Renault Clio vs Volkswagen Polo: which fails its MOT less?

Allowing for age, the Volkswagen Polo fails its MOT less often than the Renault Clio.

less often than the Renault Clio, at the same age
18.0%less often than the Renault Clio, at the same age

MOTs passed in 2024: Renault Clio 63.8%, Volkswagen Polo 71.8%

Both fail more often than normal for their age.

Data: DVSA MOT results · 2024 · 919,302 tests

Check either car by registration

Which fails less for its age?

Allowing for age, the Volkswagen Polo fails less often: MOT Risk Index 111.6 against 136.1 (100 = normal for its age; difference 24.5, 95% CI 23.8–25.2).

Both fail more often than normal for their age.

Renault Clio and Volkswagen Polo side by side
MeasureRenault ClioVolkswagen PoloYears
Passed at the first attempt, %57.265.72024
MOT Risk Index (100 = normal)136.1111.62024
95% interval of the index135.6–136.7111.2–112.02024
Rank among 761 models (1 = fails least for its age)7155732024
First tests323,880595,4222024
dot · Renault Clio vs Volkswagen Polo · MOT Risk Index · 136.1 vs 111.6 · 2024
MOT Risk Index with 95% intervals; 100 = normal. Renault Clio: 136.1 (135.6–136.7). Volkswagen Polo: 111.6 (111.2–112.0). Axis from 90 to 150. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2024.

Check either car by registration

For example, AB12 CDE

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars: statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. It goes to the DVSA MOT History API, never into URLs or analytics, and any cache expires within 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK and we do not sell it; read how we use your data.

Free to use. Independent site. Not affiliated with DVSA, DVLA or GOV.UK.

After defects were fixed at the test centre

63.8% of Renault Clio tests and 71.8% of Volkswagen Polo tests passed, including defects fixed during the test. This is a different outcome from passing at the first attempt.

What explains the difference?

The clearest difference is suspension: against its own class and age, the Renault Clio runs +10.9 items per 100 tests and the Volkswagen Polo +0.7, so the Volkswagen Polo has 10.2 fewer per 100 tests (95% interval 10.1 to 10.3).

Each model is compared with its own class and age; the fleets can differ in mileage and use.

Download this comparison's numbers (CSV) · How to cite
More detail

Dangerous defects and advisory items

Recorded items per 100 initial tests, 2019–2024; not age-adjusted
MeasureRenault ClioVolkswagen Polo
Dangerous defects per 100 tests14.110.0
Advisory items per 100 tests142.3121.5

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024. A test can record several items. CSV

At what age does one of them fail more?

The Volkswagen Polo fails less at 17 of 17 ages where both are tested, and the gap points the same way at every age where it is clear. Across the 4 yearly tests from age 4 to 7, the gaps add up to 31.8 extra failed tests per 100 for the Renault Clio (a sum of yearly rates, not the chance of one car failing).

Renault Clio minus Volkswagen Polo: first-time failure rate at the same age, percentage points (2019–2024)
AgeDifference, pp95% intervalReading
3+5.5+5.1 to +5.8Volkswagen Polo fails less
4+5.0+4.6 to +5.4Volkswagen Polo fails less
5+6.4+6.0 to +6.8Volkswagen Polo fails less
6+8.5+8.1 to +8.9Volkswagen Polo fails less
7+11.9+11.4 to +12.4Volkswagen Polo fails less
8+13.0+12.5 to +13.4Volkswagen Polo fails less
9+13.4+13.0 to +13.9Volkswagen Polo fails less
10+13.0+12.5 to +13.5Volkswagen Polo fails less
11+12.3+11.7 to +12.8Volkswagen Polo fails less
12+11.7+11.2 to +12.2Volkswagen Polo fails less
13+9.5+9.0 to +10.0Volkswagen Polo fails less
14+7.6+7.1 to +8.1Volkswagen Polo fails less
15+6.1+5.6 to +6.6Volkswagen Polo fails less
16+4.6+4.0 to +5.1Volkswagen Polo fails less
17+3.0+2.4 to +3.7Volkswagen Polo fails less
18+2.0+1.3 to +2.8Volkswagen Polo fails less
19+1.7+0.8 to +2.6Volkswagen Polo fails less
By age band: first-time failure rate, % (2019–2024; ages published for both models)
Age bandAges includedRenault Clio, %Volkswagen Polo, %Difference, pp95% intervalReading
3–53–520.114.5+5.6+5.5 to +5.8Volkswagen Polo fails less
6–106–1040.628.3+12.3+12.2 to +12.4Volkswagen Polo fails less
11+11–20+53.446.1+7.3+7.2 to +7.4Volkswagen Polo fails less

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,516,163 (initial tests at shared ages) · Method: difference of two proportions per age, Bonferroni-corrected for 17 ages; age bands pool the published ages with an unadjusted 95% interval, and the same car can appear at more than one age, so that interval is somewhat narrow · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where do their MOT failures diverge?

The clearest difference is suspension: against its own class and age, the Renault Clio runs +10.9 items per 100 tests and the Volkswagen Polo +0.7, so the Volkswagen Polo has 10.2 fewer per 100 tests (95% interval 10.1 to 10.3).

dot · Renault Clio vs Volkswagen Polo · failure items per 100 tests against own class and age · Suspension +10.9 vs +0.7 · 2019–2024
Failure items per 100 tests against the rate expected for each model's own class and age; 0 = expected for its class and age. Suspension: Renault Clio +10.9, Volkswagen Polo +0.7; Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Renault Clio +13.7, Volkswagen Polo +4.8; Body, chassis, structure: Renault Clio −0.1, Volkswagen Polo +3.7; Steering: Renault Clio +5.2, Volkswagen Polo +1.6; Noise, emissions and leaks: Renault Clio −0.9, Volkswagen Polo +2.5; Visibility: Renault Clio +3.6, Volkswagen Polo +1.0. DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024.
Failure items per 100 tests above (+) or below (−) the rate expected for each model's own class and age, largest gaps first (2019–2024)
Component groupRenault Clio vs its classVolkswagen Polo vs its classGap, Renault Clio minus Volkswagen Polo95% intervalReading
Suspension+10.9+0.7+10.2+10.1 to +10.3Volkswagen Polo fails less
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment+13.7+4.8+9.0+8.9 to +9.1Volkswagen Polo fails less
Body, chassis, structure−0.1+3.7−3.7−3.8 to −3.7Renault Clio fails less
Steering+5.2+1.6+3.6+3.6 to +3.6Volkswagen Polo fails less
Noise, emissions and leaks−0.9+2.5−3.4−3.4 to −3.4Renault Clio fails less
Visibility+3.6+1.0+2.7+2.6 to +2.7Volkswagen Polo fails less

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 5,742,170 (initial tests) · Method: each model's failure items per 100 tests against the rate expected for its own class and age; Poisson interval; the age standard leaves the model out and is treated as fixed; items in the same test are treated as independent, so the interval is slightly narrow · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If one fails, which is more likely to fail again?

A failure on the Volkswagen Polo carries 2.6 percentage points more extra risk of failing again than on the Renault Clio.

Share failing the next ordinary MOT, same vehicles a year later (2019–2024)
MeasureRenault ClioVolkswagen Polo
After a failed test, %45.639.3
After a passed test, %36.327.4
Extra risk carried by a failure, pp9.311.9

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 398,962 (tests after a fail) · Method: test chains of the same vehicles; cars sold or scrapped after a fail drop out · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about the two?

The biggest gap in advisories turning into fails is steering: 24.7% on the Renault Clio against 12.8% on the Volkswagen Polo failed on the same item at the next MOT.

Advisory on a component that became a fail on the same component at the next MOT, % (2019–2024)
ComponentRenault ClioVolkswagen PoloDifference, pp
Steering24.712.8+11.9
Suspension31.222.2+9.0
Body, chassis, structure14.521.0−6.5
Noise, emissions and leaks6.711.1−4.5
Visibility15.312.4+3.0
Brakes17.214.5+2.7
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems8.66.4+2.2
Tyres11.29.6+1.6
Identification of the vehicle4.63.8+0.9
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment36.637.2−0.6
Retests, mileage exposure and care proxies (2019–2024)
MeasureRenault ClioVolkswagen Polo
Repaired and passed the same day43.2%45.9%
Passed 1–10 days later54.0%51.5%
Median retest delay1.0 days1.0 days
Failures per 10,000 miles0.8150.602
Three-test clean streak28.8%37.6%
Same advisory repeated 3+ times36.2%31.6%

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 3,703,068 (tracked advisories) · Method: same vehicles followed to their next ordinary MOT; common publishable components only · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Recalls, other countries and running costs, side by side

DVSA lists 24 recall campaigns matched to the Renault Clio and 30 to the Volkswagen Polo; more campaigns do not by themselves mean a less reliable car. Abroad, compare each model with that country's own average, because pass rates do not carry across rulebooks. Repair bills are catalogue estimates, not quotes.

Renault Clio and Volkswagen Polo: recalls, inspections abroad and repair-cost estimates
MeasureRenault ClioVolkswagen Polo
DVSA recall campaigns listed2430
Finland Katsastus: fails, % (national average 26.3%)36.4 (9,865 inspections)24.0 (21,606 inspections)
Netherlands APK: fails, % (national average 50.8%)54.9 (120,379 inspections)54.0 (216,450 inspections)
Norway PKK: fails, % (national average 33.7%)41.8 (2,167 inspections)36.2 (20,649 inspections)
Expected MOT repair bill, £ (estimate)£136£93
Repair bill range, £ (catalogue range, not a 95% interval)£136–£259£93–£176

Source: DVSA vehicle recalls register (OGL v3.0); Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; UK repair price catalogue · Window: register as published; inspections 2024 · n = 391,116 (inspections abroad) · Method: recall campaigns matched by make and model, licensed-fleet denominator where available; abroad, samples below 500 suppressed and each model set against that country's own average, with no difference taken across countries; repair bill = chance of failing each item × its most common UK repair price, a catalogue estimate · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV · licences and full notice

How to cite this comparison

MOT Risk Index (2026). Renault Clio vs Volkswagen Polo: MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 25 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/compare/renault-clio-vs-volkswagen-polo/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

Renault Clio vs Volkswagen Polo: quick answers

Is the Renault Clio or the Volkswagen Polo more reliable?

Allowing for age, the Volkswagen Polo fails less often: MOT Risk Index 111.6 against 136.1 (100 = normal for its age; difference 24.5, 95% CI 23.8–25.2).

Does the Renault Clio or the Volkswagen Polo fail more MOTs?

42.8% of Renault Clio first tests and 34.4% of Volkswagen Polo first tests failed in 2024. These raw rates do not allow for age; the MOT Risk Index does.

Which should I buy, the Renault Clio or the Volkswagen Polo?

If MOT reliability decides it, the evidence favours the Volkswagen Polo. Still check the individual car's MOT history: these figures describe whole model populations.