MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Nissan Pickup — MOT statistics 2024

The Nissan Pickup failed 46.03% of 1,297 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 111.2 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 11% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 111.2, 95% CI 104.7–117.7 (100 = national average) 100 111.2 0 200
Index
111.2
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
46.03%
n = 1,297
Dangerous /100
20
national ≈11
Rank
568 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Volkswagen LT (index 111.2) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.

Nissan Pickup common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Body, chassis, structure stand out at 35.0 per 100 tests, against 14.5 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Nissan Pickup common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical48.96,14038.51.27×1.24–1.30
Brakes42.35,31923.71.78×1.74–1.83
Suspension40.25,05131.51.28×1.24–1.31
Body & structure35.04,40114.52.42×2.35–2.49
Visibility18.32,30112.61.45×1.39–1.51
Steering8.21,0346.21.33×1.25–1.42
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 12,568 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake9.991.039.70×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired8.951.128.01×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn12.524.872.57×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded8.311.415.91×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the…Vehicle structure corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is seriously reduced6.970.3918.01×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure6.761.165.83×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources7.372.832.61×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated6.261.903.29×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning5.602.092.68×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements5.632.572.19×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Nissan Pickup MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 76.1 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 8.2 per 100 tests — the gap is 67.9 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Nissan Pickup MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension76.1
Brakes65.3
Body & structure39.5
Tyres29.6
Emissions & leaks10.1
Steering8.2

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed35.6%1,251
It passed37.3%4,579

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (35.6% against 37.3%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is tyres — 33.3% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 12,302 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only105.0fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage102.9fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year6.8%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (-2.1 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Nissan Pickup compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeNissan PickupSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
11 years44.38%28.22%+16.15 pp160
12 years43.96%30.55%+13.41 pp298
13 years45.77%32.62%+13.15 pp437
14 years46.4%34.57%+11.83 pp722
15 years44.74%36.02%+8.72 pp1,540
16 years47.23%37.07%+10.17 pp1,844
17 years46.09%37.45%+8.64 pp1,892
18 years46.39%37.82%+8.57 pp1,677
19 years45.95%37.42%+8.53 pp1,445
20 years46.16%36.93%+9.23 pp1,107

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Nissan Pickup perform as it gets older?

The Pickup at age 20 stands out at 47.1%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Nissan Pickup perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–52%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeNissan PickupAll vehiclesGap
1948.0%43.5%+4.5 pp
2047.1%41.0%+6.0 pp

Is a Nissan Pickup ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Nissan Pickup MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 0.3%.

Based on 1,254 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 2
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 15
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 184
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 74
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 152
20+ years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 826

How dangerous are Nissan Pickup MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 157.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Nissan Pickup MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor36.1214.222.54×
Major156.9552.752.98×
Dangerous19.9411.151.79×

Chart values: Minor 36.1 · Major 156.9 · Dangerous 19.9.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Nissan Pickup MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 48.3%; May is lowest at 43.3% — the gap is 5.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Nissan Pickup MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–50%.

bars: Nissan Pickup · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthNissan PickupAll vehiclesGap
Jan48.32%31.12%+17.2 pp
Feb46.2%29.99%+16.2 pp
Mar47.22%28.26%+19.0 pp
Apr43.92%29.78%+14.1 pp
May43.33%28.79%+14.5 pp
Jun45.05%28.15%+16.9 pp
Jul45.61%29.33%+16.3 pp
Aug44.09%29.2%+14.9 pp
Sep46.29%28.19%+18.1 pp
Oct47.42%30.34%+17.1 pp
Nov45.22%30.58%+14.6 pp
Dec47.51%29.33%+18.2 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.0 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Nissan Pickup average mileage by age

At age 20+, the middle half of Pickups runs from 85,995 miles to 146,349 miles, against 113,045 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Nissan Pickup MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 40.4% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 50.6% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

Does high mileage mean more Nissan Pickup MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Nissan Pickup: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
15+40-70k miles40.4%33.1–48.1%161 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles44.1%38.5–49.9%288 (rough estimate)
15+100-140k miles47.7%42.9–52.5%415 (rough estimate)
15+140k+ miles50.6%45.1–56.2%310 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1975,96699,966132,606152
20+85,995113,045146,349826

A typical 20+-year-old Pickup has ~113,045 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Nissan Pickup fails its MOT most

Plymouth area is highest at 63.3%; Colchester area is lowest at 31.7% — the gap is 31.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Nissan Pickup line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Plymouth (PL)63.25%+17.2 pp
Exeter (EX)61.95%+15.9 pp
Truro (TR)61.11%+15.1 pp
Taunton (TA)60.19%+14.1 pp
York (YO)59.19%+13.1 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Colchester (CO)31.69%-14.4 pp
Redhill (RH)33.91%-12.1 pp
Sheffield (S)34.55%-11.5 pp
Chelmsford (CM)34.65%-11.4 pp
Reading (RG)34.95%-11.1 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 39%–62% failing.

How many miles does a Nissan Pickup last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 59.8%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 18.5% — the gap is 41.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles7,38359.83%
150,000+ miles2,28218.49%

Of 12,339 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 59.8% had reached 100k miles, 18.5% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Nissan Pickup faults that come together

Identification + Tyres stand out at 4.17×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Identification of the vehicleTyres484.17× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering204.03× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering513.6× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks283.34× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks2832.99× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering842.85× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1602.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility862.81× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems492.81× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle1222.78× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering882.78× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle1172.77× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2422.75× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels552.75× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres652.72× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems212.7× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres1172.69× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2432.66× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension2422.59× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels382.56× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility1572.47× (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels382.47× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks2382.42× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension382.41× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering3992.4× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres3212.38× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility252.34× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility2192.33× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension1052.33× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering3672.3× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension3882.28× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureTyres2962.28× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility2632.28× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureBrakes1,1212.26×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter222.26× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering4842.25× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres3062.21× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres572.21× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2602.19× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility1502.19× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1,1052.17×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres3782.16× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks2762.16× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension1,1342.15×
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension2172.15× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility9712.09×
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,3162.04×
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,3362×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension1,3361.95×
BrakesVisibility6991.95×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility6461.87×
SuspensionVisibility6601.8×
Road WheelsTyres17too few (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSpeedometer and speed limiter17too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSpeedometer and speed limiter15too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterSuspension12too few (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels11too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterVisibility8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleRoad Wheels7too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems7too few (rough estimate)
Speedometer and speed limiterTyres6too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Brakes» appear together 2.26× more often than chance (1,121 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Nissan Pickup?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 32.2%, against 49.9% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year32.22%298
8–12k miles/year49.87%461
Gap (low − normal)-17.66 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1235.855353.7108-17.85 pp
1332.568648.61144-16.05 pp
1430.8215949.28209-18.46 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 32.2% vs 49.9% for 8–12k miles/year — 17.7 pp lower (n_low=298, n_normal=461). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 32.2% low-use vs 49.9% normal (-17.7 pp).

Nissan Pickup MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £204.27 to £388.11, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£204–388
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension40.2 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£72.36
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment48.9 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£68.46
Brakes42.3 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£63.45

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £204 to £388, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Nissan Pickup rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 9.01×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
9.01×
6.89% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
46th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Nissan Pickup fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Nissan Pickup advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 26.1%; Noise, emissions and leaks are lowest at 5.8% — the gap is 20.3 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Nissan Pickup chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Nissan Pickup, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Suspension 26.1% · Body & chassis 24.5% · Brakes 24.1% · Steering 17.7% · Tyres 9.6% · Identification of the veh… 6.9% · Noise, emissions, leaks 5.8%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Suspension26.1%12.1 months3,8983,385
Body, chassis, structure24.5%12.2 months3,5762,272
Brakes24.1%12.2 months3,2243,423
Steering17.7%12.2 months3,476628
Tyres9.6%12.2 months3,9581,725
Identification of the vehicle6.9%12.2 months2,785564
Noise, emissions and leaks5.8%12.1 months5,413844

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 26 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 3,898 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Nissan Pickup?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 9-11 are highest at 35.6%; Brakes after a passed at age 9-11 are lowest at 8.1% — the gap is 27.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 9.0% · Brakes 8.1% · Visibility 8.1%111 (rough estimate)
9-11advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.7% · Brakes 17.5% · Body, chassis, structure 16.7%114 (rough estimate)
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 35.6% · Brakes 25.3% · Suspension 24.1%174 (rough estimate)
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.3% · Suspension 13.4% · Body, chassis, structure 11.3%425 (rough estimate)
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.4% · Suspension 18.2% · Brakes 17.9%532
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 30.4% · Suspension 23.5% · Body, chassis, structure 20.2%784
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.5% · Brakes 13.0% · Body, chassis, structure 12.6%1,386
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.7% · Suspension 20.1% · Brakes 18.7%2,125
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.3% · Suspension 25.5% · Brakes 24.6%2,910
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 12.8% · Suspension 12.8% · Body, chassis, structure 11.7%196 (rough estimate)
20+advisorySuspension 22.4% · Brakes 19.7% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.3%295 (rough estimate)
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 30.7% · Suspension 26.1% · Body, chassis, structure 24.5%433 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Nissan Pickup ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 72.4%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 10.2% — the gap is 62.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
17.41%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
1.049
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
16.34%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.907%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 3,895 failures followed through to their re-test, 17.41% were repaired and passed the same day and 72.37% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 14,976 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.049 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 3,002 miles a year across 2,512 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 16.34% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 54.15% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.907% of 2,570 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 14,770 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Nissan Pickup MOT: quick answers

Nissan Pickup MOT Risk Index stands out at 111.2, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Nissan Pickup first-time MOT pass rate?
53.97% of first attempts passed in 2024 (1,297 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 46.03% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 1,297 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 111.2 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Nissan Pickup with other cars

Citroen Saxo is highest at 111.3; Citroen C2 is lowest at 111.1 — the gap is 0.2 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Nissan MOT statisticsNissan X-Trail MOT statsNissan Primera MOT stats

Similar risk

Volkswagen LT (index 111.2)Citroen Saxo (index 111.3)Citroen C2 (index 111.1)

Same size class

how Mazda CX-7 compareshow Daihatsu Fourtrak compareshow Honda Integra compares

By build year

Nissan Pickup 2001Nissan Pickup 2002Nissan Pickup 2003Nissan Pickup 2004Nissan Pickup 2005Nissan Pickup 2006Nissan Pickup 2007

By area

Nissan Pickup MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Nissan Pickup body, chassis and structure failuresNissan Pickup brakes failuresNissan Pickup vehicle identification failuresNissan Pickup lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresNissan Pickup noise, emissions and leaks failuresNissan Pickup road wheels failuresNissan Pickup seat belts and airbags failuresNissan Pickup steering failuresNissan Pickup suspension failuresNissan Pickup tyres failuresNissan Pickup visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:nissan-pickup:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Nissan Pickup MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/nissan-pickup/ · Published 2026-07-30.