MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Fiat Grande Punto — MOT statistics 2024

The Fiat Grande Punto failed 45.16% of 3,348 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 108.0 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 8% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

MOT risk index 108.0, 95% CI 104.0–112.0 (100 = national average) 100 108.0 0 200
Index
108.0
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
45.16%
n = 3,348
Dangerous /100
14
national ≈11
Rank
541 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Renault Koleos (index 107.9) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.

Fiat Grande Punto common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 36.9 per 100 tests, against 27.2 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Fiat Grande Punto common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical36.910,61927.21.36×1.33–1.38
Suspension23.76,80424.60.96×0.94–0.98
Brakes13.93,99716.60.84×0.81–0.86
Tyres11.03,16110.61.04×1.00–1.07
Emissions & leaks10.83,1175.61.92×1.86–1.99
Body & structure9.82,8298.41.17×1.13–1.21
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 28,766 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Spring or spring component fractured or seriously…A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened6.402.862.24×Ask the seller about: A spring or spring component fractured or seriously weakened
Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or…Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range specified by the manufacturer3.310.536.26×Ask the seller about: Lambda coefficient outside the default limits or the range s
Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure3.821.163.30×Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly
Shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does…A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage3.620.983.69×Ask the seller about: A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not func
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements4.982.571.94×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.382.092.10×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement3.051.242.46×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources4.592.831.62×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements5.023.591.40×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn4.674.870.96×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Fiat Grande Punto MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 53.6 per 100 tests; Lamps & electrical are lowest at 9.0 per 100 tests — the gap is 44.6 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Fiat Grande Punto MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension53.6
Tyres46.9
Brakes28.6
Emissions & leaks13.8
Body & structure11.8
Lamps & electrical9

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed45.7%2,502
It passed37.9%12,056

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 7.8 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 42.7% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 27,981 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only110.3fails more often than expected
Age and annual mileage114.0fails more often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year6.9%a normal spread of use

Mileage changes little here (+3.7 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Fiat Grande Punto compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeFiat Grande PuntoSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
9 years38.52%32.03%+6.49 pp906
10 years40.87%35.59%+5.27 pp3,646
11 years42.46%38.65%+3.81 pp4,958
12 years43.04%41.25%+1.79 pp5,244
13 years44.77%43.29%+1.48 pp4,901
14 years44.6%45.04%-0.43 pp4,244
15 years45.59%46.31%-0.72 pp3,121
16 years46.49%47.34%-0.86 pp1,224
17 years46.41%47.79%-1.38 pp362

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Fiat Grande Punto perform as it gets older?

The Grande Punto at age 16 stands out at 46.7%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Fiat Grande Punto perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–50%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars; from about age 14 it stays above the national age curve.

Data table
AgeFiat Grande PuntoAll vehiclesGap
1442.5%40.4%+2.1 pp
1545.2%41.6%+3.6 pp
1646.7%43.1%+3.6 pp
1744.6%43.1%+1.5 pp

Is a Fiat Grande Punto ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Fiat Grande Punto MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 89.1%.

Based on 3,342 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 years94.3%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 632
15–17 years88.2%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 2,639
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 71
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are Fiat Grande Punto MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 87.7 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Fiat Grande Punto MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor19.3014.221.36×
Major87.6652.751.66×
Dangerous13.7511.151.23×

Chart values: Minor 19.3 · Major 87.7 · Dangerous 13.8.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Fiat Grande Punto MOT matter?

Jan is highest at 45.1%; Jun is lowest at 42.2% — the gap is 3.0 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Fiat Grande Punto MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–47%.

bars: Fiat Grande Punto · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthFiat Grande PuntoAll vehiclesGap
Jan45.13%31.12%+14.0 pp
Feb43.31%29.99%+13.3 pp
Mar43.07%28.26%+14.8 pp
Apr44.2%29.78%+14.4 pp
May44.42%28.79%+15.6 pp
Jun42.16%28.15%+14.0 pp
Jul43.48%29.33%+14.1 pp
Aug42.94%29.2%+13.7 pp
Sep43.48%28.19%+15.3 pp
Oct42.99%30.34%+12.7 pp
Nov43.06%30.58%+12.5 pp
Dec45.05%29.33%+15.7 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 3.0 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Fiat Grande Punto average mileage by age

At age 16, the middle half of Grande Puntos runs from 71,021 miles to 109,251 miles, against 91,281 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Fiat Grande Punto · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–118k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Fiat Grande Punto MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 29.5% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 48.8% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Fiat Grande Punto MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Fiat Grande Punto: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
10–14<40k miles28%17.5–41.7%50 (rough estimate)
10–1440-70k miles34.1%27.4–41.6%167 (rough estimate)
10–1470-100k miles47.1%40.9–53.4%242 (rough estimate)
10–14100-140k miles47.6%39.7–55.7%147 (rough estimate)
15+<40k miles29.5%22.9–37.1%156 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles38.5%34.5–42.6%551
15+70-100k miles46.4%43.3–49.6%963
15+100-140k miles52%48.4–55.6%737
15+140k+ miles48.8%40.1–57.5%123 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1461,30281,543101,415590
1566,66786,375105,4171,604
1671,02191,281109,251766
1761,15485,082111,961269

A typical 16-year-old Grande Punto has ~91,281 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Fiat Grande Punto fails its MOT most

Huddersfield area is highest at 61.4%; St Albans area is lowest at 22.0% — the gap is 39.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fiat Grande Punto line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Huddersfield (HD)61.39%+17.9 pp
Perth (PH)59.13%+15.6 pp
Kirkcaldy (KY)58.95%+15.4 pp
Lancaster (LA)57.97%+14.4 pp
Bournemouth (BH)53.69%+10.1 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
St Albans (AL)22%-21.5 pp
Kingston upon Thames (KT)26.58%-17.0 pp
Enfield (EN)28.38%-15.2 pp
Uxbridge (UB)30.56%-13.0 pp
Romford (RM)31.09%-12.4 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 35%–53% failing.

How many miles does a Fiat Grande Punto last?

100,000+ miles stands out at 23.6%.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles6,59623.57%

Of 27,986 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 23.6% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Fiat Grande Punto faults that come together

Body & structure + Emissions & leaks stand out at 4.60×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks8844.6×
Road WheelsVisibility374.1× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres374× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres283.38× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle293.35× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems793.28× (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels333.23× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering2453.19× (rough estimate)
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle293.16× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility673.15× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels303.11× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels712.96× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1592.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment602.79× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks232.76× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks5582.74×
Body, chassis, structureBrakes5702.7×
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems592.69× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1812.59× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension522.58× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering1862.57× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres5182.56×
BrakesVisibility5002.54×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering4592.54× (rough estimate)
SteeringTyres1732.49× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres542.48× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels232.47× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems562.46× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,2482.38×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1,1052.38×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks1,1272.36×
BrakesSuspension1,0342.35×
Body, chassis, structureTyres4462.34× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility4162.33× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,1432.31×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1,0662.25×
Body, chassis, structureVisibility4192.25× (rough estimate)
SteeringSuspension3352.21× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension1052.21× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility3892.17× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres3922.13× (rough estimate)
SteeringVisibility1372.02× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension2,0331.97×
SuspensionTyres7841.97×
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension7791.94×
Identification of the vehicleSuspension351.94× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility7491.93×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension7961.91×
Identification of the vehicleVisibility19too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering18too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering11too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSteering8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 4.60× more often than chance (884 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Fiat Grande Punto?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 32.9%, against 48.4% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year32.86%5,718
8–12k miles/year48.37%5,308
Gap (low − normal)-15.52 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
1022.225450.21233-27.99 pp
1137.847450.36280-12.52 pp
1227.179250.2247-23.03 pp
1332.4311147.55204-15.12 pp
1433.9410952.32151-18.37 pp

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
928.3121945.62217-17.31 pp
1030.2574747.51863-17.25 pp
1132.2399947.931,089-15.7 pp
1233.761,18546.97975-13.22 pp
1334.721,20450758-15.28 pp
1433.861,14347.24508-13.39 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 32.9% vs 48.4% for 8–12k miles/year — 15.5 pp lower (n_low=5,718, n_normal=5,308). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Which Fiat Grande Punto engine is best?

diesel 1.8–2.0 is highest at 114.2; petrol 1.2–1.5 is lowest at 98.7 — the gap is 15.5 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrol1.2–1.5 litre98.742.87%22,030
diesel1.0–1.2 litre102.544.68%3,478 (rough estimate)
petrol1.0–1.2 litre104.946.36%2,916 (rough estimate)
diesel1.8–2.0 litre114.249.81%257 (rough estimate)

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.8–2.0 runs at 114.2 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.2–1.5 runs at 98.7 — a spread of 15.5 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Fiat Grande Punto MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £146.67 to £278.67, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£147–279
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment36.9 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£51.66
Suspension23.7 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£42.66
Noise, emissions and leaks10.8 (nat. 3.67)Exhaust rear silencer£200£21.60
Brakes13.9 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£20.85
Tyres11.0 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£9.90

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £147 to £279, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Fiat Grande Punto running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 17 are close to the reference at 45.0%, against 43.0% at age 14, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 14
43
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 590 tests)
At age 17
45
other cars of this model tested at age 17 in 2024 (rough estimate: 269 tests)
Repairs per 100
£14,667
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
1d
median; 40.86% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1442.54%81,543590—
1545.2%86,3751,604—
1646.74%91,281766—
1744.61%85,082269—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Fiat Grande Punto rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 9.01×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
9.01×
6.9% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
59th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 1 postcode areas

This Fiat Grande Punto fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Fiat Grande Punto advisory become a failure?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 32.5%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 32.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Fiat Grande Punto chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Fiat Grande Punto, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Lamps & electrical 32.5% · Suspension 22% · Brakes 13.1% · Body & chassis 12.6% · Noise, emissions, leaks 12.1% · Tyres 11.1% · Identification of the veh… 3.4% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment32.5%12.1 months5,0541,286
Suspension22.0%12.1 months4,7505,929
Brakes13.1%12.1 months4,9924,000
Body, chassis, structure12.6%12 months5,0462,208
Noise, emissions and leaks12.1%12.1 months5,4252,710
Tyres11.1%12.1 months5,1066,417
Identification of the vehicle3.4%12.2 months3,356554
Non-component advisories0.0%——1,491

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 33 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 5,054 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Fiat Grande Punto?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 33.0%; Visibility after a passed at age 6-8 is lowest at 4.6% — the gap is 28.4 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
6-8passedSuspension 8.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 6.2% · Visibility 4.6%194 (rough estimate)
6-8advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.8% · Suspension 11.8% · Tyres 8.1%136 (rough estimate)
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.8% · Suspension 13.8% · Brakes 9.2%218 (rough estimate)
9-11passedSuspension 13.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.0% · Tyres 5.9%3,335
9-11advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.6% · Suspension 16.7% · Tyres 7.8%3,251
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.4% · Suspension 19.3% · Brakes 10.5%4,481
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.9% · Suspension 12.2% · Body, chassis, structure 7.1%2,372
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.9% · Suspension 18.3% · Body, chassis, structure 9.4%3,287
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 29.5% · Suspension 20.9% · Body, chassis, structure 12.6%4,406
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.8% · Suspension 14.5% · Body, chassis, structure 8.3%228 (rough estimate)
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25.5% · Suspension 19.8% · Body, chassis, structure 13.7%278 (rough estimate)
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 33.0% · Suspension 23.7% · Brakes 14.4%451 (rough estimate)

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Fiat Grande Punto ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 55.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 3.4% — the gap is 52.4 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
40.86%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.803
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
20.37%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
1.832%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 8,955 failures followed through to their re-test, 40.86% were repaired and passed the same day and 55.78% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 25,324 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.803 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 4,290 miles a year across 5,673 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 20.37% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 43.24% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 1.832% of 5,677 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 31,603 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Fiat Grande Punto MOT: quick answers

Fiat Grande Punto MOT Risk Index stands out at 108.0, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Fiat Grande Punto first-time MOT pass rate?
54.84% of first attempts passed in 2024 (3,348 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 45.16% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 3,348 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 108.0 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Fiat Grande Punto with other cars

Volvo V40 is highest at 108.1; Hyundai Santa Fe is lowest at 107.8 — the gap is 0.3 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Fiat MOT statisticsFiat Qubo MOT statsFiat Grande Punto MOT stats

Similar risk

Renault Koleos (index 107.9)Volvo V40 (index 108.1)Hyundai Santa Fe (index 107.8)

Same size class

how Peugeot 205 compareshow Chrysler 300C compareshow Iveco Daily compares

By build year

Fiat Grande Punto 2006Fiat Grande Punto 2007Fiat Grande Punto 2008Fiat Grande Punto 2009Fiat Grande Punto 2010

By area

Fiat Grande Punto MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Fiat Grande Punto body, chassis and structure failuresFiat Grande Punto brakes failuresFiat Grande Punto vehicle identification failuresFiat Grande Punto lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresFiat Grande Punto noise, emissions and leaks failuresFiat Grande Punto road wheels failuresFiat Grande Punto seat belts and airbags failuresFiat Grande Punto steering failuresFiat Grande Punto suspension failuresFiat Grande Punto tyres failuresFiat Grande Punto visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:fiat-grand:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Fiat Grande Punto MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/fiat-grand/ · Published 2026-07-30.