MOT Risk Index.co.uk

MG ZS MOT pass rate and common problems

87.4% of MG ZS models passed the 2024 MOT (44,212 first tests): 84.1% at the first attempt and 3.3% after a fix at the test centre (PRS). About 1 in 5 failed the first attempt. For its age, it fails 17% more often than normal: MOT Risk Index 117.4 (95% CI 114.9–119.9; 100 = normal).

MG ZS at a glance, 2024 MOT
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MOT pass rate87.4%incl. 3.3% fixed at the test centre202444212
Passed at the first attempt84.1%all first tests202444212
MOT Risk Index (95% CI 114.9–119.9)117.4index100 = normal for its age · rank 626 of 761 (1 = fails least for its age)202444212
Biggest excess: Brakes7.1per 1002.9 same-age2019–202493021
Dangerous defects5.5per 10011.2 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202493021
Advisory items84.3per 100127.1 UK, not age-adjusted2019–202493021
strip · MG ZS · MOT Risk Index · 117.4 vs 100 = normal · 2024
MOT Risk Index · MG ZS. 0–240; 100 = normal for its age; median model 92.8 · rank 626 of 761 (1 = fails least for its age). It would rank between 602 and 652 anywhere within its 95% interval, other models held where they are. DVSA, 2024.
MG ZS index position among 761 models
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Rank626of 761published models, 1 = fails least for its age202444212
Best rank within its 95% interval602rankother models held where they are202444212
Worst rank within its 95% interval652rankother models held where they are202444212

Check this car by registration

Before you submit. Enter a UK registration to compare this vehicle with similar cars. We send the registration to the DVSA MOT History API, do not put it in the URL or send it to analytics, and keep any server-side cache for no more than 15 minutes. MOT history is free on GOV.UK; we do not sell it. Statistical information, not vehicle condition advice. Read how we use your data.

Download this page's numbers (CSV) · How to cite

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · full dataset (v5). This model's index changed from 123.7 to 117.4 in the 24 September 2026 release, after duplicate test records were removed.

What actually fails on an MG ZS MOT, and how often?

MG ZS MOTs fail most often on brakes: 7.1 per 100 tests, against 2.9 for UK cars of the same age (2019–2024, n = 93,021).

bar · MG ZS · Brakes · 7.1 vs 2.9 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes7.1per 1002.92019–20246601
Tyres5.5per 1006.02019–20245083
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment5.3per 1002.62019–20244963
Visibility3.3per 1004.72019–20243108
Suspension1.4per 1001.42019–20241306
Noise, emissions and leaks1.4per 1000.62019–20241267

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 93,021 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Tyres, brakes and suspension: how does the MG ZS compare with cars of the same age?

The biggest excess for the MG ZS is brakes at age 6: 8.9 failures per 100 tests, against 3.8 for same-age cars of comparable models (2019–2024, n = 5,432).

bullet · MG ZS · Tyres, age 3 · 3.4 vs 4.2 · 2019–2024
Tyres, age 3: 3.4 vs 4.2. Brakes, age 3: 3.1 vs 1.8. Suspension, age 3: 0.8 vs 0.6. Tyres, age 4: 4.6 vs 4.5. Brakes, age 4: 4.6 vs 2.4. Suspension, age 4: 1.1 vs 1.2. Tyres, age 5: 5.1 vs 5.1. Brakes, age 5: 6.6 vs 3.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres, age 33.4per 1004.22019–202441516
Brakes, age 33.1per 1001.82019–202441516
Suspension, age 30.8per 1000.62019–202441516
Tyres, age 44.6per 1004.52019–202426607
Brakes, age 44.6per 1002.42019–202426607
Suspension, age 41.1per 1001.22019–202426607
Tyres, age 55.1per 1005.12019–202414077
Brakes, age 56.6per 1003.12019–202414077
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Suspension, age 51.9per 1002.22019–202414077
Tyres, age 66.2per 1005.52019–20245432
Brakes, age 68.9per 1003.82019–20245432
Suspension, age 63.7per 1003.72019–20245432

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my MG ZS's advisory become a fail at the next MOT?

MG ZS advisories turn into fails less often than on the median model; the one to watch is brakes: advisories on it became a fail at the next MOT 11.7% of the time.

funnel · MG ZS · Brakes · 11.7 vs median model · 2019–2024
Advisories on brakes: 11.7 of 100 became a fail on the same item at the next MOT. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes11.7% next failmedian model2019–20249376
Suspension7.5% next failmedian model2019–20241108
Tyres7.5% next failmedian model2019–202410387
Non-component advisories0% next failmedian model2019–20243710

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

My MG ZS got an MOT advisory: what gets flagged most?

MG ZS MOTs flag tyres most: 35.1 advisories per 100 tests, against 39.7 across UK tests (2019–2024, n = 93,021).

bar · MG ZS · Tyres · 35.1 vs 39.7 · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres35.1per 10039.72019–202432635
Brakes34per 10034.72019–202431597
Non-component advisories8.7per 1007.82019–20248109
Suspension4.1per 10026.22019–20243834
Noise, emissions and leaks0.9per 1005.22019–2024866
Identification of the vehicle0.4per 1002.52019–2024327

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 93,021 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What is likely to fail next on an MG ZS?

For MG ZS models aged under 3 whose last MOT was a pass, the item most likely to fail at the next MOT is tyres: 3.3% failed on it (2019–2024, n = 15,188).

bar · MG ZS · Tyres, under 3 years old, after a pass · 3.3 vs baseline · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Tyres, under 3 years old, after a pass3.3% next fail2019–202415188
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, under 3 years old, after a pass2.7% next fail2019–202415188
Brakes, under 3 years old, after a pass2.4% next fail2019–202415188
Visibility, under 3 years old, after a pass2.4% next fail2019–202415188
Noise, emissions and leaks, under 3 years old, after a pass0.9% next fail2019–202415188
Suspension, under 3 years old, after a pass0.7% next fail2019–202415188
Steering, under 3 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202415188
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, under 3 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202415188
Full table
Further values · 2019–2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure, under 3 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202415188
Identification of the vehicle, under 3 years old, after a pass0.1% next fail2019–202415188
Road wheels, under 3 years old, after a pass0.0% next fail2019–202415188
Brakes, under 3 years old, after an advisory6.2% next fail2019–20245774
Tyres, under 3 years old, after an advisory5.8% next fail2019–20245774
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, under 3 years old, after an advisory3.5% next fail2019–20245774
Visibility, under 3 years old, after an advisory3.5% next fail2019–20245774
Noise, emissions and leaks, under 3 years old, after an advisory1.5% next fail2019–20245774
Suspension, under 3 years old, after an advisory1.4% next fail2019–20245774
Steering, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.4% next fail2019–20245774
Body, chassis, structure, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–20245774
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.1% next fail2019–20245774
Identification of the vehicle, under 3 years old, after an advisory0.1% next fail2019–20245774
Tyres, under 3 years old, after a fail5.8% next fail2019–20242816
Brakes, under 3 years old, after a fail5.8% next fail2019–20242816
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, under 3 years old, after a fail5.4% next fail2019–20242816
Visibility, under 3 years old, after a fail3.4% next fail2019–20242816
Suspension, under 3 years old, after a fail1.8% next fail2019–20242816
Noise, emissions and leaks, under 3 years old, after a fail1.2% next fail2019–20242816
Steering, under 3 years old, after a fail0.4% next fail2019–20242816
Identification of the vehicle, under 3 years old, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20242816
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, under 3 years old, after a fail0.3% next fail2019–20242816
Body, chassis, structure, under 3 years old, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–20242816
Brakes, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass4.2% next fail2019–202414431
Tyres, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass4.1% next fail2019–202414431
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass3.9% next fail2019–202414431
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass3.0% next fail2019–202414431
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass1.6% next fail2019–202414431
Noise, emissions and leaks, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass1.4% next fail2019–202414431
Body, chassis, structure, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202414431
Steering, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.3% next fail2019–202414431
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.2% next fail2019–202414431
Identification of the vehicle, 3 to 5 years old, after a pass0.1% next fail2019–202414431
Brakes, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory9.7% next fail2019–20248199
Tyres, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory6.0% next fail2019–20248199
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory5.2% next fail2019–20248199
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory4.4% next fail2019–20248199
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory2.1% next fail2019–20248199
Noise, emissions and leaks, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory2.0% next fail2019–20248199
Body, chassis, structure, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.4% next fail2019–20248199
Steering, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.3% next fail2019–20248199
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.2% next fail2019–20248199
Identification of the vehicle, 3 to 5 years old, after an advisory0.1% next fail2019–20248199
Brakes, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail8.4% next fail2019–20244958
Tyres, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail7.4% next fail2019–20244958
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail7.2% next fail2019–20244958
Visibility, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail4.2% next fail2019–20244958
Suspension, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail3.5% next fail2019–20244958
Noise, emissions and leaks, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail2.5% next fail2019–20244958
Steering, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.5% next fail2019–20244958
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.5% next fail2019–20244958
Body, chassis, structure, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.4% next fail2019–20244958
Identification of the vehicle, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.2% next fail2019–20244958
Road wheels, 3 to 5 years old, after a fail0.1% next fail2019–20244958
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment, 6 to 8 years old, after a fail (rough estimate: 57 cars)8.8% next fail2019–202457

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How often does an MG ZS get a dangerous MOT defect?

The MG ZS gets a dangerous defect less often than the UK average: 5.5 per 100 first tests against 11.2 across the UK. In the same tests, 16.1 major and 3.4 minor defects were recorded per 100 tests (one test can record several).

bullet · MG ZS · Dangerous defects · 5.5 vs 11.2 · 2019–2024
Dangerous defects: 5.5 vs 11.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dangerous defects5.5per 10011.22019–202493021

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 93,021 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id; severity not recorded for some 2018–2021 tests · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Will my MG ZS still pass its MOT in a few years?

First-time MOT failures for the MG ZS go from 11.5% at age 3 to 27.2% at age 7 (rough estimate: 349 tests, 95% interval 22.8–32.1%), against 20.2% for all cars aged 7 (rough estimate: 349 tests, 95% interval 22.8–32.1%) (2024, n = 44,212).

line · MG ZS · Age 3 · 11.5 vs 12.4 · 2024
Age 3: 11.5. Age 7 (rough estim: 27.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 311.5% failed first time12.4202415307
Age 415.6% failed first time13.1202412536
Age 520.1% failed first time15.120248650
Age 624.2% failed first time17.520245082
Age 7 (rough estimate: 349 tests, 95% interval 22.8–32.1%)27.2% failed first time20.22024349

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How does the MG ZS compare with cars of its own age and size?

At every age shown, MG ZS models fail first time more often than comparable models of the same size class; the biggest difference is at age 6, where they fail more often: 24.4% against 20.8% (2024, n = 5,432).

line · MG ZS · Age 3 · 12.3 vs 11.3 · 2024
Age 3: 12.3. Age 7: 27.2. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 312.3% fail11.3202441516
Age 416.3% fail14.2202426607
Age 520.1% fail17.4202414077
Age 624.4% fail20.820245432
Age 727.2% fail24.32024349

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MG ZS years should I avoid?

The MG ZS build year that fails most for its age is 2019: index 107.9 (95% CI 104.7–111.1) against the model's own age norm of 100 (2019–2024, n = 25,816).

bar · MG ZS · Build year 2017 (rough estimate: 1,340 tests, 95% interval 95.0–121.2) · 108.1 vs 100 = normal · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Build year 2017 (rough estimate: 1,340 tests, 95% interval 95.0–121.2)108.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–20241340
Build year 2018 (worse for its age)104.1index vs own age100 = normal2019–202420225
Build year 2019 (worse for its age)107.9index vs own age100 = normal2019–202425816
Build year 202099.7index vs own age100 = normal2019–202424944

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How much does it cost to fix an MG ZS MOT fail?

Expected repair cost per MG ZS MOT: about £28 (up to about £54 if more expensive parts are needed), from the chance of failing each item and its most common UK repair price (catalogue estimate, n = 44,212).

Computed, not measured.

bar · MG ZS · Expected repair bill · 28.3 vs modal price catalogue · price catalogue
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (price catalogue)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Expected repair bill28.3GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue44212
Estimated range lower28.3GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue44212
Estimated range upper53.9GBP estimatemodal price catalogueprice catalogue44212
Brakes: Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)10.7GBP expected contribution150price catalogue44212
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment: Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)7.4GBP expected contribution140price catalogue44212
Tyres: Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)5.0GBP expected contribution90price catalogue44212
Noise, emissions and leaks: Exhaust rear silencer2.8GBP expected contribution200price catalogue44212
Suspension: Suspension coil spring (single corner)2.5GBP expected contribution180price catalogue44212

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: price catalogue · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the MG ZS more reliable than similar cars?

Of 8 similar models, 6 fail less often for their age than the MG ZS and 2 as often or more. The MG ZS has an MOT Risk Index of 117.4, where 100 = normal for its age (2024, n = 44,212).

bar · MG ZS · MG ZS (this model) · 117.4 vs 100 = normal · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
MG ZS (this model)117.4index100 = normal202444212
Volkswagen Beetle115.1index117.4202444170
Ford Grand C-MAX116.2index117.4202435822
Fiat Punto117.2index117.4202461272
Peugeot 206113.9index117.4202445114
Fiat 500X115.3index117.4202435966
MG 3124.6index117.4202421060
Jeep Renegade116.7index117.4202428860
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Vauxhall Adam119.5index117.4202459025

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does an MG ZS normally do?

At age 5, the median MG ZS had covered 32,240 miles by its MOT; the middle half ranged from 23,508 to 42,567 miles (2024, n = 8,650).

line · MG ZS · Age 3 median · 22608 vs baseline · 2024
Age 3 median: 22608. Age 7 P75 (rough e: 55681. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3 median22608miles202415307
Age 3 P2515824miles202415307
Age 3 P7530492miles202415307
Age 4 median27165miles202412536
Age 4 P2519473miles202412536
Age 4 P7536547miles202412536
Age 5 median32240miles20248650
Age 5 P2523508miles20248650
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 5 P7542567miles20248650
Age 6 median38991miles20245082
Age 6 P2528040miles20245082
Age 6 P7551065miles20245082
Age 7 median (rough estimate)44293miles2024349
Age 7 P25 (rough estimate)31190miles2024349
Age 7 P75 (rough estimate)55681miles2024349

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does high mileage mean more MG ZS MOT failures at the same age?

At ages 3–5, 12.9% of MG ZS models with under 40,000 miles failed first time, against 21.1% of those with 100,000 to 140,000 miles (2024, n = 30,049). Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

bar · MG ZS · Age 3–5, <40k miles · 12.9 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3–5, <40k miles12.9% failed first time202429935
Age 3–5, 40-70k miles23.9% failed first time20245879
Age 3–5, 70-100k miles30.2% failed first time2024530
Age 3–5, 100-140k miles (rough estimate: 114 tests, 95% interval 14.6–29.4%)21.1% failed first time2024114
Age 6–9, <40k miles19.2% failed first time20242795
Age 6–9, 40-70k miles29.1% failed first time20242243
Age 6–9, 70-100k miles (rough estimate: 347 tests, 95% interval 29.8–39.7%)34.6% failed first time2024347

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many miles does an MG ZS last?

0.3% of MG ZS models tested had reached 100,000 miles, and 0.0% had reached 150,000 (2024, n = 298).

line · MG ZS · 100,000 miles (rough estimate: 298 tests, 95% interval 0.3–0.4%) · 0.3 vs baseline · 2024
100,000 miles (rou: 0.3. 200,000 miles (rou: 0.0. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
100,000 miles (rough estimate: 298 tests, 95% interval 0.3–0.4%)0.3% of tested cars2024298
150,000 miles (rough estimate: 36 tests, 95% interval 0.0–0.1%)0.0% of tested cars202436
200,000 miles (rough estimate: 5 tests, 95% interval 0.0–0.0%)0.0% of tested cars20245

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is the MG ZS driven more or less than average, and does that change the picture?

Matched on annual mileage as well as age, the MG ZS index is 117.5, against 108.9 on age alone (2019–2024, n = 44,212).

slope · MG ZS · Age and mileage adjusted index · 117.5 vs 108.9 · 2019–2024
Age and mileage adjusted index: 108.9 vs 117.5. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age and mileage adjusted index117.5index108.92019–202444212

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MG ZS fuel fails its MOT less?

Petrol MG ZS models failed first time in 17.2% of tests and electric ones in 13.0%, before allowing for age (2024, n = 44,209).

bar · MG ZS · Petrol · 17.2 vs other fuels · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol17.2% fail first timeother fuels202430896
Electric13.0% fail first timeother fuels202413313

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MG ZS engine is best?

No MG ZS engine band clearly fails less or more for its age: the capacity bands are within 5 index points of each other or their 95% intervals overlap (2024, n = 44,212).

bar · MG ZS · Petrol under 1.0 litre · 97.6 vs 100 = model average · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Petrol under 1.0 litre97.6index vs model norm100 = model average202426114
Petrol 1.2–1.5 litre101.3index vs model norm100 = model average202444968

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Where in Britain does the MG ZS fail its MOT most?

First-time failure rates for the MG ZS range from 8.5% in the Oldham (OL) postcode area to 28.4% in the Falkirk (FK) postcode area, before allowing for age: a wider spread by area than for the typical model.

map · MG ZS · Falkirk (FK) · 28.4 vs 15.9 · 2024
Scotland. N. England. Wales. London. S. West. % failing. 11%. 21%. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Falkirk (FK)28.4% fail first time15.920241067
Swansea (SA)22.6% fail first time15.920243164
Perth (PH) (rough estimate: 185 tests, 95% interval 15.8–27.5%)21.1% fail first time15.92024185
Worcester (WR) (rough estimate: 165 tests, 95% interval 4.7–13.0%)7.9% fail first time15.92024165
Oldham (OL)8.5% fail first time15.92024562
Southend-on-Sea (SS)9.2% fail first time15.920241551
Cardiff (CF)21.0% fail first time15.920245904
Edinburgh (EH)20.9% fail first time15.920241202
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Dundee (DD)20.6% fail first time15.92024529
Shrewsbury (SY) (rough estimate: 470 tests, 95% interval 16.8–24.1%)20.2% fail first time15.92024470
Kirkcaldy (KY) (rough estimate: 300 tests, 95% interval 15.9–24.9%)20% fail first time15.92024300
Glasgow (G)19.9% fail first time15.920242187
Aberdeen (AB)19.7% fail first time15.92024665
Huddersfield (HD) (rough estimate: 277 tests, 95% interval 15.3–24.6%)19.5% fail first time15.92024277
Motherwell (ML)18.9% fail first time15.92024567
Paisley (PA)18.8% fail first time15.920241161
Torquay (TQ) (rough estimate: 372 tests, 95% interval 14.9–22.8%)18.6% fail first time15.92024372
Brighton (BN)18.5% fail first time15.92024973
Truro (TR) (rough estimate: 347 tests, 95% interval 14.7–22.9%)18.4% fail first time15.92024347
Darlington (DL) (rough estimate: 422 tests, 95% interval 14.6–22.0%)18.0% fail first time15.92024422
Northampton (NN)17.9% fail first time15.92024626
Kilmarnock (KA)17.7% fail first time15.92024683
Crewe (CW) (rough estimate: 498 tests, 95% interval 14.6–21.3%)17.7% fail first time15.92024498
Bradford (BD) (rough estimate: 429 tests, 95% interval 14.2–21.4%)17.5% fail first time15.92024429
Colchester (CO)17.4% fail first time15.920241159
Leeds (LS)17.0% fail first time15.92024958
Bolton (BL)16.8% fail first time15.92024505
Reading (RG)16.8% fail first time15.920241064
Newport (NP)16.7% fail first time15.920241297
Dudley (DY)16.1% fail first time15.920241161
Bromley (BR) (rough estimate: 379 tests, 95% interval 12.7–20.1%)16.1% fail first time15.92024379
Guildford (GU)16.0% fail first time15.92024770
Doncaster (DN)15.9% fail first time15.92024998
Exeter (EX)15.9% fail first time15.92024910
Cleveland (TS) (rough estimate: 449 tests, 95% interval 12.7–19.5%)15.8% fail first time15.92024449
Sutton (SM) (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 11.5–21.1%)15.7% fail first time15.92024223
Sunderland (SR) (rough estimate: 455 tests, 95% interval 12.6–19.2%)15.6% fail first time15.92024455
Uxbridge (UB)15.5% fail first time15.92024535
Cambridge (CB)15.4% fail first time15.92024576
Slough (SL) (rough estimate: 254 tests, 95% interval 11.4–20.3%)15.3% fail first time15.92024254
Preston (PR)15.3% fail first time15.920241376
Hemel Hempstead (HP)15.2% fail first time15.92024558
Stevenage (SG)15.2% fail first time15.92024685
York (YO)15.2% fail first time15.92024561
Llandrindod Wells (LD) (rough estimate: 165 tests, 95% interval 10.5–21.4%)15.2% fail first time15.92024165
Stockport (SK)15.1% fail first time15.92024728
Newcastle (NE)15.1% fail first time15.920242535
Bristol (BS)14.9% fail first time15.920241090
London E (E)14.8% fail first time15.920241220
Inverness (IV) (rough estimate: 223 tests, 95% interval 10.7–20.1%)14.8% fail first time15.92024223
Ilford (IG) (rough estimate: 413 tests, 95% interval 11.7–18.5%)14.8% fail first time15.92024413
Carlisle (CA) (rough estimate: 332 tests, 95% interval 11.3–19.0%)14.8% fail first time15.92024332
Dumfries (DG) (rough estimate: 122 tests, 95% interval 9.5–22.1%)14.8% fail first time15.92024122
Manchester (M)14.7% fail first time15.92024604
London SE (SE)14.7% fail first time15.920241047
Portsmouth (PO)14.7% fail first time15.920241889
Tonbridge (TN)14.6% fail first time15.92024816
St Albans (AL) (rough estimate: 413 tests, 95% interval 11.5–18.3%)14.5% fail first time15.92024413
Medway (ME)14.5% fail first time15.920241200
Birmingham (B)14.4% fail first time15.920241711
Wolverhampton (WV)14.4% fail first time15.92024508
Ipswich (IP)14.3% fail first time15.920241330
Salisbury (SP) (rough estimate: 182 tests, 95% interval 9.9–20.1%)14.3% fail first time15.92024182
Chelmsford (CM)14.3% fail first time15.920241583
Llandudno (LL) (rough estimate: 404 tests, 95% interval 11.1–17.8%)14.1% fail first time15.92024404
Harrow (HA)14.1% fail first time15.92024994
Halifax (HX) (rough estimate: 165 tests, 95% interval 9.5–20.0%)13.9% fail first time15.92024165
Liverpool (L)13.9% fail first time15.92024828
Wigan (WN)13.8% fail first time15.92024607
Bournemouth (BH)13.8% fail first time15.92024673
Southampton (SO)13.7% fail first time15.920241224
Milton Keynes (MK)13.7% fail first time15.92024788
Oxford (OX)13.6% fail first time15.92024898
Nottingham (NG)13.5% fail first time15.92024859
Kingston upon Thames (KT)13.5% fail first time15.92024639
Watford (WD)13.4% fail first time15.92024589
Luton (LU) (rough estimate: 409 tests, 95% interval 10.3–16.8%)13.2% fail first time15.92024409
Plymouth (PL) (rough estimate: 220 tests, 95% interval 9.3–18.3%)13.2% fail first time15.92024220
Blackpool (FY) (rough estimate: 275 tests, 95% interval 9.6–17.6%)13.1% fail first time15.92024275
Blackburn (BB)13.0% fail first time15.92024755
Telford (TF) (rough estimate: 455 tests, 95% interval 10.2–16.4%)13.0% fail first time15.92024455
Stoke-on-Trent (ST)12.9% fail first time15.92024978
Gloucester (GL)12.5% fail first time15.920241260
Chester (CH)12.5% fail first time15.92024920
Croydon (CR)12.5% fail first time15.92024883
Walsall (WS)12.4% fail first time15.92024563
Coventry (CV)12.4% fail first time15.92024758
Dartford (DA)12.3% fail first time15.920241257
Canterbury (CT) (rough estimate: 400 tests, 95% interval 9.4–15.8%)12.3% fail first time15.92024400
Twickenham (TW) (rough estimate: 287 tests, 95% interval 8.9–16.5%)12.2% fail first time15.92024287
Redhill (RH)12.2% fail first time15.92024648
Lancaster (LA) (rough estimate: 156 tests, 95% interval 7.9–18.2%)12.2% fail first time15.92024156
Enfield (EN) (rough estimate: 338 tests, 95% interval 9.1–16.0%)12.1% fail first time15.92024338
Peterborough (PE)12% fail first time15.920241734
Norwich (NR)12.0% fail first time15.920241355
Durham (DH)11.9% fail first time15.92024647
Romford (RM)11.9% fail first time15.92024783
Wakefield (WF)11.8% fail first time15.92024764
Derby (DE)11.5% fail first time15.92024971
London NW (NW)11.5% fail first time15.920241043
Warrington (WA)11.1% fail first time15.920241238
Swindon (SN)11.1% fail first time15.92024759
London N (N) (rough estimate: 433 tests, 95% interval 8.3–14.1%)10.8% fail first time15.92024433
Leicester (LE)10.8% fail first time15.92024907
Sheffield (S)10.8% fail first time15.920241758
Bath (BA)10.7% fail first time15.92024524
Lincoln (LN)10.5% fail first time15.92024817
Galashiels (TD) (rough estimate: 340 tests, 95% interval 7.2–13.6%)10% fail first time15.92024340
London W (W) (rough estimate: 420 tests, 95% interval 7.3–13.0%)9.8% fail first time15.92024420
Hull (HU)9.6% fail first time15.92024941
London SW (SW) (rough estimate: 326 tests, 95% interval 6.8–13.2%)9.5% fail first time15.92024326
Lerwick (ZE) (rough estimate: 158 tests, 95% interval 5.8–15.1%)9.5% fail first time15.92024158
Taunton (TA) (rough estimate: 298 tests, 95% interval 6.6–13.2%)9.4% fail first time15.92024298

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does an MG ZS rust more than average?

Allowing for age, MG ZS MOTs record corrosion failures at 0.1 times the national rate: 0.04% of tests against 0.77% (2024 + geographic layers, n = 44,212).

Computed, not measured.

slope · MG ZS · Salt belt susceptibility · 0.1 vs 1 · 2024 + geographic layers
Salt belt susceptibility: 1 vs 0.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024 + geographic layers)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Salt belt susceptibility0.1ratio estimate12024 + geographic layers44212

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 + geographic layers · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is an MG ZS ULEZ compliant?

All MG ZS models tested are likely ULEZ-compliant, judged from fuel type and first-use date; check a specific car with TfL's vehicle checker (2024).

Computed, not measured.

stacked · MG ZS · Likely compliant · 100 vs baseline · 2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Likely compliant100% estimate202444212

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What do six years of MOTs show about owning an MG ZS?

Of failed MG ZS MOTs, 50.0% were retested the same day and a further 47.2% within 10 days; the median failed car passed its retest after 0 days (2019–2024, n = 9,857).

bar · MG ZS · Same-day retest · 50.0 vs failed initial tests · 2019–2024
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Same-day retest50.0%failed initial tests2019–20249857
Retest within 10 days47.2%failed initial tests2019–20249857
Clean MOT streak29.5%observed chains2019–202415289
Repeat advisory8.4%observed chains2019–202415289
Decreasing odometer0.4% mileage anomalyobserved chains2019–202427228

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Is low mileage better for an MG ZS?

MG ZS models aged 5 to 6 doing under 5,000 miles a year failed first time in 12.7% of tests, against 26.9% for those doing 8,000 to 12,000 miles (2019–2024, n = 5,745).

bullet · MG ZS · Low-use first-time failure · 12.7 vs 26.9 · 2019–2024
Low-use first-time failure: 12.7 vs 26.9. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Low-use first-time failure12.7%26.92019–20245745
Low-use gap-14.2percentage points8–12k miles2019–20245745

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

How many years is an MG ZS likely to last?

MG ZS models aged 5 are forecast to keep taking MOTs for at least 0.9 more years; the survival curve is observed only until age 7, so the true figure is likely higher.

Computed, not measured.

Forecast, not a prediction for a particular car.

bar · MG ZS · Age 5 (at least; observed only until age 7) · 0.9 vs baseline · survival forecast
DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (survival forecast)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 5 (at least; observed only until age 7)0.9years forecastsurvival forecast0

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: survival forecast · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MG ZS models are still on the road?

In 2024, for every 100 MG ZS models tested at ages 4 to 6, about 35 were tested at age 6 (2024, n = 5,432).

line · MG ZS · Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6) · 100 vs baseline · 2024
Age 3 (at least as: 100. Age 7: 2.3. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 3 (at least as many as at ages 4–6)100% of age 4–6 baseline202441516
Age 4 (at least as many as at ages 4–6)100% of age 4–6 baseline202426607
Age 591.6% of age 4–6 baseline202414077
Age 635.3% of age 4–6 baseline20245432
Age 72.3% of age 4–6 baseline2024349

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If an MG ZS fails, does it fail again?

21.1% of MG ZS models that failed an MOT failed the next one too, against 16.4% after a pass (2019–2024, n = 2,727). The failure most likely to come back is ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’: 25.4% of those fails recurred at the next MOT.

bullet · MG ZS · Repeat after fail · 21.1 vs 16.4 · 2019–2024
Repeat after fail: 21.1 vs 16.4. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2019–2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Repeat after fail21.1%16.42019–20242727

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Which MG ZS faults come together?

On MG ZS models, ‘body, chassis, structure’ and ‘lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment’ failures turn up together 6.0 times as often as chance would predict (2024, n = 49).

MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Body, chassis, structure + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 49 tests, 95% interval 4.4–7.9)6.0liftexpected joint rate202449
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 39 tests, 95% interval 3.6–6.8)5liftexpected joint rate202439
Brakes + Suspension (rough estimate: 235 tests, 95% interval 4.1–5.3)4.7liftexpected joint rate2024235
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 148 tests, 95% interval 3.7–5.1)4.3liftexpected joint rate2024148
Brakes + Noise, emissions and leaks (rough estimate: 178 tests, 95% interval 3.5–4.7)4.0liftexpected joint rate2024178
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Suspension (rough estimate: 154 tests, 95% interval 3.4–4.7)4liftexpected joint rate2024154
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Tyres3.9liftexpected joint rate2024507
Brakes + Steering (rough estimate: 44 tests, 95% interval 2.9–5.3)3.9liftexpected joint rate202444
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Brakes + Tyres3.7liftexpected joint rate2024623
Brakes + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (rough estimate: 496 tests, 95% interval 3.4–4.1)3.7liftexpected joint rate2024496
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Visibility (rough estimate: 311 tests, 95% interval 3.1–3.9)3.5liftexpected joint rate2024311
Body, chassis, structure + Visibility (rough estimate: 25 tests, 95% interval 2.3–5.2)3.5liftexpected joint rate202425
Body, chassis, structure + Tyres (rough estimate: 36 tests, 95% interval 2.4–4.8)3.5liftexpected joint rate202436
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Visibility (rough estimate: 23 tests, 95% interval 2.2–5.2)3.4liftexpected joint rate202423
Noise, emissions and leaks + Tyres (rough estimate: 144 tests, 95% interval 2.8–4.0)3.4liftexpected joint rate2024144
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Steering (rough estimate: 29 tests, 95% interval 2.2–4.8)3.4liftexpected joint rate202429
Suspension + Tyres (rough estimate: 159 tests, 95% interval 2.8–3.8)3.3liftexpected joint rate2024159
Body, chassis, structure + Brakes (rough estimate: 35 tests, 95% interval 2.3–4.6)3.3liftexpected joint rate202435
Steering + Tyres (rough estimate: 35 tests, 95% interval 2.2–4.5)3.2liftexpected joint rate202435
Brakes + Visibility (rough estimate: 339 tests, 95% interval 2.7–3.3)3.0liftexpected joint rate2024339
Brakes + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (rough estimate: 30 tests, 95% interval 2.0–4.2)3.0liftexpected joint rate202430
Tyres + Visibility (rough estimate: 315 tests, 95% interval 2.5–3.2)2.8liftexpected joint rate2024315
Noise, emissions and leaks + Suspension (rough estimate: 36 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.9)2.8liftexpected joint rate202436
Suspension + Visibility (rough estimate: 90 tests, 95% interval 2.2–3.3)2.7liftexpected joint rate202490
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Tyres (rough estimate: 25 tests, 95% interval 1.6–3.8)2.5liftexpected joint rate202425
Noise, emissions and leaks + Visibility (rough estimate: 74 tests, 95% interval 2.0–3.2)2.5liftexpected joint rate202474
Steering + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)17tests with both202417
Body, chassis, structure + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)16tests with both202416
Body, chassis, structure + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)16tests with both202416
Steering + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)13tests with both202413
Brakes + Identification of the vehicle (seen together; too few for a multiplier)12tests with both202412
Noise, emissions and leaks + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Identification of the vehicle + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)11tests with both202411
Identification of the vehicle + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)10tests with both202410
Brakes + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Identification of the vehicle + Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (seen together; too few for a multiplier)8tests with both20248
Road Wheels + Tyres (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Noise, emissions and leaks + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems + Suspension (seen together; too few for a multiplier)7tests with both20247
Body, chassis, structure + Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Identification of the vehicle + Noise, emissions and leaks (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)6tests with both20246
Noise, emissions and leaks + Road Wheels (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245
Body, chassis, structure + Steering (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245
Road Wheels + Visibility (seen together; too few for a multiplier)5tests with both20245

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

What does an MG ZS cost to run in a fleet?

Of every 100 MG ZS models tested at age 5, about 20 failed the MOT first time; at age 7, about 27 (rough estimate). These are one-year rates for different cars tested in the same year, not a fleet followed over time; the steepest one-year step in this cross-section is between cars aged 4 and 5, 4.42 percentage points (2024).

MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Age 311.5% fail first time202415307
Age 415.6% fail first time202412536
Age 520.1% fail first time20248650
Age 624.2% fail first time20245082
Age 7 (rough estimate: 349 tests, 95% interval 22.8–32.1%)27.2% fail first time2024349

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Does the MG ZS fail inspections in other countries too?

In Norway, 28.0% of MG ZS models failed their periodic roadworthiness inspection, against 33.7% for all cars there (2024 by country, n = 5,051 inspections).

Both readings are shown: this comparison changes when usage or inspection rules differ.

Inspections abroad disagree: none point the same way as Britain, Norway and the Netherlands do not. Test rules, climate and how the vehicles are used differ, so both readings are shown.

bullet · MG ZS · Norway · 28 vs 33.7 · 2024 by country
Norway: 28 vs 33.7. Netherlands: 29.7 vs 50.8. Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024 by country)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
Norway28% failed33.72024 by country5051
Netherlands29.7% failed50.82024 by country2397

Source: Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; covers 430 of 761 models · Window: 2024 by country · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV · licences and full notice

Does the month of an MG ZS MOT matter?

MG ZS models fail first time most in May (16.6%, against 28.8% for all cars that month) and least in January (13.4%) (2024, n = 44,212).

line · MG ZS · January · 13.4 vs 31.1 · 2024
January: 13.4. December: 16.1. DVSA MOT bulk data, 24 Sep 2026.
MG ZS: the numbers behind this answer (2024)
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
January13.4% fail first time31.120245807
February14.7% fail first time30.020246114
March14.9% fail first time28.320248627
April16.1% fail first time29.820246809
May16.6% fail first time28.820246908
June15.5% fail first time28.120247943
July16.1% fail first time29.320247549
August15.0% fail first time29.220247923
Full table
Further values · 2024
MeasureValueUnitCompared withYearsTests
September13.9% fail first time28.220249994
October14.5% fail first time30.320249402
November16.0% fail first time30.620248873
December16.1% fail first time29.320247072

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2024 · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: one initial test per test_id · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Not enough tests for… (and why)

Real-world MPG against the official figure (manufacturer level)

layer not yet computed for this model (covers 19 of 761 models). 44,212 initial MG ZS tests are in the published model cohort.

Source: European Commission OBFCM; covers 19 of 761 models · Window: 2021+ cohorts · n = 44,212 (initial tests) · Method: computed estimate, not measured · Updated: 24 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

See the Peugeot 308, a car of the same inspection class with 3.0× the tests · Check your car by registration

How to cite this page

MOT Risk Index (2026). MG ZS MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 24 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/cars/mg-zs/

How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.

Report an error

What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.

MG ZS MOT: quick answers

What is the MG ZS first-time MOT pass rate?

84.1% of first attempts passed in 2024 (44,212 tests). Retests after repair are excluded; cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) are shown separately.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites may count retests or all attempts. This page uses 44,212 primary tests: 15.92% failed first time and 87.4% passed when cars fixed at the test centre (PRS) count as passes. The age-adjusted MOT Risk Index 117.4 is shown separately.