MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Mercedes-Benz EQA — MOT statistics 2024

The Mercedes-Benz EQA failed 12.08% of 5,109 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 99.0 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age.

MOT risk index 99.0, 95% CI 91.9–106.6 (100 = national average) 100 99.0 0 200
Index
99.0
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
12.08%
n = 5,109
Dangerous /100
6
national ≈11
Rank
448 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Kia Optima (index 99.0) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Mercedes-Benz EQA common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Visibility stands out at 5.4 per 100 tests, against 3.7 per 100 tests across UK electric vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Mercedes-Benz EQA common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK electric vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 2 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Tyres11.761310.51.11×1.03–1.21
Visibility5.42823.71.45×1.28–1.63
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 5,225 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged6.392.542.52×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Wiper blade defectiveWiper blade defective2.221.261.76×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged2.221.631.36×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view2.032.360.86×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements2.833.590.79×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 57.3 per 100 tests; Brakes are lowest at 1.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 56.3 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres57.3
Non-component advisories5.9
Suspension1.6
Brakes1

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Mercedes-Benz EQA against cars of the same age

AgePartMercedes-Benz EQASame age, petrol and dieselDifference
3 yearsTyres8.594.174.42
3 yearsBrakes0.121.77-1.65
3 yearsSuspension0.450.63-0.18

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 5,222 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only98.7fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage95.3fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year5.1%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (-3.4 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Mercedes-Benz EQA compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeMercedes-Benz EQASame class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years12.19%12.56%-0.36 pp4,855

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Mercedes-Benz EQA perform as it gets older?

The EQA at age 3 is close to the reference at 12.2%, against 12.4% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Mercedes-Benz EQA perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–14%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeMercedes-Benz EQAAll vehiclesGap
312.2%12.4%-0.2 pp

Is a Mercedes-Benz EQA ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.

Based on 5,109 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 254
3–5 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 4,855
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 8.8 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor4.8014.220.34×
Major8.8252.750.17×
Dangerous5.6511.150.51×

Chart values: Minor 4.8 · Major 8.8 · Dangerous 5.7.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT matter?

Jun is highest at 13.7%; Jan is lowest at 2.6% — the gap is 11.1 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 1%–33%.

bars: Mercedes-Benz EQA · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthMercedes-Benz EQAAll vehiclesGap
Jan2.56%31.12%-28.6 pp
Feb5.26%29.99%-24.7 pp
Mar8.92%28.26%-19.3 pp
Apr10.88%29.78%-18.9 pp
May12.55%28.79%-16.2 pp
Jun13.68%28.15%-14.5 pp
Jul11.51%29.33%-17.8 pp
Aug12.38%29.2%-16.8 pp
Sep12.59%28.19%-15.6 pp
Oct11.81%30.34%-18.5 pp
Nov11.75%30.58%-18.8 pp
Dec11.28%29.33%-18.0 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 11.1 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Mercedes-Benz EQA average mileage by age

At age 3, the middle half of EQAs runs from 16,633 miles to 32,938 miles, against 23,916 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 3–5, 11.2% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 19.2% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Mercedes-Benz EQA: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
3–5<40k miles11.2%10.2–12.2%4,191
3–540-70k miles19.2%16.3–22.4%621

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
316,63323,91632,9384,855

A typical 3-year-old EQA has ~23,916 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Mercedes-Benz EQA fails its MOT most

Too few tests in any single postcode area to name one, so this is the wider picture across 5,225 tests, 2019-2024.

Part of Britain% failingTests
Wales17.97%128
Midlands12.59%1,398
Southern England12.23%2,600
Scotland10.77%297
Northern England8.74%801

Raw pass/fail rates, not age-adjusted: fleets differ by region. England is split north of Sheffield, between Sheffield and Oxford, and south of it.

Mercedes-Benz EQA faults that come together

Tyres + Visibility stand out at 2.61×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
TyresVisibility542.61× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres6too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Tyres» and «Visibility» appear together 2.61× more often than chance (54 co-occurrences in the same test; 45 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Mercedes-Benz EQA rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at <0.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
<0.1×
0% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
31st
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Mercedes-Benz EQA virtually never fails on corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

What will fail next on a Mercedes-Benz EQA?

Tyres after a passed at age <3 stand out at 4.2%.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedTyres 4.2%215 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Mercedes-Benz EQA safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 5.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Mercedes-Benz EQA recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Mercedes-Benz EQA. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2021: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2023: 0 · 2024: 1 · 2025: 2.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Mercedes-Benz EQA
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2025/43913/11/20252SRPC2515 - Short-range sensor front
R/2025/10617/04/20255,803SRPC2500 – Update battery management system control unit software
R/2024/16606/05/202417,718SRPC2404 – Backup function of steering software
R/2022/06224/03/202217BOLTING ON BRAKE CALIPER HOUSING MIGHT NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS
R/2021/39026/11/20212CERTAIN VEHICLES MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN EQUIPPED WITH THE PRINTED OWNER'S MANUAL

DVSA lists 5 safety recall campaigns for the Mercedes-Benz EQA, covering roughly 23,542 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT: quick answers

Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 99.0, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Mercedes-Benz EQA first-time MOT pass rate?
87.92% of first attempts passed in 2024 (5,109 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 12.08% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 5,109 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 99.0 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Mercedes-Benz EQA with other cars

Suzuki Alto is highest at 99.0; Mercedes-Benz EQA is lowest at 99.0 — the gap is 0.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Mercedes-Benz MOT statisticsMercedes-Benz V-Class MOT statsMercedes-Benz CLA MOT stats

Similar risk

Kia Optima (index 99.0)Kia Venga (index 99.0)Suzuki Alto (index 99.0)

Same size class

how Kia Sedona compareshow Lotus Elise compareshow Peugeot 106 compares

By area

Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Mercedes-Benz EQA lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresMercedes-Benz EQA tyres failuresMercedes-Benz EQA visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:mercedes-eqa:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mercedes-eqa/ · Published 2026-07-30.