Lamborghini Huracan — MOT statistics 2024
The Lamborghini Huracan failed 3.65% of 986 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 19.2 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 81% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Ferrari California (index 19.1) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.
Lamborghini Huracan common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Identification of the vehicle stands out at 1.9 per 100 tests, against 0.3 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identification | 1.9 | 79 | 0.3 | 7.31×5.94–9.35 |
Lamborghini Huracan MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Tyres stand out at 12.2 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Tyres | 12.2 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
Tyres, brakes and suspension: Lamborghini Huracan against cars of the same age
| Age | Part | Lamborghini Huracan | Same age, petrol and diesel | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | Tyres | 0.59 | 4.17 | -3.58 |
| 3 years | Brakes | 0.23 | 1.77 | -1.54 |
| 3 years | Suspension | 0.12 | 0.63 | -0.51 |
| 4 years | Tyres | 1.3 | 4.54 | -3.24 |
| 4 years | Brakes | 0 | 2.43 | -2.43 |
| 4 years | Suspension | 0.12 | 1.21 | -1.09 |
Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 5.3% | 76 |
| It passed | 4.3% | 2,571 |
A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (5.3% against 4.3%): the difference is within the margin of error. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 3,991 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 25.5 | fails less often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 42.6 | fails less often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 65.3% | a large low-use population — often second vehicles or cars kept for occasional use |
Split by how much each car is driven. This is a split by annual mileage, not by body type — the MOT record does not say whether a car is a conversion. Within each band the index compares with vehicles of the same age driven as much.
| Miles a year | Tests | Failed first time | Index within band |
|---|---|---|---|
| under 3,000 | 2,605 | 3.9% | 43.4 |
| 3,000–6,000 | 1,175 | 6.0% | 43.9 |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 17.1 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Lamborghini Huracan compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Lamborghini Huracan | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 years | 6.21% | 10.78% | -4.57 pp | 854 |
| 4 years | 3.91% | 12.35% | -8.44 pp | 844 |
| 5 years | 3.89% | 14.17% | -10.28 pp | 771 |
| 6 years | 4.34% | 16.09% | -11.75 pp | 622 |
| 7 years | 3.55% | 18.25% | -14.7 pp | 423 |
| 8 years | 5.59% | 20.54% | -14.95 pp | 286 |
| 9 years | 5.88% | 23.1% | -17.21 pp | 170 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Lamborghini Huracan perform as it gets older?
The Huracan at age 9 is well below the reference at 6.1%, against 26.5% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–33%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Lamborghini Huracan | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6.9% | 13.1% | -6.2 pp |
| 5 | 3.2% | 15.1% | -12.0 pp |
| 6 | 3.4% | 17.5% | -14.1 pp |
| 7 | 2.8% | 20.2% | -17.3 pp |
| 8 | 4.8% | 23.3% | -18.6 pp |
| 9 | 6.1% | 26.5% | -20.4 pp |
Is a Lamborghini Huracan ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Lamborghini Huracan MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.
Based on 985 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 1 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 356 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 350 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 105 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 115 |
| 10–14 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 58 |
| 15–17 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
How dangerous are Lamborghini Huracan MOT failures?
Major defects are well below the reference at 3.6 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 0.81 | 14.22 | 0.06× |
| Major | 3.58 | 52.75 | 0.07× |
| Dangerous | 0.77 | 11.15 | 0.07× |
Chart values: Minor 0.8 · Major 3.6 · Dangerous 0.8.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Lamborghini Huracan MOT matter?
Oct is highest at 6.2%; Jul is lowest at 2.1% — the gap is 4.1 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 1%–33%.
bars: Lamborghini Huracan · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Lamborghini Huracan | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 3.72% | 31.12% | -27.4 pp |
| Feb | 4.71% | 29.99% | -25.3 pp |
| Mar | 4.1% | 28.26% | -24.2 pp |
| Apr | 5.46% | 29.78% | -24.3 pp |
| May | 3.37% | 28.79% | -25.4 pp |
| Jun | 4.36% | 28.15% | -23.8 pp |
| Jul | 2.06% | 29.33% | -27.3 pp |
| Aug | 5.51% | 29.2% | -23.7 pp |
| Sep | 6.08% | 28.19% | -22.1 pp |
| Oct | 6.2% | 30.34% | -24.1 pp |
| Nov | 4.64% | 30.58% | -25.9 pp |
| Dec | 4.89% | 29.33% | -24.4 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 4.1 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Lamborghini Huracan average mileage by age
At age 8, the middle half of Huracans runs from 14,274 miles to 25,374 miles, against 19,256 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–33k mi.
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 3,755 | 6,712 | 9,698 | 97 |
| 4 | 5,515 | 9,806 | 15,658 | 102 |
| 5 | 6,960 | 10,717 | 16,254 | 157 |
| 6 | 7,029 | 11,627 | 17,916 | 209 |
| 7 | 10,685 | 15,343 | 22,135 | 141 |
| 8 | 14,274 | 19,256 | 25,374 | 105 |
| 9 | 17,069 | 26,564 | 31,376 | 115 |
A typical 8-year-old Huracan has ~19,256 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Lamborghini Huracan fails its MOT most
Chelmsford area is highest at 30.9%; Reading area is lowest at 0.9% — the gap is 30.0 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Chelmsford (CM) | 30.89% | +26.3 pp |
| Bristol (BS) | 9.52% | +4.9 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Reading (RG) | 0.9% | -3.7 pp |
| Leicester (LE) | 1.04% | -3.5 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.
Lamborghini Huracan survival: which cars are still on the road
By age 10 is well below the reference at 7.8%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.
Survival vs fail rate by age
| Age | Tests | Survival vs ages 4–6 | Fail % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 854 | 100% | 6.21% |
| 4 | 844 | 100% | 3.91% |
| 5 | 771 | 100% | 3.89% |
| 6 | 622 | 83.4% | 4.34% |
| 7 | 423 | 56.7% | 3.55% |
| 8 | 286 | 38.4% | 5.59% |
| 9 | 170 | 22.8% | 5.88% |
| 10 | 58 | 7.8% | 0% |
By age 10, only about 8% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈746); survivors still fail at 0.0% vs 3.9% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.
How many years is a Lamborghini Huracan likely to last?
Bought at age 5 is highest at 2.6 years; Bought at age 10 is lowest at 0.5 years — the gap is 2.1 years.
bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve
| Age now | Typical mileage (p50) | Expected years left |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | — | 2.6 |
| 8 | — | at least 1.3 |
| 10 | — | at least 0.5 |
estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 0.5 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 10, so the true figure is likely higher.
Lamborghini Huracan faults that come together
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Tyres | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Identification of the vehicle» and «Visibility» were seen together in 5 tests (45 pairs compared).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Lamborghini Huracan running costs for a fleet
Vehicles failing at age 9 stand out at 6.0%, against 3.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
| Age | Fails | Median odometer | Tests | Gap vs age 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 6.86% | 9,806 | 102 | +3.7 pp |
| 5 | 3.18% | 10,717 | 157 | +0.0 pp |
| 6 | 3.35% | 11,627 | 209 | +0.2 pp |
| 7 | 2.84% | 15,343 | 141 | -0.3 pp |
| 8 | 4.76% | 19,256 | 105 | +1.6 pp |
| 9 | 6.09% | 26,564 | 115 | +2.9 pp |
No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).
Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.
Lamborghini Huracan rust problems: where they corrode
Salt-belt exposure is well below the reference at 6th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
This Lamborghini Huracan has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
What will fail next on a Lamborghini Huracan?
Identification of the vehicle after a passed at age 6-8 is highest at 2.0%; Visibility after a passed at age 3-5 is lowest at 0.5% — the gap is 1.4 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| <3 | passed | Identification of the vehicle 1.6% | 319 (rough estimate) |
| 3-5 | passed | Identification of the vehicle 0.8% · Tyres 0.7% · Visibility 0.5% | 1,700 |
| 6-8 | passed | Identification of the vehicle 2.0% · Tyres 0.8% | 612 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Lamborghini Huracan ownership: what six years of MOTs show
Clean three-test streak is highest at 87.5%; Repeated the same advisory is lowest at 0.9% — the gap is 86.6 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.17 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 1,609 miles a year across 952 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 87.48% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 0.86% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 0.105% of 952 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 36,936 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Lamborghini Huracan safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 5.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2023/216 | 21/07/2023 | 2 | An incorrect bonding of the front hood carbon bezel during an internal cosmetic rework may |
R/2022/177 | 17/06/2022 | 2 | THE LEFT DOOR OUTSIDE HANDLE MAY NOT HAVE BEEN CORRECTLY ASSEMBLED |
R/2022/177 | 17/06/2022 | 2 | THE LEFT DOOR OUTSIDE HANDLE MAY NOT HAVE BEEN CORRECTLY ASSEMBLED |
R/2022/119 | 20/05/2022 | 2 | A DEFECTIVE SCALE AT THE SUPPLIER DELIVERED WRONG OIL WEIGHT DATA FOR OIL FILLING FOR A CE |
R/2022/119 | 20/05/2022 | 2 | A DEFECTIVE SCALE AT THE SUPPLIER DELIVERED WRONG OIL WEIGHT DATA FOR OIL FILLING FOR A CE |
DVSA lists 5 safety recall campaigns for the Lamborghini Huracan, covering roughly 10 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
Lamborghini Huracan technical service bulletins: what dealers are told
US market, Lamborghini HURACAN, model year 2020 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.
NHTSA manufacturer communications are 3.
bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults
These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.
United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications
| Communication year | Bulletins | Leading subjects across all years |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 2 |
|
| 2020 | 1 |
Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.
Lamborghini Huracan owner complaints: what goes wrong
US market, Lamborghini HURACAN, model year 2020 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.
Owner complaints stand out at 1.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
What the reports actually say
[XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
US owners have filed 1 complaints about the equivalent Lamborghini Huracan to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including 0 that mention a crash, 1 a fire and 0 an injury. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.
Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.
Lamborghini Huracan MOT: quick answers
Lamborghini Huracan MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 19.2, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Lamborghini Huracan first-time MOT pass rate?
- 96.35% of first attempts passed in 2024 (986 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 3.65% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 986 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 19.2 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Lamborghini Huracan with other cars
Aston Martin DBS is highest at 20.6; Ferrari California is lowest at 19.1 — the gap is 1.5 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Lamborghini MOT statistics
Similar risk
Ferrari California (index 19.1)Nissan GT-R (index 19.5)Aston Martin DBS (index 20.6)
Same size class
how McLaren 570 compareshow Mercedes-Benz GT compareshow Mercedes-Benz G-Class compares
By area
Lamborghini Huracan MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Lamborghini Huracan vehicle identification failuresLamborghini Huracan tyres failuresLamborghini Huracan visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:lamborghini-huracan:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Lamborghini Huracan MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/lamborghini-huracan/ · Published 2026-07-30.