MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Toyota Dyna — MOT statistics 2024

The Toyota Dyna failed 40.7% of 941 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 100.6 (100 = expected for its age profile). This van is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 100.6, 95% CI 92.9–108.4 (100 = national average) 100 100.6 0 200
Index
100.6
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
40.7%
n = 941
Dangerous /100
16
national ≈11
Rank
466 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Renault Master (index 103.0) — the two published results are 2.4 index points apart.

Toyota Dyna common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Brakes stand out at 38.4 per 100 tests, against 27.4 per 100 tests across UK vans and pickups of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Toyota Dyna common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vans and pickups of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical47.33,10242.81.11×1.07–1.15
Brakes38.42,51827.41.40×1.34–1.45
Suspension31.32,05536.00.87×0.83–0.91
Visibility26.11,71118.31.42×1.36–1.49
Body & structure10.367419.90.52×0.48–0.56
Tyres9.05949.20.98×0.91–1.07 · not distinguishable
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 6,564 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn16.074.873.30×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.7.970.5913.46×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view8.612.363.65×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Shock absorber bush excessively wornA shock absorber bush excessively worn 5.360.2026.93×Ask the seller about: A shock absorber bush excessively worn
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement5.581.244.50×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources7.082.832.50×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning5.932.092.84×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen5.482.222.47×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements4.862.571.89×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements5.383.591.50×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Toyota Dyna MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 58.1 per 100 tests; Identification is lowest at 8.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 50.1 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Toyota Dyna MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension58.1
Tyres33.2
Brakes30.5
Body & structure15.7
Emissions & leaks11
Identification8

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a van like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed39.5%706
It passed34.3%2,726

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 5.2 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 39.2% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every van with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 6,548 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only107.5fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage104.1fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year4.7%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (-3.4 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Toyota Dyna compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against other light commercials tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeToyota DynaSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
7 years30.06%32.35%-2.29 pp173
8 years37.79%35.66%+2.13 pp262
9 years39.63%38.45%+1.18 pp323
10 years42.3%40.89%+1.41 pp461
11 years41.86%43.09%-1.22 pp547
12 years44.68%44.91%-0.23 pp620
13 years44.68%46.08%-1.4 pp658
14 years42.47%46.86%-4.39 pp657
15 years43.11%47.39%-4.29 pp631
16 years43.01%47.58%-4.56 pp551
17 years44.12%47.51%-3.39 pp510
18 years41.06%47.45%-6.39 pp358
19 years47.45%46.93%+0.52 pp255
20 years46.74%46.09%+0.65 pp184

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Toyota Dyna perform as it gets older?

The Dyna at age 20 stands out at 44.6%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Toyota Dyna perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: van age, years · failure-rate scale 0–48%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeToyota DynaAll vehiclesGap
1541.9%41.6%+0.4 pp
1641.2%43.1%-1.9 pp
1740.3%43.1%-2.8 pp
2044.6%41.0%+3.5 pp

Is a Toyota Dyna ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Toyota Dyna MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 0.5%.

Based on 941 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 3
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 7
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 263
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 355
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 84
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 63
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 166

How dangerous are Toyota Dyna MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 129.8 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Toyota Dyna MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor33.7614.222.37×
Major129.7752.752.46×
Dangerous16.4511.151.48×

Chart values: Minor 33.8 · Major 129.8 · Dangerous 16.4.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Toyota Dyna MOT matter?

May is highest at 47.0%; Nov is lowest at 38.8% — the gap is 8.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Toyota Dyna MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–48%.

bars: Toyota Dyna · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthToyota DynaAll vehiclesGap
Jan41.88%31.12%+10.8 pp
Feb39.51%29.99%+9.5 pp
Mar39.47%28.26%+11.2 pp
Apr45.45%29.78%+15.7 pp
May46.96%28.79%+18.2 pp
Jun44.84%28.15%+16.7 pp
Jul45.01%29.33%+15.7 pp
Aug41.56%29.2%+12.4 pp
Sep43.74%28.19%+15.6 pp
Oct43.25%30.34%+12.9 pp
Nov38.79%30.58%+8.2 pp
Dec40.52%29.33%+11.2 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 8.2 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Toyota Dyna average mileage by age

At age 17, the middle half of Dynas runs from 93,358 miles to 165,214 miles, against 124,716 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Toyota Dyna · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: van age, years · odometer scale 0–173k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Toyota Dyna MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 25.6% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 38.4% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Toyota Dyna MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Toyota Dyna: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
10–1470-100k miles37.3%25.3–51%51 (rough estimate)
10–14100-140k miles40.2%30.8–50.4%92 (rough estimate)
10–14140k+ miles37.1%26.2–49.5%62 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles25.6%17.3–36.3%78 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles49.6%40.9–58.3%123 (rough estimate)
15+100-140k miles52.4%45.6–59%210 (rough estimate)
15+140k+ miles38.4%32.3–44.8%232 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1577,503106,327139,141124
1671,170106,459147,356102
1793,358124,716165,214129
1890,725120,945152,01184
20+96,097128,164162,781166

A typical 17-year-old Dyna has ~124,716 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Toyota Dyna fails its MOT most

Leeds area is highest at 53.3%; Reading area is lowest at 27.1% — the gap is 26.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Leeds (LS)53.33%+11.0 pp
Lancaster (LA)52.88%+10.6 pp
Northampton (NN)52.78%+10.5 pp
Doncaster (DN)50.96%+8.7 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Reading (RG)27.1%-15.2 pp
Sheffield (S)31.65%-10.6 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)32.04%-10.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

Toyota Dyna survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 19 is close to the reference at 100.0%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toyota Dyna survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: van age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
56469.9%23.44%
6119100%33.61%
7173100%30.06%
8262100%37.79%
9323100%39.63%
10461100%42.3%
11547100%41.86%
12620100%44.68%
13658100%44.68%
14657100%42.47%
15631100%43.11%
16551100%43.01%
17510100%44.12%
18358100%41.06%
19255100%47.45%

Ages 4–6 average 92 tests, too few for an 'only X% as many' claim. The rows are the counts of cars still coming to an MOT.

How many miles does a Toyota Dyna last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 54.9%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 19.2% — the gap is 35.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles3,59654.92%
150,000+ miles1,25719.2%

Of 6,548 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 54.9% had reached 100k miles, 19.2% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

How many years is a Toyota Dyna likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 20.5 years; Bought at age 15 is lowest at 4.5 years — the gap is 16.0 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 20.5
8—at least 11.5
10—at least 9.5
12—at least 7.5
15—at least 4.5

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 9.5 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 19, so the true figure is likely higher.

Toyota Dyna faults that come together

Body & structure + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 5.19×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems555.19× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering394.79× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks213.85× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks773.39× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes2383.27× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems903.27× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels223.27× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems283.26× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres223.23× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks1813.06× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering663.06× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment783.04× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension1602.97× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle202.97× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension1502.94× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1942.92× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering1542.75× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres592.7× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility552.69× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2842.65× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres1942.63× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension662.63× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension4452.58× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1042.57× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering452.57× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension412.57× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle442.52× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres1662.47× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks2122.44× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres682.4× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment6542.35×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres252.33× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres2502.31× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension5712.25×
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres512.22× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering1812.2× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility692.15× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility1732.03× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility1711.98× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility1361.97× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility6341.95×
BrakesVisibility4241.92× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility1241.89× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility3641.8× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension16too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering16too few (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels15too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility12too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels8too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels7too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres6too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering5too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Brakes» and «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» appear together 2.35× more often than chance (654 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Toyota Dyna?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 32.3%, against 45.5% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year32.28%539
8–12k miles/year45.48%1,129
Gap (low − normal)-13.2 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
930.33343.69103-13.39 pp
10356041.77158-6.77 pp
1128.579145.36194-16.79 pp
1233.9610647.53223-13.57 pp
1333.3312045.18228-11.84 pp
1432.0312846.58219-14.54 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 32.3% vs 45.5% for 8–12k miles/year — 13.2 pp lower (n_low=539, n_normal=1,129). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 32.3% low-use vs 45.5% normal (-13.2 pp).

Toyota Dyna MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £188.26 to £357.69, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£188–358
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment47.3 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£66.22
Brakes38.4 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£57.60
Suspension31.3 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£56.34
Tyres9.0 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£8.10

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £188 to £358, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Toyota Dyna running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 17 are close to the reference at 40.0%, against 42.0% at age 15, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 15
42
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 124 tests)
At age 17
40
other cars of this model tested at age 17 in 2024 (rough estimate: 129 tests)
Repairs per 100
£18,826
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
3d
median; 19.91% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1541.94%106,327124—
1641.18%106,459102—
1740.31%124,716129—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Toyota Dyna rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 2.66×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
2.66×
2.04% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
32nd
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Toyota Dyna fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Toyota Dyna advisory become a failure?

Brakes are highest at 22.5%; Tyres are lowest at 9.1% — the gap is 13.4 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Toyota Dyna chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Toyota Dyna, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Brakes 22.5% · Suspension 20.5% · Body & chassis 12% · Tyres 9.1%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Brakes22.5%12.1 months5,818947
Suspension20.5%12.1 months5,9081,632
Body, chassis, structure12.0%12.1 months4,431558
Tyres9.1%12.1 months5,8471,169

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 22 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 5,818 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Toyota Dyna?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 34.9%; Brakes after a passed at age 6-8 are lowest at 7.9% — the gap is 27.1 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
3-5passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.4%67 (rough estimate)
6-8passedVisibility 10.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.2% · Brakes 7.9%229 (rough estimate)
6-8advisoryVisibility 20.8% · Suspension 17.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.5%168 (rough estimate)
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.9% · Suspension 20.1% · Visibility 17.8%219 (rough estimate)
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.4% · Brakes 11.3% · Visibility 11.0%390 (rough estimate)
9-11advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.5% · Visibility 19.5% · Suspension 18.1%349 (rough estimate)
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 31.9% · Visibility 22.6% · Brakes 21.3%562
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.1% · Visibility 12.2% · Brakes 12.0%434 (rough estimate)
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26.4% · Visibility 22.7% · Brakes 16.8%459 (rough estimate)
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.1% · Visibility 25.6% · Brakes 23.5%718
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.1% · Visibility 14.2% · Brakes 11.6%381 (rough estimate)
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.8% · Visibility 22.9% · Suspension 15.8%449 (rough estimate)
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 34.9% · Visibility 26.4% · Brakes 25.0%656
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.9% · Suspension 21.7% · Visibility 19.6%46 (rough estimate)
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 32.3% · Visibility 30.6% · Brakes 19.4%62 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Toyota Dyna ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 70.5%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 9.6% — the gap is 60.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
19.91%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.627
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
26.72%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
3.874%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,838 failures followed through to their re-test, 19.91% were repaired and passed the same day and 70.51% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 7,385 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.627 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 4,949 miles a year across 1,232 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 26.72% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 47.69% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 3.874% of 1,239 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 39,578 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Toyota Dyna safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 21.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Toyota Dyna recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Toyota Dyna. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2012: 16 · 2013: 0 · 2014: 3 · 2015: 0 · 2016: 0 · 2017: 1 · 2018: 1.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Toyota Dyna
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2018/25906/12/2018386CRACKS MAY APPEAR IN THE BYPASS PIPE IN THE RECIRCULATING GAS COOLING UNIT
R/2016/26827/02/2017515FUEL MAY LEAK LEADING TO ENGINE CUT OUT
R/2014/15315/12/2014295FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2014/15315/12/2014295FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2014/15315/12/2014295FUEL MAY LEAK
All 21 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2018/25906/12/201816/09/2010 – 21/09/2012386CRACKS MAY APPEAR IN THE BYPASS PIPE IN THE RECIRCULATING GAS COOLING UNIT
R/2016/26827/02/201701/10/2011 – 31/10/2015515FUEL MAY LEAK LEADING TO ENGINE CUT OUT
R/2014/15315/12/201413/10/2011 – 21/05/2014295FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2014/15315/12/201431/08/2011 – 22/05/2013295FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2014/15315/12/201413/11/2011 – 21/05/2014295FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2012/07508/08/201204/09/2006 – 26/01/20111,761FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2012/07508/08/201226/10/2006 – 30/11/20071,761FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2012/07508/08/201205/09/2006 – 24/01/20111,761FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2012/07508/08/201201/09/2006 – 01/02/20111,761FUEL MAY LEAK
R/2012/00912/03/201218/03/2009 – 16/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201220/10/2009 – 16/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201226/02/2009 – 28/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201221/04/2009 – 22/03/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201231/10/2009 – 22/03/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201222/04/2009 – 08/03/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201219/05/2009 – 09/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201203/03/2009 – 16/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201202/04/2009 – 28/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201224/12/2009 – 24/12/2009257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201212/03/2009 – 25/03/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE
R/2012/00912/03/201226/02/2009 – 12/04/2010257HORN MAY NOT OPERATE

DVSA lists 21 safety recall campaigns for the Toyota Dyna, covering roughly 11,914 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Toyota Dyna MOT: quick answers

Toyota Dyna MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 100.6, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Toyota Dyna first-time MOT pass rate?
59.3% of first attempts passed in 2024 (941 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 40.7% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 941 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 100.6 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Toyota Dyna with other cars

Mercedes-Benz CLA is highest at 100.6; Volvo 700 Series is lowest at 100.4 — the gap is 0.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Toyota MOT statisticsToyota Starlet MOT statsToyota Carina MOT stats

Similar risk

Mercedes-Benz CLA (index 100.6)Volkswagen Bora (index 100.5)Volvo 700 Series (index 100.4)

Same size class

how Skoda Felicia compareshow Mercedes-Benz EQE compareshow Triumph TR6 compares

By area

Toyota Dyna MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Toyota Dyna body, chassis and structure failuresToyota Dyna brakes failuresToyota Dyna vehicle identification failuresToyota Dyna lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresToyota Dyna noise, emissions and leaks failuresToyota Dyna road wheels failuresToyota Dyna seat belts and airbags failuresToyota Dyna steering failuresToyota Dyna suspension failuresToyota Dyna tyres failuresToyota Dyna visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:toyota-dyna:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Toyota Dyna MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/toyota-dyna/ · Published 2026-07-30.