MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Volvo 900 — MOT statistics 2024

The Volvo 900 failed 37.37% of 3,112 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 108.8 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 9% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 108.8, 95% CI 103.9–113.8 (100 = national average) 100 108.8 0 200
Index
108.8
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
37.37%
n = 3,112
Dangerous /100
10
national ≈11
Rank
547 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Peugeot 407 (index 109.1) — the two published results are 0.3 index points apart.

Volvo 900 common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 37.1 per 100 tests, against 29.7 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Volvo 900 common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical37.15,35429.71.25×1.21–1.28
Brakes21.93,16320.71.06×1.02–1.10
Suspension18.62,69020.50.91×0.87–0.94
Visibility15.22,20010.91.40×1.34–1.46
Body & structure13.61,97115.50.88×0.84–0.92
Emissions & leaks12.61,8147.91.60×1.52–1.67
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 14,448 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired6.511.125.82×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrierA battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier5.410.2918.78×Ask the seller about: A battery insecure but not likely to fall from carrier
Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure6.191.165.34×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view5.632.362.39×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Emissions levels exceed default limitsEmissions levels exceed default limits3.260.477.00×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources5.162.831.82×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake3.021.032.93×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.062.091.94×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen3.492.221.57×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn5.114.871.05×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Volvo 900 MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 59.9 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 11.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 48.9 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Volvo 900 MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension59.9
Brakes49.5
Tyres35.4
Body & structure25.1
Emissions & leaks22.9
Non-component advisories11

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed33.2%1,293
It passed29.8%5,882

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 3.4 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 34.5% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 11,468 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only113.6fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage97.5fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year8.5%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 16.1 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How does the Volvo 900 perform as it gets older?

The 900 at age 20 is close to the reference at 40.2%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Volvo 900 perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeVolvo 900All vehiclesGap
2040.2%41.0%-0.8 pp

How dangerous are Volvo 900 MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 96.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Volvo 900 MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor30.0614.222.11×
Major96.6652.751.83×
Dangerous10.2411.150.92×

Chart values: Minor 30.1 · Major 96.7 · Dangerous 10.2.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Volvo 900 MOT matter?

May is highest at 39.1%; Dec is lowest at 35.5% — the gap is 3.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Volvo 900 MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–41%.

bars: Volvo 900 · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthVolvo 900All vehiclesGap
Jan36.85%31.12%+5.7 pp
Feb37.1%29.99%+7.1 pp
Mar38.09%28.26%+9.8 pp
Apr38.14%29.78%+8.4 pp
May39.1%28.79%+10.3 pp
Jun36.98%28.15%+8.8 pp
Jul36.58%29.33%+7.3 pp
Aug37.49%29.2%+8.3 pp
Sep36.58%28.19%+8.4 pp
Oct36.31%30.34%+6.0 pp
Nov38.01%30.58%+7.4 pp
Dec35.45%29.33%+6.1 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.6 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Volvo 900 average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of 900s runs from 107,741 miles to 187,250 miles, against 155,923 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Volvo 900 MOT failures?

All ages together, split by odometer (the bands are not split by age, so higher-mileage cars are also older and this mixes wear with age): 24.2% of the lowest-mileage cars failed versus 40.3% of the highest.

Does high mileage mean more Volvo 900 MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Odometer% failingTestsGap vs lowest-mileage band
40-70k miles24.2%636+0.0 pp
70-100k miles29.7%1,558+5.5 pp
100-140k miles36%3,812+11.8 pp
140k+ miles40.3%8,268+16.1 pp

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
20+107,741155,923187,250174

A typical 20+-year-old 900 has ~155,923 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Volvo 900 fails its MOT most

Kirkcaldy area is highest at 53.5%; Southend-on-Sea area is lowest at 23.9% — the gap is 29.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Volvo 900 line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Kirkcaldy (KY)53.51%+16.3 pp
Bristol (BS)49.36%+12.2 pp
Cardiff (CF)49.31%+12.1 pp
Cambridge (CB)48.6%+11.4 pp
Bath (BA)48.04%+10.8 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Southend-on-Sea (SS)23.93%-13.3 pp
Kingston upon Thames (KT)26.18%-11.0 pp
Coventry (CV)29.79%-7.4 pp
Hemel Hempstead (HP)30.41%-6.8 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 30%–49% failing.

How many miles does a Volvo 900 last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 83.8%; 200,000+ miles is lowest at 19.3% — the gap is 64.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles12,08083.82%
150,000+ miles7,20950.02%
200,000+ miles2,78419.32%

Of 14,412 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 83.8% had reached 100k miles, 50.0% had reached 150k miles, 19.3% had reached 200k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Volvo 900 faults that come together

Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 4.77×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks5624.77×
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks373.78× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension1603.72× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1243.52× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1103.47× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle503.44× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1623.43× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle373.41× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter283.38× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility443.18× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension423.17× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres1863.11× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks4893.09× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres2453.06× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5283.01×
Identification of the vehicleSteering202.98× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment732.86× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension3922.72× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension5812.71×
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres1432.66× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension4202.63× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering562.57× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension2522.55× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres412.55× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering2052.53× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering2722.51× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2082.51× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres1822.5× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment7562.46×
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1792.46× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres912.46× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility1072.39× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres3322.36× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment9702.35×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks6332.28×
TyresVisibility1722.26× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility3612.17× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension8112.16×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering3942.07× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility8022.05×
BrakesVisibility4592.05× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility3032.02× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility1971.91× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility3681.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres18too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSpeedometer and speed limiter16too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterVisibility13too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSuspension12too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSpeedometer and speed limiter7too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSteering6too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSpeedometer and speed limiter6too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension5too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility5too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 4.77× more often than chance (562 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Volvo 900 MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £143.47 to £272.59, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£143–273
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment37.1 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£51.94
Suspension18.6 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£33.48
Brakes21.9 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£32.85
Noise, emissions and leaks12.6 (nat. 3.67)Exhaust rear silencer£200£25.20

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £143 to £273, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Volvo 900 rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.45×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
0.45×
0.34% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
51st
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Volvo 900 fails on corrosion much less often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish. Both point the same way and reinforce each other: it resists corrosion even though its owners live in saltier areas than most.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Volvo 900 advisory become a failure?

Brakes are highest at 17.7%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 17.7 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Volvo 900 chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Volvo 900, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Brakes 17.7% · Suspension 17.5% · Body & chassis 14.4% · Noise, emissions, leaks 12.7% · Steering 11.6% · Tyres 8% · Identification of the veh… 3.8% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Brakes17.7%12 months1,8312,699
Suspension17.5%12 months1,9882,688
Body, chassis, structure14.4%12 months1,8121,820
Noise, emissions and leaks12.7%12 months2,5712,006
Steering11.6%12 months2,528836
Tyres8.0%12 months1,8602,108
Identification of the vehicle3.8%12.1 months2,421766
Non-component advisories0.0%——950

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 18 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 1,831 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Volvo 900?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 30.4%; Visibility after a passed at age 20+ is lowest at 6.2% — the gap is 24.3 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.6% · Brakes 7.0% · Visibility 6.2%2,665
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.7% · Visibility 12.7% · Brakes 12.1%3,576
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 30.4% · Brakes 16.6% · Visibility 15.2%3,569
unknownfailureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.7% · Suspension 10.4% · Visibility 9.7%154 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Volvo 900 ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 67.9%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 10.4% — the gap is 57.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
21.75%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.1
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
16.11%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
2.519%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 3,467 failures followed through to their re-test, 21.75% were repaired and passed the same day and 67.9% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 10,637 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.1 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,876 miles a year across 3,673 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 16.11% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 38.01% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 2.519% of 3,851 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 21,883 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Volvo 900 safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 4.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Volvo 900 recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Volvo 900. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 1993: 1 · 1994: 0 · 1995: 0 · 1996: 0 · 1997: 0 · 1998: 1 · 1999: 0 · 2000: 0 · 2001: 0 · 2002: 1 · 2003: 1.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Volvo 900
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2003/00810/01/20031,042DETACHABLE TOW BAR MAY WORK LOOSE
R/2002/09711/07/20021,042DETACHABLE TOW BAR MAY WORK LOOSE
R/1998/02315/04/19988,502LOSS OF BRAKE SERVO ASSISTANCE
R/1993/03304/06/1993805POSSIBLE JAMMING OF THROTTLE

DVSA lists 4 safety recall campaigns for the Volvo 900, covering roughly 11,391 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Volvo 900 MOT: quick answers

Volvo 900 MOT Risk Index stands out at 108.8, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Volvo 900 first-time MOT pass rate?
62.63% of first attempts passed in 2024 (3,112 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 37.37% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 3,112 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 108.8 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Volvo 900 with other cars

Peugeot 407 is highest at 109.1; Hyundai Getz is lowest at 108.3 — the gap is 0.8 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Volvo MOT statisticsVolvo V40 MOT statsVolvo V50 MOT stats

Similar risk

Volkswagen Caddy (index 109.0)Peugeot 407 (index 109.1)Hyundai Getz (index 108.3)

Same size class

how Jaguar XJS compareshow Toyota Starlet compareshow Lexus LS compares

By area

Volvo 900 MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Volvo 900 body, chassis and structure failuresVolvo 900 brakes failuresVolvo 900 vehicle identification failuresVolvo 900 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresVolvo 900 noise, emissions and leaks failuresVolvo 900 seat belts and airbags failuresVolvo 900 steering failuresVolvo 900 suspension failuresVolvo 900 tyres failuresVolvo 900 visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:volvo-900:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Volvo 900 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/volvo-900/ · Published 2026-07-30.