Nissan Kubistar — MOT statistics 2024

The Nissan Kubistar failed 49.95% of 963 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 116.8 (100 = expected for its age profile). This van fails its MOT about 17% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.

Age-adjusted peer: Mercedes-Benz Vito (index 117.7) — the two published results are 0.9 index points apart.

Nissan Kubistar common problems: what actually fails the MOT

Steering stands out at 20.1 per 100 tests, against 8.6 per 100 tests across UK vans and pickups of the same ages.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

family vs national — matched to UK vans and pickups of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.

Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.

Nissan Kubistar MOT advisories: what gets flagged

Brakes are highest at 52.6 per 100 tests; Steering is lowest at 9.2 per 100 tests — the gap is 43.4 per 100 tests.

higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests

Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.

If a van like this fails, does it fail again?

A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.

A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (47.5% against 44.1%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is visibility — 42.6% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.

Adjusted for how much these are actually driven

The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every van with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 8,919 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.

Mileage changes little here (-3.8 points): this fleet is driven about as much as the vehicles it is compared with. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.

How the Nissan Kubistar compares with cars of its own age and size

Not against the whole fleet — against other light commercials tested at the same age, 2019-2024.

Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.

How does the Nissan Kubistar perform as it gets older?

The Kubistar at age 18 stands out at 54.2%, against 43.9% for all vehicles of the same age.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart axes: van age, years · failure-rate scale 0–59%.

Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.

How dangerous are Nissan Kubistar MOT failures?

Major defects stand out at 136.0 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.

higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests

Chart values: Minor 39.1 · Major 136.0 · Dangerous 21.6.

Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.

Does the month of a Nissan Kubistar MOT matter?

Jun is highest at 56.8%; Oct is lowest at 47.6% — the gap is 9.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Chart scale: 27%–58%.

bars: Nissan Kubistar · dashed: all class-4 cars

Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 9.3 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.

Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.

Nissan Kubistar average mileage by age

At age 18, the middle half of Kubistars runs from 95,332 miles to 147,499 miles, against 116,814 miles as the median.

further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75

Chart axes: van age, years · odometer scale 0–158k mi.

Does high mileage mean more Nissan Kubistar MOT failures at the same age?

Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 50.7% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 53.5% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.

line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)

A typical 18-year-old Kubistar has ~116,814 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.

Where in Britain the Nissan Kubistar fails its MOT most

Exeter area is highest at 64.7%; Manchester area is lowest at 41.0% — the gap is 23.8 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Toughest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Exeter (EX)	64.74%	+12.4 pp
Brighton (BN)	64%	+11.7 pp
Newcastle (NE)	61.82%	+9.5 pp
Northampton (NN)	61.31%	+9.0 pp
Nottingham (NG)	60.71%	+8.4 pp

Easiest areas	% failing	vs model overall
Manchester (M)	40.95%	-11.4 pp
Leicester (LE)	41.38%	-10.9 pp
Oxford (OX)	41.71%	-10.6 pp
Southend-on-Sea (SS)	42.06%	-10.3 pp

Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.

Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 42%–57% failing.

How many miles does a Nissan Kubistar last?

100,000+ miles is highest at 64.1%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 19.6% — the gap is 44.5 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Of 8,921 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 64.1% had reached 100k miles, 19.6% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.

Nissan Kubistar faults that come together

Emissions & leaks + Seatbelts & SRS stand out at 3.10×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.

above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less

Defects in «Brakes» and «Suspension» appear together 2.14× more often than chance (708 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).

Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).

Is low mileage better for a Nissan Kubistar?

Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 39.4%, against 55.4% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 39.4% vs 55.4% for 8–12k miles/year — 16.1 pp lower (n_low=399, n_normal=1,356). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 39.4% low-use vs 55.5% normal (-16.1 pp).

Which Nissan Kubistar engine is best?

diesel 1.2–1.5 is highest at 100.7; petrol 1.0–1.2 is lowest at 79.1 — the gap is 21.6 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.2–1.5 runs at 100.7 against this model's own age norm while the petrol 1.0–1.2 runs at 79.1 — a spread of 21.6 points between two cars that share a name.

Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.

Nissan Kubistar MOT repair costs

The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £172.92 to £328.55, against £54.85 for the test itself.

bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only

Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £173 to £329, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.

Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.

For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.

Nissan Kubistar running costs for a fleet

Vehicles failing at age 19 stand out at 50.0%, against 45.0% at age 16, tested in the same year.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).

Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.

Nissan Kubistar rust problems: where they corrode

Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 4.1×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.

above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less

This Nissan Kubistar fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish.

Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.

Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.

Does a Nissan Kubistar advisory become a failure?

Suspension is highest at 27.0%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 27.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now

This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.

Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 27 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 4,346 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.

What will fail next on a Nissan Kubistar?

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 12-14 are highest at 35.6%; Brakes after a passed at age 9-11 are lowest at 10.5% — the gap is 25.0 percentage points.

higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability

The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.

The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.

Nissan Kubistar ownership: what six years of MOTs show

The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 61.2%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 3.9% — the gap is 57.3 percentage points.

higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points

Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 3,549 failures followed through to their re-test, 34.94% were repaired and passed the same day and 61.2% within ten days; the median gap is 1 day. 12,518 defect items were cleared in the process.

Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.996 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 3,909 miles a year across 1,832 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.

Two populations hide inside one model. 16.38% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 49.34% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.

Odometer anomalies: 0.816% of 1,839 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 1,852 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.

Nissan Kubistar MOT: quick answers

Nissan Kubistar MOT Risk Index stands out at 116.8, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

What is the Nissan Kubistar first-time MOT pass rate?

50.05% of first attempts passed in 2024 (963 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.

Why does this number differ from other sites?

Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 49.95% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 963 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 116.8 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.

Compare the Nissan Kubistar with other cars

Nissan Kubistar is highest at 116.8; Jeep Renegade is lowest at 116.7 — the gap is 0.1 points.

below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age

Same brand

All Nissan MOT statisticsNissan Qashqai MOT statsNissan Pathfinder MOT stats

Similar risk

Jeep Renegade (index 116.7)Renault Twingo (index 116.7)Tesla Model X (index 116.7)

Same size class

how Citroen C8 compareshow Bentley Mulsanne compareshow Cupra Leon compares

By build year

Nissan Kubistar 2005Nissan Kubistar 2006Nissan Kubistar 2007Nissan Kubistar 2008

By area

Nissan Kubistar MOT failure rate by postcode area

By failure group

Nissan Kubistar body, chassis and structure failuresNissan Kubistar brakes failuresNissan Kubistar vehicle identification failuresNissan Kubistar lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresNissan Kubistar noise, emissions and leaks failuresNissan Kubistar road wheels failuresNissan Kubistar seat belts and airbags failuresNissan Kubistar steering failuresNissan Kubistar suspension failuresNissan Kubistar tyres failuresNissan Kubistar visibility failures