan 2003Hyundai Terracan 2004Hyundai Terracan 2005Hyundai Terracan 2006Hyundai Terracan 2007

By area

Hyundai Terracan MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Hyundai Terracan body, chassis and structure failuresHyundai Terracan brakes failuresHyundai Terracan vehicle identification failuresHyundai Terracan lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresHyundai Terracan noise, emissions and leaks failuresHyundai Terracan road wheels failuresHyundai Terracan seat belts and airbags failuresHyundai Terracan steering failuresHyundai Terracan suspension failuresHyundai Terracan tyres failuresHyundai Terracan visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:hyundai-terracan:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Hyundai Terracan MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/hyundai-terracan/ · Published 2026-07-30.