Toyota Proace — MOT statistics 2024

The Toyota Proace failed 29.82% of 12,904 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 168.5 (100 = expected for its age profile). This van fails its MOT about 69% more often than expected for its age.

Age-adjusted peer: Ford Transit Courier (index 160.7) — the two published results are 7.8 index points apart.

Toyota Proace common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Body, chassis, structure stand out at 12.4 per 100 tests, against 3.9 per 100 tests across UK vans and pickups of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

family vs national — matched to UK vans and pickups of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Toyota Proace MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Brakes are highest at 36.7 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 2.7 per 100 tests — the gap is 34.0 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Toyota Proace against cars of the same age

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a van like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 10.8 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is body, chassis, structure — 39.0% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every van with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 46,901 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 28.9 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the van sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Toyota Proace compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against other light commercials tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Toyota Proace perform as it gets older?

The Proace at age 9 stands out at 48.7%, against 26.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: van age, years · failure-rate scale 0–53%.

Takeaway: a 10-year-old Proace has roughly a 49% chance of failing its MOT; from about age 3 it stays above the national age curve.

How dangerous are Toyota Proace MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 44.3 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chart values: Minor 20.4 · Major 44.3 · Dangerous 10.3.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Toyota Proace MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 32.4%; Mar is lowest at 29.2% — the gap is 3.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart scale: 27%–34%.

bars: Toyota Proace · dashed: all class-4 cars

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Toyota Proace average mileage by age

At age 8, the middle half of Proaces runs from 58,861 miles to 113,634 miles, against 82,713 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Chart axes: van age, years · odometer scale 0–140k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Toyota Proace MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 3–5, 17.5% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 43.3% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

A typical 8-year-old Proace has ~82,713 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Toyota Proace fails its MOT most

Kirkcaldy area is highest at 53.9%; London W area is lowest at 16.2% — the gap is 37.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Kirkcaldy (KY)	53.88%	+23.1 pp
Telford (TF)	46.67%	+15.9 pp
Torquay (TQ)	45.77%	+15.0 pp
Bristol (BS)	43.07%	+12.3 pp
Motherwell (ML)	42.15%	+11.4 pp

Easiest areas	% failing	vs model overall
London W (W)	16.19%	-14.6 pp
Nottingham (NG)	18.36%	-12.4 pp
Galashiels (TD)	19.65%	-11.1 pp
Dumfries (DG)	21.29%	-9.5 pp
London E (E)	21.59%	-9.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 23%–39% failing.

Toyota Proace survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 11 is well below the reference at 2.6%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: van age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

By age 10, only about 12% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈8,096); survivors still fail at 48.3% vs 27.8% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many miles does a Toyota Proace last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 15.8%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 2.6% — the gap is 13.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Of 46,929 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 15.8% had reached 100k miles, 2.6% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

How many years is a Toyota Proace likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 2.6 years; Bought at age 10 is lowest at 0.5 years — the gap is 2.1 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 0.5 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 10, so the true figure is likely higher.

Toyota Proace faults that come together

Steering + Suspension stand out at 6.05×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Suspension» appear together 3.48× more often than chance (692 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Toyota Proace?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 15.7%, against 28.3% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 15.7% vs 28.3% for 8–12k miles/year — 12.7 pp lower (n_low=548, n_normal=2,304). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 15.7% low-use vs 28.3% normal (-12.6 pp).

Which Toyota Proace engine is best?

diesel 1.8–2.0 is highest at 104.0; diesel 1.5–1.8 is lowest at 94.9 — the gap is 9.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.8–2.0 runs at 104 against this model's own age norm while the diesel 1.5–1.8 runs at 94.9 — a spread of 9.1 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Best year for a Toyota Proace, and the years to avoid

Build year 2015 is highest at 120.5; Build year 2017 is lowest at 82.2 — the gap is 38.3 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

The best build year here is 2017 and the weakest is 2015. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 4 of 8 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Toyota Proace MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £62.16 to £118.10, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £62 to £118, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Toyota Proace running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 10 stand out at 49.0%, against 24.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Toyota Proace rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.21×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

This Toyota Proace fails on corrosion much less often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish. Both point the same way and reinforce each other: it resists corrosion even though its owners live in saltier areas than most.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Toyota Proace advisory become a failure?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 37.0%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 37.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 37 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 9,577 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Toyota Proace?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 9-11 are highest at 31.6%; Tyres after a passed at age <3 are lowest at 4.3% — the gap is 27.4 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Toyota Proace ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 54.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 2.7% — the gap is 52.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 9,498 failures followed through to their re-test, 42.51% were repaired and passed the same day and 54.76% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 25,297 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.307 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 9,054 miles a year across 10,606 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 39.54% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 15.1% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.45% of 10,621 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 23,609 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Toyota Proace safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 80.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

DVSA lists 80 safety recall campaigns for the Toyota Proace, covering roughly 102,859 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Toyota Proace inspection results in other countries

Netherlands APK is well below the reference at 41.2%, against 50.8% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

The countries disagree about this van, and that is worth saying out loud rather than averaging away. A model can sit above its national average in one country and below it in another because the fleets are not the same cars: different model years, different engines, different roads and salt, and inspection rules that weight components differently. Treat each row as evidence from one regime, not as a verdict.

Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 0.898 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Toyota Proace is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Toyota Proace MOT: quick answers

Toyota Proace MOT Risk Index stands out at 168.5, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Toyota Proace first-time MOT pass rate?

70.18% of first attempts passed in 2024 (12,904 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 29.82% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 12,904 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 168.5 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Toyota Proace with other cars

Mercedes-Benz Citan is highest at 181.7; Ford Transit Custom is lowest at 156.9 — the gap is 24.8 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Toyota MOT statisticsToyota Hilux MOT statsToyota Celica MOT stats

Similar risk

Ford Transit Courier (index 160.7)Ford Transit Custom (index 156.9)Mercedes-Benz Citan (index 181.7)

Same size class

how MG HS compareshow Fiat Tipo compareshow Lexus UX compares

By build year

Toyota Proace 2013Toyota Proace 2014Toyota Proace 2015Toyota Proace 2016Toyota Proace 2017Toyota Proace 2018Toyota Proace 2019Toyota Proace 2020

By area

Toyota Proace MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Toyota Proace body, chassis and structure failuresToyota Proace brakes failuresToyota Proace vehicle identification failuresToyota Proace lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresToyota Proace noise, emissions and leaks failuresToyota Proace road wheels failuresToyota Proace seat belts and airbags failuresToyota Proace steering failuresToyota Proace suspension failuresToyota Proace tyres failuresToyota Proace visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Toyota Proace in the Netherlands