MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Volkswagen e-Golf — MOT statistics 2024

The Volkswagen e-Golf failed 13.74% of 6,530 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 95.1 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car is too close to call — statistically indistinguishable from normal for its age.

MOT risk index 95.1, 95% CI 89.5–101.0 (100 = national average) 100 95.1 0 200
Index
95.1
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
13.74%
n = 6,530
Dangerous /100
9
national ≈11
Rank
397 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Toyota Celica (index 95.2) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.

Volkswagen e-Golf common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Tyres stand out at 12.9 per 100 tests, against 10.7 per 100 tests across UK electric vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Volkswagen e-Golf common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK electric vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Tyres12.92,28210.71.21×1.16–1.25
Visibility3.66434.80.76×0.70–0.82
Suspension1.62892.00.82×0.74–0.93
Lamps & electrical1.42422.60.55×0.47–0.60
Brakes0.5901.70.30×0.24–0.37
Seatbelts & SRS0.3570.21.43×1.16–1.98
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 17,726 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Tyre cords visible or damagedA tyre cords visible or damaged5.141.633.15×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged5.292.542.08×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does…A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not function or showing signs of severe leakage1.450.981.48×Ask the seller about: A shock absorber damaged to the extent that it does not func
Tyre has a lump, bulge or tear caused by…A tyre has a lump, bulge or tear caused by separation or partial failure of its structure. This includes any lifting of the tread rubber0.290.201.49×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Wiper blade defectiveWiper blade defective1.081.260.86×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Windscreen washers not working or not providing…Windscreen washers not working or not providing sufficient fluid to clear the windscreen0.391.620.24×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Windscreen or window damaged or seriously…Windscreen or window damaged or seriously discoloured but not adversely affecting driver's view1.102.360.47×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the…Wiper blade missing or obviously not clearing the windscreen0.772.220.35×Check wipers, washers and windscreen chips in the driver's view
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the…Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements1.813.590.50×Check tyre tread depth across the full width
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements0.292.570.11×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Volkswagen e-Golf MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Tyres are highest at 53.1 per 100 tests; Road Wheels are lowest at 0.3 per 100 tests — the gap is 52.8 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Volkswagen e-Golf MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Tyres53.1
Suspension13.6
Non-component advisories5.5
Brakes3.5
Identification0.5
Road Wheels0.3

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Volkswagen e-Golf against cars of the same age

AgePartVolkswagen e-GolfSame age, petrol and dieselDifference
3 yearsTyres9.34.175.13
3 yearsBrakes0.231.77-1.54
3 yearsSuspension0.710.630.08
4 yearsTyres8.544.544.00
4 yearsBrakes0.342.43-2.09
4 yearsSuspension1.281.210.07
5 yearsTyres9.335.064.27
5 yearsBrakes0.533.09-2.56
5 yearsSuspension2.082.19-0.11

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed10.1%287
It passed13.3%9,500

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (10.1% against 13.3%): the difference is within the margin of error. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 17,726 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only92.6fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage98.9fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year6.7%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 6.3 points — this fleet is driven less than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view flatters it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Volkswagen e-Golf compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeVolkswagen e-GolfSame class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years12.96%12.54%+0.42 pp6,615
4 years13.11%14%-0.89 pp6,507
5 years14.31%17.43%-3.12 pp3,934
6 years12.88%20.92%-8.04 pp326

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Volkswagen e-Golf perform as it gets older?

The e-Golf at age 6 is well below the reference at 13.0%, against 17.5% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Volkswagen e-Golf perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–22%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeVolkswagen e-GolfAll vehiclesGap
413.4%13.1%+0.3 pp
514.0%15.1%-1.1 pp
613.0%17.5%-4.5 pp

Is a Volkswagen e-Golf ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Volkswagen e-Golf MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 100.0%.

Based on 6,530 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
3–5 years100.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 6,207
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 322
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
10–14 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1
15–17 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
18 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
19 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0
20+ yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 0

How dangerous are Volkswagen e-Golf MOT failures?

Major defects are well below the reference at 9.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Volkswagen e-Golf MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor3.0514.220.21×
Major9.0452.750.17×
Dangerous8.7811.150.79×

Chart values: Minor 3.0 · Major 9.0 · Dangerous 8.8.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Volkswagen e-Golf MOT matter?

Oct is highest at 14.9%; Mar is lowest at 12.0% — the gap is 2.9 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Volkswagen e-Golf MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 10%–33%.

bars: Volkswagen e-Golf · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthVolkswagen e-GolfAll vehiclesGap
Jan13.47%31.12%-17.6 pp
Feb13.42%29.99%-16.6 pp
Mar11.96%28.26%-16.3 pp
Apr13.35%29.78%-16.4 pp
May12.77%28.79%-16.0 pp
Jun12.63%28.15%-15.5 pp
Jul12.23%29.33%-17.1 pp
Aug12.97%29.2%-16.2 pp
Sep13.38%28.19%-14.8 pp
Oct14.86%30.34%-15.5 pp
Nov13.24%30.58%-17.3 pp
Dec12.61%29.33%-16.7 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 2.9 percentage points — booking month barely matters for this family. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Volkswagen e-Golf average mileage by age

At age 5, the middle half of e-Golfs runs from 24,311 miles to 45,145 miles, against 34,142 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Does high mileage mean more Volkswagen e-Golf MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 3–5, 12.6% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 20.1% of those with 70,000–100,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Volkswagen e-Golf MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Volkswagen e-Golf: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
3–5<40k miles12.6%11.6–13.6%4,397
3–540-70k miles16.2%14.5–18.1%1,640
3–570-100k miles20.1%14.6–27.2%154 (rough estimate)
6–9<40k miles13.9%9.4–20.2%158 (rough estimate)
6–940-70k miles10.5%6.5–16.6%143 (rough estimate)

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
420,80128,05537,5232,542
524,31134,14245,1453,621
632,96240,18046,180322

A typical 5-year-old e-Golf has ~34,142 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Volkswagen e-Golf fails its MOT most

Huddersfield area is highest at 27.5%; London E area is lowest at 3.9% — the gap is 23.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Volkswagen e-Golf line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Huddersfield (HD)27.45%+14.3 pp
Portsmouth (PO)21.7%+8.5 pp
Guildford (GU)21.35%+8.2 pp
Salisbury (SP)20.33%+7.1 pp
Reading (RG)20%+6.8 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
London E (E)3.92%-9.3 pp
Doncaster (DN)5.29%-7.9 pp
London SW (SW)8.47%-4.7 pp
Nottingham (NG)8.91%-4.3 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 8%–21% failing.

Volkswagen e-Golf survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 6 is well below the reference at 6.2%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Volkswagen e-Golf survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
36,615100%12.96%
46,507100%13.11%
53,93475.4%14.31%
63266.2%12.88%

By age 6, only about 6% as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈5,220); survivors still fail at 12.9% vs 13.1% at age 4. Older cars that still appear are a selected subset — weaker ones have already left.

How many years is a Volkswagen e-Golf likely to last?

Bought at age 5 stands out at 0.6 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 0.6

estimateObserved only until age 6. The curve does not run five years past the stated age with the share still tested under 50%, so no 'years left' number is given.

Volkswagen e-Golf faults that come together

Lamps & electrical + Suspension stand out at 8.43×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension238.43× (rough estimate)
SuspensionVisibility314.49× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility253.76× (rough estimate)
SuspensionTyres572.87× (rough estimate)
TyresVisibility1332.74× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres462.4× (rough estimate)
BrakesTyres11too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres10too few (rough estimate)
BrakesVisibility9too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension8too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres8too few (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension6too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems5too few (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility5too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Suspension» appear together 8.43× more often than chance (23 co-occurrences in the same test; 55 pairs compared).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Volkswagen e-Golf?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 9.6%, against 15.8% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year9.62%1,039
8–12k miles/year15.83%1,080
Gap (low − normal)-6.21 pp—

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 9.6% vs 15.8% for 8–12k miles/year — 6.2 pp lower (n_low=1,039, n_normal=1,080). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates.

Volkswagen e-Golf MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £17.20 to £32.68, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£17–33
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Tyres12.9 (nat. 8.7)Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted)£90£11.61
Suspension1.6 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£2.88
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1.4 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£1.96
Brakes0.5 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£0.75

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £17 to £33, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Volkswagen e-Golf running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 6 are well below the reference at 13.0%, against 14.0% at age 5, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 5
14
vehicles needing work
At age 6
13
other cars of this model tested at age 6 in 2024 (rough estimate: 322 tests)
Repairs per 100
£1,720
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
0d
median; 52.7% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
413.41%28,0552,542-0.6 pp
514.03%34,1423,621+0.0 pp
613.04%40,180322-1.0 pp

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Volkswagen e-Golf rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility is well below the reference at <0.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
<0.1×
0.01% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
49th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 0 postcode areas

This Volkswagen e-Golf virtually never fails on corrosion once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Volkswagen e-Golf advisory become a failure?

Tyres are highest at 10.2%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 10.2 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Volkswagen e-Golf chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Volkswagen e-Golf, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Tyres 10.2% · Suspension 4% · Non-component 0%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Tyres10.2%12 months7,0763,011
Suspension4.0%11.9 months9,036884
Non-component advisories0.0%——534

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 10 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12 months and roughly 7,076 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Volkswagen e-Golf?

Tyres after a advisory at age 3-5 are highest at 10.6%; Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a passed at age <3 are lowest at 1.1% — the gap is 9.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedTyres 8.0% · Visibility 2.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 1.1%3,057
<3advisoryTyres 9.4% · Visibility 3.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 2.1%1,333
<3failureTyres 8.5% · Visibility 3.0% · Suspension 1.6%633
3-5passedTyres 8.0% · Visibility 2.7% · Suspension 1.8%3,604
3-5advisoryTyres 10.6% · Visibility 3.9% · Suspension 2.4%1,724
3-5failureTyres 7.2% · Visibility 3.6% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 1.7%814

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Volkswagen e-Golf ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The same-day re-test pass rate is highest at 52.7%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 2.5% — the gap is 50.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
52.7%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.188
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
30.6%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
0.315%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 1,907 failures followed through to their re-test, 52.7% were repaired and passed the same day and 44.78% within ten days; the median gap is 0 days. 3,015 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.188 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 6,543 miles a year across 6,350 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 30.6% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 4.81% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 0.315% of 6,353 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 8,594 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Volkswagen e-Golf technical service bulletins: what dealers are told

US market, Volkswagen E-GOLF, model years 2015–2019 only. A count of bulletins, not a UK failure rate.

NHTSA manufacturer communications are 609.

bigger number = more recorded dealer communicationsnot affected vehicles or confirmed faults

These are the issues the manufacturer fixes quietly: service communications sent to dealers without a public recall campaign. They show what the service network has been told even when the issue never became news.

United States · NHTSA manufacturer communications

US technical service bulletins by communication year; leading subjects cover the full file
Communication yearBulletinsLeading subjects across all years
20132
  • Equipment (269)
  • Electrical system (141)
  • Engine and cooling (79)
  • Engine (55)
  • Other / uncategorised (40)
  • Powertrain (22)
  • Adaptive and mobility equipment (21)
  • Structure (19)
201480
201521
201664
201748
201831
201961
202050
202170
202259
202341
202433
202528
202621

Caveat worth stating plainly: this is NHTSA data about US-specification cars. British cars sold under the same name often use different gearboxes, engines and equipment, so a bulletin may describe a component that was never fitted here. The file counts dealer communications, not affected vehicles or confirmed failures, and it cannot tell you whether an individual UK car has the issue. A communication can carry more than one subject tag, so topic counts do not have to add up to the total. Source: NHTSA Manufacturer Communications API (US-market vehicles; queried model years 2015-2022). Licence: U.S. Government work / public domain · retrieved 2026-09-25.

Volkswagen e-Golf owner complaints: what goes wrong

US market, Volkswagen E-GOLF, model years 2015–2019 only. A count of owner complaints, not a UK failure rate; NHTSA has no UK denominator.

Lamps & electrical are highest at 22; Steering is lowest at 1 — the gap is 21.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

Owner complaints (US) against actual MOT failures (UK) for the same component groups
ComponentComplaintsShareMOT fail items per 100MOT rankAgreement
Lamps & electrical2261.1%1.4#4complained about, fails occasionally
Engine (not MOT-tested)616.7%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Transmission (not MOT-tested)513.9%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Steering12.8%not in top 6—complained about, rarely an MOT failure
Brakes12.8%0.5#5complained about, fails occasionally
Restraints12.8%0.3#6complained about, fails occasionally

Two different populations answering two different questions: the MOT records what an inspector can measure once a year, the complaint file records what annoyed or frightened an owner on the road. A component high in one column and absent from the other is the interesting case — driver-assistance and electronics dominate complaints while almost never appearing as an MOT failure item.

What the reports actually say
The trim located around the gear selectors has separated leaving a sharp chrome edge that cuts your hand when reaching into the cubby beyond the shifter. This issue was corrected by VW Canada in a recall but not by VW US. It is a known issue and is prevalent across the golf lineup.
NHTSA complaint, filed 08/02/2021
EV CHARGER WILL NOT DISENGAGE FROM PORT EVEN WHEN CAR IS UNLOCKED WITH REMOTE. RED LIGHT INDICATING CHARGING FAILURE REMAINS AND CHARGER MUST BE REMOVED USING EMERGENCY DISENGAGE PIN WHICH IS DIFFICULT TO ACCESS AND CAR IS IMMOBILIZED WHILE CHARGER REMAINS STUCK. ELECTRICAL ERROR MESSAGE REQUESTING SERVICE COMES UP ON DASHBOARD TWO DAYS BUT DISAPPEARS UPON RESTART OF VEHICLE.
NHTSA complaint, filed 08/06/2019 · ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

US owners have filed 36 complaints about the equivalent Volkswagen e-Golf to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, including 0 that mention a crash, 2 a fire and 2 an injury. These are owner reports, not verified findings — but they are the only large public record of what drivers themselves notice, and they cover the years between MOT tests.

Caveat worth stating plainly: US-specification cars, self-selected reporters, no denominator — complaint counts scale with how many cars were sold there and how motivated owners are to file. The mechanical gap matters as much as the statistical one: American cars of the same name often carry different gearboxes, engines and equipment — automatics where Britain buys manuals — so a drivetrain complaint filed in Ohio may describe a part that was never fitted here. Read the ranking inside a model, not between models, and treat drivetrain entries with particular caution. Source: NHTSA ODI consumer complaints (US market, public domain) — US-spec vehicles, indicative only.

Volkswagen e-Golf MOT: quick answers

Volkswagen e-Golf MOT Risk Index is close to the reference at 95.1, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Volkswagen e-Golf first-time MOT pass rate?
86.26% of first attempts passed in 2024 (6,530 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 13.74% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 6,530 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 95.1 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Volkswagen e-Golf with other cars

Skoda Superb is highest at 95.3; Volkswagen Crafter is lowest at 94.9 — the gap is 0.4 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Volkswagen MOT statisticsVolkswagen Crafter MOT statsVolkswagen Scirocco MOT stats

Similar risk

Toyota Celica (index 95.2)Volkswagen Crafter (index 94.9)Skoda Superb (index 95.3)

Same size class

how Toyota GT86 compareshow Subaru XV compareshow Vauxhall Tigra compares

By build year

Volkswagen e-Golf 2018Volkswagen e-Golf 2019Volkswagen e-Golf 2020

By area

Volkswagen e-Golf MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Volkswagen e-Golf brakes failuresVolkswagen e-Golf vehicle identification failuresVolkswagen e-Golf lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresVolkswagen e-Golf seat belts and airbags failuresVolkswagen e-Golf suspension failuresVolkswagen e-Golf tyres failuresVolkswagen e-Golf visibility failures


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:volkswagen-e-golf:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Volkswagen e-Golf MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/volkswagen-e-golf/ · Published 2026-07-30.