Citroen C8 — MOT statistics 2024
The Citroen C8 failed 51.98% of 958 first MOT attempts in 2024 ("first-time", excluding retests). Adjusted for the age of the fleet, its initial-failure ratio is 121.8 (100 = expected for its age profile). This car fails its MOT about 22% more often than expected for its age. Small sample — treat with care.
Age-adjusted peer: Peugeot 3008 (index 121.9) — the two published results are 0.1 index points apart.
Citroen C8 common problems: what actually fails the MOT
Brakes stand out at 43.1 per 100 tests, against 20.5 per 100 tests across UK vehicles of the same ages.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
family vs national — matched to UK vehicles of the same ages — top component groups, per 100 tests. Legend: This family · National avg. Combined labels: family / national average. A gap here reflects how these vehicles are driven, used and maintained as well as how they were built — an MOT defect is a test outcome, not a breakdown.
Component-group comparison table
Each ratio carries a 95% interval. With 6 groups compared here, roughly one apparent difference in twenty is chance alone.
| Group | This family | Cases behind it | UK, same ages | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps & electrical | 49.0 | 6,127 | 33.9 | 1.45×1.41–1.48 |
| Brakes | 43.1 | 5,393 | 20.4 | 2.11×2.05–2.16 |
| Suspension | 42.8 | 5,359 | 29.0 | 1.47×1.44–1.52 |
| Body & structure | 29.9 | 3,745 | 11.4 | 2.62×2.54–2.71 |
| Visibility | 16.9 | 2,111 | 11.2 | 1.51×1.44–1.57 |
| Tyres | 11.7 | 1,459 | 10.8 | 1.09×1.03–1.14 |
| What failed | per 100 tests (this family) | per 100 tests (UK average) | ratio family / UK | What to check |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parking brake efficiency below minimum requirementParking brake efficiency below minimum requirement | 11.99 | 1.24 | 9.68× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer…A suspension joint dust cover missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 9.17 | 1.78 | 5.14× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt etc | 8.85 | 1.56 | 5.68× | Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot missing or |
| Parking brake inoperative on one sideParking brake inoperative on one side | 7.74 | 0.61 | 12.77× | Feel for brake judder and pulling on the test drive |
| Suspension pin, bush or joint excessively wornA suspension pin, bush or joint excessively worn | 11.07 | 4.87 | 2.27× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of…Stop lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 7.42 | 1.50 | 4.95× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a…A lamp missing, inoperative or in the case of a multiple light source more than 1/2 not functioning | 7.86 | 2.09 | 3.76× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Suspension joint dust cover severely deterioratedA suspension joint dust cover severely deteriorated | 7.32 | 1.90 | 3.85× | Listen for knocks over bumps — worn joints show up on the test |
| Rear registration plate lamp or light source…A rear registration plate lamp or light source missing or inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources | 8.11 | 2.83 | 2.87× | Try every light and switch — lamps are a top failure |
| Transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot…A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely deteriorated | 6.74 | 1.48 | 4.56× | Ask the seller about: A transmission shaft constant velocity joint boot severely d |
Named defects ranked by how much more often they appear than the national average — not by raw rate.
Citroen C8 MOT advisories: what gets flagged
Brakes are highest at 47.2 per 100 tests; Body & structure are lowest at 11.8 per 100 tests — the gap is 35.4 per 100 tests.
higher bar = flagged more oftenadvisory items per 100 initial tests
Advisory rates table
| Group | Advisories per 100 |
|---|---|
| Brakes | 47.2 |
| Tyres | 47.1 |
| Suspension | 32.7 |
| Non-component advisories | 18.6 |
| Emissions & leaks | 16.6 |
| Body & structure | 11.8 |
Advisories are wear the tester noted but didn't fail — what will need money soon.
If a car like this fails, does it fail again?
A failure rate does not say whether a failure is a one-off or the start of something. This follows the same vehicles into their next ordinary MOT a year later — retests after a repair are excluded, because they follow a failure by definition. 2019-2024.
| After this year's test | Fails next year | Vehicles followed |
|---|---|---|
| It failed | 44.7% | 1,164 |
| It passed | 47.2% | 3,631 |
A failed test does not clearly change next year's odds here (44.7% against 47.2%): the difference is within the margin of error. The failure most likely to come back is lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment — 39.2% of those vehicles fail again next year. Some of this is the vehicle and some is the owner: a car that was let go once tends to be let go again. One caveat: a car that fails may be sold or scrapped rather than tested again, so these figures describe the vehicles that came back.
Adjusted for how much these are actually driven
The headline index adjusts for the fleet's age. Wear, though, follows mileage: a three-year-old taxi and a three-year-old garage queen sit in the same age band. These two rows compare every car with vehicles of the same age, and then with vehicles of the same age and the same annual mileage, 2019-2024, on 12,482 tests. Both stand on the six-year corpus so they are measured on identical data — compare them with each other, not with the headline index above, which is measured on 2024 alone.
| Standardised for | Index | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Age only | 129.5 | fails more often than expected |
| Age and annual mileage | 124.5 | fails more often than vehicles driven as much |
| Share doing under 3,000 miles a year | 2.1% | a normal spread of use |
Mileage matters here: matching on how much these are driven moves the figure by 5.0 points — this fleet works harder than the vehicles it is measured against, so the age-only view penalises it — but it does not change which side of normal the car sits on. One limit to keep in mind: mileage is partly a result of how often a car breaks down — one that spends weeks in the workshop covers fewer miles — so the mileage-matched figure can understate a real weakness. Tests with no usable odometer reading are left out of it.
How the Citroen C8 compares with cars of its own age and size
Not against the whole fleet — against cars of the same size class tested at the same age, 2019-2024.
| Age | Citroen C8 | Same class, same age | Difference | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 years | 47.92% | 30.03% | +17.89 pp | 288 |
| 11 years | 54.2% | 33.45% | +20.76 pp | 666 |
| 12 years | 58.38% | 36.45% | +21.93 pp | 1,307 |
| 13 years | 58.57% | 38.87% | +19.7 pp | 1,885 |
| 14 years | 55.36% | 40.82% | +14.54 pp | 2,175 |
| 15 years | 54.81% | 42.29% | +12.52 pp | 2,162 |
| 16 years | 55.04% | 43.12% | +11.92 pp | 1,766 |
| 17 years | 53.57% | 43.5% | +10.07 pp | 1,105 |
| 18 years | 49.59% | 43.62% | +5.96 pp | 605 |
| 19 years | 49.2% | 43.19% | +6 pp | 311 |
Raw first-time failure rates within each age, so fleet age cannot flatter either side. A positive difference means this model fails more often than its own class at that age.
How does the Citroen C8 perform as it gets older?
The C8 at age 17 stands out at 55.1%, against 43.1% for all vehicles of the same age.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart axes: car age, years · failure-rate scale 0–60%.
Takeaway: solid line: this family; dashed: all cars.
Data table
| Age | Citroen C8 | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 53.1% | 41.6% | +11.5 pp |
| 16 | 51.4% | 43.1% | +8.4 pp |
| 17 | 55.1% | 43.1% | +12.0 pp |
| 18 | 48.3% | 43.9% | +4.4 pp |
| 19 | 51.1% | 43.5% | +7.6 pp |
| 20 | 49.5% | 41.0% | +8.5 pp |
Is a Citroen C8 ULEZ compliant?
The share of classifiable 2024 Citroen C8 MOT tests likely ULEZ compliant by first-registration date is 9.8%.
Based on 954 classifiable initial MOT tests. This describes the tested fleet, not a specific car. MOT data do not record Euro class, so likely compliance is inferred from fuel and first-registration date. For the only authoritative answer, check the registration with TfL's official ULEZ checker.
higher = larger share likely compliantinferred from fuel and first-registration date; not a recorded Euro class
| Vehicle age at test | Likely ULEZ-compliant share | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Under 3 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 3–5 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 6–7 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 8 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 9 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 0 |
| 10–14 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 38 |
| 15–17 years | 12.3% Check a registration with TfL | n = 527 |
| 18 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 147 |
| 19 years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 133 |
| 20+ years | Suppressed — sample below publication threshold Check a registration with TfL | n = 109 |
How dangerous are Citroen C8 MOT failures?
Major defects stand out at 155.4 per 100 tests, against 52.8 per 100 tests nationally.
higher bar = fails more oftenrate per 100 tests
Severity table
| Severity | This family /100 | National /100 | Family / national |
|---|---|---|---|
| Minor | 35.52 | 14.22 | 2.50× |
| Major | 155.37 | 52.75 | 2.95× |
| Dangerous | 20.55 | 11.15 | 1.84× |
Chart values: Minor 35.5 · Major 155.4 · Dangerous 20.6.
Per 100 tests on this family. National average: Minor 14.2 · Major 52.8 · Dangerous 11.2 per 100.
Does the month of a Citroen C8 MOT matter?
Feb is highest at 58.8%; Sep is lowest at 52.6% — the gap is 6.2 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Chart scale: 27%–60%.
bars: Citroen C8 · dashed: all class-4 cars
Month-by-month table
| Month | Citroen C8 | All vehicles | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan | 57% | 31.12% | +25.9 pp |
| Feb | 58.82% | 29.99% | +28.8 pp |
| Mar | 54.15% | 28.26% | +25.9 pp |
| Apr | 55.38% | 29.78% | +25.6 pp |
| May | 55.42% | 28.79% | +26.6 pp |
| Jun | 56% | 28.15% | +27.9 pp |
| Jul | 55.85% | 29.33% | +26.5 pp |
| Aug | 53.24% | 29.2% | +24.0 pp |
| Sep | 52.58% | 28.19% | +24.4 pp |
| Oct | 55.29% | 30.34% | +24.9 pp |
| Nov | 53.71% | 30.58% | +23.1 pp |
| Dec | 52.72% | 29.33% | +23.4 pp |
Takeaway: the spread between best and worst month is 6.2 percentage points — noticeable seasonality. Seasonality partly reflects registration-date clustering, not weather.
Before reading the shape: most of it is not about cars. Britain changes its registration plates twice a year, and 18.9% of these cars were first registered in March with another17.1% in September — 36% in two months against the 17% an even spread would give. An MOT falls due three years after first registration, so the buying calendar becomes the testing calendar. That shapes how many cars are tested each month — not how often they fail: the busiest months here are not the worst ones, so read the failure line on its own and the volume behind it separately.
Citroen C8 average mileage by age
At age 18, the middle half of C8s runs from 92,871 miles to 140,227 miles, against 115,479 miles as the median.
further right = more milesmedian is the typical car; band is p25–p75
Chart axes: car age, years · odometer scale 0–154k mi.
Does high mileage mean more Citroen C8 MOT failures at the same age?
Within the same age group, split by odometer (2024 MOTs), so this separates wear from age: at ages 15+, 51.1% of those with 40,000–70,000 miles failed first time versus 52% of those with over 140,000 miles.No clear mileage gap inside this age group, among cars still being tested.
| Age | Odometer | % failing | 95% interval | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15+ | 40-70k miles | 51.1% | 40.9–61.3% | 88 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 70-100k miles | 43.9% | 37.4–50.6% | 212 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 100-140k miles | 56.1% | 51.1–61% | 376 (rough estimate) |
| 15+ | 140k+ miles | 52% | 45.5–58.4% | 229 (rough estimate) |
line: median · band: middle half of the fleet (p25–p75)
Mileage by age (p25 / median / p75)
| Age | p25 | Median | p75 | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 85,774 | 110,418 | 132,713 | 130 |
| 16 | 93,491 | 114,779 | 137,148 | 173 |
| 17 | 90,472 | 118,399 | 141,414 | 225 |
| 18 | 92,871 | 115,479 | 140,227 | 147 |
| 19 | 94,177 | 115,999 | 146,261 | 133 |
| 20+ | 84,632 | 111,656 | 137,041 | 109 |
A typical 18-year-old C8 has ~115,479 miles on the clock. Much more — ask why; much less — check for gaps in the MOT history.
Where in Britain the Citroen C8 fails its MOT most
Exeter area is highest at 68.1%; Romford area is lowest at 34.6% — the gap is 33.6 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Toughest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Exeter (EX) | 68.14% | +13.1 pp |
| Brighton (BN) | 66.92% | +11.9 pp |
| Bath (BA) | 66.9% | +11.9 pp |
| Nottingham (NG) | 66.83% | +11.8 pp |
| Swansea (SA) | 64.74% | +9.7 pp |
| Easiest areas | % failing | vs model overall |
|---|---|---|
| Romford (RM) | 34.58% | -20.5 pp |
| Dartford (DA) | 37.93% | -17.1 pp |
| Slough (SL) | 42.2% | -12.8 pp |
| Redhill (RH) | 44.44% | -10.6 pp |
| Southend-on-Sea (SS) | 44.79% | -10.2 pp |
Every dot is a postcode area — size = how many were tested there, colour = share failing. These figures are not age-adjusted: coastal and rural areas often run older fleets and salted roads, so higher raw fail rates do not automatically mean a worse local stock of this model.
Map labels: Scotland · N. England · Wales · London · S. West. Colour scale: 46%–68% failing.
How many miles does a Citroen C8 last?
100,000+ miles is highest at 61.6%; 150,000+ miles is lowest at 15.0% — the gap is 46.6 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Odometer | Tests ≥ threshold | Share of sample |
|---|---|---|
| 100,000+ miles | 7,686 | 61.57% |
| 150,000+ miles | 1,868 | 14.96% |
Of 12,483 tests of this family with a usable odometer in 2024, 61.6% had reached 100k miles, 15.0% had reached 150k miles. This is a cross-section of cars still presenting for MOT, not a full birth cohort.
Citroen C8 faults that come together
Seatbelts & SRS + Steering stand out at 2.87×, against 1.00× if the faults were independent.
above 1.0× = more than expectedbelow 1.0× = less
| Group A | Group B | Together | Lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Steering | 53 | 2.87× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 80 | 2.72× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Identification of the vehicle | 37 | 2.72× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 251 | 2.55× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Identification of the vehicle | 34 | 2.43× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 41 | 2.38× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Steering | 294 | 2.37× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Tyres | 81 | 2.28× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Tyres | 98 | 2.18× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 257 | 2.12× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Tyres | 150 | 2.1× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Tyres | 609 | 2.07× |
| Brakes | Noise, emissions and leaks | 406 | 2.05× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Noise, emissions and leaks | 394 | 2.05× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Tyres | 485 | 2.03× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Suspension | 236 | 2.01× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Visibility | 231 | 2.01× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Noise, emissions and leaks | 484 | 1.99× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Suspension | 290 | 1.96× (rough estimate) |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Steering | 73 | 1.96× (rough estimate) |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Visibility | 111 | 1.94× (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Suspension | 32 | 1.92× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Steering | 292 | 1.91× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Visibility | 889 | 1.88× |
| Brakes | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 1,505 | 1.85× |
| Tyres | Visibility | 256 | 1.84× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 175 | 1.84× (rough estimate) |
| Suspension | Tyres | 514 | 1.81× |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | Suspension | 426 | 1.81× (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Suspension | 1,384 | 1.76× |
| Brakes | Visibility | 669 | 1.74× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 1,359 | 1.72× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Brakes | 1,100 | 1.72× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Tyres | 393 | 1.7× (rough estimate) |
| Steering | Visibility | 122 | 1.69× (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Suspension | 1,631 | 1.68× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Visibility | 623 | 1.67× |
| Body, chassis, structure | Steering | 199 | 1.65× (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Suspension | 1,169 | 1.53× |
| Suspension | Visibility | 696 | 1.52× |
| Identification of the vehicle | Tyres | 15 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Brakes | Road Wheels | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Noise, emissions and leaks | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Visibility | 13 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Steering | 12 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Suspension | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Road Wheels | 11 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Road Wheels | Visibility | 7 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Identification of the vehicle | Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 6 | too few (rough estimate) |
| Body, chassis, structure | Road Wheels | 5 | too few (rough estimate) |
Defects in «Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment» and «Tyres» appear together 2.07× more often than chance (609 co-occurrences in the same test; lift≥1.3, n≥500).
Lift = how many times more often both groups appear on the same test than if independent. A pair is listed from 5 tests with both faults; the lift is shown from 20, and called above chance only when its 95% interval excludes 1 (see rough estimates).
Is low mileage better for a Citroen C8?
Cars driven under 5,000 miles a year is well below the reference at 42.0%, against 61.1% for cars driven 8,000–12,000 miles a year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
| Band | Fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| <5k miles/year | 41.97% | 567 |
| 8–12k miles/year | 61.09% | 2,550 |
| Gap (low − normal) | -19.12 pp | — |
By fuel and age
Diesel
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 37.5 | 48 | 61.89 | 265 | -24.39 pp |
| 12 | 41.46 | 82 | 61.86 | 548 | -20.4 pp |
| 13 | 43.7 | 119 | 62.03 | 748 | -18.33 pp |
| 14 | 40.29 | 139 | 59.85 | 802 | -19.56 pp |
Petrol
| Age | Low-use fail % | n | Normal fail % | n | Gap pp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 40.62 | 32 | 54.05 | 37 | -13.43 pp |
| 13 | 49.09 | 55 | 59.26 | 54 | -10.17 pp |
| 14 | 39.47 | 76 | 59.3 | 86 | -19.83 pp |
At matched ages 5–14, cars averaging under 5k miles/year fail at 42.0% vs 61.1% for 8–12k miles/year — 19.1 pp lower (n_low=567, n_normal=2,550). In this family low annual use is associated with fewer MOT fails, not more — the ‘garage queen’ penalty is not visible in overall fail rates. Diesel alone: 41.2% low-use vs 61.2% normal (-20.0 pp).
Which Citroen C8 engine is best?
diesel 1.8–2.0 is highest at 102.5; diesel over 2.0 is lowest at 93.3 — the gap is 9.2 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
| Fuel | Capacity | vs own age norm | Raw fail % | Tests |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| diesel | over 2.0 litre | 93.3 | 50.65% | 2,142 (rough estimate) |
| petrol | 1.8–2.0 litre | 97 | 53.13% | 2,076 (rough estimate) |
| diesel | 1.8–2.0 litre | 102.5 | 56.69% | 8,213 |
Splitting this model by fuel alone hides the thing that actually differs. Within the same badge, the diesel 1.8–2.0 runs at 102.5 against this model's own age norm while the diesel over 2.0 runs at 93.3 — a spread of 9.2 points between two cars that share a name.
Read this one with more care than the rest of the page. Age is held constant, but who buys which engine is not: the largest capacity in a range is often a performance or executive variant that is garaged, cherished and lightly driven, while the smallest is frequently a fleet or entry car worked hard from new. The gap below is real in the test records; how much of it is the engine and how much is the owner, this data cannot separate. Bands under 100 tests are not shown; bands under 5,000 tests are rough estimates.
Best year for a Citroen C8, and the years to avoid
Build year 2007 is highest at 100.8; Build year 2005 is lowest at 91.4 — the gap is 9.4 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
build year vs the same model at the same age · 100 = as expected
Every build year with its confidence interval
| Build year | vs own age norm | 95% CI | Raw fail % | Tests | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 97.9 | 89.2–106.7 | 54.74% | 886 | no different |
| 2008 | 98.4 | 91.9–104.8 | 56.55% | 1,572 | no different |
| 2007 | 100.8 | 95.2–106.3 | 59.52% | 2,137 | no different |
| 2006 | 93.8 | 87.9–99.8 | 55.48% | 1,743 | better |
| 2005 | 91.4 | 84.2–98.7 | 53.38% | 1,154 | better |
The best build year here is 2005 and the weakest is 2006. Comparing build years sounds simple and is not: within a single year of testing, a car's build year and its age are the same number, so a naive comparison of years is a comparison of ages wearing a disguise. Each year below is measured against the same model at the same age in other cohorts, across six years of testing — 2 of 5 years come out distinguishable from their own model's age norm.
Two limits worth knowing before you act on this. Age, test year and build year are locked together by arithmetic, so the test-year effect is taken from the observed national failure level of each year rather than estimated — it is an adjustment, not a solution.
Citroen C8 MOT repair costs
The MOT-failure repair budget per test runs from £220.82 to £419.56, against £54.85 for the test itself.
bigger number = costs morepounds per test, MOT-failing faults only
| Component | Fails per 100 tests | Typical repair | Its price | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 42.8 (nat. 15.36) | Suspension coil spring (single corner) | £180 | £77.04 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 49.0 (nat. 18.09) | Battery replacement (standard 12V lead-acid) | £140 | £68.60 |
| Brakes | 43.1 (nat. 11.25) | Front brake pads (parts + labour, typical hatchback) | £150 | £64.65 |
| Tyres | 11.7 (nat. 8.7) | Tyre (single mid-range 16" fitted) | £90 | £10.53 |
Multiply how often each component fails on this model by what that repair usually costs, and you get the amount an owner should expect to budget per test for MOT-failing faults only — roughly £221 to £420, on top of the test fee itself. It is a budgeting figure, not a quote: the spread between a set of pads and a set of discs is most of the range.
Prices are modal quotes from a hand-kept catalogue of published UK garage guides — we do not scrape the booking sites, their terms forbid it, so this list is short and updated by hand with a source and date against each line. Each line prices one typical repair in that group, not a full remedy, and only groups our catalogue actually covers are counted. The contrast worth noticing is the second card: the legal maximum for the test has been £54.85 since 2010, while the repairs it uncovers have followed inflation the whole time.
For scale from a different direction: Warrantywise, which sees used-car warranty claims rather than test failures, puts the average claim at £2,052 across the ten highest-claim models it ranks and £539 for Honda, the lowest-claim make in its index (Warrantywise index 2026, 1.6 million claims, cars aged 3–15). Those sit an order of magnitude above the figures in this table, and the gap is the point: a warranty claim is a gearbox or an engine, which almost never fails an MOT, while the faults that do fail one are corrosion, lamps and tyres, which no warranty pays for. The two numbers answer different questions and neither replaces the other.
Citroen C8 running costs for a fleet
Vehicles failing at age 19 are close to the reference at 51.0%, against 53.0% at age 15, tested in the same year.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failure rate and typical odometer by age
| Age | Fails | Median odometer | Tests | Gap vs age 5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 | 53.08% | 110,418 | 130 | — |
| 16 | 51.45% | 114,779 | 173 | — |
| 17 | 55.11% | 118,399 | 225 | — |
| 18 | 48.3% | 115,479 | 147 | — |
| 19 | 51.13% | 115,999 | 133 | — |
No single year stands out as the point where this model starts costing more: the year-to-year steps in its failure rate are too small or rest on too few tests to name one (D1 rule: a step is named only with at least 2,000 tests on both sides and a jump above 3 percentage points).
Repair spend uses the same modal prices as the section above, so it inherits the same limits: one typical repair per component group, not a full remedy. Downtime is the gap between the failed test and the passed re-test, which is the window a vehicle is legally off the road.
Citroen C8 rust problems: where they corrode
Age-standardised corrosion susceptibility stands out at 4.28×, against 1.00× for the national age-standardised rate.
above 1.0× = rusts more than averagebelow 1.0× = rusts less
This Citroen C8 fails on corrosion far more often than average once age is held constant, and its owners live in areas that are about typical for the models we publish. Those two point in opposite directions, which is the informative case: it rusts more than average despite living in gentler places, so the cause is the car, not the postcode.
Corrosion is the one failure mode that is as much about geography as about the car. We keep the two apart on purpose: a model can look rusty simply because it is popular in Scotland, and a model can look clean simply because it is bought in Surrey. Blending them into a single score would hide which of the two is doing the work.
Exposure is this model's tests weighted by an area corrosion index built from frost days, salt load and distance to the coast — the composite validated at r = 0.42 against corrosion defects we actually record. It is published as a rank, not a raw score, because every mainstream model skews towards low-corrosion areas for the simple reason that most of Britain's cars are in the south. Susceptibility is standardised to the national age profile, so an old fleet does not get labelled a rusty model.
Does a Citroen C8 advisory become a failure?
Suspension is highest at 32.5%; Non-component advisories are lowest at 0.0% — the gap is 32.5 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
chance the same component fails at the next MOT, given an advisory now
| Component | Fails next time | Typical lead time | Miles of warning | Advisories tracked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 32.5% | 12.1 months | 5,314 | 1,737 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 29.9% | 12 months | 5,043 | 822 |
| Brakes | 28.3% | 12 months | 5,171 | 2,443 |
| Tyres | 11.0% | 12.1 months | 5,298 | 2,514 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 8.0% | 12 months | 4,662 | 1,299 |
| Non-component advisories | 0.0% | — | — | 1,279 |
This is the question an advisory note actually raises, and it needs six years of test history to answer. We followed the same vehicles from one MOT to the next across 2019–2024 and measured how often a component that was merely advised came back as a genuine failure at the next test.
Read it as a budgeting horizon, not a prophecy: the most likely component above turns into a failure for about 32 in 100 cars, and the median gap is 12.1 months and roughly 5,314 miles. The rest were repaired, sold, scrapped, or simply held. Rows with fewer than 500 tracked advisories are not shown.
What will fail next on a Citroen C8?
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment after a failure at age 9-11 are highest at 34.6%; Brakes after a passed at age 15-19 are lowest at 16.9% — the gap is 17.7 percentage points.
higher = more likelypercentage is the observed transition probability
| Age | Last test | Most likely next failures | Cars tracked |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9-11 | passed | Body, chassis, structure 21.3% · Suspension 20.7% · Brakes 18.1% | 353 (rough estimate) |
| 9-11 | advisory | Body, chassis, structure 26.9% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 23.3% · Suspension 23.3% | 331 (rough estimate) |
| 9-11 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 34.6% · Brakes 29.8% · Suspension 28.8% | 791 |
| 12-14 | passed | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 21.5% · Suspension 20.9% · Brakes 17.2% | 977 |
| 12-14 | advisory | Suspension 28.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 27.8% · Brakes 22.2% | 1,039 |
| 12-14 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 31.9% · Suspension 29.9% · Brakes 26.8% | 2,535 |
| 15-19 | passed | Suspension 23.7% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 20.3% · Brakes 16.9% | 532 |
| 15-19 | advisory | Suspension 27.3% · Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 24.7% · Body, chassis, structure 19.2% | 842 |
| 15-19 | failure | Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 31.3% · Suspension 30.2% · Body, chassis, structure 23.8% | 1,526 |
The same chains, cut differently: given a car's age and how its last test went, which component most often causes trouble at the following one.
The pattern that repeats across every family: a failure at one test roughly doubles the chance of a failure on the same component at the next one, and an advisory sits about half-way between a clean pass and a failure. Age bands in years; probabilities are per car, not per defect item.
Citroen C8 ownership: what six years of MOTs show
The ten-day re-test pass rate is highest at 68.9%; The later re-test pass rate is lowest at 5.5% — the gap is 63.4 percentage points.
higher = larger sharecompare shares in percentage points
Failing is usually a same-week event, not a disaster. Of 5,010 failures followed through to their re-test, 25.63% were repaired and passed the same day and 68.88% within ten days; the median gap is 2 days. 17,617 defect items were cleared in the process.
Per mile driven, not per year. Dividing failures by the miles that actually went onto the odometers between consecutive tests gives 0.915 failures per 10,000 miles, on a median of 4,708 miles a year across 2,759 chains. This is the number to compare between models — an annual rate quietly rewards cars that barely leave the drive.
Two populations hide inside one model. 16.66% of these cars strung together three or more tests with nothing recorded at all, while 41.12% carried the same advisory three times or more — the same fault, noted, ignored, noted again. When you buy used you are buying one of those two histories, and the MOT record shows which.
Odometer anomalies: 2.059% of 2,768 chains show a reading lower than the previous test, with a median drop of 59,091 miles. We call this an anomaly and not fraud on purpose — instrument swaps, imports, unit mix-ups and keying errors all land in the same bucket. Obvious typos (drops under 100 miles or over 90% of the reading) are already excluded.
Citroen C8 safety recalls and how to check yours
DVSA recall campaigns stand out at 20.
bigger number = more recorded casescompare like-for-like scope, not sample size alone
recall campaigns launched per year
| Reference | Launched | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|
R/2015/243 | 08/12/2015 | 9,483 | FUEL MAY LEAK |
R/2013/099 | 02/09/2013 | 37 | LOSS OF STEERING |
R/2012/042 | 28/03/2012 | 17 | TYRE MAY DEFLATE |
R/2011/082 | 11/07/2011 | 1,357 | POWER STEERING ASSISTANCE MAY FAIL |
R/2011/018 | 22/02/2011 | 33 | FUEL MAY LEAK |
All 20 campaigns
| Reference | Launched | Build dates | Vehicles | Concern |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R/2015/243 | 08/12/2015 | 01/09/2012 – 02/01/2014 | 9,483 | FUEL MAY LEAK |
R/2013/099 | 02/09/2013 | 15/06/2011 – 14/11/2011 | 37 | LOSS OF STEERING |
R/2012/042 | 28/03/2012 | 19/01/2012 – 20/01/2012 | 17 | TYRE MAY DEFLATE |
R/2011/082 | 11/07/2011 | 01/02/2010 – 07/02/2011 | 1,357 | POWER STEERING ASSISTANCE MAY FAIL |
R/2011/018 | 22/02/2011 | 08/07/2010 – 13/10/2010 | 33 | FUEL MAY LEAK |
R/2010/155 | 05/10/2010 | 04/07/2007 – 27/03/2008 | 12,950 | LIGHTS MAY FAIL WITHOUT WARNING |
R/2010/111 | 09/08/2010 | 24/02/2010 – 27/05/2010 | 630 | BRAKING EFFICIENCY MAY BE COMPROMISED |
R/2009/158 | 06/01/2010 | 01/07/2007 – 27/03/2008 | 592 | VEHICLE EXTERIOR LIGHTS MAY FAIL WITHOUT WARNING |
R/2008/115 | 28/07/2008 | 02/03/2006 – 30/01/2008 | 1,611 | POSSIBLE LEAKAGE FROM THE DIESEL RETURN PIPE FIXED TO THE INTAKE MANIFOLD. |
R/2008/111 | 16/07/2008 | 16/05/2006 – 22/12/2006 | 307 | VACUUM BRAKING ASSISTANCE MAY REDUCE. |
R/2007/164 | 07/11/2007 | 12/12/2006 – 20/04/2007 | 18 | POSSIBILITY OF EXTENDED BRAKE PEDAL TRAVEL |
R/2006/071 | 06/05/2006 | 08/07/2003 – 29/11/2004 | 5,062 | BRAKING MAY BE AFFECTED |
R/2006/080 | 06/05/2006 | 04/01/2006 – 05/01/2006 | 39 | SEATBELT MAY NOT OPERATE AS DESIGNED |
R/2006/011 | 26/01/2006 | 25/04/2002 – 10/04/2003 | 502 | FUEL MAY LEAK INTO ENGINE |
R/2005/136 | 26/09/2005 | 01/07/2003 – 31/03/2004 | 2,305 | BRAKE FLUID MAY LEAK |
R/2005/093 | 08/07/2005 | 01/04/2002 – 31/07/2004 | 5,628 | AIRBAG LIGHT MAY COME ON INADVERTENTLY |
R/2005/094 | 08/07/2005 | 01/04/2002 – 30/09/2004 | 5,218 | THE ENGINE PROTECTION TRAY MAY DETACH |
R/2004/017 | 09/02/2004 | 01/04/2002 – 31/10/2002 | 25 | HEATER BLOWER MODULE - RISK OF FIRE |
R/2003/121 | 18/07/2003 | 25/04/2002 – 12/12/2002 | 118 | WATER INGRESS INTO THE AIRBAG ECU |
R/2003/120 | 18/07/2003 | 25/04/2002 – 12/12/2002 | 269 | ELECTRICAL SIGNAL COULD NEUTRALISE THE SLIDING DOOR SAFETY LOCK. |
DVSA lists 20 safety recall campaigns for the Citroen C8, covering roughly 46,201 vehicles in total. A recall is the manufacturer fixing a fault for free, so an open recall on your car costs nothing to clear.
Counter-intuitive, and measured on our own data: across the 25 families published here, more recalls go with a lower MOT Risk Index (r = −0.52). Heavily recalled models are not worse cars in the test bay — an active manufacturer removes the fault before it becomes an MOT failure.
Check whether a specific car has an outstanding recall — free, by registration — at DVSA's recall service. Source: DVSA vehicle safety recalls (check-vehicle-recalls.service.gov.uk), OGL.
Citroen C8 MOT: quick answers
Citroen C8 MOT Risk Index stands out at 121.8, against 100 for a car with the same age profile.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
- What is the Citroen C8 first-time MOT pass rate?
- 48.02% of first attempts passed in 2024 (958 tests). This is the first-time figure: retests after repair are excluded. Basis: first-time, excluding retests.
- Why does this number differ from other sites?
- Other sites often report a pass rate that includes retests or counts all attempts. Our 51.98% figure is the first-time initial failure rate, using 958 primary tests as the denominator (first-time, excluding retests). The age-adjusted MOT initial-failure ratio 121.8 is shown separately because raw rates compare fleet age as well as cars.
Compare the Citroen C8 with other cars
Fiat 500e is highest at 122.1; Citroen DS5 is lowest at 121.6 — the gap is 0.5 points.
below 100 is betterabove 100 is worse100 = normal for this model at that age
Same brand
All Citroen MOT statisticsCitroen DS5 MOT statsCitroen Nemo MOT stats
Similar risk
Peugeot 3008 (index 121.9)Citroen DS5 (index 121.6)Fiat 500e (index 122.1)
Same size class
how Nissan Kubistar compareshow Bentley Mulsanne compareshow Cupra Leon compares
By build year
Citroen C8 2005Citroen C8 2006Citroen C8 2007Citroen C8 2008Citroen C8 2009
By area
Citroen C8 MOT failure rate by postcode area
By failure group
Citroen C8 body, chassis and structure failuresCitroen C8 brakes failuresCitroen C8 vehicle identification failuresCitroen C8 lamps, reflectors and electrics failuresCitroen C8 noise, emissions and leaks failuresCitroen C8 seat belts and airbags failuresCitroen C8 steering failuresCitroen C8 suspension failuresCitroen C8 tyres failuresCitroen C8 visibility failures
Data details & how to cite
Scope: class-4 vehicles (cars), initial tests only, outcomes pass / fail / fixed-on-the-spot at the station (PRS counts towards the failure rate — the defect was present at arrival). Index = observed initial failures ÷ failures expected for this fleet's exact age profile, ×100; margin of error is a 95% confidence interval. Covers ALL generations together — a 3-year-old and a 15-year-old are very different cars; a generation split is on the roadmap. Dataset release dataset_release_id=dvsa-2024-v2, frozen baseline; headline claim_id=family-stats:citroen-c8:dvsa-2024-v2. Full method: methodology.
Cite: MOT Risk Index (2026). Citroen C8 MOT statistics 2024 (data release dvsa-2024-v2; downloadable dataset motriskindex-families-2024-v5, doi:10.5281/zenodo.22975051). https://motriskindex.co.uk/cars/citroen-c8/ · Published 2026-07-30.