MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Triumph TR6 — MOT statistics 2024

The Triumph TR6 failed 15.51% of 948 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 38.2 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 62% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 38.2, 95% CI 32.8–44.2 (100 = national average) 100 38.2 0 200
Index
38.2
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
15.51%
n = 948
Dangerous /100
4
national ≈11
Rank
61 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: TVR Griffith (index 38.1) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.

Triumph TR6 common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are well below the reference at 14.5 per 100 tests, against 29.4 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Triumph TR6 common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical14.598329.40.49×0.46–0.53
Brakes9.463420.20.46×0.43–0.50
Suspension6.745119.30.35×0.31–0.38
Visibility5.939910.60.56×0.50–0.61
Steering5.83907.60.76×0.69–0.84
Body & structure3.020615.00.20×0.18–0.23
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 6,765 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover…Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated2.540.763.35×Ask the seller about: Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover damaged or det
Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen3.401.622.10×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Audible warning inoperativeAudible warning inoperative1.760.296.11×Ask the seller about: Audible warning inoperative
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.2.040.593.45×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover…Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc1.970.603.29×Ask the seller about: Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no
Direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or…A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning1.880.603.14×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or…A headlamp or light source missing, inoperative or more than ½ not functioning in the case of LED2.081.241.67×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement1.511.241.22×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated1.761.900.92×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements2.002.570.78×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Triumph TR6 MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 19.3 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 2.9 per 100 tests — the gap is 16.4 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Triumph TR6 MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension19.3
Emissions & leaks12.1
Brakes6.1
Tyres5.8
Non-component advisories3.5
Body & structure2.9

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed19.2%214
It passed11.5%2,908

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 7.7 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 21.4% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 6,619 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only52.4fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage61.5fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year97.6%a large low-use population — often second vehicles or cars kept for occasional use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 9.1 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How does the Triumph TR6 perform as it gets older?

The TR6 at age 20 is well below the reference at 15.4%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Triumph TR6 perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeTriumph TR6All vehiclesGap
2015.4%41.0%-25.7 pp

Is a Triumph TR6 ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Triumph TR6 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 2.4%.

Based on 932 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 8
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 9
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 3
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 6
20+ years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 903

How dangerous are Triumph TR6 MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 36.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Triumph TR6 MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor7.1814.220.50×
Major36.7352.750.70×
Dangerous4.0111.150.36×

Chart values: Minor 7.2 · Major 36.7 · Dangerous 4.0.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Triumph TR6 MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 23.5%; Oct is lowest at 15.0% — the gap is 8.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Triumph TR6 MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 14%–33%.

bars: Triumph TR6 · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthTriumph TR6All vehiclesGap
Jan23.46%31.12%-7.7 pp
Feb18.89%29.99%-11.1 pp
Mar16.57%28.26%-11.7 pp
Apr16.88%29.78%-12.9 pp
May16.8%28.79%-12.0 pp
Jun15.8%28.15%-12.3 pp
Jul18.56%29.33%-10.8 pp
Aug15.57%29.2%-13.6 pp
Sep16%28.19%-12.2 pp
Oct15.01%30.34%-15.3 pp
Nov15.52%30.58%-15.1 pp
Dec17.7%29.33%-11.6 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 8.5 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Triumph TR6 average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of TR6s runs from 17,441 miles to 75,205 miles, against 43,267 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Triumph TR6 MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 13.4% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 15.6% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Triumph TR6 MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Triumph TR6: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+<40k miles13.4%10.5–17%425 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles18.6%13.9–24.5%204 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles15.6%11.8–20.3%276 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
20+17,44143,26775,205903

A typical 20+-year-old TR6 has ~43,267 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Triumph TR6 fails its MOT most

London W area is highest at 47.8%; Peterborough area is lowest at 9.4% — the gap is 38.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
London W (W)47.83%+31.1 pp
Tonbridge (TN)25.56%+8.8 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Peterborough (PE)9.38%-7.3 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

Triumph TR6 faults that come together

Lamps & electrical + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 10.12×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems3010.12× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility537.08× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1776.85× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes496.45× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension416.15× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility1016.14× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering385.62× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment655.44× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1425.41× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension785.32× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension654.99× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering744.98× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility704.78× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility684.71× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1054.56× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering1014.33× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks17too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility15too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres15too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems13too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment11too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension11too few (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks11too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering10too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems9too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility9too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility7too few (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres7too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres6too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks6too few (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres6too few (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility6too few (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres6too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering6too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems» appear together 10.12× more often than chance (30 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Triumph TR6 MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £46.46 to £88.27, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£46–88
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment14.5 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£20.30
Brakes9.4 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£14.10
Suspension6.7 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£12.06

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £46 to £88, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Triumph TR6 rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 14th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
14th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Triumph TR6 has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Triumph TR6 advisory become a failure?

Suspension stands out at 4.7%.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Suspension4.7%12.6 months572511

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 5 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.6 months and roughly 572 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Triumph TR6?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 11.3%; Steering after a passed at age 20+ is lowest at 2.9% — the gap is 8.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 4.9% · Brakes 3.0% · Steering 2.9%2,970
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.6% · Visibility 6.3% · Brakes 5.4%648
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.3% · Visibility 6.6% · Brakes 6.0%716

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Triumph TR6 ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 64.2%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 11.3% — the gap is 53.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
24.53%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.568
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
66.67%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.365%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 738 failures followed through to their re-test, 24.53% were repaired and passed the same day and 64.23% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 2,119 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.568 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 418 miles a year across 1,511 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 66.67% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 11.08% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.365% of 1,539 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 9,994 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Triumph TR6 MOT: quick answers

Triumph TR6 MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 38.2, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Triumph TR6 first-time MOT pass rate?
84.49% of first attempts passed in 2024 (948 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 15.51% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 948 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 38.2 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Triumph TR6 with other cars

Ferrari F8 is highest at 38.6; Ford Sierra is lowest at 38.0 — the gap is 0.6 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Similar risk

TVR Griffith (index 38.1)Ford Sierra (index 38.0)Ferrari F8 (index 38.6)

Same size class

how Bentley Mulsanne compareshow Cupra Leon compareshow Skoda Felicia compares

By area

Triumph TR6 MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Triumph TR6 body, chassis and structure failuresTriumph TR6 brakes failuresTriumph TR6 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresTriumph TR6 noise, emissions and leaks failuresTriumph TR6 seat belts and airbags failuresTriumph TR6 steering failuresTriumph TR6 suspension failuresTriumph TR6 tyres failuresTriumph TR6 visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:triumph-tr6:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Triumph TR6 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/triumph-tr6/ · Published 2026-07-30.