Audi Coupe — MOT statistics 2024
The Audi Coupe failed 26.04% of 553 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 75.0 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 25% less often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Audi Q3 (index 75.0) — the two published results are 0.0 index points apart.
Audi Coupe common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment stand out at 34.7 per 100 tests, against 30.0 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone, and 1 of these is already inside an interval that includes 1.00×.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 34.7 | 1,408 | 30.0 | 1.16×1.10–1.22 |
| Brakes | 22.8 | 928 | 20.6 | 1.10×1.04–1.18 |
| Suspension | 16.8 | 682 | 20.6 | 0.82×0.75–0.88 |
| Body & structure | 15.7 | 638 | 15.3 | 1.03×0.95–1.11 · not distinguishable |
| Emissions & leaks | 11.9 | 482 | 7.7 | 1.54×1.40–1.68 |
| Visibility | 9.5 | 388 | 10.9 | 0.87×0.79–0.97 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emissions levels exceed default limitsEmissions levels exceed default limits | 4.85 | 0.47 | 10.41× | Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly |
| Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated | 4.95 | 1.48 | 3.35× | Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d |
| Direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or…A direction indicator lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 3.15 | 0.60 | 5.26× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 3.64 | 1.56 | 2.34× | Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or |
| Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements | 4.58 | 2.57 | 1.78× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Significant brake effort recorded with no brake…Significant brake effort recorded with no brake applied indicating a binding brake | 2.86 | 1.03 | 2.78× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Exhaust system leaking or insecureExhaust system leaking or insecure | 2.86 | 1.16 | 2.47× | Watch for smoke on a cold start — emissions failures are costly |
| Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 2.73 | 1.24 | 2.20× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view | 3.10 | 2.36 | 1.31× | Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view |
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 5.27 | 4.87 | 1.08× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Audi Coupe MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Suspension is highest at 55.4 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 9.3 per 100 tests — the gap is 46.1 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Suspension | 55.4 |
| Brakes | 42.7 |
| Tyres | 20.3 |
| Body & structure | 12.1 |
| Emissions & leaks | 10.8 |
| Non-component advisories | 9.3 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 28.9% | 287 |
| It passed | 20.4% | 1,587 |
A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 8.5 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is suspension — 32.1% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 3,553 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 94.1 | fails less often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 86.2 | fails less often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 22.0% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 7.9 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How does the Audi Coupe perform as it gets older?
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Audi Coupe | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|
How dangerous are Audi Coupe MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 89.8 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 22.89 | 14.22 | 1.61× |
| Major | 89.81 | 52.75 | 1.70× |
| Dangerous | 9.48 | 11.15 | 0.85× |
Chart values: Minor 22.9 · Major 89.8 · Dangerous 9.5.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of an Audi Coupe MOT matter?
Apr is highest at 36.5%; Sep is lowest at 27.0% — the gap is 9.4 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 26%–38%.
bars: Audi Coupe · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Audi Coupe | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 27.56% | 31.12% | -3.6 pp |
| Feb | 32.58% | 29.99% | +2.6 pp |
| Mar | 28.81% | 28.26% | +0.5 pp |
| Apr | 36.47% | 29.78% | +6.7 pp |
| May | 32.3% | 28.79% | +3.5 pp |
| Jun | 29.68% | 28.15% | +1.5 pp |
| Jul | 27.4% | 29.33% | -1.9 pp |
| Aug | 30.83% | 29.2% | +1.6 pp |
| Sep | 27.04% | 28.19% | -1.2 pp |
| Oct | 29.64% | 30.34% | -0.7 pp |
| Nov | 32.62% | 30.58% | +2.0 pp |
| Dec | 29.91% | 29.33% | +0.6 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 9.4 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Audi Coupe average mileage by age
Does high mileage mean more Audi Coupe MOT failures?
All ages together, split by odometer (the bands are not split by age, so higher-mileage cars are also older and this mixes wear with age): 28.1% of the lowest-mileage cars failed versus 33.2% of the highest.
| Odometer | % failing | Tests | Gap vs lowest-mileage band |
|---|---|---|---|
| 70-100k miles | 28.1% | 684 | +0.0 pp |
| 100-140k miles | 31.3% | 1,236 | +3.2 pp |
| 140k+ miles | 33.2% | 1,655 | +5.1 pp |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|
Where in Britain the Audi Coupe fails its MOT most
Too few tests in any single postcode area to name one, so this is the wider picture across 4,063 tests, 2019-2024.
| Part of Britain | % failing | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Northern England | 32.64% | 579 |
| Midlands | 30.52% | 1,363 |
| Southern England | 29.78% | 1,528 |
| Scotland | 29.06% | 382 |
| Wales | 28.91% | 211 |
Raw pass/fail rates, not age-adjusted: fleets differ by region. England is split north of Sheffield, between Sheffield and Oxford, and south of it.
How many miles does an Audi Coupe last?
100,000+ miles is highest at 71.6%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 32.3% — the gap is 39.3 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 2,891 | 71.63% |
| 150,000+ miles | 1,305 | 32.33% |
Of 4,036 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 71.6% had reached 100k miles, 32.3% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
Audi Coupe faults that come together
Lamps & electrical + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 4.21×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 25 | 4.21× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 60 | 3.96× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 56 | 3.62× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 171 | 3.47× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 44 | 3.36× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 126 | 3.34× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 33 | 3.28× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 123 | 3.24× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 262 | 3.21× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 69 | 3.18× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 169 | 3.12× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 101 | 3.09× (rough estimate) |
| Tyres | Visibility | 31 | 3.08× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 36 | 3.04× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 210 | 2.98× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 76 | 2.97× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 169 | 2.96× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 158 | 2.92× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 142 | 2.87× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 51 | 2.84× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 71 | 2.83× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Steering | 50 | 2.8× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 42 | 2.76× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 217 | 2.65× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Visibility | 97 | 2.57× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Visibility | 30 | 2.53× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 95 | 2.51× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Visibility | 77 | 2.36× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 16 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 15 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 10 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 9 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 8 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Road Wheels | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems» appear together 4.21× more often than chance (25 co-occurrences in the same test; 66 pairs compared).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Which Audi Coupe engine is best?
petrol 1.5–1.8 is highest at 125.5; petrol over 2.0 is lowest at 92.4 — the gap is 33.1 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
| Fuel | Capacity | vs own age norm | Raw fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| petrol | over 2.0 litre | 92.4 | 28.42% | 2,438 (rough estimate) |
| petrol | 1.8–2.0 litre | 113.5 | 34.77% | 903 (rough estimate) |
| petrol | 1.5–1.8 litre | 125.5 | 44.02% | 209 (rough estimate) |
Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the petrol 1.5–1.8 runs at 125.5 against this model's own age norm while the petrol over 2.0 runs at 92.4 — a spread of 33.1 points between two cars that share a name.
Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.
Audi Coupe MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £136.82 to £259.96, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 34.7 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £48.58 |
| Brakes | 22.8 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £34.20 |
| Suspension | 16.8 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £30.24 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 11.9 (nat. 3.67) | Exhaust rear silencer | £200 | £23.80 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £137 to £260, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Audi Coupe rust problems: where they corrode
Salt-belt exposure stands out at 74th percentile, against 50th percentile as the middle of published models.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
This Audi Coupe has too few tests to judge for corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does an Audi Coupe advisory become a failure?
Brakes are highest at 18.1%; Suspension is lowest at 12.6% — the gap is 5.5 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 18.1% | 12.1 months | 1,208 | 635 |
| Suspension | 12.6% | 12.2 months | 1,289 | 754 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 18 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 1,208 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on an Audi Coupe?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 20+ are highest at 24.5%; Body, chassis, structure after a passed at age 20+ are lowest at 5.9% — the gap is 18.5 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20+ | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.1% · Body, chassis, structure 5.9% · Brakes 5.9% | 1,164 |
| 20+ | advisory | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 17.1% · Body, chassis, structure 13.0% · Brakes 10.1% | 733 |
| 20+ | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.5% · Brakes 15.7% · Body, chassis, structure 14.2% | 850 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Audi Coupe ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 69.5%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 13.1% — the gap is 56.4 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 779 failures followed through to their re-test, 17.46% were repaired and passed the same day and 69.45% within ten days; the median gap is 4 days. 2,657 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 1.588 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 608 miles a year across 864 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 40.08% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 28.61% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 3.282% of 914 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 21,941 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Audi Coupe MOT: quick answers
Audi Coupe MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 75.0, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Audi Coupe first-time MOT pass rate?
- 73.96% of first attempts passed in 2024 (553 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 26.04% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 553 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 75.0 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Audi Coupe with other cars
Land Rover 88 is highest at 75.2; Audi Coupe is lowest at 75.0 — the gap is 0.2 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Audi MOT statisticsAudi Q3 MOT statsAudi TT MOT stats
Similar risk
Audi Q3 (index 75.0)BMW X1 (index 75.1)Land Rover 88 (index 75.2)
Same size class
how McLaren 720S compareshow Maserati GranCabrio compareshow Porsche 924 compares
By area
Audi Coupe MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Audi Coupe body, chassis and structure failuresAudi Coupe brakes failuresAudi Coupe lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresAudi Coupe noise, emissions and leaks failuresAudi Coupe seat belts and airbags failuresAudi Coupe steering failuresAudi Coupe suspension failuresAudi Coupe tyres failuresAudi Coupe visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:audi-coupe:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Audi Coupe MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/audi-coupe/ · Published 2026-07-30.