Honda Jazz vs Renault Clio: which fails its MOT less?
Allowing for age, the Honda Jazz fails its MOT less often than the Renault Clio.
- less often than the Renault Clio, at the same age
- 41.0%less often than the Renault Clio, at the same age
MOTs passed in 2024: Honda Jazz 79.2%, Renault Clio 63.8%
Data: DVSA MOT results · 2024 · 643,188 tests
Check either car by registration
Which fails less for its age?
Allowing for age, the Honda Jazz fails less often: MOT Risk Index 80.8 against 136.1 (100 = normal for its age; difference 55.3, 95% CI 54.6–56.0).
| Measure | Honda Jazz | Renault Clio | Years |
|---|---|---|---|
| Passed at the first attempt, % | 72.9 | 57.2 | 2024 |
| MOT Risk Index (100 = normal) | 80.8 | 136.1 | 2024 |
| 95% interval of the index | 80.3–81.2 | 135.6–136.7 | 2024 |
| Rank among 761 models (1 = fails least for its age) | 267 | 715 | 2024 |
| First tests | 319,308 | 323,880 | 2024 |
Check either car by registration
After defects were fixed at the test centre
79.2% of Honda Jazz tests and 63.8% of Renault Clio tests passed, including defects fixed during the test. This is a different outcome from passing at the first attempt.
What explains the difference?
The clearest difference is suspension: against its own class and age, the Honda Jazz runs −8.2 items per 100 tests and the Renault Clio +10.9, so the Honda Jazz has 19.1 fewer per 100 tests (95% interval 19.0 to 19.2).
Each model is compared with its own class and age; the fleets can differ in mileage and use.
More detail
Dangerous defects and advisory items
| Measure | Honda Jazz | Renault Clio |
|---|---|---|
| Dangerous defects per 100 tests | 9.0 | 14.1 |
| Advisory items per 100 tests | 125.6 | 142.3 |
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data, 2019–2024. A test can record several items. CSV
At what age does one of them fail more?
The Honda Jazz fails less at 17 of 17 ages where both are tested, and the gap points the same way at every age where it is clear. Across the 4 yearly tests from age 4 to 7, the gaps add up to 69.5 extra failed tests per 100 for the Renault Clio (a sum of yearly rates, not the chance of one car failing).
| Age | Difference, pp | 95% interval | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | −9.9 | −10.3 to −9.5 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 4 | −11.3 | −11.7 to −10.8 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 5 | −15.0 | −15.4 to −14.6 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 6 | −19.5 | −20.0 to −19.1 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 7 | −23.7 | −24.2 to −23.2 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 8 | −26.5 | −27.0 to −26.0 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 9 | −28.2 | −28.7 to −27.7 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 10 | −28.3 | −28.8 to −27.8 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 11 | −26.6 | −27.1 to −26.0 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 12 | −24.7 | −25.2 to −24.2 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 13 | −20.8 | −21.3 to −20.3 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 14 | −18.0 | −18.5 to −17.5 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 15 | −15.8 | −16.4 to −15.3 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 16 | −13.4 | −14.1 to −12.8 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 17 | −11.7 | −12.4 to −11.0 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 18 | −10.2 | −11.0 to −9.3 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 19 | −8.8 | −9.9 to −7.8 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| Age band | Ages included | Honda Jazz, % | Renault Clio, % | Difference, pp | 95% interval | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3–5 | 3–5 | 7.9 | 20.1 | −12.2 | −12.4 to −12.0 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 6–10 | 6–10 | 15.5 | 40.6 | −25.1 | −25.2 to −24.9 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| 11+ | 11–20+ | 35.7 | 53.4 | −17.7 | −17.8 to −17.5 | Honda Jazz fails less |
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 3,947,784 (initial tests at shared ages) · Method: difference of two proportions per age, Bonferroni-corrected for 17 ages; age bands pool the published ages with an unadjusted 95% interval, and the same car can appear at more than one age, so that interval is somewhat narrow · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Where do their MOT failures diverge?
The clearest difference is suspension: against its own class and age, the Honda Jazz runs −8.2 items per 100 tests and the Renault Clio +10.9, so the Honda Jazz has 19.1 fewer per 100 tests (95% interval 19.0 to 19.2).
| Component group | Honda Jazz vs its class | Renault Clio vs its class | Gap, Honda Jazz minus Renault Clio | 95% interval | Reading |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | −8.2 | +10.9 | −19.1 | −19.2 to −19.0 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | −3.8 | +13.7 | −17.5 | −17.6 to −17.4 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| Steering | −0.6 | +5.2 | −5.8 | −5.8 to −5.7 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| Tyres | −3.4 | +1.5 | −4.9 | −4.9 to −4.8 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| Visibility | −0.9 | +3.6 | −4.5 | −4.6 to −4.4 | Honda Jazz fails less |
| Body, chassis, structure | −4.1 | −0.1 | −4.1 | −4.1 to −4.0 | Honda Jazz fails less |
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 4,059,218 (initial tests) · Method: each model's failure items per 100 tests against the rate expected for its own class and age; Poisson interval; the age standard leaves the model out and is treated as fixed; items in the same test are treated as independent, so the interval is slightly narrow · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
If one fails, which is more likely to fail again?
A failure on the Honda Jazz carries 4.6 percentage points more extra risk of failing again than on the Renault Clio.
| Measure | Honda Jazz | Renault Clio |
|---|---|---|
| After a failed test, % | 34.9 | 45.6 |
| After a passed test, % | 21.0 | 36.3 |
| Extra risk carried by a failure, pp | 13.9 | 9.3 |
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 266,227 (tests after a fail) · Method: test chains of the same vehicles; cars sold or scrapped after a fail drop out · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
What do six years of MOTs show about the two?
The biggest gap in advisories turning into fails is suspension: 19.2% on the Honda Jazz against 31.2% on the Renault Clio failed on the same item at the next MOT.
| Component | Honda Jazz | Renault Clio | Difference, pp |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 19.2 | 31.2 | −11.9 |
| Steering | 13.3 | 24.7 | −11.4 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 31.7 | 36.6 | −4.9 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 10.5 | 14.5 | −4.0 |
| Visibility | 11.3 | 15.3 | −4.0 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 5.0 | 8.6 | −3.6 |
| Tyres | 7.6 | 11.2 | −3.5 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 9.0 | 6.7 | +2.4 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 3.0 | 4.6 | −1.6 |
| Brakes | 15.6 | 17.2 | −1.5 |
| Measure | Honda Jazz | Renault Clio |
|---|---|---|
| Repaired and passed the same day | 50.7% | 43.2% |
| Passed 1–10 days later | 47.0% | 54.0% |
| Median retest delay | 0.0 days | 1.0 days |
| Failures per 10,000 miles | 0.559 | 0.815 |
| Three-test clean streak | 42.5% | 28.8% |
| Same advisory repeated 3+ times | 33.4% | 36.2% |
Source: DVSA MOT bulk data · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 2,625,639 (tracked advisories) · Method: same vehicles followed to their next ordinary MOT; common publishable components only · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV
Recalls, other countries and running costs, side by side
DVSA lists 31 recall campaigns matched to the Honda Jazz and 24 to the Renault Clio; more campaigns do not by themselves mean a less reliable car. Abroad, compare each model with that country's own average, because pass rates do not carry across rulebooks. Repair bills are catalogue estimates, not quotes.
| Measure | Honda Jazz | Renault Clio |
|---|---|---|
| DVSA recall campaigns listed | 31 | 24 |
| Finland Katsastus: fails, % (national average 26.3%) | 24.3 (4,345 inspections) | 36.4 (9,865 inspections) |
| Netherlands APK: fails, % (national average 50.8%) | 48.9 (19,459 inspections) | 54.9 (120,379 inspections) |
| Norway PKK: fails, % (national average 33.7%) | 33.7 (3,250 inspections) | 41.8 (2,167 inspections) |
| Expected MOT repair bill, £ (estimate) | £78 | £136 |
| Repair bill range, £ (catalogue range, not a 95% interval) | £78–£149 | £136–£259 |
Source: DVSA vehicle recalls register (OGL v3.0); Statens vegvesen PKK (CC BY 4.0), Traficom Katsastus (CC BY 4.0), RDW APK (CC0), adapted; UK repair price catalogue · Window: register as published; inspections 2024 · n = 159,465 (inspections abroad) · Method: recall campaigns matched by make and model, licensed-fleet denominator where available; abroad, samples below 500 suppressed and each model set against that country's own average, with no difference taken across countries; repair bill = chance of failing each item × its most common UK repair price, a catalogue estimate · Updated: 25 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV · licences and full notice
How to cite this comparison
MOT Risk Index (2026). Honda Jazz vs Renault Clio: MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; full dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, DOI 10.5281/zenodo.22975051), updated 25 September 2026. motriskindex.co.uk/compare/honda-jazz-vs-renault-clio/
How the MOT Risk Index and every figure on this page are calculated: methodology.
Report an error
What is wrong on this page? One tap sends the category only, no text and nothing about you.
Honda Jazz vs Renault Clio: quick answers
Is the Honda Jazz or the Renault Clio more reliable?
Allowing for age, the Honda Jazz fails less often: MOT Risk Index 80.8 against 136.1 (100 = normal for its age; difference 55.3, 95% CI 54.6–56.0).
Does the Honda Jazz or the Renault Clio fail more MOTs?
27.1% of Honda Jazz first tests and 42.8% of Renault Clio first tests failed in 2024. These raw rates do not allow for age; the MOT Risk Index does.
Which should I buy, the Honda Jazz or the Renault Clio?
If MOT reliability decides it, the evidence favours the Honda Jazz. Still check the individual car's MOT history: these figures describe whole model populations.