MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Subaru Legacy — MOT statistics 2024

The Subaru Legacy failed 36.94% of 5,265 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 93.9 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 6% less often than expected for its age.

MOT risk index 93.9, 95% CI 90.7–97.3 (100 = national average) 100 93.9 0 200
Index
93.9
100 = age-normal
Raw fail rate
36.94%
n = 5,265
Dangerous /100
14
national ≈11
Rank
390 of 761
lower index = better

Age-adjusted peer: Jeep Wrangler (index 94.2) — the two published results are 0.3 index points apart.

Subaru Legacy common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Noise, emissions and leaks stand out at 11.6 per 100 tests, against 7.1 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Subaru Legacy common problems: what actually fails the MOT — 2024 UK MOT data

family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Component-group comparison table

Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.

GroupThis familyCases behind itUK, same agesFamily / national
Lamps & electrical33.914,41431.31.08×1.07–1.10
Suspension27.911,83026.51.05×1.03–1.07
Brakes15.36,51619.40.79×0.77–0.81
Body & structure12.85,43511.11.15×1.12–1.18
Emissions & leaks11.64,9087.11.64×1.59–1.68
Visibility10.24,33410.90.94×0.91–0.97
Named defects — items per 100 initial tests, this family vs UK national average; this model measured on 42,459 tests, 2019-2024, national column 2024
What failedper 100 tests (this family)per 100 tests (UK average)ratio family / UKWhat to check
Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn13.234.872.72×Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test
Strength or continuity of the load bearing…The strength or continuity of the load bearing structure within 30cm of any sub-frame, spring or suspension component mounting (a 'prescribed area') is significantly reduced or inadequately repaired4.151.123.71×Look underneath for rust or cracks around subframe and suspension mountings
Headlamp reflector or lens slightly defectiveHeadlamp reflector or lens slightly defective3.771.093.45×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources5.412.831.91×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning4.542.092.17×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunctionEngine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction3.431.192.89×Ask the seller about: Engine MIL illuminated indicating a malfunction
Aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down…The aim of a headlamp is not within limits laid down in the requirements4.682.571.82×Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure
Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated3.491.482.36×Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d
Brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mma brake lining or pad worn below 1.5mm3.462.151.61×Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive
Tyre seriously damagedA tyre seriously damaged3.582.541.41×Check tyre tread depth across the full width

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Subaru Legacy MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Suspension is highest at 79.9 per 100 tests; Non-component advisories are lowest at 6.9 per 100 tests — the gap is 73.0 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Subaru Legacy MOT advisories: what gets flagged — 2024 UK MOT data
Advisory rates table
GroupAdvisories per 100
Suspension79.9
Brakes46.9
Tyres35.1
Body & structure12.2
Emissions & leaks7
Non-component advisories6.9

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

Tyres, brakes and suspension: Subaru Legacy against cars of the same age

AgePartSubaru LegacySame age, petrol and dieselDifference
8 yearsTyres6.236.31-0.08
8 yearsBrakes6.425.381.04
8 yearsSuspension5.227.78-2.56

Failing items per 100 initial tests, 2019-2024. The comparison group is every petrol or diesel car tested at the same age, so weight and drivetrain show up rather than fleet age.

If a car like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

After this year's testFails next yearVehicles followed
It failed37.1%3,478
It passed31.3%18,828

A failed test raises next year's chance of failing again by 5.8 percentage points. The failure most likely to come back is steering — 39.3% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 42,032 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Standardised forIndexReading
Age only93.9fails less often than expected
Age and annual mileage89.9fails less often than vehicles driven as much
Share doing under 3,000 miles a year3.5%a normal spread of use

Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 4.0 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Subaru Legacy compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

AgeSubaru LegacySame class, same ageDifferenceTests
3 years23.58%11.69%+11.89 pp229
4 years26.17%13.29%+12.88 pp256
5 years26.85%15.06%+11.79 pp257
6 years22.52%17.33%+5.18 pp413
7 years23.93%20.15%+3.78 pp652
8 years25.66%23.21%+2.45 pp1,091
9 years29.26%26.73%+2.53 pp1,630
10 years31.37%30.03%+1.34 pp2,158
11 years33.24%33.45%-0.21 pp2,626
12 years35.29%36.47%-1.18 pp2,964
13 years37.02%38.89%-1.87 pp3,598
14 years39.26%40.84%-1.58 pp4,032
15 years39.94%42.31%-2.37 pp4,199
16 years42.07%43.13%-1.06 pp3,943
17 years40.6%43.52%-2.92 pp3,446
18 years42.39%43.63%-1.25 pp2,909
19 years43.94%43.19%+0.75 pp2,294
20 years42.67%42.43%+0.25 pp1,645

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Subaru Legacy perform as it gets older?

The Legacy at age 17 is well below the reference at 34.9%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

How does the Subaru Legacy perform as it gets older? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–47%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

Data table
AgeSubaru LegacyAll vehiclesGap
1131.8%33.2%-1.4 pp
1229.7%35.7%-6.0 pp
1334.7%38.2%-3.5 pp
1438.4%40.4%-2.1 pp
1538.0%41.6%-3.5 pp
1642.7%43.1%-0.4 pp
1734.9%43.1%-8.2 pp
1842.1%43.9%-1.8 pp
1941.7%43.5%-1.8 pp
2038.1%41.0%-2.9 pp

Is a Subaru Legacy ULEZ compliant?

The share of classifiable 2024 Subaru Legacy MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 53.3%.

Based on 5,011 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.

higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class

Age-band estimate from classifiable initial MOT tests
Vehicle age at testLikely ULEZ-compliant shareTests
Under 3 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 4
3–5 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 131
6–7 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 106
8 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 52
9 yearsSuppressed — sample below publication threshold
Check a registration with TfL
n = 40
10–14 years56.5%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,355
15–17 years84.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,169
18 years99.5%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 594
19 years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 528
20+ years0.0%
Check a registration with TfL
n = 1,032

How dangerous are Subaru Legacy MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 88.6 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

How dangerous are Subaru Legacy MOT failures? — 2024 UK MOT data
Severity table
SeverityThis family /100National /100Family / national
Minor23.5814.221.66×
Major88.6352.751.68×
Dangerous13.5611.151.22×

Chart values: Minor 23.6 · Major 88.6 · Dangerous 13.6.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Subaru Legacy MOT matter?

Nov is highest at 39.2%; Dec is lowest at 33.9% — the gap is 5.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Does the month of a Subaru Legacy MOT matter? — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart scale: 27%–41%.

bars: Subaru Legacy · dashed: all class-4 cars

Month-by-month table
MonthSubaru LegacyAll vehiclesGap
Jan38.38%31.12%+7.3 pp
Feb37.28%29.99%+7.3 pp
Mar38.6%28.26%+10.3 pp
Apr38.87%29.78%+9.1 pp
May37.55%28.79%+8.8 pp
Jun38.05%28.15%+9.9 pp
Jul36.89%29.33%+7.6 pp
Aug38.53%29.2%+9.3 pp
Sep35.22%28.19%+7.0 pp
Oct37.5%30.34%+7.2 pp
Nov39.24%30.58%+8.7 pp
Dec33.94%29.33%+4.6 pp

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 5.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Subaru Legacy average mileage by age

At age 16, the middle half of Legacys runs from 92,267 miles to 143,678 miles, against 117,715 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Bars: Subaru Legacy · dashed: all class-4 cars — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–158k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Subaru Legacy MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 25.8% of those with under 40,000 miles failed first time versus 46.1% of those with over 140,000 miles.Inside this age group, higher mileage goes with more failures.

Does high mileage mean more Subaru Legacy MOT failures at the same age? — 2024 UK MOT data
Subaru Legacy: first-time failure by mileage within each age group (2024)
AgeOdometer% failing95% intervalTests
6–970-100k miles23.2%14.1–35.8%56 (rough estimate)
6–9100-140k miles25.3%17.2–35.6%83 (rough estimate)
10–1440-70k miles24.4%19.1–30.6%213 (rough estimate)
10–1470-100k miles32.6%28.3–37.2%423 (rough estimate)
10–14100-140k miles38.4%34.2–42.8%492 (rough estimate)
10–14140k+ miles41.7%34.9–48.7%192 (rough estimate)
15+<40k miles25.8%16.6–37.9%62 (rough estimate)
15+40-70k miles27.4%23–32.4%339 (rough estimate)
15+70-100k miles34.2%31.1–37.6%812
15+100-140k miles42.3%39.6–45.1%1,207
15+140k+ miles46.1%42.9–49.4%898

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
Agep25Medianp75Tests
1171,15089,405115,326189
1270,54493,128117,661263
1380,025104,648127,369444
1481,841108,936133,286443
1581,312104,678128,219389
1692,267117,715143,678358
1785,582113,954144,230432
1891,417115,230144,326596
1992,182120,521150,325530
20+84,511112,789142,4721,033

A typical 16-year-old Legacy has ~117,715 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Subaru Legacy fails its MOT most

Dundee area is highest at 51.7%; Romford area is lowest at 22.5% — the gap is 29.2 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Subaru Legacy line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75) — 2024 UK MOT data
Toughest areas% failingvs model overall
Dundee (DD)51.72%+14.2 pp
Aberdeen (AB)51.06%+13.6 pp
Lincoln (LN)51%+13.5 pp
Truro (TR)50.89%+13.4 pp
Dorchester (DT)49.47%+12.0 pp
Easiest areas% failingvs model overall
Romford (RM)22.51%-15.0 pp
Uxbridge (UB)23.14%-14.4 pp
Wolverhampton (WV)24%-13.5 pp
Coventry (CV)25.1%-12.4 pp
Dudley (DY)26.27%-11.2 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 29%–49% failing.

Subaru Legacy survival: which cars are still on the road

By age 19 is close to the reference at 100.0%, against 100.0% at the ages 4–6 reference level.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Subaru Legacy survival: which cars are still on the road — 2024 UK MOT data

Chart axes: car age, years · survival vs ages 4–6 · scale 0–105%.

Survival vs fail rate by age
AgeTestsSurvival vs ages 4–6Fail %
322974.2%23.58%
425682.9%26.17%
525783.3%26.85%
6413100%22.52%
7652100%23.93%
81,091100%25.66%
91,630100%29.26%
102,158100%31.37%
112,626100%33.24%
122,964100%35.29%
133,598100%37.02%
144,032100%39.26%
154,199100%39.94%
163,943100%42.07%
173,446100%40.6%
182,909100%42.39%
192,294100%43.94%

By age 19, at least as many cars of this family present for MOT as at ages 4–6 (reference n≈309): the older fleet has not thinned out here, so there is no survivor selection to allow for.

How many miles does a Subaru Legacy last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 57.4%; 200,000+ miles is lowest at 1.8% — the gap is 55.6 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

OdometerTests ≥ thresholdShare of sample
100,000+ miles24,29357.42%
150,000+ miles6,15714.55%
200,000+ miles7651.81%

Of 42,308 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 57.4% had reached 100k miles, 14.6% had reached 150k miles, 1.8% had reached 200k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

How many years is a Subaru Legacy likely to last?

Bought at age 5 is highest at 17.3 years; Bought at age 15 is lowest at 4.5 years — the gap is 12.8 years.

bigger number = longer remaining lifeyears on the observed survival curve

Age nowTypical mileage (p50)Expected years left
5—at least 17.3
8—at least 11.5
10—at least 9.5
12—at least 7.5
15—at least 4.5

estimateEstimate only — not a warranty: a typical 10-year-old example of this family has at least 9.5 expected years of further MOT-present life. The curve is observed only until age 19, so the true figure is likely higher.

Subaru Legacy faults that come together

Identification + Steering stand out at 4.31×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Group AGroup BTogetherLift
Identification of the vehicleSteering214.31× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSuspension2893.91× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1483.73× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureNoise, emissions and leaks1,2403.7×
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsSteering343.7× (rough estimate)
BrakesRoad Wheels413.48× (rough estimate)
BrakesSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1563.47× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksRoad Wheels363.46× (rough estimate)
BrakesNoise, emissions and leaks1,0633.45×
BrakesIdentification of the vehicle803.36× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleVisibility753.35× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsVisibility373.34× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSuspension633.25× (rough estimate)
Road WheelsTyres273.25× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems1573.21× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureIdentification of the vehicle803.09× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleNoise, emissions and leaks653.09× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureSteering2312.98× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1542.97× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleSuspension1162.96× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentRoad Wheels742.89× (rough estimate)
BrakesSuspension1,6402.86×
Noise, emissions and leaksSteering1782.82× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureRoad Wheels362.81× (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleTyres462.74× (rough estimate)
BrakesSteering1942.72× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsVisibility1152.72× (rough estimate)
Noise, emissions and leaksSuspension1,3652.69×
SteeringSuspension3152.69× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentNoise, emissions and leaks1,7682.64×
BrakesTyres6452.63×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems2532.59× (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSteering3892.51× (rough estimate)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systemsTyres792.5× (rough estimate)
BrakesLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,8632.46×
Body, chassis, structureBrakes9272.45×
Body, chassis, structureSuspension1,5062.42×
Noise, emissions and leaksVisibility7002.42×
Noise, emissions and leaksTyres5262.42×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentVisibility1,6942.38×
SuspensionTyres9512.35×
BrakesVisibility7662.34×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSuspension2,9022.33×
TyresVisibility5372.33×
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentTyres1,2332.31×
SteeringVisibility1532.28× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment1,8542.25×
SuspensionVisibility1,1882.21×
SteeringTyres1072.13× (rough estimate)
Body, chassis, structureVisibility7532.12×
Body, chassis, structureTyres5171.94×
Identification of the vehicleSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems13too few (rough estimate)
Identification of the vehicleRoad Wheels9too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSeat belts and supplementary restraint systems8too few (rough estimate)
Road WheelsSteering7too few (rough estimate)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipmentSpeedometer and speed limiter6too few (rough estimate)

Defects in «Body, chassis, structure» and «Noise, emissions and leaks» appear together 3.70× more often than chance (1,240 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Subaru Legacy?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 22.5%, against 38.6% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

BandFail %Tests
<5k miles/year22.49%1,885
8–12k miles/year38.57%8,098
Gap (low − normal)-16.08 pp—
By fuel and age

Diesel

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
920.593433.25406-12.66 pp
10204537.23556-17.23 pp
1123.735936.52649-12.79 pp
1213.856541.7542-27.85 pp
1331.156144.1458-12.96 pp
14385046.99249-8.99 pp

Petrol

AgeLow-use fail %nNormal fail %nGap pp
710.874618.66134-7.79 pp
815.497128.24216-12.75 pp
913.5910328.42278-14.83 pp
1021.6214829.97387-8.35 pp
1120.6318937.43529-16.79 pp
1222.0823137.75792-15.67 pp
1324.2931740.451,120-16.16 pp
1426.9143144.391,471-17.48 pp

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 22.5% vs 38.6% for 8–12k miles/year — 16.1 pp lower (n_low=1,885, n_normal=8,098). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 24.5% low-use vs 40.5% normal (-16.0 pp).

Which Subaru Legacy engine is best?

diesel 1.8–2.0 is highest at 108.3; petrol 1.8–2.0 is lowest at 98.3 — the gap is 10.0 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Engine bands against this model's own failure rate at the same ages
FuelCapacityvs own age normRaw fail %Tests
petrol1.8–2.0 litre98.337.2%19,280
petrolover 2.0 litre99.138.59%16,233
diesel1.8–2.0 litre108.335.85%6,410

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.8–2.0 runs at 108.3 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.8–2.0 runs at 98.3 — a spread of 10 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Best year for a Subaru Legacy, and the years to avoid

Build year 2000 is highest at 108.8; Build year 2009 is lowest at 93.7 — the gap is 15.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected

Subaru Legacy build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected — 2024 UK MOT data
Subaru Legacy by build year, tests 2019–2024. Below 100 is better than the model's own age norm.
Every build year with its confidence interval
Build yearvs own age norm95% CIRaw fail %TestsVerdict
201399.486.4–112.329.43%768no different
201294.184.8–103.529.09%1,337no different
201195.188.9–101.430.6%2,938no different
20109892.1–103.933.5%3,167no different
200993.787.9–99.533.58%2,990better
2008102.896.8–108.938.75%2,857no different
200797.291.8–102.637.82%3,300no different
2006101.997.5–106.440.73%4,927no different
200598.994.5–103.240.49%4,969no different
2004100.595.7–105.341.46%4,074no different
2003106.399.3–113.344.53%1,992no different
2002105.596.1–11544.04%1,090no different
2001108.398.5–118.246.51%1,004no different
2000108.896.8–120.846.61%678no different

The best build year here is 2009 and the weakest is 2009. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 1 of 14 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.

Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.

Subaru Legacy MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £143.83 to £273.28, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

MOT repairs, budget
£144–273
per test, repairs only
The test itself
£54.85
statutory cap, unchanged since 2010
How the figure is built: chance of failing × typical price of that repair
ComponentFails per 100 testsTypical repairIts priceContribution
Suspension27.9 (nat. 15.36)Suspension coil spring (single corner)£180£50.22
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment33.9 (nat. 18.09)Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid)£140£47.46
Noise, emissions and leaks11.6 (nat. 3.67)Exhaust rear silencer£200£23.20
Brakes15.3 (nat. 11.25)Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback)£150£22.95

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £144 to £273, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Subaru Legacy running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 stand out at 42.0%, against 32.0% at age 11, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fails per 100 at age 11
32
vehicles needing work (rough estimate: 189 tests)
At age 19
42
other cars of this model tested at age 19 in 2024 (rough estimate: 530 tests)
Repairs per 100
£14,383
plus £5,485 in test fees
Off the road
2d
median; 29.35% cleared same day
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
AgeFailsMedian odometerTestsGap vs age 5
1131.75%89,405189—
1229.66%93,128263—
1334.68%104,648444—
1438.37%108,936443—
1538.05%104,678389—
1642.74%117,715358—
1734.95%113,954432—
1842.11%115,230596—
1941.7%120,521530—

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Subaru Legacy rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 2.8×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

How it rusts
2.8×
2.14% of tests record a corrosion defect vs 0.77% typical — age-standardised
Salt Belt exposure
80th
percentile among the models published here, from its tests across 6 postcode areas

This Subaru Legacy fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are saltier than most for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Subaru Legacy advisory become a failure?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment are highest at 35.3%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 35.3 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

Subaru Legacy chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now — 2024 UK MOT data
Subaru Legacy, advisory → failure conversion by component group, chained tests 2019–2024. Chart labels and rates: Lamps & electrical 35.3% · Suspension 21.4% · Body & chassis 19% · Brakes 13.8% · Noise, emissions, leaks 11.6% · Tyres 10.9% · Steering 5.3% · Identification of the veh… 4%.
Advisory today → failure at the next test, with how long you have
ComponentFails next timeTypical lead timeMiles of warningAdvisories tracked
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment35.3%12.1 months5,450626
Suspension21.4%12.1 months4,88410,685
Body, chassis, structure18.9%12 months4,3882,929
Brakes13.8%12.1 months4,5337,895
Noise, emissions and leaks11.6%12.1 months4,1151,877
Tyres10.9%12.1 months5,3206,587
Steering5.3%12 months3,136545
Identification of the vehicle4.0%12 months4,7251,179
Non-component advisories0.0%——1,882

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 35 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 5,450 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Subaru Legacy?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 15-19 are highest at 28.8%; Brakes after a passed at age 6-8 are lowest at 4.3% — the gap is 24.5 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

Probability of each component failing at the next test, by age and last result
AgeLast testMost likely next failuresCars tracked
<3passedBody, chassis, structure 7.8% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 7.3% · Suspension 5.6%179 (rough estimate)
<3advisorySuspension 14.4% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.5% · Body, chassis, structure 9.6%104 (rough estimate)
<3failureSuspension 18.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 15.5% · Body, chassis, structure 12.7%71 (rough estimate)
3-5passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10.7% · Suspension 5.3% · Body, chassis, structure 5.0%319 (rough estimate)
3-5advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 16.9% · Suspension 9.7% · Body, chassis, structure 9.2%195 (rough estimate)
3-5failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.4% · Body, chassis, structure 13.5% · Tyres 7.4%163 (rough estimate)
6-8passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.5% · Suspension 4.9% · Brakes 4.3%1,192
6-8advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.5% · Visibility 8.0% · Suspension 7.2%709
6-8failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.5% · Visibility 9.6% · Suspension 9.2%654
9-11passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 11.5% · Suspension 6.4% · Brakes 5.8%2,194
9-11advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.8% · Suspension 11.4% · Brakes 8.8%2,071
9-11failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.9% · Suspension 15.4% · Brakes 11.5%2,043
12-14passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 13.7% · Suspension 9.9% · Body, chassis, structure 7.3%2,658
12-14advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19.8% · Suspension 16.1% · Body, chassis, structure 10.5%2,895
12-14failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.5% · Suspension 21.1% · Body, chassis, structure 13.5%3,345
15-19passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 14.1% · Suspension 11.3% · Body, chassis, structure 8.1%2,995
15-19advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.7% · Suspension 19.9% · Body, chassis, structure 13.5%3,522
15-19failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 28.8% · Suspension 23.6% · Body, chassis, structure 15.7%4,486
20+passedLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 8.3% · Suspension 8.0% · Body, chassis, structure 7.9%834
20+advisoryLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18.4% · Suspension 15.6% · Body, chassis, structure 14.7%849
20+failureLamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.0% · Suspension 20.5% · Body, chassis, structure 16.1%1,048

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Subaru Legacy ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 64.2%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 6.5% — the gap is 57.7 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Fixed same day
29.35%
of failures re-tested
Fails /10k miles
0.683
miles actually driven
Clean streaks
24.7%
3+ tests, nothing noted
Odometer anomaly
7.193%
reading went backwards

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 10,732 failures followed through to their re-test, 29.35% were repaired and passed the same day and 64.16% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 32,740 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.683 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 4,402 miles a year across 8,571 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 24.7% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 45.02% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 7.193% of 8,606 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 40,330 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Subaru Legacy safety recalls and how to check yours

DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 13.

bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone

recall campaigns launched per year

Subaru Legacy recall campaigns launched per year — 2024 UK MOT data
Campaigns launched per year for the Subaru Legacy. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls. Chart values: 2005: 2 · 2006: 0 · 2007: 0 · 2008: 0 · 2009: 0 · 2010: 1 · 2011: 0 · 2012: 0 · 2013: 0 · 2014: 2 · 2015: 0 · 2016: 1 · 2017: 0 · 2018: 4 · 2019: 3.
Most recent safety recall campaigns for the Subaru Legacy
ReferenceLaunchedVehiclesConcern
R/2019/05220/03/2019422A DRIVING RANGE INDICATOR IN THE MULTI INFORMATION DISPLAY HAS A PROGRAM ERROR
R/2019/02501/03/2019812THE LOAD MAY EXCEED THE VALVE SPRING'S FATIGUE STRENGTH AND THE SPRING MAY FRACTURE
R/2018/34601/01/20194,199ELECTRONIC PARKING BRAKE CAPACITOR ON INNER CIRCUIT BOARD AND MAGNET RING OF THE SENSOR MA
R/2018/32601/12/20186,649MIS CONNECTION OF THE FUEL PUMP CONNECTOR
R/2018/22920/09/20183,906OBSTRUCTION IN COWL AREA MAY FORCE WIPERS TO PARK OUT OF POSITION AND OVERHEAT
All 13 campaigns
ReferenceLaunchedBuild datesVehiclesConcern
R/2019/05220/03/201927/07/2017 – 01/08/2018422A DRIVING RANGE INDICATOR IN THE MULTI INFORMATION DISPLAY HAS A PROGRAM ERROR
R/2019/02501/03/201901/01/2013 – 31/12/2014812THE LOAD MAY EXCEED THE VALVE SPRING'S FATIGUE STRENGTH AND THE SPRING MAY FRACTURE
R/2018/34601/01/201925/05/2005 – 27/06/20144,199ELECTRONIC PARKING BRAKE CAPACITOR ON INNER CIRCUIT BOARD AND MAGNET RING OF THE SENSOR MA
R/2018/32601/12/201801/01/2004 – 31/07/20096,649MIS CONNECTION OF THE FUEL PUMP CONNECTOR
R/2018/22920/09/201801/01/2009 – 31/12/20143,906OBSTRUCTION IN COWL AREA MAY FORCE WIPERS TO PARK OUT OF POSITION AND OVERHEAT
R/2018/14123/07/20187,589FRONT PASSENGER AIRBAG INFLATOR MAY RUPTURE IN A DEPLOYMENT EVENT
R/2018/12230/04/201801/01/2004 – 31/12/200913,200FRONT PASSENGER AIRBAG INFLATOR MAY FAIL
R/2016/14701/08/2016255ENGINE MAY STALL
R/2014/12730/11/201401/01/2004 – 31/12/200921,343BRAKE FLUID MAY LEAK
R/2013/11924/01/201412,379BRAKES MAY FAIL
R/2010/13003/09/2010404CVT GEARBOX OIL MAY LEAK AND LOSS OF DRIVE MAY OCCUR
R/2005/11730/11/20052,065REAR BRAKE CALIPER UNION BOLT MAY LEAK
R/2005/11614/10/20054,319REAR DOOR MAY NOT CLOSE CORRECTLY

DVSA lists 13 safety recall campaigns for the Subaru Legacy, covering roughly 77,542 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.

Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.

Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.

Subaru Legacy inspection results in other countries

United Kingdom MOT stands out at 36.9%, against 26.0% nationally.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Same model, different national inspection regimes
CountryTestThis model failsNational averagePositionSample
United KingdomMOT (class 4)36.94%26.01%+10.9 pp5,265
FinlandKatsastus29.7%26.3%+3.4 pp4,370
NorwayPKK43.6%33.7%+9.9 pp4,026
NetherlandsAPK53.8%50.8%+3 pp2,756

The verdict is consistent across every regime where the difference is clear, which is the strongest form this comparison takes: independent inspectorates, different rulebooks, same direction of travel.

What Finland fails it for — share of recorded faults
Fault areaShare
Axles, wheels and suspension48.1%
Environmental hazards17.4%
Brake systems16.7%
Chassis and body7.8%
Lighting devices and electrical equipment5%

Useful as a cross-check on the UK defect table above: the categories are named differently, but a component that dominates in both regimes is a genuine weak point of the model rather than an artefact of one country's testing style.

The exact faults Netherlands records — APK defect codes, 2024
CodeFaultRecordedType
210Tyre pressure not at the correct value593failure
497Number-plate light not working or missing313failure
516Dipped headlight incorrectly aimed240failure
584Sidelight not working properly222failure
115Exhaust not gas-tight or venting unsafely197failure
391Wipers leave insufficient visibility173failure
205Tyre with insufficient tread158failure
RA2Excessive leak of other fluids154advisory

Worth dwelling on how mundane the top of that list is: tyre pressure, tread depth, headlight aim. The Dutch APK records 1.419 defects per inspection against a much higher national failure rate than Britain's, and the reason is not that Dutch cars are worse — it is that the two regimes draw the line between "note it" and "fail it" in different places. Codes are the RDW's own; the English wording here is our translation of the Dutch original.

Britain is not the only country that inspects every car every year, and the Subaru Legacy is on the road in all of them. Each national regime writes its own rules, so the pass rates below are not comparable to each other — what does travel across a border is whether a model sits above or below its own country's average.

One caveat before you read the UK row: these are raw failure rates, because no other country publishes the age detail our index needs. This model's raw UK rate looks worse than the national average while its age-adjusted index is 93.9 — the fleet here is unusually old, and the raw column silently credits that. The index above is the fair comparison; this table is for reading each country against itself.

Rows with fewer than 500 inspections are not published. Sources: Traficom — Periodic inspections of cars by model / by model and fault object 2024, CC BY 4.0; Statens vegvesen — Periodisk kjøretøykontroll (PKK) 2024, CC BY 4.0; RDW open data — Meldingen Keuringsinstantie + Geconstateerde Gebreken + Gekentekende voertuigen (2024), CC0. Not an RDW endorsement.. Adapted; licences and full notice.

Subaru Legacy MOT: quick answers

Subaru Legacy MOT Risk Index is well below the reference at 93.9, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Subaru Legacy first-time MOT pass rate?
63.06% of first attempts passed in 2024 (5,265 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
Why does this number differ from other sites?
Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 36.94% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 5,265 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 93.9 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Subaru Legacy with other cars

Mercedes-Benz A-Class is highest at 94.2; Suzuki Grand Vitara is lowest at 93.5 — the gap is 0.7 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Subaru MOT statisticsSubaru Forester MOT statsSubaru Outback MOT stats

Similar risk

Jeep Wrangler (index 94.2)Mercedes-Benz A-Class (index 94.2)Suzuki Grand Vitara (index 93.5)

Same size class

how Nissan 350Z compareshow Talbot Express compareshow Mercedes-Benz Viano compares

By build year

Subaru Legacy 2000Subaru Legacy 2001Subaru Legacy 2002Subaru Legacy 2003Subaru Legacy 2004Subaru Legacy 2005Subaru Legacy 2006Subaru Legacy 2007Subaru Legacy 2008Subaru Legacy 2009Subaru Legacy 2010Subaru Legacy 2011Subaru Legacy 2012Subaru Legacy 2013

By area

Subaru Legacy MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Subaru Legacy body, chassis and structure failuresSubaru Legacy brakes failuresSubaru Legacy vehicle identification failuresSubaru Legacy lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresSubaru Legacy noise, emissions and leaks failuresSubaru Legacy road wheels failuresSubaru Legacy seat belts and airbags failuresSubaru Legacy steering failuresSubaru Legacy suspension failuresSubaru Legacy tyres failuresSubaru Legacy visibility failures

Inspections abroad

Subaru Legacy in NorwaySubaru Legacy in FinlandSubaru Legacy in the Netherlands


Data details & how to cite

Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:subaru-legacy:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.

Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Subaru Legacy MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/subaru-legacy/ · Published 2026-07-30.