Mercedes-Benz EQA — MOT statistics 2024
The Mercedes-Benz EQA failed 12.08% of 5,109 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 99.0 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age.
Age-adjusted peer: Kia Optima (index 99.0) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.
Mercedes-Benz EQA common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Visibility stands out at 5.4 per 100 tests, against 3.7 per 100 tests across UK electric vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK electric vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 2 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 11.7 | 613 | 10.5 | 1.11×1.03–1.21 |
| Visibility | 5.4 | 282 | 3.7 | 1.45×1.28–1.63 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged | 6.39 | 2.54 | 2.52× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Wiper blade defectiveWiper blade defective | 2.22 | 1.26 | 1.76× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged | 2.22 | 1.63 | 1.36× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
| Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view | 2.03 | 2.36 | 0.86× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements | 2.83 | 3.59 | 0.79× | Check tyre tread depth across the full width |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Tyres are highest at 57.3 per 100 tests; Brakes are lowest at 1.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 56.3 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Tyres | 57.3 |
| Non-component advisories | 5.9 |
| Suspension | 1.6 |
| Brakes | 1 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
Tyres, brakes and suspension: Mercedes-Benz EQA against cars of the same age
| Age | Part | Mercedes-Benz EQA | Same age, petrol and diesel | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | Tyres | 8.59 | 4.17 | 4.42 |
| 3 years | Brakes | 0.12 | 1.77 | -1.65 |
| 3 years | Suspension | 0.45 | 0.63 | -0.18 |
Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 5,222 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 98.7 | fails less often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 95.3 | fails less often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 5.1% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage changes little here (-3.4 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Mercedes-Benz EQA compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Mercedes-Benz EQA | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | 12.19% | 12.56% | -0.36 pp | 4,855 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Mercedes-Benz EQA perform as it gets older?
The EQA at age 3 is close to the reference at 12.2%, against 12.4% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–14%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Mercedes-Benz EQA | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 12.2% | 12.4% | -0.2 pp |
Is a Mercedes-Benz EQA ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.
Based on 5,109 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 254 |
| 3–5 years | 100.0% Check a registration with TfL | n = 4,855 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 10–14 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 15–17 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
How dangerous are Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failures?
Major defects are well below the reference at 8.8 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 4.80 | 14.22 | 0.34× |
| Major | 8.82 | 52.75 | 0.17× |
| Dangerous | 5.65 | 11.15 | 0.51× |
Chart values: Minor 4.8 · Major 8.8 · Dangerous 5.7.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT matter?
Jun is highest at 13.7%; Jan is lowest at 2.6% — the gap is 11.1 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 1%–33%.
bars: Mercedes-Benz EQA · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Mercedes-Benz EQA | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 2.56% | 31.12% | -28.6 pp |
| Feb | 5.26% | 29.99% | -24.7 pp |
| Mar | 8.92% | 28.26% | -19.3 pp |
| Apr | 10.88% | 29.78% | -18.9 pp |
| May | 12.55% | 28.79% | -16.2 pp |
| Jun | 13.68% | 28.15% | -14.5 pp |
| Jul | 11.51% | 29.33% | -17.8 pp |
| Aug | 12.38% | 29.2% | -16.8 pp |
| Sep | 12.59% | 28.19% | -15.6 pp |
| Oct | 11.81% | 30.34% | -18.5 pp |
| Nov | 11.75% | 30.58% | -18.8 pp |
| Dec | 11.28% | 29.33% | -18.0 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 11.1 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Mercedes-Benz EQA average mileage by age
At age 3, the middle half of EQAs runs from 16,633 miles to 32,938 miles, against 23,916 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Does high mileage mean more Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 3–5, 11.2% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 19.2% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–5 | <40k miles | 11.2% | 10.2–12.2% | 4,191 |
| 3–5 | 40-70k miles | 19.2% | 16.3–22.4% | 621 |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 16,633 | 23,916 | 32,938 | 4,855 |
A typical 3-year-old EQA has ~23,916 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Mercedes-Benz EQA fails its MOT most
Too few tests in any single postcode area to name one, so this is the wider picture across 5,225 tests, 2019-2024.
| Part of Britain | % failing | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Wales | 17.97% | 128 |
| Midlands | 12.59% | 1,398 |
| Southern England | 12.23% | 2,600 |
| Scotland | 10.77% | 297 |
| Northern England | 8.74% | 801 |
Raw pass/fail rates, not age-adjusted: fleets differ by region. England is split north of Sheffield, between Sheffield and Oxford, and south of it.
Mercedes-Benz EQA faults that come together
Tyres + Visibility stand out at 2.61×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | Visibility | 54 | 2.61× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Tyres» and «Visibility» appear together 2.61× more often than chance (54 co-occurrences in the same test; 45 pairs compared).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Mercedes-Benz EQA rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at <0.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Mercedes-Benz EQA virtually never fails on corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
What will fail next on a Mercedes-Benz EQA?
Tyres after a passed at age <3 stand out at 4.2%.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| <3 | passed | Tyres 4.2% | 215 (rough estimate) |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Mercedes-Benz EQA safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 5.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
recall campaigns launched per year
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2025/439 | 13/11/2025 | 2 | SRPC2515 - Short-range sensor front |
R/2025/106 | 17/04/2025 | 5,803 | SRPC2500 – Update battery management system control unit software |
R/2024/166 | 06/05/2024 | 17,718 | SRPC2404 – Backup function of steering software |
R/2022/062 | 24/03/2022 | 17 | BOLTING ON BRAKE CALIPER HOUSING MIGHT NOT MEET SPECIFICATIONS |
R/2021/390 | 26/11/2021 | 2 | CERTAIN VEHICLES MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN EQUIPPED WITH THE PRINTED OWNER'S MANUAL |
DVSA lists 5 safety recall campaigns for the Mercedes-Benz EQA, covering roughly 23,542 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT: quick answers
Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 99.0, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Mercedes-Benz EQA first-time MOT pass rate?
- 87.92% of first attempts passed in 2024 (5,109 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 12.08% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 5,109 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 99.0 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Mercedes-Benz EQA with other cars
Suzuki Alto is highest at 99.0; Mercedes-Benz EQA is lowest at 99.0 — the gap is 0.0 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Mercedes-Benz MOT statisticsMercedes-Benz V-Class MOT statsMercedes-Benz CLA MOT stats
Similar risk
Kia Optima (index 99.0)Kia Venga (index 99.0)Suzuki Alto (index 99.0)
Same size class
how Kia Sedona compareshow Lotus Elise compareshow Peugeot 106 compares
By area
Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Mercedes-Benz EQA lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresMercedes-Benz EQA tyres failuresMercedes-Benz EQA visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:mercedes-eqa:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Mercedes-Benz EQA MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mercedes-eqa/ · Published 2026-07-30.