Fiat Coupe — MOT statistics 2024
The Fiat Coupe failed 35.79% of 802 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 99.8 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Skoda Fabia (index 99.8) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.
Fiat Coupe common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Brakes stand out at 41.8 per 100 tests, against 23.4 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 2 of these are already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 41.8 | 2,364 | 23.4 | 1.79×1.71–1.86 |
| Lamps & electrical | 34.6 | 1,956 | 33.9 | 1.02×0.98–1.07 · not distinguishable |
| Suspension | 20.7 | 1,168 | 27.8 | 0.74×0.70–0.79 |
| Body & structure | 14.8 | 836 | 17.2 | 0.86×0.80–0.92 |
| Emissions & leaks | 14.6 | 824 | 10.2 | 1.43×1.34–1.53 |
| Visibility | 13.1 | 741 | 12.7 | 1.03×0.96–1.11 · not distinguishable |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 9.50 | 1.24 | 7.67× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired | 7.48 | 1.12 | 6.69× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Emissions levels exceed default limitsEmissions levels exceed default limits | 5.20 | 0.47 | 11.16× | Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly |
| Service brake efficiency below minimum requirementService brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 4.44 | 0.20 | 21.98× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen | 5.15 | 1.62 | 3.18× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 5.94 | 2.57 | 2.31× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Brake pipe damaged or excessively corrodedBrake pipe damaged or excessively corroded | 3.82 | 1.41 | 2.72× | Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings |
| Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen | 3.80 | 2.22 | 1.71× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 3.36 | 2.83 | 1.19× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 3.40 | 4.87 | 0.70× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Fiat Coupe MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Brakes are highest at 53.1 per 100 tests; Lamps & electrical are lowest at 4.8 per 100 tests — the gap is 48.3 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Brakes | 53.1 |
| Suspension | 46.4 |
| Tyres | 26.1 |
| Body & structure | 16.4 |
| Emissions & leaks | 15 |
| Lamps & electrical | 4.8 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 32.5% | 567 |
| It passed | 28.6% | 2,098 |
A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (32.5% against 28.6%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is seat belts and supplementary restraint systems — 43.1% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 5,065 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 95.3 | fails less often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 94.6 | fails less often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 20.4% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage changes little here (-0.7 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Fiat Coupe compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Fiat Coupe | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19 years | 36% | 43.2% | -7.2 pp | 175 |
| 20 years | 37.92% | 42.43% | -4.51 pp | 414 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Fiat Coupe perform as it gets older?
The Coupe at age 20 is well below the reference at 34.3%, against 41.0% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Fiat Coupe | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 34.3% | 41.0% | -6.8 pp |
How dangerous are Fiat Coupe MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 122.1 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 22.74 | 14.22 | 1.60× |
| Major | 122.13 | 52.75 | 2.32× |
| Dangerous | 11.85 | 11.15 | 1.06× |
Chart values: Minor 22.7 · Major 122.1 · Dangerous 11.8.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Fiat Coupe MOT matter?
Nov is highest at 41.1%; Jan is lowest at 34.5% — the gap is 6.6 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 27%–43%.
bars: Fiat Coupe · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Fiat Coupe | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 34.52% | 31.12% | +3.4 pp |
| Feb | 40.65% | 29.99% | +10.7 pp |
| Mar | 35.88% | 28.26% | +7.6 pp |
| Apr | 36.18% | 29.78% | +6.4 pp |
| May | 36.98% | 28.79% | +8.2 pp |
| Jun | 34.72% | 28.15% | +6.6 pp |
| Jul | 38.68% | 29.33% | +9.4 pp |
| Aug | 36.75% | 29.2% | +7.6 pp |
| Sep | 38.49% | 28.19% | +10.3 pp |
| Oct | 35.95% | 30.34% | +5.6 pp |
| Nov | 41.12% | 30.58% | +10.5 pp |
| Dec | 37.38% | 29.33% | +8.1 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 6.6 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Fiat Coupe average mileage by age
At age 20+, the middle half of Coupes runs from 71,819 miles to 119,525 miles, against 93,791 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Does high mileage mean more Fiat Coupe MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 31.2% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles failed first time versus 39.1% of those with 100,000–140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15+ | 70-100k miles | 31.2% | 21.9–42.2% | 77 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 100-140k miles | 39.1% | 28.5–50.9% | 69 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20+ | 71,819 | 93,791 | 119,525 | 216 |
A typical 20+-year-old Coupe has ~93,791 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Fiat Coupe fails its MOT most
Worcester area is highest at 53.4%; Milton Keynes area is lowest at 20.1% — the gap is 33.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Worcester (WR) | 53.37% | +16.2 pp |
| Peterborough (PE) | 47.06% | +9.9 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Milton Keynes (MK) | 20.11% | -17.1 pp |
| Southend-on-Sea (SS) | 20.2% | -17.0 pp |
| Birmingham (B) | 25.64% | -11.6 pp |
| Leicester (LE) | 26.91% | -10.3 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West.
How many miles does a Fiat Coupe last?
100,000+ miles stands out at 45.8%.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 2,589 | 45.82% |
Of 5,650 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 45.8% had reached 100k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
Fiat Coupe faults that come together
Emissions & leaks + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 3.60×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 68 | 3.6× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 75 | 3.41× (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 58 | 3.26× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 89 | 3.25× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Steering | 34 | 3.16× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 134 | 3.15× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 20 | 3.12× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 21 | 3.08× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 67 | 3.02× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 26 | 3× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 282 | 2.98× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 101 | 2.96× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 44 | 2.9× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 95 | 2.85× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 118 | 2.84× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 139 | 2.82× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 79 | 2.8× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 50 | 2.8× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 61 | 2.75× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Steering | 148 | 2.74× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 95 | 2.74× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 287 | 2.65× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 242 | 2.62× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 187 | 2.61× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 62 | 2.59× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 353 | 2.58× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Visibility | 181 | 2.53× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 153 | 2.52× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 272 | 2.5× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 516 | 2.48× |
| Brakes | Visibility | 274 | 2.47× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 273 | 2.46× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 128 | 2.43× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 136 | 2.35× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 309 | 2.31× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Visibility | 65 | 2.31× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 113 | 2.29× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 19 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 18 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 15 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Road Wheels | 10 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Road Wheels | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Tyres | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Steering | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Brakes» and «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» appear together 2.48× more often than chance (516 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Fiat Coupe MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £177.60 to £337.44, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 41.8 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £62.70 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 34.6 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £48.44 |
| Suspension | 20.7 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £37.26 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 14.6 (nat. 3.67) | Exhaust rear silencer | £200 | £29.20 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £178 to £337, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Fiat Coupe rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at 0.54×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Fiat Coupe fails on corrosion much less often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are gentler than most for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does a Fiat Coupe advisory become a failure?
Brakes are highest at 25.7%; Tyres are lowest at 6.1% — the gap is 19.6 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 25.7% | 12.3 months | 1,018 | 1,154 |
| Suspension | 18.5% | 12.2 months | 1,133 | 917 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 13.3% | 12.1 months | 1,341 | 570 |
| Tyres | 6.1% | 12.3 months | 924 | 636 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 26 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.3 months and roughly 1,018 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on a Fiat Coupe?
Brakes after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 24.4%; Suspension after a passed at age 20+ is lowest at 6.7% — the gap is 17.7 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15-19 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.9% · Brakes 13.1% · Body, chassis, structure 9.2% | 130 (rough estimate) |
| 15-19 | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.9% · Brakes 21.6% · Suspension 14.8% | 88 (rough estimate) |
| 15-19 | failure | Brakes 24.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 22.1% · Suspension 21.4% | 131 (rough estimate) |
| 20+ | passed | Brakes 10.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.2% · Suspension 6.7% | 1,345 |
| 20+ | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 20.7% · Brakes 19.4% · Suspension 13.7% | 1,037 |
| 20+ | failure | Brakes 22.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.1% · Suspension 15.0% | 1,401 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Fiat Coupe ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 71.8%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 11.7% — the gap is 60.2 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,278 failures followed through to their re-test, 16.51% were repaired and passed the same day and 71.83% within ten days; the median gap is 3 days. 4,296 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 2.132 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 757 miles a year across 1,222 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 33.1% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 36.34% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 3.236% of 1,236 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 36,302 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Fiat Coupe MOT: quick answers
Fiat Coupe MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 99.8, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Fiat Coupe first-time MOT pass rate?
- 64.21% of first attempts passed in 2024 (802 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 35.79% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 802 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 99.8 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Fiat Coupe with other cars
Mercedes-Benz V-Class is highest at 99.9; BMW X2 is lowest at 99.7 — the gap is 0.2 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Fiat MOT statisticsFiat Fullback MOT statsFiat Panda MOT stats
Similar risk
Skoda Fabia (index 99.8)BMW X2 (index 99.7)Mercedes-Benz V-Class (index 99.9)
Same size class
how Bentley Turbo compareshow Nissan 200 compareshow Audi 80 compares
By area
Fiat Coupe MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Fiat Coupe body, chassis and structure failuresFiat Coupe brakes failuresFiat Coupe vehicle identification failuresFiat Coupe lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresFiat Coupe noise, emissions and leaks failuresFiat Coupe road wheels failuresFiat Coupe seat belts and airbags failuresFiat Coupe steering failuresFiat Coupe suspension failuresFiat Coupe tyres failuresFiat Coupe visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:fiat-coupe:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Fiat Coupe MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/fiat-coupe/ · Published 2026-07-30.