MOT Risk Index.co.uk

Does the MGB fail the MOT on tyres more than it should?

The MGB records 1.43 tyres failure items per 100 initial MOT tests (2019–2024), against 3.94 expected for a car of the same age mix: less than expected for its class and age (−2.51, 95% interval −2.72 to −2.30). It ranks 555 of 751 models on tyres (1 = most failures above expected).

Data release dvsa-2024-v2 (24 Sep 2026) · page updated 30 Sep 2026 · all models on tyres · check a MGB by registration

What exactly fails on tyres?

The most frequent DVSA defect wording in this group on the MGB is “A tyre seriously damaged”, recorded 210 times in 2019–2024.

MGB: most frequent tyres defect wordings, 2019–2024 (30+ items each)
DVSA defect wordingItemsPer 100 tests
A tyre seriously damaged2100.61
Tyre tread depth not in accordance with the requirements810.24
A tyre valve seriously damaged or misaligned likely to cause sudden deflation of the tyre430.13
A tyre cords visible or damaged420.12

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data (OGL v3.0) · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 34,158 (initial tests) · Method: failure items (major and minor) grouped by DVSA's defect tree; wordings with 30+ items · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

If a MGB gets a tyres advisory, how often does it fail next time?

3.3% of MGB MOTs with a tyres advisory were followed by a fail in the same group at the next MOT, typically 12.5 months and 262 miles later (860 advisories followed).

Source: DVSA MOT bulk data (OGL v3.0) · Window: 2019–2024 · n = 860 (advisories followed) · Method: the same vehicles followed to their next ordinary MOT · Updated: 30 Sep 2026 · Release: dvsa-2024-v2 · CSV

Other pages for this model

MGB in the Netherlands · MGB by postcode area · MGB body, chassis and structure failures · MGB brakes failures · MGB vehicle identification failures · MGB lamps, reflectors and electrics failures · MGB noise, emissions and leaks failures · MGB road wheels failures · MGB seat belts and airbags failures · MGB steering failures · MGB suspension failures · MGB visibility failures