MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Nissan Sunny — MOT statistics 2024

The Nissan Sunny failed 34.64% of 537 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 99.1 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 99.1, 95% CI 87.9–110.9 (100 = national average) 100 99.1 0 200
Index
99.1
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
34.64%
n = 537
Dangerous /100
11
national ≈11
Rank
450 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Kia Optima (index 99.0) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.

Nissan Sunny common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Body, chassis, structure stand out at 26.4 per 100 tests, against 15.2 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Nissan Sunny common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 2 of these are already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Suspension30.61,38020.01.53×1.45–1.61
Body & structure26.41,18915.21.74×1.64–1.84
Brakes23.21,04420.51.13×1.06–1.20
Lamps & electrical20.793229.70.70×0.65–0.74
Visibility11.049510.81.02×0.93–1.11 · not distinguishable
Steering7.53397.60.99×0.89–1.10 · not distinguishable
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 4,506 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired19.171.1217.15×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any seat belt anchorage (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired5.260.3813.92×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc6.411.564.11×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated6.151.484.16×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the…Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced3.950.3910.21×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover…Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc3.950.606.59×Ask the seller about: Steering rack gaiter or ball joint dust cover missing or no
Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the…Brakes imbalance across an axle such that the braking effort from any wheel is less than 70% of the maximum effort recorded from the other wheel on the same axle.3.790.596.40×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake3.971.033.85×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded3.621.412.58×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen3.912.221.76×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Nissan Sunny MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 50.9 per 100 tests; Identification is lowest at 6.1 per 100 tests — the gap is 44.8 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Nissan Sunny MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension50.9
Brakes44.5
Tyres28.2
Body & structure18.8
Emissions & leaks10.8
Identification6.1

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed38.3%321
It passed31.3%1,603

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 7.0 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 39.6% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 4,024 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only118.2fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage123.8fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year62.0%a large low-use population — often second vehicles or cars kept for occasional use

Split by how much each car is driven. This is a split by annual mileage, not by body type — the MOT record does not say whether a car is a conversion. Within each band the index compares with vehicles of the same age driven as much.

Miles a yearTestsFailed first timeIndex within band
under 3,0002,49635.0%129.6
3,000–6,0001,39044.0%119.4

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.6 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How does the Nissan Sunny perform as it gets older?

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeNissan SunnyAll vehiclesGap

How dangerous are Nissan Sunny MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 106.2 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Nissan Sunny MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor21.1114.221.48×
Major106.1952.752.01×
Dangerous11.3811.151.02×

Chart values: Minor 21.1 · Major 106.2 · Dangerous 11.4.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Nissan Sunny MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 48.2%; Jun is lowest at 33.8% — the gap is 14.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Nissan Sunny MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–50%.

bars: Nissan Sunny · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthNissan SunnyAll vehiclesGap
Jan48.15%31.12%+17.0 pp
Feb37.8%29.99%+7.8 pp
Mar39.9%28.26%+11.6 pp
Apr38.19%29.78%+8.4 pp
May35.31%28.79%+6.5 pp
Jun33.8%28.15%+5.6 pp
Jul39.06%29.33%+9.7 pp
Aug34.25%29.2%+5.1 pp
Sep34.37%28.19%+6.2 pp
Oct34.79%30.34%+4.4 pp
Nov44.83%30.58%+14.3 pp
Dec34%29.33%+4.7 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 14.4 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Nissan Sunny average mileage by age

Does high mileage mean more Nissan Sunny MOT failures?

All ages together, split by odometer (the bands are not split by age, so higher-mileage cars are also older and this mixes wear with age): 34.3% of the lowest-mileage cars failed versus 44.1% of the highest.

Bars: Nissan Sunny · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data
Odometer% failingTestsGap vs lowest-mileage band
40-70k miles34.3%1,461+0.0 pp
70-100k miles41.4%1,420+7.1 pp
100-140k miles44.1%794+9.8 pp

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests

Where in Britain the Nissan Sunny fails its MOT most

Exeter area is highest at 56.8%; Birmingham area is lowest at 23.6% — the gap is 33.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Exeter (EX)56.78%+18.8 pp
Bournemouth (BH)56%+18.0 pp
Portsmouth (PO)48.36%+10.3 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Birmingham (B)23.64%-14.4 pp
Leicester (LE)27.1%-10.9 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.

How many miles does a Nissan Sunny last?

100,000+ miles stands out at 24.5%.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles1,09724.52%

Of 4,473 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 24.5% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Nissan Sunny faults that come together

Seatbelts & SRS + Suspension stand out at 3.46×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension903.46× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres253.29× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility573.15× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks803.12× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks1062.94× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres952.94× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres762.87× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems612.86× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres712.84× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1992.83× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1422.79× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks752.77× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension2312.69× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility372.54× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems512.53× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension812.45× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension2222.44× (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility1172.43× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering872.4× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension1052.37× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes2182.33× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres822.33× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering242.31× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment2252.27× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility1412.27× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres282.17× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility402.16× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension2542.1× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility522.1× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering712.07× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems582.04× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility1362.01× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering972.01× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering231.74× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres18too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment16too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems15too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility10too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle10too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension9too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems» and «Suspension» appear together 3.46× more often than chance (90 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Which Nissan Sunny engine is best?

petrol 1.2–1.5 is highest at 108.6; petrol 1.8–2.0 is lowest at 63.6 — the gap is 45.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrol1.8–2.0 litre63.622.63%548 (rough estimate)
petrol1.5–1.8 litre99.838.53%1,290 (rough estimate)
petrol1.2–1.5 litre108.641.99%2,134 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the petrol 1.2–1.5 runs at 108.6 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.8–2.0 runs at 63.6 — a spread of 45 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Nissan Sunny MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £118.86 to £225.83, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£119–226
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension30.6 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£55.08
Brakes23.2 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£34.80
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment20.7 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£28.98

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £119 to £226, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Nissan Sunny rust problems: where they corrode

Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 27th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How it rusts
—
not enough tests to publish
Salt Belt exposure
27th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Nissan Sunny has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Nissan Sunny advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 22.6%; Tyres are lowest at 9.1% — the gap is 13.6 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Nissan Sunny chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Nissan Sunny, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Suspension 22.6% · Brakes 16.9% · Tyres 9.1%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Suspension22.6%12.2 months1,410698
Brakes16.9%12.2 months1,232739
Tyres9.1%12 months1,578552

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 23 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.2 months and roughly 1,410 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Nissan Sunny?

Suspension after a failure at age 20+ is highest at 22.8%; Brakes after a passed at age 20+ are lowest at 7.2% — the gap is 15.6 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
20+passedBody, chassis, structure 11.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.7% · Brakes 7.2%1,076
20+advisoryBody, chassis, structure 17.8% · Suspension 15.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.2%816
20+failureSuspension 22.8% · Body, chassis, structure 21.0% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.2%1,109

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Nissan Sunny ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 70.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 9.7% — the gap is 61.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
19.58%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.804
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
32.28%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
3.276%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,088 failures followed through to their re-test, 19.58% were repaired and passed the same day and 70.77% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 3,263 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.804 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 771 miles a year across 1,015 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 32.28% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 31.53% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 3.276% of 1,038 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 33,447 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Nissan Sunny MOT: quick answers

Nissan Sunny MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 99.1, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Nissan Sunny first-time MOT pass rate?
65.36% of first attempts passed in 2024 (537 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 34.64% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 537 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 99.1 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Nissan Sunny with other cars

Nissan Sunny is highest at 99.1; Kia Optima is lowest at 99.0 — the gap is 0.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Nissan MOT statisticsNissan Note MOT statsNissan Leaf MOT stats

Similar risk

Kia Optima (index 99.0)Kia Venga (index 99.0)Mercedes-Benz EQA (index 99.0)

Same size class

how Audi Quattro compareshow Audi SQ8 compareshow Porsche 924 compares

By area

Nissan Sunny MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Nissan Sunny body, chassis and structure failuresNissan Sunny brakes failuresNissan Sunny lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresNissan Sunny noise, emissions and leaks failuresNissan Sunny seat belts and airbags failuresNissan Sunny steering failuresNissan Sunny suspension failuresNissan Sunny tyres failuresNissan Sunny visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:nissan-sunny:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Nissan Sunny MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/nissan-sunny/ · Published 2026-07-30.